I actually think ward prowse is one of the most consistant accurate crossers in the premier league although the rest of his game is pretty mediocre
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
stats are awful Chelsea could have 40 crosses a game with 10% accuracy that means 4 accurate crosses where stoke may have 3 crosses 100% accurate if all lead to goals Chelsea win 4-3.
one thing i dont get is how a fantastic passer like cesc Fabregas delivers such awful corners.
99% of the time, crossing is just sideways hoofball
I love the early the crosses or L1 O on the PlayStation. The whip put on the those for an on rushing player is bliss. Tackling is probably the least important skill. You'll never win player of the month or a balon dor for that unfortunately.
Bet you didn't like the cross you scored from yesterday then
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 31 minutes ago
Bet you didn't like the cross you scored from yesterday then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a strange comment.
Across Europe's big leagues, only 1.5% of crosses resulted in goals last season.
But Real Madrid averaged 3.5%, scoring 40 goals from crosses in the process.
I found this article interesting. I first found it posted on this site - Edinspur maybe?
https://medium.com/@VI_PRO/real-madrids-royal-wings-e67e26cd9601
have a look at this Mendy from Manc city
I think one has to differentiate between an aimless "lump it into the mixer" cross and a precision aerial pass. Aimless crossing is too wasteful and is usually used more by less skilful teams/players from lower divisons.
depends on the type of cross.... a low cross whipped across the six yard box is probably one of the most dangerous attacking moves in the game.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Crossing is overrated
Page 1 of 1
posted on 10/9/17
I actually think ward prowse is one of the most consistant accurate crossers in the premier league although the rest of his game is pretty mediocre
posted on 10/9/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/9/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/9/17
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/9/17
stats are awful Chelsea could have 40 crosses a game with 10% accuracy that means 4 accurate crosses where stoke may have 3 crosses 100% accurate if all lead to goals Chelsea win 4-3.
posted on 10/9/17
one thing i dont get is how a fantastic passer like cesc Fabregas delivers such awful corners.
posted on 10/9/17
99% of the time, crossing is just sideways hoofball
posted on 10/9/17
I love the early the crosses or L1 O on the PlayStation. The whip put on the those for an on rushing player is bliss. Tackling is probably the least important skill. You'll never win player of the month or a balon dor for that unfortunately.
posted on 10/9/17
Bet you didn't like the cross you scored from yesterday then
posted on 10/9/17
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 31 minutes ago
Bet you didn't like the cross you scored from yesterday then
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a strange comment.
posted on 10/9/17
Across Europe's big leagues, only 1.5% of crosses resulted in goals last season.
But Real Madrid averaged 3.5%, scoring 40 goals from crosses in the process.
I found this article interesting. I first found it posted on this site - Edinspur maybe?
https://medium.com/@VI_PRO/real-madrids-royal-wings-e67e26cd9601
posted on 10/9/17
have a look at this Mendy from Manc city
posted on 10/9/17
I think one has to differentiate between an aimless "lump it into the mixer" cross and a precision aerial pass. Aimless crossing is too wasteful and is usually used more by less skilful teams/players from lower divisons.
posted on 11/9/17
depends on the type of cross.... a low cross whipped across the six yard box is probably one of the most dangerous attacking moves in the game.
Page 1 of 1