simple answer is no.he doesn't work hard enough. goes missing in loads of games and is up his own ar*e!
keane, doyle, long, walters, cox, best are ahead of him in the q and rightly so.
he's better than keogh thou
No. I'm a Celtic fan and have seen lots of Stokes as Irish Rover says he is up his own ass and doesn't work hard enough.
My pecking order for Ireland would be Keane, Long, Doyle, Best, Walters, and then Stokes. With all those fit Stokes won't get a look in. I don't rate Cox - nothing against him just don't think he's up to much. Says a lot about where Celtic are at at for strikers at the moment.
Agree with the above, Stokes is wasy down the pecking order. He must still believe in all the hype about him when he was 16. Had lots of natural ability but didn't work hard enough at his game.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Anthony Stokes?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 24/9/11
simple answer is no.he doesn't work hard enough. goes missing in loads of games and is up his own ar*e!
keane, doyle, long, walters, cox, best are ahead of him in the q and rightly so.
he's better than keogh thou
posted on 25/9/11
No. I'm a Celtic fan and have seen lots of Stokes as Irish Rover says he is up his own ass and doesn't work hard enough.
My pecking order for Ireland would be Keane, Long, Doyle, Best, Walters, and then Stokes. With all those fit Stokes won't get a look in. I don't rate Cox - nothing against him just don't think he's up to much. Says a lot about where Celtic are at at for strikers at the moment.
posted on 27/9/11
Agree with the above, Stokes is wasy down the pecking order. He must still believe in all the hype about him when he was 16. Had lots of natural ability but didn't work hard enough at his game.
Page 1 of 1