Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Melton has already explained the use of the word “or” and the context in which it is to be understood.
You are understanding it wrong Toor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think I am and neither didn't the assistant so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There isn’t anything to disagree about, you’re just wrong as it is a factual point.
I’m erring on this being a wum though as I don’t think anyone can be this stupid, particularly to not even be able to read properly. I don’t think there can be a football fan with this low a level of understanding of offside either.
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
This reminds me of the “our version of aggressive intimidation is okay whereas their version of aggressive intimidation isn’t okay” debate.
comment by Ashtonianblue (U12469)
posted 27 minutes ago
This reminds me of the “our version of aggressive intimidation is okay whereas their version of aggressive intimidation isn’t okay” debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic at its finest
comment by Ashtonianblue (U12469)
posted 36 minutes ago
This reminds me of the “our version of aggressive intimidation is okay whereas their version of aggressive intimidation isn’t okay” debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it? Is that the time when some Man City fans, including the worst in LQ decided that throwing some things at a bus was comparable with putting a man in a coma and stabbings in Rome would be karma?
Man City logic at its finest.
Lying again toor, so sad to see the lengths you will go too.
I mentioned your fans reputation in Europe and added that the bus incident was the latest in a very long line of violent behaviour in Europe.
One incident of many it’s just that one was the latest.
I also mentioned the poor barman who ended up in a coma after istambul.
That was a more accurate example.
You are lying and twisting things to suit your agenda.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just thought of the scenario and replaced the opponent with the post and I would definitely consider it onside if it came off the post. So yes, I'm wrong.
TOOR are you a real person?
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
TOOR are you a real person?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I will be when that bloody fairy from Pinocchio finally gets round to it.
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 9 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just thought of the scenario and replaced the opponent with the post and I would definitely consider it onside if it came off the post. So yes, I'm wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally! Fair play though.
I still think you were wumming for most of it though...
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 9 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just thought of the scenario and replaced the opponent with the post and I would definitely consider it onside if it came off the post. So yes, I'm wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally! Fair play though.
I still think you were wumming for most of it though...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could have been drunk 😵
Had a medical yesterday, I am allowed allowed to drink from today. Not that I drink on school nights anyhow.
Allowed allowed is that like encouragement
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 days, 10 hours ago
Had a medical yesterday, I am allowed allowed to drink from today. Not that I drink on school nights anyhow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Teachers not too keen on you smelling of white lightning ?
Update
Bookies odds
Man City 8-13 out to 8-11
Liverpool 5-1 into 9-2
Man Utd 13-2 out to 8-1
Chelsea 10-1 out to 12-1
Spurs 12-1 out to 14-1
Arsenal 25-1 still 25-1
Market reflecting decent window for Liverpool and poor one for Utd Chelsea & Spurs with Arsenal remaining irrelevant
Claude Puel,Javi Garcia and Special needs one all co favourites as first PL manager to go
comment by Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
posted 16 hours, 29 minutes ago
Update
Bookies odds
Man City 8-13 out to 8-11
Liverpool 5-1 into 9-2
Man Utd 13-2 out to 8-1
Chelsea 10-1 out to 12-1
Spurs 12-1 out to 14-1
Arsenal 25-1 still 25-1
Market reflecting decent window for Liverpool and poor one for Utd Chelsea & Spurs with Arsenal remaining irrelevant
Claude Puel,Javi Garcia and Special needs one all co favourites as first PL manager to go
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No value in Chelsea at those odds with them being in the Europa league. Not unless they recall some of those 48 players on loan.
Price update
City into 8-13
Liverpool into 7-2
Utd out to 18-1 🤣
Spurs out to 20-1
Chelsea out to 22-1
Arsenal out to 50-1
Sign in if you want to comment
Premier League challengers next season?
Page 4 of 4
posted on 9/5/18
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
posted on 9/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by RipleysCat (U1862)
posted 1 minute ago
Melton has already explained the use of the word “or” and the context in which it is to be understood.
You are understanding it wrong Toor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think I am and neither didn't the assistant so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There isn’t anything to disagree about, you’re just wrong as it is a factual point.
I’m erring on this being a wum though as I don’t think anyone can be this stupid, particularly to not even be able to read properly. I don’t think there can be a football fan with this low a level of understanding of offside either.
posted on 9/5/18
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
posted on 9/5/18
This reminds me of the “our version of aggressive intimidation is okay whereas their version of aggressive intimidation isn’t okay” debate.
posted on 9/5/18
comment by Ashtonianblue (U12469)
posted 27 minutes ago
This reminds me of the “our version of aggressive intimidation is okay whereas their version of aggressive intimidation isn’t okay” debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scouse logic at its finest
posted on 9/5/18
comment by Ashtonianblue (U12469)
posted 36 minutes ago
This reminds me of the “our version of aggressive intimidation is okay whereas their version of aggressive intimidation isn’t okay” debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it? Is that the time when some Man City fans, including the worst in LQ decided that throwing some things at a bus was comparable with putting a man in a coma and stabbings in Rome would be karma?
Man City logic at its finest.
posted on 9/5/18
Lying again toor, so sad to see the lengths you will go too.
I mentioned your fans reputation in Europe and added that the bus incident was the latest in a very long line of violent behaviour in Europe.
One incident of many it’s just that one was the latest.
I also mentioned the poor barman who ended up in a coma after istambul.
That was a more accurate example.
You are lying and twisting things to suit your agenda.
posted on 9/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
posted on 9/5/18
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just thought of the scenario and replaced the opponent with the post and I would definitely consider it onside if it came off the post. So yes, I'm wrong.
posted on 9/5/18
TOOR are you a real person?
posted on 9/5/18
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
TOOR are you a real person?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I will be when that bloody fairy from Pinocchio finally gets round to it.
posted on 9/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 9 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just thought of the scenario and replaced the opponent with the post and I would definitely consider it onside if it came off the post. So yes, I'm wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally! Fair play though.
I still think you were wumming for most of it though...
posted on 10/5/18
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 hours, 21 minutes ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 9 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 3 hours, 26 minutes ago
comment by gratedbean (U4885)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
Why would somebody be offside if they were on when a team mate played it but off when it deflected off an opposition player? That’d contradict everything the offside rule is about.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I think the rule should be changed. The attacker should not gain an advantage by being in an offside position.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just thought of the scenario and replaced the opponent with the post and I would definitely consider it onside if it came off the post. So yes, I'm wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally! Fair play though.
I still think you were wumming for most of it though...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could have been drunk 😵
posted on 10/5/18
Had a medical yesterday, I am allowed allowed to drink from today. Not that I drink on school nights anyhow.
posted on 10/5/18
Allowed allowed is that like encouragement
posted on 12/5/18
comment by There'sOnlyOneReds (U1721)
posted 2 days, 10 hours ago
Had a medical yesterday, I am allowed allowed to drink from today. Not that I drink on school nights anyhow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Teachers not too keen on you smelling of white lightning ?
posted on 29/7/18
Update
Bookies odds
Man City 8-13 out to 8-11
Liverpool 5-1 into 9-2
Man Utd 13-2 out to 8-1
Chelsea 10-1 out to 12-1
Spurs 12-1 out to 14-1
Arsenal 25-1 still 25-1
Market reflecting decent window for Liverpool and poor one for Utd Chelsea & Spurs with Arsenal remaining irrelevant
Claude Puel,Javi Garcia and Special needs one all co favourites as first PL manager to go
posted on 30/7/18
comment by Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
posted 16 hours, 29 minutes ago
Update
Bookies odds
Man City 8-13 out to 8-11
Liverpool 5-1 into 9-2
Man Utd 13-2 out to 8-1
Chelsea 10-1 out to 12-1
Spurs 12-1 out to 14-1
Arsenal 25-1 still 25-1
Market reflecting decent window for Liverpool and poor one for Utd Chelsea & Spurs with Arsenal remaining irrelevant
Claude Puel,Javi Garcia and Special needs one all co favourites as first PL manager to go
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No value in Chelsea at those odds with them being in the Europa league. Not unless they recall some of those 48 players on loan.
posted on 14/8/18
Price update
City into 8-13
Liverpool into 7-2
Utd out to 18-1 🤣
Spurs out to 20-1
Chelsea out to 22-1
Arsenal out to 50-1
Page 4 of 4