The lad can't trap a bag of cement
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Name a better striker you could get for half the price. I'm intrigued.
Koeman will bring in a far better Striker at half the price, mark my words!!
................
Wazza?
£90m!! Fantastic bit of business if true
I'm in A&E with a broken foot currently after seeing what all the fuss was about and trying to trap a bag of cement.
comment by _Viva_la Nemanja Vida (U6044)
posted 35 seconds ago
The lad can't trap a bag of cement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly would you trap a bag of cement?
Would it be as simple as a piece of cheese under a box held up by a stick? A cheeky hole in the ground covered loosely with twigs and leaves? Or would you need to go a little more advanced with some fancy noose trap device that would fasten round his little cement ankles and haul him up into a tree?
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by _Viva_la Nemanja Vida (U6044)
posted 35 seconds ago
The lad can't trap a bag of cement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly would you trap a bag of cement?
Would it be as simple as a piece of cheese under a box held up by a stick? A cheeky hole in the ground covered loosely with twigs and leaves? Or would you need to go a little more advanced with some fancy noose trap device that would fasten round his little cement ankles and haul him up into a tree?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cement doesn't move quickly... A big oversized butterfly net sort of thing would do the job... Although the net would tear trying to lift it i suppose
A real man would just use a lasso and then wrestle it to the ground
If he guarantees us 25+ goals a season, I couldn't give a fack if the club spend 90 mill on him. It's not my money and I don't know why Everton fans would be happy, you are losing your best player and that money will only line your new owners pockets.
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 7 seconds ago
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean £45m...because that's half of £90m.
(90/2=45)
maybe a large metal anvil timed to drop directly onto the cement as it trudges across the landscape?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by _Viva_la Nemanja Vida (U6044)
posted 35 seconds ago
The lad can't trap a bag of cement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly would you trap a bag of cement?
--------------
Don't ask Big Rom
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 2 minutes ago
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry Kane - 78 PL goals in 105 games, transfer fee = £0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Needs to do it for more than 3 seasons if you are going to compare him with the likes of Lukaku.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 2 minutes ago
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry Kane - 78 PL goals in 105 games, transfer fee = £0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies won? Big fat Zero. Meanwhile a very poor Utd have won 3 in last 15 months.
Kane needs to leave Spurs before he becomes the next Shearer.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Giggs#11 (U19135)
posted 28 minutes ago
If he guarantees us 25+ goals a season, I couldn't give a fack if the club spend 90 mill on him. It's not my money and I don't know why Everton fans would be happy, you are losing your best player and that money will only line your new owners pockets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think it will, going by reports coming from the club we're still on the hunt for new players. Most Evertonians would rather sell Rom and buy two 15+ strikers (Giroud & Dembélé ). Given the choice I would have loved to have kept Lukaku and added one of those strikers but Rom wants out and there's nowt we can do about it.
Sign in if you want to comment
£90million
Page 1 of 2
posted on 7/7/17
The lad can't trap a bag of cement
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
Name a better striker you could get for half the price. I'm intrigued.
posted on 7/7/17
Koeman will bring in a far better Striker at half the price, mark my words!!
................
Wazza?
posted on 7/7/17
£90m!! Fantastic bit of business if true
posted on 7/7/17
I'm in A&E with a broken foot currently after seeing what all the fuss was about and trying to trap a bag of cement.
posted on 7/7/17
comment by _Viva_la Nemanja Vida (U6044)
posted 35 seconds ago
The lad can't trap a bag of cement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly would you trap a bag of cement?
Would it be as simple as a piece of cheese under a box held up by a stick? A cheeky hole in the ground covered loosely with twigs and leaves? Or would you need to go a little more advanced with some fancy noose trap device that would fasten round his little cement ankles and haul him up into a tree?
posted on 7/7/17
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
posted on 7/7/17
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by _Viva_la Nemanja Vida (U6044)
posted 35 seconds ago
The lad can't trap a bag of cement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly would you trap a bag of cement?
Would it be as simple as a piece of cheese under a box held up by a stick? A cheeky hole in the ground covered loosely with twigs and leaves? Or would you need to go a little more advanced with some fancy noose trap device that would fasten round his little cement ankles and haul him up into a tree?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cement doesn't move quickly... A big oversized butterfly net sort of thing would do the job... Although the net would tear trying to lift it i suppose
A real man would just use a lasso and then wrestle it to the ground
posted on 7/7/17
If he guarantees us 25+ goals a season, I couldn't give a fack if the club spend 90 mill on him. It's not my money and I don't know why Everton fans would be happy, you are losing your best player and that money will only line your new owners pockets.
posted on 7/7/17
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 7 seconds ago
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You mean £45m...because that's half of £90m.
(90/2=45)
posted on 7/7/17
maybe a large metal anvil timed to drop directly onto the cement as it trudges across the landscape?
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
comment by Manfrombelmonty (U1705)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by _Viva_la Nemanja Vida (U6044)
posted 35 seconds ago
The lad can't trap a bag of cement
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How exactly would you trap a bag of cement?
--------------
Don't ask Big Rom
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 2 minutes ago
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry Kane - 78 PL goals in 105 games, transfer fee = £0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Needs to do it for more than 3 seasons if you are going to compare him with the likes of Lukaku.
posted on 7/7/17
3 season wonder.
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
comment by Ace (U18814)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Mike (U1170)
posted 2 minutes ago
Good luck to your £40m replacement striker aiming for 90ish goals in 150ish games for you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Harry Kane - 78 PL goals in 105 games, transfer fee = £0
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trophies won? Big fat Zero. Meanwhile a very poor Utd have won 3 in last 15 months.
Kane needs to leave Spurs before he becomes the next Shearer.
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
1 in a row then.
posted on 7/7/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 7/7/17
comment by Giggs#11 (U19135)
posted 28 minutes ago
If he guarantees us 25+ goals a season, I couldn't give a fack if the club spend 90 mill on him. It's not my money and I don't know why Everton fans would be happy, you are losing your best player and that money will only line your new owners pockets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think it will, going by reports coming from the club we're still on the hunt for new players. Most Evertonians would rather sell Rom and buy two 15+ strikers (Giroud & Dembélé ). Given the choice I would have loved to have kept Lukaku and added one of those strikers but Rom wants out and there's nowt we can do about it.
Page 1 of 2