comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 49 seconds ago
Revisionism?

Nope.

Just the fact that you didn't realise that you can be engaging in conversation without starting the conversation.

You looked like a prat tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No idiot. You’re too thick to realise that engaging in conversation means starting a conversation with someone.

Filtered anyone recently?

" You’re too thick to realise that engaging in conversation means starting a conversation with someone."



You really should check your facts - you sound like a moron.

"Engage"

'participate or become involved in.'

I cannot believe I'm having to explain the definition of a word to you. You really have embarrassed yourself here.

Two things:

- Why? I mean, is that really what you're left with? Reading what I wrote and arguing about the definition of a word?
- If you are going to try and pick me up on something, make sure you get it right. Because if you don't, I'll destroy you.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 seconds ago
" You’re too thick to realise that engaging in conversation means starting a conversation with someone."



You really should check your facts - you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the dictionary’s wrong and you’re right

https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/418907/7

Look at you on here bullying Ripley’s. Very mature and not in the least hypocritical. Sums you up though.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
"Engage"

'participate or become involved in.'

I cannot believe I'm having to explain the definition of a word to you. You really have embarrassed yourself here.

Two things:

- Why? I mean, is that really what you're left with? Reading what I wrote and arguing about the definition of a word?
- If you are going to try and pick me up on something, make sure you get it right. Because if you don't, I'll destroy you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ engage someone in conversationto start having a conversation with someone“

Keep going thick caaant

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 seconds ago
" You’re too thick to realise that engaging in conversation means starting a conversation with someone."



You really should check your facts - you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the dictionary’s wrong and you’re right

https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/418907/7

Look at you on here bullying Ripley’s. Very mature and not in the least hypocritical. Sums you up though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, the dictionary supports my view.

Bullying Ripleys?

Here we go. This is your next attempt at having a pop and you're already making a mess of it.

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
"Engage"

'participate or become involved in.'

I cannot believe I'm having to explain the definition of a word to you. You really have embarrassed yourself here.

Two things:

- Why? I mean, is that really what you're left with? Reading what I wrote and arguing about the definition of a word?
- If you are going to try and pick me up on something, make sure you get it right. Because if you don't, I'll destroy you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“ engage someone in conversationto start having a conversation with someone“

Keep going thick caaant
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But I didn't say you engaged me in conversation, did I?

There's a subtle difference that a day later you still haven't understood.

This is embarrassing.

You're becoming a little obsessed by me, aren't you Fields?

Are you not embarrassed that someone on an anonymous forum is affecting you so much?

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 10 seconds ago
" You’re too thick to realise that engaging in conversation means starting a conversation with someone."



You really should check your facts - you sound like a moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah the dictionary’s wrong and you’re right

https://www.ja606.co.uk/comments/viewAllComments/418907/7

Look at you on here bullying Ripley’s. Very mature and not in the least hypocritical. Sums you up though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, the dictionary supports my view.

Bullying Ripleys?

Here we go. This is your next attempt at having a pop and you're already making a mess of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just posted the definition above, again. Read it properly this time and you won’t look like as thick as you do now.

Well for all your crying about us nasty Liverpool fans ‘bullying’ and whining on about maturity that link just shows you up for the hypocrite we know you are.

Maybe take a break from the site and calm down instead of lashing out.

FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

You posted the definition for 'engage someone in conversation', which I didn't say you'd done.

That link shows me losing my patience with someone intent on derailing a good thread, one in which I had a decent conversation with several Liverpool fans.

Thanks for showing that it is possible if trolls like you don't ruin it for everyone else.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Fields now desperately checking back to see what I'd said. That penny is going to drop soon.

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 14 seconds ago
You don't come off well in that interaction with Ripleys..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Couldn't care less tbh, but what it doesn't show is that he'd done the same thing recently.

His contribution was pathetic.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

You posted the definition for 'engage someone in conversation', which I didn't say you'd done.

That link shows me losing my patience with someone intent on derailing a good thread, one in which I had a decent conversation with several Liverpool fans.

Thanks for showing that it is possible if trolls like you don't ruin it for everyone else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did you liar. I posted the quote yesterday, which you conveniently ignored

Ripley’s didn’t say anything particularly off topic or out of order. He even corrected himself when an error was pointed out. He wasn’t derailing the thread at all. You’re such a hypocrite it’s funny. This is a case of you didn’t agree with what he had to say so went off on him for no good reason, and then like a coward filtered him. Very mature of you

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 14 seconds ago
You don't come off well in that interaction with Ripleys..
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Couldn't care less tbh, but what it doesn't show is that he'd done the same thing recently.

His contribution was pathetic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But it was a contribution that was on topic and not personal against you, which is all you have asked from people in terms of using the site?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How was it on topic to tell me that the discussion was pointless?

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

You posted the definition for 'engage someone in conversation', which I didn't say you'd done.

That link shows me losing my patience with someone intent on derailing a good thread, one in which I had a decent conversation with several Liverpool fans.

Thanks for showing that it is possible if trolls like you don't ruin it for everyone else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did you liar. I posted the quote yesterday, which you conveniently ignored

Ripley’s didn’t say anything particularly off topic or out of order. He even corrected himself when an error was pointed out. He wasn’t derailing the thread at all. You’re such a hypocrite it’s funny. This is a case of you didn’t agree with what he had to say so went off on him for no good reason, and then like a coward filtered him. Very mature of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No you didn't, you posted something else.

Do you really not understand the difference?

Fack me

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

You posted the definition for 'engage someone in conversation', which I didn't say you'd done.

That link shows me losing my patience with someone intent on derailing a good thread, one in which I had a decent conversation with several Liverpool fans.

Thanks for showing that it is possible if trolls like you don't ruin it for everyone else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did you liar. I posted the quote yesterday, which you conveniently ignored

Ripley’s didn’t say anything particularly off topic or out of order. He even corrected himself when an error was pointed out. He wasn’t derailing the thread at all. You’re such a hypocrite it’s funny. This is a case of you didn’t agree with what he had to say so went off on him for no good reason, and then like a coward filtered him. Very mature of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No you didn't, you posted something else.

Do you really not understand the difference?

Fack me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Go on then, show me what I posted.

Ignoring your hypocrisy I see. The biggest troll on the site doesn’t like it when people disagree with him so bullies and then filters. What a coward.

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

You posted the definition for 'engage someone in conversation', which I didn't say you'd done.

That link shows me losing my patience with someone intent on derailing a good thread, one in which I had a decent conversation with several Liverpool fans.

Thanks for showing that it is possible if trolls like you don't ruin it for everyone else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did you liar. I posted the quote yesterday, which you conveniently ignored

Ripley’s didn’t say anything particularly off topic or out of order. He even corrected himself when an error was pointed out. He wasn’t derailing the thread at all. You’re such a hypocrite it’s funny. This is a case of you didn’t agree with what he had to say so went off on him for no good reason, and then like a coward filtered him. Very mature of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No you didn't, you posted something else.

Do you really not understand the difference?

Fack me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Go on then, show me what I posted.

Ignoring your hypocrisy I see. The biggest troll on the site doesn’t like it when people disagree with him so bullies and then filters. What a coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There's no hypocrisy.

You're the one claiming that I said you'd engaged me in conversation - you prove it.

Except you can't, because I didn't.

So we're all set for another day of Fields whinging and whining about me.

What's this, the 5th day in total?

What a bizarre thing to choose to do.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)

He said:

"As far as this topic, it’s pointless in my opinion."

I rejected that (politely) and he just went on and on about how it's not worth discussing.

The he capped it off with a complete contradiction - one of the stupidest things I've seen written on here ever.

So why did he bother joining the thread? He was being an idiot.

"your responses pretty much go against everything that you ask for from other people"

This simply isn't true.

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

You posted the definition for 'engage someone in conversation', which I didn't say you'd done.

That link shows me losing my patience with someone intent on derailing a good thread, one in which I had a decent conversation with several Liverpool fans.

Thanks for showing that it is possible if trolls like you don't ruin it for everyone else.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes you did you liar. I posted the quote yesterday, which you conveniently ignored

Ripley’s didn’t say anything particularly off topic or out of order. He even corrected himself when an error was pointed out. He wasn’t derailing the thread at all. You’re such a hypocrite it’s funny. This is a case of you didn’t agree with what he had to say so went off on him for no good reason, and then like a coward filtered him. Very mature of you
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No you didn't, you posted something else.

Do you really not understand the difference?

Fack me
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? Go on then, show me what I posted.

Ignoring your hypocrisy I see. The biggest troll on the site doesn’t like it when people disagree with him so bullies and then filters. What a coward.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There's no hypocrisy.

You're the one claiming that I said you'd engaged me in conversation - you prove it.

Except you can't, because I didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course there isn’t. Mr ‘I always admit when I’m wrong’ isn’t going to admit he’s gone against everything he whinges about others doing on here.

I did prove it yesterday. Scroll through yourself and re read. I’m not doing the work for you. Go on, chop chop.

FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)

No, there's no hypocrisy.

You haven't proved sheite. I didn't say you'd engaged me in conversation.

I'm not surprised you can't admit it.

Imagine not understanding the difference between 'you engaged me in conversation' and 'you're engaging in conversation with me'.

Imagine trying to use this as a point to get one over on someone on a football forum.

Imagine, having tried, then getting it wrong.