Who would they normally endorse
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 23 minutes ago
Who would they normally endorse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dems the last 2 elections
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 5 hours, 27 minutes ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjdl5y3y3mvo
Hello my southern chums, i dont suppose any of you are pwoud that this fellow "just did my duty to England".
Although I suspect clappy might be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/asylum-seeker-hotel-worker-27-stabbed-to-death-man-charged-murder/
I can produce far more incidents like this than you can about the far-right you fecking dolt.
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
Israel has bombed Iran. These religious lunatics are determined to destroy the world just because they were dumb enough to think their religion overrides world secirity.
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 5 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 5 hours, 27 minutes ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjdl5y3y3mvo
Hello my southern chums, i dont suppose any of you are pwoud that this fellow "just did my duty to England".
Although I suspect clappy might be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/asylum-seeker-hotel-worker-27-stabbed-to-death-man-charged-murder/
I can produce far more incidents like this than you can about the far-right you fecking dolt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ur not v brite r u?
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 8 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you think that these increases won’t get passed onto Joe Bloggs in some way, be it increased prices for products or job losses?
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted about 14 hours ago
NEWS: The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement in this year's presidential race, the editor of the editorial pages has told colleagues at a tense meeting this morning
This is the second paper to not endorse a candidate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pranks knows
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 8 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you think that these increases won’t get passed onto Joe Bloggs in some way, be it increased prices for products or job losses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wibble wibble.
2% on NIEC eh?
Cost increases and/or lower wages being offered will be the result of this. As for incentivising private industry; that’s that well and truly scuppered.
So much for pro business.
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 8 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you think that these increases won’t get passed onto Joe Bloggs in some way, be it increased prices for products or job losses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wibble wibble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most intelligent thing I’ve ever seen you post.
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 15 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of businesses where every percentage point counts.
Job losses have already started on the back of this and they’ll continue. Prices will rise and employers will pull back on salary increases to recover these costs.
Wait until you see the affects as the negativity has already set in.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don’t yet know exactly how they’re going to go about it either, do we?
IMO, there should be at least one more higher band, and probably two, of employee and employer NI, where the burden of any increase should fall.
At present, if I’m not wrong, employers are paying 13.8% on the top two NI bands (roughly £2,000 to £4,000, and over £4,000 a month). If it has to be employer’s NI, I’d load a larger percentage on the current top band, and introduce say £6,000 plus and £10,000 plus bands with higher percentages again.
Several European states have introduced or are looking at introducing some quite novel ways to try to simultaneously boost their economies, boost their treasuries and deal with inequality by offering structured tax incentives to businesses which better control their pay ratios, which is where I’d be starting rather than employer NI. Push up pay for your lowest earners, curb management and exec pay, and get tax relief. Do the opposite, and get punished.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 15 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of businesses where every percentage point counts.
Job losses have already started on the back of this and they’ll continue. Prices will rise and employers will pull back on salary increases to recover these costs.
Wait until you see the affects as the negativity has already set in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah; the real worry for me is job losses.
Hard to say how much of an impact there might be without having the data, but the primary reason why I’d be thinking about looking elsewhere first (capital gains tax is an absolute facking no brainer) is jobs.
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they're mainly not-for-profit organisations.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 15 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of businesses where every percentage point counts.
Job losses have already started on the back of this and they’ll continue. Prices will rise and employers will pull back on salary increases to recover these costs.
Wait until you see the affects as the negativity has already set in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of working people where every percentage price, inflation, bank interest, utility tax, personal tax, rise counts.You cant get blood out of a stone.
Dont forget that during the election you lot were advocating that the working poor, unemployed, frail, sick, vulnerable, homeless, disabled, single working mums, sections of our society on benefits had to stump up your preferred government's 'plan for growth'. And what a 'plan' that would have turned out to be.
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the GVT want to protect sectors such as the NHS, Education etc which is under threat because they are haemorrhaging valued and needed, time served, qualified staff, who are actually the bedrock of our society. It's called responsible government trying to fix things. You have probably forgotten about that being a Tory.
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the GVT want to protect sectors such as the NHS, Education etc which is under threat because they are haemorrhaging valued and needed, time served, qualified staff, who are actually the bedrock of our society. It's called responsible government trying to fix things. You have probably forgotten about that being a Tory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think I’m a Tory?
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the GVT want to protect sectors such as the NHS, Education etc which is under threat because they are haemorrhaging valued and needed, time served, qualified staff, who are actually the bedrock of our society. It's called responsible government trying to fix things. You have probably forgotten about that being a Tory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think I’m a Tory?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think he’s referring to Ginge….
Aye rosso is the biggest stealth Tory of all time
Sign in if you want to comment
Arguing w/strangers cause I'm lonely thread
Page 4727 of 4890
4728 | 4729 | 4730 | 4731 | 4732
posted on 25/10/24
Who would they normally endorse
posted on 25/10/24
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 23 minutes ago
Who would they normally endorse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dems the last 2 elections
posted on 25/10/24
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 5 hours, 27 minutes ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjdl5y3y3mvo
Hello my southern chums, i dont suppose any of you are pwoud that this fellow "just did my duty to England".
Although I suspect clappy might be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/asylum-seeker-hotel-worker-27-stabbed-to-death-man-charged-murder/
I can produce far more incidents like this than you can about the far-right you fecking dolt.
posted on 25/10/24
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
posted on 26/10/24
Israel has bombed Iran. These religious lunatics are determined to destroy the world just because they were dumb enough to think their religion overrides world secirity.
posted on 26/10/24
*security
posted on 26/10/24
comment by clapfreesince2003 (U22207)
posted 5 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 5 hours, 27 minutes ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cjdl5y3y3mvo
Hello my southern chums, i dont suppose any of you are pwoud that this fellow "just did my duty to England".
Although I suspect clappy might be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/asylum-seeker-hotel-worker-27-stabbed-to-death-man-charged-murder/
I can produce far more incidents like this than you can about the far-right you fecking dolt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ur not v brite r u?
posted on 26/10/24
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 8 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you think that these increases won’t get passed onto Joe Bloggs in some way, be it increased prices for products or job losses?
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted about 14 hours ago
NEWS: The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement in this year's presidential race, the editor of the editorial pages has told colleagues at a tense meeting this morning
This is the second paper to not endorse a candidate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pranks knows
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 8 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you think that these increases won’t get passed onto Joe Bloggs in some way, be it increased prices for products or job losses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wibble wibble.
posted on 26/10/24
2% on NIEC eh?
Cost increases and/or lower wages being offered will be the result of this. As for incentivising private industry; that’s that well and truly scuppered.
So much for pro business.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Hector (U3606)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 8 hours, 1 minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE:
Rachel Reeves will increase employers’ national insurance by up to 2 percentage points in her budget as she seeks to fund the NHS and balance the books
The chancellor is also expected to make a “significant” cut to the earnings threshold at which employers start making national insurance contributions
The combined measures will raise about £20 billion a year and represent the biggest tax rise in the budget
The burden will fall entirely on the private sector, with public sector employers such as government departments and the NHS being reimbursed by the Treasury to avoid cuts
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/rachel-reeves-to-increase-national-insurance-employers-nhs-cfr73kh2g
My foooking chancellor
----------------------------------------------------------------------
about time too.
Unchecked capitalism and boardroom greed facked this country under the Tories. Now they have to pay to fix it. Because those who can afford to has to. Let's hope this is just the beginning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you think that these increases won’t get passed onto Joe Bloggs in some way, be it increased prices for products or job losses?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wibble wibble.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most intelligent thing I’ve ever seen you post.
posted on 26/10/24
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 15 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of businesses where every percentage point counts.
Job losses have already started on the back of this and they’ll continue. Prices will rise and employers will pull back on salary increases to recover these costs.
Wait until you see the affects as the negativity has already set in.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don’t yet know exactly how they’re going to go about it either, do we?
IMO, there should be at least one more higher band, and probably two, of employee and employer NI, where the burden of any increase should fall.
At present, if I’m not wrong, employers are paying 13.8% on the top two NI bands (roughly £2,000 to £4,000, and over £4,000 a month). If it has to be employer’s NI, I’d load a larger percentage on the current top band, and introduce say £6,000 plus and £10,000 plus bands with higher percentages again.
Several European states have introduced or are looking at introducing some quite novel ways to try to simultaneously boost their economies, boost their treasuries and deal with inequality by offering structured tax incentives to businesses which better control their pay ratios, which is where I’d be starting rather than employer NI. Push up pay for your lowest earners, curb management and exec pay, and get tax relief. Do the opposite, and get punished.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 15 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of businesses where every percentage point counts.
Job losses have already started on the back of this and they’ll continue. Prices will rise and employers will pull back on salary increases to recover these costs.
Wait until you see the affects as the negativity has already set in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah; the real worry for me is job losses.
Hard to say how much of an impact there might be without having the data, but the primary reason why I’d be thinking about looking elsewhere first (capital gains tax is an absolute facking no brainer) is jobs.
posted on 26/10/24
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because they're mainly not-for-profit organisations.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 15 minutes ago
2% rise in Employer NI is hardly punitive.
My car insurance has gone up by 41% and my water bill by 22% in the last month, I'm sure most companies can absorb 2%.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of businesses where every percentage point counts.
Job losses have already started on the back of this and they’ll continue. Prices will rise and employers will pull back on salary increases to recover these costs.
Wait until you see the affects as the negativity has already set in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then you don’t probably understand the nuances of the vast majority of working people where every percentage price, inflation, bank interest, utility tax, personal tax, rise counts.You cant get blood out of a stone.
Dont forget that during the election you lot were advocating that the working poor, unemployed, frail, sick, vulnerable, homeless, disabled, single working mums, sections of our society on benefits had to stump up your preferred government's 'plan for growth'. And what a 'plan' that would have turned out to be.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the GVT want to protect sectors such as the NHS, Education etc which is under threat because they are haemorrhaging valued and needed, time served, qualified staff, who are actually the bedrock of our society. It's called responsible government trying to fix things. You have probably forgotten about that being a Tory.
posted on 26/10/24
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the GVT want to protect sectors such as the NHS, Education etc which is under threat because they are haemorrhaging valued and needed, time served, qualified staff, who are actually the bedrock of our society. It's called responsible government trying to fix things. You have probably forgotten about that being a Tory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think I’m a Tory?
posted on 26/10/24
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - He kicked lumps out of them (U21434)
posted 39 seconds ago
comment by rosso says the time has come to unlock the unlimited Pote-ntial of the Fernçalvenoo triumvirate (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 minutes ago
If this increase doesn’t affect the “working man” (definitions on a postcard please), why are working public sector employees protected from this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not quite following your logic there, Ginge.
You could protect “working people” in both the public and private sectors from NI increases and also protect public sector *employers* from NI increases.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because the GVT want to protect sectors such as the NHS, Education etc which is under threat because they are haemorrhaging valued and needed, time served, qualified staff, who are actually the bedrock of our society. It's called responsible government trying to fix things. You have probably forgotten about that being a Tory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think I’m a Tory?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think he’s referring to Ginge….
posted on 26/10/24
Aye rosso is the biggest stealth Tory of all time
Page 4727 of 4890
4728 | 4729 | 4730 | 4731 | 4732