Not enough natural width for my favoured 4-1-4-1
Think its nearer 4-2-3-1.
But thats semantics. I like the positive approach
Who’s going to play the right wing role, seen a couple of line ups with Praet there. Could equally be 4-3-3 with Barnes and Maddison as the wide and kind of wide players. Guess it was hard to drop Praet after last week but looks a little unbalanced. Unless he’s going to spring a real surprise and play with Vardy and Barnes as split strikers on their full backs 😱
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 2 minutes ago
Not enough natural width for my favoured 4-1-4-1
Think its nearer 4-2-3-1.
But thats semantics. I like the positive approach
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely more positive starting 11 than against other ‘top 6’ teams! Like it
Jesus spurs are in meltdown
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
4 1 311sort of diamond with maddison at top?
The difference has been whether the 2 in midfield are defensive midfielders or not, but it’s always been a variation of 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So is it Praet with ndidi
Vardy running in behind will be a big threat to Liverpool, lovren starting so Vardy should play off him as often as possible.
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats 4-1-4-1 as well and its the best weve played
https://images.app.goo.gl/pkAagxRHKAphME4w7
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
tv just showed 433
barnes vardy maddison
praet nidi tilemans
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats 4-1-4-1 as well and its the best weve played
https://images.app.goo.gl/pkAagxRHKAphME4w7
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No that’s also a 4-3-3. We play with wide forwards
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 48 seconds ago
tv just showed 433
barnes vardy maddison
praet nidi tilemans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. That’s cos that’s what it is. This is all your fault Mersey
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 18 minutes ago
Jesus spurs are in meltdown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just listened to the match on the radio. It didn’t sound good at all for Spurs. Anyway, I’ll be tuning into you today dubs.
comment by downsouf (U4095)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 18 minutes ago
Jesus spurs are in meltdown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just listened to the match on the radio. It didn’t sound good at all for Spurs. Anyway, I’ll be tuning into you today dubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
something to look forward to on match of the day
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope it’s definitely a 4-1-2-2-1
comment by Cupcake (formerly Flip78) (U7985)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope it’s definitely a 4-1-2-2-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got me lucky coffee mug out
Semantics. I like 4-1-4-1. And if thats what i like then thats your problem not mine
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Cupcake (formerly Flip78) (U7985)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope it’s definitely a 4-1-2-2-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s some serious number crunching going on here. So that’s 4 at the back, with Ndidi sitting ahead of them, with Praet & Tielemans ahead of Ndidi with Barnes and Maddison just in front of them on the left and right respectively? Is that right?
Nice to watch a game without the feelings
Of dread or fear
Says a lot about how far we gave come
Or is it the drugs chilling me out 🤔
Sign in if you want to comment
Pool v City
Page 1 of 5
posted on 5/10/19
Not enough natural width for my favoured 4-1-4-1
Think its nearer 4-2-3-1.
But thats semantics. I like the positive approach
posted on 5/10/19
Who’s going to play the right wing role, seen a couple of line ups with Praet there. Could equally be 4-3-3 with Barnes and Maddison as the wide and kind of wide players. Guess it was hard to drop Praet after last week but looks a little unbalanced. Unless he’s going to spring a real surprise and play with Vardy and Barnes as split strikers on their full backs 😱
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 2 minutes ago
Not enough natural width for my favoured 4-1-4-1
Think its nearer 4-2-3-1.
But thats semantics. I like the positive approach
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Definitely more positive starting 11 than against other ‘top 6’ teams! Like it
posted on 5/10/19
Jesus spurs are in meltdown
posted on 5/10/19
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
posted on 5/10/19
4 1 311sort of diamond with maddison at top?
posted on 5/10/19
The difference has been whether the 2 in midfield are defensive midfielders or not, but it’s always been a variation of 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 1 minute ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So is it Praet with ndidi
posted on 5/10/19
Vardy running in behind will be a big threat to Liverpool, lovren starting so Vardy should play off him as often as possible.
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats 4-1-4-1 as well and its the best weve played
https://images.app.goo.gl/pkAagxRHKAphME4w7
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
posted on 5/10/19
tv just showed 433
barnes vardy maddison
praet nidi tilemans
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats 4-1-4-1 as well and its the best weve played
https://images.app.goo.gl/pkAagxRHKAphME4w7
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No that’s also a 4-3-3. We play with wide forwards
posted on 5/10/19
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 48 seconds ago
tv just showed 433
barnes vardy maddison
praet nidi tilemans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep. That’s cos that’s what it is. This is all your fault Mersey
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
posted on 5/10/19
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 18 minutes ago
Jesus spurs are in meltdown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just listened to the match on the radio. It didn’t sound good at all for Spurs. Anyway, I’ll be tuning into you today dubs.
posted on 5/10/19
comment by downsouf (U4095)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 18 minutes ago
Jesus spurs are in meltdown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just listened to the match on the radio. It didn’t sound good at all for Spurs. Anyway, I’ll be tuning into you today dubs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
something to look forward to on match of the day
posted on 5/10/19
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope it’s definitely a 4-1-2-2-1
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Cupcake (formerly Flip78) (U7985)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope it’s definitely a 4-1-2-2-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 5/10/19
Got me lucky coffee mug out
posted on 5/10/19
Semantics. I like 4-1-4-1. And if thats what i like then thats your problem not mine
posted on 5/10/19
COME ON LEICESTER CITY!!
posted on 5/10/19
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Cupcake (formerly Flip78) (U7985)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by dublin fox optimistically pessimistic, (now a Cambridge fox)(still can not spell fox) (U1131)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Cheesynacho (U1254)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Black Starr (U12353)
posted 6 minutes ago
I don’t think we’ve ever played a 4-1-4-1 and I’m convinced it’s a formation Mersey made up for us last season
A 4-1-4-1 would indicate having a flat 4 midfield (with left and right wingers) and a defensive midfielder. I can’t remember us playing anything like that since the days of Shakespeare
It’s a 4-2-3-1 and always has been. We don’t play with wide midfielders or classic wingers
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These call it a 4-5-1
But I prefer 4-1-4-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/p7u8qakKCwgEVkF9A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a 4-3-3 all day
It’s a not a flat 4 across midfield. It’s no way a 4-1-4-1, we don’t play that
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yes that formation
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope it’s definitely a 4-1-2-2-1
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There’s some serious number crunching going on here. So that’s 4 at the back, with Ndidi sitting ahead of them, with Praet & Tielemans ahead of Ndidi with Barnes and Maddison just in front of them on the left and right respectively? Is that right?
posted on 5/10/19
Nice to watch a game without the feelings
Of dread or fear
Says a lot about how far we gave come
Or is it the drugs chilling me out 🤔
Page 1 of 5