exactly

Not my mistake i passed it on from a bear on twitter

Well you brought it to the debate

Either way, it wisnae me despite what two bhoys were claiming .

“ colour of scarf or something”

comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 1 day, 16 hours ago
It would be 70p in the £. The previous deal was 7p in the £
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm coming back to this late but can I ask IE - can you confirm that the above cut'n'paste is what you wrote??
This one,

"It would be 70p in the £. The previous deal was 7p in the £".

On the basis that the above is a straight quote from you I have a question:-

Do you realise that saying "It would be 70p in the £." is exactly the same as saying it would be 70%?

Without fear or contradiction and as other have tried to tell you already there is not a snowball's chance in hell that Rangers will receive 70% on replica gear sales. To even think that is the height of utter stupidity. To put it down on here, and then try to squirm out of it, only confirms the stupidity.

70% 70 feckin percent , what a plum

Of course it’s 70%, 70p in the £

I’ve not said it’s not?

I’ve no idea what clubs generally get as said previously .

“ plum “ etc etc

Silly tully

I presume you’ve realised the error of your way ya “ plum”

comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 5 days ago
It would be 70p in the £. The previous deal was 7p in the £
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Wow , good that argued otherwise though

Good that you*

Of course it wouldn’t be 70p a shirt ffs


That would have been worse than the 7p in the £ deal

You know you messed up laddie.

Sooner you hold your hands up the sooner we all go 'hey man no worries we all make mistakes'

I’ve no idea what your on about . It’s getting boring now. End of page 2, start of page 3 I’m responding to tully asking about 70p a shirt and weig saying 70p in the £.


Zzzzz