Yes, you're engaging in conversation with me.
That's accurate and it's entirely different to saying that you 'engaged me in conversation'.
I didn't realise that you'd need such a basic part of the English language explained to you.
Dear oh dear. This is actually making me laugh now.
What has Fields been reduced to here. Wow.
Paisley, what’s your English like? Fancy educating Fields for me?
What’s the matter Paisley, cat got your tongue?
Hard to believe that this started as a $pud thread about Souness...
Yeh, once those Liverpool fans get involved then anything can happen.
Paisley, see what you’ve created here?
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Yes, you're engaging in conversation with me.
That's accurate and it's entirely different to saying that you 'engaged me in conversation'.
I didn't realise that you'd need such a basic part of the English language explained to you.
Dear oh dear. This is actually making me laugh now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where you said ‘engaged in conversation with you’
Idiot
Oh look, brains has discovered I’m right and he’s backtracking.
How about you show me where I used the word incorrectly?
I’ll be happy to educate you.
Winston filtered me! For no reason.
That will tell you you all you need to know Fields.
Enjoy the VAR tonight, Paisley?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 minutes ago
Admin, end this thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a mess it has become.
And here's the root cause, back for more.
After yesterday's embarrassment, Fields is going to spam the thread as well now, is he?
Ah revisionism.
Winston spamming the site after embarrassing himself every day.
Revisionism?
Nope.
Just the fact that you didn't realise that you can be engaging in conversation without starting the conversation.
You looked like a prat tbh.
Graeme...are you ok ?
Page 57 of 68
58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62
posted on 17/2/20
Yes, you're engaging in conversation with me.
That's accurate and it's entirely different to saying that you 'engaged me in conversation'.
I didn't realise that you'd need such a basic part of the English language explained to you.
Dear oh dear. This is actually making me laugh now.
posted on 17/2/20
What has Fields been reduced to here. Wow.
posted on 17/2/20
posted on 17/2/20
Paisley, what’s your English like? Fancy educating Fields for me?
posted on 17/2/20
posted on 17/2/20
What’s the matter Paisley, cat got your tongue?
posted on 17/2/20
Hard to believe that this started as a $pud thread about Souness...
posted on 17/2/20
Yeh, once those Liverpool fans get involved then anything can happen.
posted on 17/2/20
posted on 17/2/20
Paisley, see what you’ve created here?
posted on 17/2/20
posted on 17/2/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Yes, you're engaging in conversation with me.
That's accurate and it's entirely different to saying that you 'engaged me in conversation'.
I didn't realise that you'd need such a basic part of the English language explained to you.
Dear oh dear. This is actually making me laugh now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where you said ‘engaged in conversation with you’
Idiot
posted on 17/2/20
Oh look, brains has discovered I’m right and he’s backtracking.
How about you show me where I used the word incorrectly?
I’ll be happy to educate you.
posted on 17/2/20
Winston filtered me! For no reason.
That will tell you you all you need to know Fields.
posted on 17/2/20
Enjoy the VAR tonight, Paisley?
posted on 17/2/20
posted on 18/2/20
posted on 18/2/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 18/2/20
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 7 minutes ago
Admin, end this thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What a mess it has become.
posted on 18/2/20
posted on 18/2/20
And here's the root cause, back for more.
posted on 18/2/20
posted on 18/2/20
After yesterday's embarrassment, Fields is going to spam the thread as well now, is he?
posted on 18/2/20
Ah revisionism.
Winston spamming the site after embarrassing himself every day.
posted on 18/2/20
Revisionism?
Nope.
Just the fact that you didn't realise that you can be engaging in conversation without starting the conversation.
You looked like a prat tbh.
Page 57 of 68
58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62