Hendrix All Along The Watchtower
Beats Dylan into a pulp (not difficult )
Nicholas Cage’s version of Gone in 60 seconds.
Didn't know there was an original version?
Love Gone in 60 Seconds, great film.
as much as i love Skynryd, Shinedowns cover of Simple Man...
Gallon Drunk's cover of the Bee Gees "To Love Somebody
Faith no more's cover of The Commodores "Easy"
Ministry's cover of Dylan's "Lay lady lay"
Dexy's midnight runners cover of The Bandwagon's "Breaking down the walls of heartache".......is as good
More to follow
or disturbeds sound of silence
as for films probably the departed?
comment by Keep It Greasy So It'll Go Down Easy (U1396)
posted 19 minutes ago
Hendrix All Along The Watchtower
Beats Dylan into a pulp (not difficult)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up there with the best cover version ever.
The Damned's cover of The Stooges "I feel alright"
Really is a toss up for the winner that one
Although not given the same name, I loved a made for TV remake of a film called 36 Hours.
The remake was called Breaking Point. The general plot of the story is the Germans capture an Overlord, convince him the war has been over for 2 years and that he has amnesia so they can find out the location of the D-Day landings.
I own 36 hours but haven’t watched it yet. Anyone familiar with either version?
Have tried to find it online and can’t
Hurt by Johnny Cash is an obvious one.
comment by IvanGolacIsMagic (U5291)
posted 13 minutes ago
Hurt by Johnny Cash is an obvious one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The NIN version?
comment by Biglaa (U5954)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by IvanGolacIsMagic (U5291)
posted 13 minutes ago
Hurt by Johnny Cash is an obvious one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The NIN version?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prefer the Leona Lewis version myself
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
Sonic Youth's cover of The Carpenters "Superstar"
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.
just accept it!
instead of this back and forth you could be thinking about your next article. here are some ideas for you
1. Top 10 favourite pokemon characters ( id actually read that and like it )
2. The most Shocking thing a Kardashian has ever said
3. Most underrated Tree
4. Players you thought were good but turned out to be average but were nice people but scored a goal against chelsea that you actually applauded because they played for chelsea once but also played for a rival but only played for our reserve team in the 80's but managed QPR but also said once in an interview that they had a soft spot for chelsea but also said they preferred tottenham in an interview for Shoot magazine.
The Beach boys "Then I kissed her" which is basically a rename of The Crystals/Phil Spector "The he kissed me"
Another tricky one
Fun boy three's cover of The Go Go's "Our lips are sealed"
Co wrote by members of both bands
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.
just accept it!
instead of this back and forth you could be thinking about your next article. here are some ideas for you
1. Top 10 favourite pokemon characters ( id actually read that and like it )
2. The most Shocking thing a Kardashian has ever said
3. Most underrated Tree
4. Players you thought were good but turned out to be average but were nice people but scored a goal against chelsea that you actually applauded because they played for chelsea once but also played for a rival but only played for our reserve team in the 80's but managed QPR but also said once in an interview that they had a soft spot for chelsea but also said they preferred tottenham in an interview for Shoot magazine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ah so you're essentially admitting to being a keyboard warrior? An internet bully?
so i think for your part, i don't think you're getting it.
Think of me as being just like your parents. I can see you in front of me, trying to get my attention. I just don’t care
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.
just accept it!
instead of this back and forth you could be thinking about your next article. here are some ideas for you
1. Top 10 favourite pokemon characters ( id actually read that and like it )
2. The most Shocking thing a Kardashian has ever said
3. Most underrated Tree
4. Players you thought were good but turned out to be average but were nice people but scored a goal against chelsea that you actually applauded because they played for chelsea once but also played for a rival but only played for our reserve team in the 80's but managed QPR but also said once in an interview that they had a soft spot for chelsea but also said they preferred tottenham in an interview for Shoot magazine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ah so you're essentially admitting to being a keyboard warrior? An internet bully?
so i think for your part, i don't think you're getting it.
Think of me as being just like your parents. I can see you in front of me, trying to get my attention. I just don’t care
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol
internet bully
Me thinking your articles are chit doesn't make me an internet bully.
i see this alot form you, you make a chit article, people criticise it and you get offended
Am not even remotely offended. But read the words you wrote.
'you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.'
Which means you deliberately set out to make somebody feel bad.
Like i say, i don't care about you whatsoever. So i'm not offended, but that is essentially what you've done.
Sign in if you want to comment
covers of songs or remakes of films........
Page 1 of 3
posted on 5/6/19
Hendrix All Along The Watchtower
Beats Dylan into a pulp (not difficult )
posted on 5/6/19
Nicholas Cage’s version of Gone in 60 seconds.
Didn't know there was an original version?
Love Gone in 60 Seconds, great film.
posted on 5/6/19
as much as i love Skynryd, Shinedowns cover of Simple Man...
posted on 5/6/19
Gallon Drunk's cover of the Bee Gees "To Love Somebody
Faith no more's cover of The Commodores "Easy"
Ministry's cover of Dylan's "Lay lady lay"
Dexy's midnight runners cover of The Bandwagon's "Breaking down the walls of heartache".......is as good
More to follow
posted on 5/6/19
or disturbeds sound of silence
posted on 5/6/19
as for films probably the departed?
posted on 5/6/19
comment by Keep It Greasy So It'll Go Down Easy (U1396)
posted 19 minutes ago
Hendrix All Along The Watchtower
Beats Dylan into a pulp (not difficult)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Up there with the best cover version ever.
posted on 5/6/19
man on fire with denzel
posted on 5/6/19
3:10 to yuma too.
posted on 5/6/19
The Damned's cover of The Stooges "I feel alright"
Really is a toss up for the winner that one
posted on 5/6/19
Although not given the same name, I loved a made for TV remake of a film called 36 Hours.
The remake was called Breaking Point. The general plot of the story is the Germans capture an Overlord, convince him the war has been over for 2 years and that he has amnesia so they can find out the location of the D-Day landings.
I own 36 hours but haven’t watched it yet. Anyone familiar with either version?
Have tried to find it online and can’t
posted on 5/6/19
Hurt by Johnny Cash is an obvious one.
posted on 5/6/19
posted on 5/6/19
comment by IvanGolacIsMagic (U5291)
posted 13 minutes ago
Hurt by Johnny Cash is an obvious one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The NIN version?
posted on 5/6/19
comment by Biglaa (U5954)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by IvanGolacIsMagic (U5291)
posted 13 minutes ago
Hurt by Johnny Cash is an obvious one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The NIN version?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prefer the Leona Lewis version myself
posted on 5/6/19
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
posted on 5/6/19
Sonic Youth's cover of The Carpenters "Superstar"
posted on 5/6/19
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
posted on 5/6/19
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
posted on 5/6/19
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.
just accept it!
instead of this back and forth you could be thinking about your next article. here are some ideas for you
1. Top 10 favourite pokemon characters ( id actually read that and like it )
2. The most Shocking thing a Kardashian has ever said
3. Most underrated Tree
4. Players you thought were good but turned out to be average but were nice people but scored a goal against chelsea that you actually applauded because they played for chelsea once but also played for a rival but only played for our reserve team in the 80's but managed QPR but also said once in an interview that they had a soft spot for chelsea but also said they preferred tottenham in an interview for Shoot magazine.
posted on 5/6/19
The Beach boys "Then I kissed her" which is basically a rename of The Crystals/Phil Spector "The he kissed me"
posted on 5/6/19
Another tricky one
Fun boy three's cover of The Go Go's "Our lips are sealed"
Co wrote by members of both bands
posted on 5/6/19
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.
just accept it!
instead of this back and forth you could be thinking about your next article. here are some ideas for you
1. Top 10 favourite pokemon characters ( id actually read that and like it )
2. The most Shocking thing a Kardashian has ever said
3. Most underrated Tree
4. Players you thought were good but turned out to be average but were nice people but scored a goal against chelsea that you actually applauded because they played for chelsea once but also played for a rival but only played for our reserve team in the 80's but managed QPR but also said once in an interview that they had a soft spot for chelsea but also said they preferred tottenham in an interview for Shoot magazine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ah so you're essentially admitting to being a keyboard warrior? An internet bully?
so i think for your part, i don't think you're getting it.
Think of me as being just like your parents. I can see you in front of me, trying to get my attention. I just don’t care
posted on 5/6/19
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by MTC 2.0 (U21799)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Noble Lord Flash (U8334)
posted 5 minutes ago
MTC
You really are the person who writes/calls to Ofcom having already had prior warning of what is going feature in a programme, yet still complains about the content in that programme
Why do you even bother? It really does defy logic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not complaining, i am passively ridiculing yet another chit article, not challenging your right to post said chit article.
I am mocking you, not complaining there is a difference
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But you get warning of what it's going to consist of. The clue is most definitely in the title. Why waste your own time if you know you're not going to approve? Which you don't
----------------------------------------------------------------------
you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.
just accept it!
instead of this back and forth you could be thinking about your next article. here are some ideas for you
1. Top 10 favourite pokemon characters ( id actually read that and like it )
2. The most Shocking thing a Kardashian has ever said
3. Most underrated Tree
4. Players you thought were good but turned out to be average but were nice people but scored a goal against chelsea that you actually applauded because they played for chelsea once but also played for a rival but only played for our reserve team in the 80's but managed QPR but also said once in an interview that they had a soft spot for chelsea but also said they preferred tottenham in an interview for Shoot magazine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ah so you're essentially admitting to being a keyboard warrior? An internet bully?
so i think for your part, i don't think you're getting it.
Think of me as being just like your parents. I can see you in front of me, trying to get my attention. I just don’t care
----------------------------------------------------------------------
lol
internet bully
Me thinking your articles are chit doesn't make me an internet bully.
i see this alot form you, you make a chit article, people criticise it and you get offended
posted on 5/6/19
Am not even remotely offended. But read the words you wrote.
'you are not getting in flash, yes i knew the article would be chit, you are correct, so instead of ignoring it, i came to mock.'
Which means you deliberately set out to make somebody feel bad.
Like i say, i don't care about you whatsoever. So i'm not offended, but that is essentially what you've done.
Page 1 of 3