That’s a list of some proper european giants...and dross like Brighton. The fact they are in there shows how wrong English football is. #moneyball
Doing it right way
Liverpool
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 1 minute ago
ah fack missed a word
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was it albatross?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
What stands out to me is look at last 5 years of honours between chelsea and liverpool and then look at spurs who are only 3 and 6 places behind them.
I would be furious with the mismanagement at that club.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/jan/22/manchester-city-financial-fair-play-breaches-2012-13-accounting-sponsorships-uefa-champions-league
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 12 minutes ago
Doing it right way
Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
absolutely had barcas pants down tbf
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 12 minutes ago
Doing it right way
Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
absolutely had barcas pants down tbf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s worse than Pogba in terms of wasting money. 130m for Coutinho
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 5 minutes ago
Getting a lot of money for a couple of players has made a big difference to Liverpool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We only got a lot of money for one player. We probably still wouldn't make the top 10 if we took that out.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 5 minutes ago
Getting a lot of money for a couple of players has made a big difference to Liverpool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We only got a lot of money for one player. We probably still wouldn't make the top 10 if we took that out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Just as impressed by the money we got for players like Ibe, Solanke, etc.
I would imagine Harry Wilsons value has grown quite a bit also if he isn't in Klopps long term plans.
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 5 minutes ago
Getting a lot of money for a couple of players has made a big difference to Liverpool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We only got a lot of money for one player. We probably still wouldn't make the top 10 if we took that out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Over £200 m for Suarez and Coutinho?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
suarez was sold in 2014
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
How much would people expect us to want for Harry Wilson if he was let go ?
20, 30, mill?
hes better than solanke so 35mil pls bournemouth
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 19 seconds ago
hes better than solanke so 35mil pls bournemouth
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe.
Isnt he now Bournemouths leading goalscorer ?
Can we do a net spend table since the start of the Premiership, would love to see a comparison table
comment by gunnersaurus rex (U21846)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can we do a net spend table since the start of the Premiership, would love to see a comparison table
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do the Premiership? It ended in 2007.
comment by gunnersaurus rex (U21846)
posted 3 minutes ago
Can we do a net spend table since the start of the Premiership, would love to see a comparison table
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointless to go much beyond 2015.
As it would have very little relevance to what's going on now.
I would imagine City, United, Chelsea and possibly Arsenal would make up the top 4 of highest spenders net, since the PL started.
https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-1992-to-date/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-1992-to-date
Dno if its right. Not that going back that far is relevant. Still less than Villa and Arsenal mind. And less than half that of chelsea n utd n a third of city
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-1992-to-date/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-1992-to-date
Dno if its right. Not that going back that far is relevant. Still less than Villa and Arsenal mind. And less than half that of chelsea n utd n a third of city
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when was this last updated
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-1992-to-date/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-1992-to-date
Dno if its right. Not that going back that far is relevant. Still less than Villa and Arsenal mind. And less than half that of chelsea n utd n a third of city
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when was this last updated
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fack knows the title says 92/93 but the tables 2003 to date. Theyre usually up to date to the last transfer window. But maybe its only from 2003.
Sign in if you want to comment
Europes Biggest Net Spenders Since 2015
Page 1 of 2
posted on 23/1/20
That’s a list of some proper european giants...and dross like Brighton. The fact they are in there shows how wrong English football is. #moneyball
posted on 23/1/20
Doing it right way
Liverpool
posted on 23/1/20
ah fack missed a word
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 1 minute ago
ah fack missed a word
----------------------------------------------------------------------
was it albatross?
posted on 23/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/1/20
What stands out to me is look at last 5 years of honours between chelsea and liverpool and then look at spurs who are only 3 and 6 places behind them.
I would be furious with the mismanagement at that club.
posted on 23/1/20
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/jan/22/manchester-city-financial-fair-play-breaches-2012-13-accounting-sponsorships-uefa-champions-league
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 12 minutes ago
Doing it right way
Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
absolutely had barcas pants down tbf
posted on 23/1/20
Brighton jeez
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 12 minutes ago
Doing it right way
Liverpool
----------------------------------------------------------------------
absolutely had barcas pants down tbf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s worse than Pogba in terms of wasting money. 130m for Coutinho
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 5 minutes ago
Getting a lot of money for a couple of players has made a big difference to Liverpool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We only got a lot of money for one player. We probably still wouldn't make the top 10 if we took that out.
posted on 23/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/1/20
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 5 minutes ago
Getting a lot of money for a couple of players has made a big difference to Liverpool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We only got a lot of money for one player. We probably still wouldn't make the top 10 if we took that out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed.
Just as impressed by the money we got for players like Ibe, Solanke, etc.
I would imagine Harry Wilsons value has grown quite a bit also if he isn't in Klopps long term plans.
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Cal Neva - Lisa For Leader (U11544)
posted 5 minutes ago
Getting a lot of money for a couple of players has made a big difference to Liverpool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We only got a lot of money for one player. We probably still wouldn't make the top 10 if we took that out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Over £200 m for Suarez and Coutinho?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
suarez was sold in 2014
posted on 23/1/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 23/1/20
How much would people expect us to want for Harry Wilson if he was let go ?
20, 30, mill?
posted on 23/1/20
hes better than solanke so 35mil pls bournemouth
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Taki Minamino (U20650)
posted 19 seconds ago
hes better than solanke so 35mil pls bournemouth
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe.
Isnt he now Bournemouths leading goalscorer ?
posted on 23/1/20
Can we do a net spend table since the start of the Premiership, would love to see a comparison table
posted on 23/1/20
comment by gunnersaurus rex (U21846)
posted 2 minutes ago
Can we do a net spend table since the start of the Premiership, would love to see a comparison table
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do the Premiership? It ended in 2007.
posted on 23/1/20
comment by gunnersaurus rex (U21846)
posted 3 minutes ago
Can we do a net spend table since the start of the Premiership, would love to see a comparison table
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointless to go much beyond 2015.
As it would have very little relevance to what's going on now.
posted on 23/1/20
I would imagine City, United, Chelsea and possibly Arsenal would make up the top 4 of highest spenders net, since the PL started.
posted on 23/1/20
https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-1992-to-date/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-1992-to-date
Dno if its right. Not that going back that far is relevant. Still less than Villa and Arsenal mind. And less than half that of chelsea n utd n a third of city
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-1992-to-date/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-1992-to-date
Dno if its right. Not that going back that far is relevant. Still less than Villa and Arsenal mind. And less than half that of chelsea n utd n a third of city
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when was this last updated
posted on 23/1/20
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by Inbefore (U20589)
posted 3 minutes ago
https://www.transferleague.co.uk/premier-league-1992-to-date/transfer-league-tables/premier-league-table-1992-to-date
Dno if its right. Not that going back that far is relevant. Still less than Villa and Arsenal mind. And less than half that of chelsea n utd n a third of city
----------------------------------------------------------------------
when was this last updated
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fack knows the title says 92/93 but the tables 2003 to date. Theyre usually up to date to the last transfer window. But maybe its only from 2003.
Page 1 of 2