Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
======
injured stepping off the bus mate?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble - Stage 1 complete. (U8919)
posted 34 seconds ago
seems to me that the blame the schools comment is sectarian.
catholic schools are better than the bush tucker trials you monkeys have to go through to get a rangers tap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Booo sectarian attack !!!
blame the schools is one remark... what about timmy education?
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 🇬🇧 elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 19 seconds ago
See to be fair, i don't think the blame the schools comment is sectarian.
I was more hurt when i realised my school didn't educate me well enough to hit the Algarve frequently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It did, but you actually had to attend it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the real reason Laudrup goes there ..... no tims !
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble - Stage 1 complete. (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
======
injured stepping off the bus mate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Funny story, i done my ankle in the 3 legged race.
The funny part was i ran it myself.
i'm not sectarian
i just don't like you guys.
i'll explain my reasons clearly
1. you're fat
2. you're ugly
3. despite the fact you are fat and ugly you seem to think of yourselves as superior, you're not. you are fat and ugly.
4. reasons 1,2, and 3.
5. i hate you.
nothing to do with religion.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
comment by Zachsda(FFS Da, put it back) (U1850)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by 🇬🇧 elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 19 seconds ago
See to be fair, i don't think the blame the schools comment is sectarian.
I was more hurt when i realised my school didn't educate me well enough to hit the Algarve frequently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It did, but you actually had to attend it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I liked school, wish i was fookin still ther
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary 7...best three years of my life.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would much rather you tried to explain the points I raised.
Like I said you have no idea who I am, my background, the faiths that my parents and rest of my family have, I dont follow religion at all. But this didnt stop you accusing me.
I think you now realise that you have made an utter khunt of it and I deserve an explanation.
You think that maybe just maybe being called a bigot or accused of being sectarian is very offensive to me hence why I wont let it go and would like some sort of explanation
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up. If I have met people on here...I have two ways to view them...how they seemed when I met them, and how they seem on here.
If I haven't met them, I only have one way to view them...how they seem on here.
This guy is joking about catholic schools and has orange in his name. That's all I have to go on.
It's suggesting a certain conclusion. I could be wrong of course.
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up. If I have met people on here...I have two ways to view them...how they seemed when I met them, and how they seem on here.
If I haven't met them, I only have one way to view them...how they seem on here.
This guy is joking about catholic schools and has orange in his name. That's all I have to go on.
It's suggesting a certain conclusion. I could be wrong of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
my name is orange sherbert its in reference to Austin Powers. I didnt mention anything about catholic schools I said timmy education ie celtic fans being thick.
TIM doesnt mean catholic it means Celtic. Its you that has banded them together and just decided that you know I have a hidden agenda or hidden messages
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would much rather you tried to explain the points I raised.
Like I said you have no idea who I am, my background, the faiths that my parents and rest of my family have, I dont follow religion at all. But this didnt stop you accusing me.
I think you now realise that you have made an utter khunt of it and I deserve an explanation.
You think that maybe just maybe being called a bigot or accused of being sectarian is very offensive to me hence why I wont let it go and would like some sort of explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well....since you're desperate to continue this...you've made a sectarian remark about Catholic schools, you're suggested that Celtic fans are thick, you've got 'orange' in your user name (and even if theres an innocent explanation it's not well advised on here)...when I questioned your initial comment you responded in a sarcastic manner and now you're indicating that you're deeply upset.
Very good.
I do have one problem with Orangesherbert.
He doesn't have dirty at the start of his username and he spelled b@stard wrong.
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up. If I have met people on here...I have two ways to view them...how they seemed when I met them, and how they seem on here.
If I haven't met them, I only have one way to view them...how they seem on here.
This guy is joking about catholic schools and has orange in his name. That's all I have to go on.
It's suggesting a certain conclusion. I could be wrong of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I say, perhaps if you treated everyone equally on here then perhaps you wouldn’t have made a Kant of it on this thread
Just cos you don’t know someone doesn’t mean you can call them sectarian or whatever when they make a type joke that’s made all the time on here.
I think the fact people you do know , as in met in real life, have told you it wasn’t sectarian and you made a Kant of it is very telling.
It’s not just the big bad bears that you’ve never met
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would much rather you tried to explain the points I raised.
Like I said you have no idea who I am, my background, the faiths that my parents and rest of my family have, I dont follow religion at all. But this didnt stop you accusing me.
I think you now realise that you have made an utter khunt of it and I deserve an explanation.
You think that maybe just maybe being called a bigot or accused of being sectarian is very offensive to me hence why I wont let it go and would like some sort of explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well....since you're desperate to continue this...you've made a sectarian remark about Catholic schools, you're suggested that Celtic fans are thick, you've got 'orange' in your user name (and even if theres an innocent explanation it's not well advised on here)...when I questioned your initial comment you responded in a sarcastic manner and now you're indicating that you're deeply upset.
Very good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well maybe you shouldnt jump to conclusions and just decide that you know better and read into things that aint there.
Especially when its something that could end up with someone being banned form the site
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that again tells us more about YOU and YOUR views
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that again tells us more about YOU and YOUR views
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No....do you not recognise that the word has other connotations in Scotland and elsewhere?
Anyway, can’t we all just get along ?
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
na its the not the first reference that would spring to mind with YOU
Sign in if you want to comment
Alfredo
Page 15 of 32
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20
posted on 3/12/18
Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
======
injured stepping off the bus mate?
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble - Stage 1 complete. (U8919)
posted 34 seconds ago
seems to me that the blame the schools comment is sectarian.
catholic schools are better than the bush tucker trials you monkeys have to go through to get a rangers tap.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Booo sectarian attack !!!
blame the schools is one remark... what about timmy education?
posted on 3/12/18
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 🇬🇧 elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 19 seconds ago
See to be fair, i don't think the blame the schools comment is sectarian.
I was more hurt when i realised my school didn't educate me well enough to hit the Algarve frequently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It did, but you actually had to attend it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
the real reason Laudrup goes there ..... no tims !
posted on 3/12/18
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble - Stage 1 complete. (U8919)
posted 1 minute ago
Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
======
injured stepping off the bus mate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Funny story, i done my ankle in the 3 legged race.
The funny part was i ran it myself.
posted on 3/12/18
i'm not sectarian
i just don't like you guys.
i'll explain my reasons clearly
1. you're fat
2. you're ugly
3. despite the fact you are fat and ugly you seem to think of yourselves as superior, you're not. you are fat and ugly.
4. reasons 1,2, and 3.
5. i hate you.
nothing to do with religion.
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Zachsda(FFS Da, put it back) (U1850)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by 🇬🇧 elite.... the wolf wan (U16936)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 19 seconds ago
See to be fair, i don't think the blame the schools comment is sectarian.
I was more hurt when i realised my school didn't educate me well enough to hit the Algarve frequently.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It did, but you actually had to attend it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye my attendance record wasn't the best to be fair.
Had more days off than Santa.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I liked school, wish i was fookin still ther
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Primary 7...best three years of my life.
posted on 3/12/18
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would much rather you tried to explain the points I raised.
Like I said you have no idea who I am, my background, the faiths that my parents and rest of my family have, I dont follow religion at all. But this didnt stop you accusing me.
I think you now realise that you have made an utter khunt of it and I deserve an explanation.
You think that maybe just maybe being called a bigot or accused of being sectarian is very offensive to me hence why I wont let it go and would like some sort of explanation
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up. If I have met people on here...I have two ways to view them...how they seemed when I met them, and how they seem on here.
If I haven't met them, I only have one way to view them...how they seem on here.
This guy is joking about catholic schools and has orange in his name. That's all I have to go on.
It's suggesting a certain conclusion. I could be wrong of course.
posted on 3/12/18
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up. If I have met people on here...I have two ways to view them...how they seemed when I met them, and how they seem on here.
If I haven't met them, I only have one way to view them...how they seem on here.
This guy is joking about catholic schools and has orange in his name. That's all I have to go on.
It's suggesting a certain conclusion. I could be wrong of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
my name is orange sherbert its in reference to Austin Powers. I didnt mention anything about catholic schools I said timmy education ie celtic fans being thick.
TIM doesnt mean catholic it means Celtic. Its you that has banded them together and just decided that you know I have a hidden agenda or hidden messages
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 3/12/18
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would much rather you tried to explain the points I raised.
Like I said you have no idea who I am, my background, the faiths that my parents and rest of my family have, I dont follow religion at all. But this didnt stop you accusing me.
I think you now realise that you have made an utter khunt of it and I deserve an explanation.
You think that maybe just maybe being called a bigot or accused of being sectarian is very offensive to me hence why I wont let it go and would like some sort of explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well....since you're desperate to continue this...you've made a sectarian remark about Catholic schools, you're suggested that Celtic fans are thick, you've got 'orange' in your user name (and even if theres an innocent explanation it's not well advised on here)...when I questioned your initial comment you responded in a sarcastic manner and now you're indicating that you're deeply upset.
Very good.
posted on 3/12/18
I do have one problem with Orangesherbert.
He doesn't have dirty at the start of his username and he spelled b@stard wrong.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There are no flaws.
Perhaps it’s you with the problem with the clique in that you say yourself you know zach and take it in the context of knowing what he’s like.
Perhaps you should afford folk you don’t know the same level of trust bearing in mind we are all equals on here. A non clique person posts a running joke on here and you presume they are a bigot cos you don’t know them. An utter moronic view
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it up. If I have met people on here...I have two ways to view them...how they seemed when I met them, and how they seem on here.
If I haven't met them, I only have one way to view them...how they seem on here.
This guy is joking about catholic schools and has orange in his name. That's all I have to go on.
It's suggesting a certain conclusion. I could be wrong of course.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
As I say, perhaps if you treated everyone equally on here then perhaps you wouldn’t have made a Kant of it on this thread
Just cos you don’t know someone doesn’t mean you can call them sectarian or whatever when they make a type joke that’s made all the time on here.
I think the fact people you do know , as in met in real life, have told you it wasn’t sectarian and you made a Kant of it is very telling.
It’s not just the big bad bears that you’ve never met
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 34 seconds ago
"I wouldn't pull Zach up about it as I've met him...he's one of the best posters on the site and a genuinely good guy. He's mainly on here for a laugh."
to this
"It would be sectarian regardless of who says it."
oh dear !
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If a comment has sectarian language in it then it's a sectarian comment.
However, the intent of the user has, in my opinion, an impact in how you treat the comment.
Do you disagree with that! If so fine, we'll have to disagree.
You waded into a thread about football with a stupid sectarian comment. That's all that happened.
The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
but if Zach had said it it wouldnt have been sectarian... Suddenly you get to decide the intent of a comment made by me despite not knowing me.
"The fact that you exacerbated it then tried to argue it is why we're still going." - you are doing the exact same thing so is a moot point.
If what i said was really a sectarian remark im damn sure a lot more would be having a go at me.
Instead we have someone who has already admitted that if someone else said it then it would be fine (just not me), you have said that my point contains sectarian language (timmy education is the exact words I used) which word is sectarian timmy or education.
You have admitted that you have been trying to drive another poster of the site.
Your $hit stirring for the sake of $hit stirring, all you have done is prove that your a contradiction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I've already said that I will cease this argument. And I will, despite the obvious flaws in your argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would much rather you tried to explain the points I raised.
Like I said you have no idea who I am, my background, the faiths that my parents and rest of my family have, I dont follow religion at all. But this didnt stop you accusing me.
I think you now realise that you have made an utter khunt of it and I deserve an explanation.
You think that maybe just maybe being called a bigot or accused of being sectarian is very offensive to me hence why I wont let it go and would like some sort of explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well....since you're desperate to continue this...you've made a sectarian remark about Catholic schools, you're suggested that Celtic fans are thick, you've got 'orange' in your user name (and even if theres an innocent explanation it's not well advised on here)...when I questioned your initial comment you responded in a sarcastic manner and now you're indicating that you're deeply upset.
Very good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
well maybe you shouldnt jump to conclusions and just decide that you know better and read into things that aint there.
Especially when its something that could end up with someone being banned form the site
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that again tells us more about YOU and YOUR views
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Ibrox Elite - Let’s go (U5255)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that again tells us more about YOU and YOUR views
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No....do you not recognise that the word has other connotations in Scotland and elsewhere?
posted on 3/12/18
Anyway, can’t we all just get along ?
posted on 3/12/18
comment by Magnum (U16400)
posted 24 seconds ago
comment by orangesherbert (U21919)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by Miller (U9310)
posted 1 minute ago
the orangesherbert name reminds me of the first Austin Powers film.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Very good. That's not the first reference that would spring to mind when you use the term orange in Scotland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
na its the not the first reference that would spring to mind with YOU
Page 15 of 32
16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20