“I don’t get what you’re aiming for?!

You did agree it would be 70p in the pound?”



No I was answering tully who asked if it would be 70 p a shirt. Read the thread.

You then tried to be a smart erse and made a coont of it

comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 2 minutes ago
“I don’t get what you’re aiming for?!

You did agree it would be 70p in the pound?”



No I was answering tully who asked if it would be 70 p a shirt. Read the thread.

You then tried to be a smart erse and made a coont of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
It would be 70p in the £. The previous deal was 7p in the £

So, that wasn’t your comment, agreeing with Weig that it’ll be 70%?

yeah im finding it difficult to read that any other way IE....

if you hold your hands up right now i promise no one will ever mention it on here again

comment by simon_bhoy - the happiest tim in the world (U16215)
posted 32 minutes ago
semantics. every bear on here knows king spvnked 500k on a contract that he didnt read properly or understand and, as a result, you lot still cant buy an xxxl orange shirt despite the league starting on saturday.

double lolzers with a rofl flake

in other news, im bricking it for tonight
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The bears don't really care about the £500k it is a drop in the ocean compared to recent years. A minor embarrassment aside the are just happy to be buying merch again, so much so Mehmet in Marmaris is buying orange fruit of the loom t-shirts by the tonne.

“comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
It would be 70p in the £. The previous deal was 7p in the £

So, that wasn’t your comment, agreeing with Weig that it’ll be 70%?”



No , as previously stated it was in answer to tully asking 70 p per shirt. I’ve not seen the deal so have no idea what it is per £ of merchandise sold.

You breenged in and made a Kant of it

“yeah im finding it difficult to read that any other way IE....

if you hold your hands up right now i promise no one will ever mention it on here again ”


That’s what segregated schooling does for you

Bottom of page 2, first few posts on page 3 FYI pov

comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 5 minutes ago
“comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
It would be 70p in the £. The previous deal was 7p in the £

So, that wasn’t your comment, agreeing with Weig that it’ll be 70%?”



No , as previously stated it was in answer to tully asking 70 p per shirt. I’ve not seen the deal so have no idea what it is per £ of merchandise sold.

You breenged in and made a Kant of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Last attempt. This is what you said:

‘“comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
It would be 70p in the £.’

So, in answering Tully, you said it would be 70%?!

It’s right there man!

You’ve made this a bigger issue than it actually is!

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 5 minutes ago
“comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
It would be 70p in the £. The previous deal was 7p in the £

So, that wasn’t your comment, agreeing with Weig that it’ll be 70%?”



No , as previously stated it was in answer to tully asking 70 p per shirt. I’ve not seen the deal so have no idea what it is per £ of merchandise sold.

You breenged in and made a Kant of it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Last attempt. This is what you said:

‘“comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
It would be 70p in the £.’

So, in answering Tully, you said it would be 70%?!

It’s right there man!

You’ve made this a bigger issue than it actually is!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Streisand effect.

Ffs

For the final time, I’ve not seen the deal. No idea what percentage of each pound rangers get.

The 70p thing was in relation to weigs post about 70p

Weig, Celtic poster , was first poster to mention 70p yet you quote me after he mentioned it, where as previously stated I was answering Tully’s question ofweigs 70p.


It’s all there in black n white. The only one making a big deal of it is you pov. All cos you steamed inandkade a complete Kant of it. After missing weigs 70p post

Colour of scarf something

Can’t admit when your wrong something else

In and made

‘comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
It would be 70p in the £.’

Answering Tully, agreeing with Weig.

Thanks for confirming that.

Did you just fake quote me?

I never said ageeeing with weig and answering tully

Desperate stuff even for you. Sometimes it’s better to stop digging .

“ context “

Shifting goalposts?

My quotation marks are only around your comments.

I’ll leave it at that. You made a wee mistake, and it happens. Another round and round argument with you, where you fail to see what you did isn’t for me today thanks!

Agreeing with Weig, answering Tully. 70p in the pound. Ffs.

Oh there’s been no shifting of goalposts from me but you’ve been all over the shop trying to save your own goal !


Splendid

‘Mit, mit-Meig said. Mah miz onwy saying to Tully!’

cmon IE

cmon










cmon

“‘Mit, mit-Meig said. Mah miz onwy saying to Tully!’
”



Reduced to a gibberish wreck

"It would be 70p in the £."

time to hold hands up

just like when i forgot to put tierney in my celtic 11

It would be . If weig is correct. Not 70p per short. Again, if weig is correct.


Simple simple stuff lhads

nah

and you know my man

just nah

Dont shoot the messenger troops

“Dont shoot the messenger troops ”



Your a Celtic fan so you’re safe. I copped it for your alleged laughable mistake.

Colour of scarf something

fact is that IE thinks rangers will make 70p in the pound for every shirt sale

FACT

FACTOID**