comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 0 seconds ago
Btw-your club were asked to comment on this by the Sun and declined. Gerrard answering a question in a presser is a bit different.
--------------------------------------------
He still commented though.
Don't know about The Sun - maybe Gerrard doesn't speak to them? I don't buy it so can't be sure..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The club declined to comment-not Gerrard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly splitting hairs? Given the other issues on this topic.
I'd argue that the Manager is one of, if not the, main face of a football club
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
It’s Traynor.
They know it’s Traynor.
They pointedly used the phrase, “sporting journalism.”
I know no bears that will speak up for him so we might be doing them a favour if he goes because of this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traynor mis-translated? Or purposely asked someone to mis-translate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it matter?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It terms of effect, no - it terms of how we got here, maybe?
It's quite a claim to prove though...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that’s why they've gone ofcom. The regulator has extensive powers. If nothing else guys will be getting baws felt by bosses but they’ll have to name someone responsible. Maybe someone will take a fall for it but it will cost to do that. The agent is the most likely because everyone knows most have few scruples but you can be sure he will make it worth his while.
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
It’s Traynor.
They know it’s Traynor.
They pointedly used the phrase, “sporting journalism.”
I know no bears that will speak up for him so we might be doing them a favour if he goes because of this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traynor mis-translated? Or purposely asked someone to mis-translate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it matter?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It terms of effect, no - it terms of how we got here, maybe?
It's quite a claim to prove though...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that’s why they've gone ofcom. The regulator has extensive powers. If nothing else guys will be getting baws felt by bosses but they’ll have to name someone responsible. Maybe someone will take a fall for it but it will cost to do that. The agent is the most likely because everyone knows most have few scruples but you can be sure he will make it worth his while.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With all the hysteria on either side it's hard to judge the real story.
I reckon it was the usual journo practise of trying to spice up an interview that went far too far rather than a deliberate attempt to lie - surely journos must be aware of potential legal issues if they do that.
Tell you what though - Aberdeen fans are benefiting from all this 'deflection'....
What we can take from this it’s clearly DeBear who completed the translation for Sky.
It’s ripping out of him
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 minutes ago
What we can take from this it’s clearly DeBear who completed the translation for Sky.
It’s ripping out of him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I only speak french
Bonner de Douche, Rodders...
All this and Kenny Miller retiring too.
‘ Slightly splitting hairs? Given the other issues on this topic.
I'd argue that the Manager is one of, if not the, main face of a football club’
I don’t think it’s splitting hairs at all. Your club haven’t been slow to fire out statements in recent years over anything that’s come up. Here’s one of their players being completely and deliberately misquoted over a volatile situation and they’ve got nothing to say? Gerrard is asked a question in a press conference-he knows he has to give an answer.
Celtic haven’t mentioned it being anything to do with rangers in either of their statements. They have though stuck up for your player. You would have thought that the club would have an official stance on that, no?
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t say he was tampering with the brakes or planting a bomb. Maybe stealing dusties is a thing again. What happened hasn’t been said
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was some hysteria around that
My first thought was that it was a journo or paparazzi put a tracker on.
I saw a comment on twitter (I know) saying that this happens t a lot of Colombian players abroad after the person had said that Morelos referred to the thing as El Nino.
The person never followed it up - I really wanted to know what the background to that was...
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t say he was tampering with the brakes or planting a bomb. Maybe stealing dusties is a thing again. What happened hasn’t been said
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And no one said there wasn’t anyone below Morelos’ car-what has been said is that it’s physically impossible to get under a Lamborghini without it being jacked up.
To be fair, when you start going down the road of the ridiculous idea about dusties being taken, then it’s obvious that you know yourself the story was blown out of all proportion, and that something else was at play.
“Lets be honest here - there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Morelos hasn't been racially abused by a tiny majority of celtic fans.”
A majority of fans DeBear? Another one of those dodgy translations?
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 1 minute ago
“Lets be honest here - there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Morelos hasn't been racially abused by a tiny majority of celtic fans.”
A majority of fans DeBear? Another one of those dodgy translations?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it seems so (on a second reading).
However - 100% not intentional.
Kudos for being the only one (including me) to spot that hideous attempt at the correct grammar...
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
The silence from Rangers FC is deafening on this.
Their star player is in the brightest of spotlights between Celtic, the entire Scottish media and the biggest ppv broadcaster in Europe and they haven’t a single word to say. I find that baffling tbh.
Ofcom is just as likely to ask Sky the question which will be fudged and may never make the news again or it will take so long that Morelos will be sold on before it comes out.
Sky have a few choices.
Do nothing at all and answer only to Ofcom - most likely
Sky claim it was received with interpretation and just didn’t check it but due to GDPR regulations or some other nonsense can’t reveal their source. - likely
Sky inform Celtic privately where it came from - unlikely.
I doubt there will be any satisfactory resolution.
My thoughts for what they are worth is that Traynor has tried this on and it’s spectacularly backfired; and Rangers know it. Hence no involvement from them at all. They’ll be struggling as to how to deal with the and the CarTell problem, so they’ll just keep in the background and hope it goes away.
But it must be affecting the player. He’s been used for others gain has been manipulated.
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I got my 'wrongness' right
The silence from Rangers FC is deafening on this.
--------------------------------
Oh no - not you too Ginger
God I really hate that expression
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I got my 'wrongness' right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 16 seconds ago
The silence from Rangers FC is deafening on this.
--------------------------------
Oh no - not you too Ginger
God I really hate that expression
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry mate
'Translategate' is certainly one of the better gates we have had in recent times
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I got my 'wrongness' right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, you mis-spoke 😂
Sign in if you want to comment
Celtic still not happy.
Page 5 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 6/2/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 0 seconds ago
Btw-your club were asked to comment on this by the Sun and declined. Gerrard answering a question in a presser is a bit different.
--------------------------------------------
He still commented though.
Don't know about The Sun - maybe Gerrard doesn't speak to them? I don't buy it so can't be sure..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The club declined to comment-not Gerrard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Slightly splitting hairs? Given the other issues on this topic.
I'd argue that the Manager is one of, if not the, main face of a football club
posted on 6/2/20
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
It’s Traynor.
They know it’s Traynor.
They pointedly used the phrase, “sporting journalism.”
I know no bears that will speak up for him so we might be doing them a favour if he goes because of this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traynor mis-translated? Or purposely asked someone to mis-translate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it matter?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It terms of effect, no - it terms of how we got here, maybe?
It's quite a claim to prove though...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that’s why they've gone ofcom. The regulator has extensive powers. If nothing else guys will be getting baws felt by bosses but they’ll have to name someone responsible. Maybe someone will take a fall for it but it will cost to do that. The agent is the most likely because everyone knows most have few scruples but you can be sure he will make it worth his while.
posted on 6/2/20
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
posted on 6/2/20
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
It’s Traynor.
They know it’s Traynor.
They pointedly used the phrase, “sporting journalism.”
I know no bears that will speak up for him so we might be doing them a favour if he goes because of this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traynor mis-translated? Or purposely asked someone to mis-translate?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does it matter?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It terms of effect, no - it terms of how we got here, maybe?
It's quite a claim to prove though...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think that’s why they've gone ofcom. The regulator has extensive powers. If nothing else guys will be getting baws felt by bosses but they’ll have to name someone responsible. Maybe someone will take a fall for it but it will cost to do that. The agent is the most likely because everyone knows most have few scruples but you can be sure he will make it worth his while.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
With all the hysteria on either side it's hard to judge the real story.
I reckon it was the usual journo practise of trying to spice up an interview that went far too far rather than a deliberate attempt to lie - surely journos must be aware of potential legal issues if they do that.
Tell you what though - Aberdeen fans are benefiting from all this 'deflection'....
posted on 6/2/20
What we can take from this it’s clearly DeBear who completed the translation for Sky.
It’s ripping out of him
posted on 6/2/20
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
posted on 6/2/20
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
posted on 6/2/20
comment by NNH (U10730)
posted 2 minutes ago
What we can take from this it’s clearly DeBear who completed the translation for Sky.
It’s ripping out of him
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I only speak french
Bonner de Douche, Rodders...
posted on 6/2/20
All this and Kenny Miller retiring too.
posted on 6/2/20
‘ Slightly splitting hairs? Given the other issues on this topic.
I'd argue that the Manager is one of, if not the, main face of a football club’
I don’t think it’s splitting hairs at all. Your club haven’t been slow to fire out statements in recent years over anything that’s come up. Here’s one of their players being completely and deliberately misquoted over a volatile situation and they’ve got nothing to say? Gerrard is asked a question in a press conference-he knows he has to give an answer.
Celtic haven’t mentioned it being anything to do with rangers in either of their statements. They have though stuck up for your player. You would have thought that the club would have an official stance on that, no?
posted on 6/2/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t say he was tampering with the brakes or planting a bomb. Maybe stealing dusties is a thing again. What happened hasn’t been said
posted on 6/2/20
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There was some hysteria around that
My first thought was that it was a journo or paparazzi put a tracker on.
I saw a comment on twitter (I know) saying that this happens t a lot of Colombian players abroad after the person had said that Morelos referred to the thing as El Nino.
The person never followed it up - I really wanted to know what the background to that was...
posted on 6/2/20
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
posted on 6/2/20
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 minute ago
Celtic fans are awful quick to jump to conclusions, there was never anyone below Morelos’ car but the story on the private investigator is 100% true, it’s Traynor now...
As for surprise at us no issuing a statement, I’m more surprised we didn’t get one out for the car incident, or other times he’s been abused. But maybe we have and I’ve just taken no notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A guy was charged with breach of the peace. Bit of an odd charge for someone allegedly tampering with brakes/planting a bomb?!
And your club released a statement after the match in December.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn’t say he was tampering with the brakes or planting a bomb. Maybe stealing dusties is a thing again. What happened hasn’t been said
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And no one said there wasn’t anyone below Morelos’ car-what has been said is that it’s physically impossible to get under a Lamborghini without it being jacked up.
To be fair, when you start going down the road of the ridiculous idea about dusties being taken, then it’s obvious that you know yourself the story was blown out of all proportion, and that something else was at play.
posted on 6/2/20
“Lets be honest here - there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Morelos hasn't been racially abused by a tiny majority of celtic fans.”
A majority of fans DeBear? Another one of those dodgy translations?
posted on 6/2/20
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
posted on 6/2/20
comment by bmcl1987 (U14177)
posted 1 minute ago
“Lets be honest here - there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Morelos hasn't been racially abused by a tiny majority of celtic fans.”
A majority of fans DeBear? Another one of those dodgy translations?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, it seems so (on a second reading).
However - 100% not intentional.
Kudos for being the only one (including me) to spot that hideous attempt at the correct grammar...
posted on 6/2/20
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
posted on 6/2/20
The silence from Rangers FC is deafening on this.
Their star player is in the brightest of spotlights between Celtic, the entire Scottish media and the biggest ppv broadcaster in Europe and they haven’t a single word to say. I find that baffling tbh.
Ofcom is just as likely to ask Sky the question which will be fudged and may never make the news again or it will take so long that Morelos will be sold on before it comes out.
Sky have a few choices.
Do nothing at all and answer only to Ofcom - most likely
Sky claim it was received with interpretation and just didn’t check it but due to GDPR regulations or some other nonsense can’t reveal their source. - likely
Sky inform Celtic privately where it came from - unlikely.
I doubt there will be any satisfactory resolution.
My thoughts for what they are worth is that Traynor has tried this on and it’s spectacularly backfired; and Rangers know it. Hence no involvement from them at all. They’ll be struggling as to how to deal with the and the CarTell problem, so they’ll just keep in the background and hope it goes away.
But it must be affecting the player. He’s been used for others gain has been manipulated.
posted on 6/2/20
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I got my 'wrongness' right
posted on 6/2/20
The silence from Rangers FC is deafening on this.
--------------------------------
Oh no - not you too Ginger
God I really hate that expression
posted on 6/2/20
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I got my 'wrongness' right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 6/2/20
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 16 seconds ago
The silence from Rangers FC is deafening on this.
--------------------------------
Oh no - not you too Ginger
God I really hate that expression
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sorry mate
posted on 6/2/20
'Translategate' is certainly one of the better gates we have had in recent times
posted on 6/2/20
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by MaHeed'sNippin aka I’m the competent Wullie Collum (U3633)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by deBear (U8633)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tully 1 (U20686)
posted 3 minutes ago
"It's quite a claim to prove though..." don't need to prove anything - that's all down to Ofcom now. Once they are involved I think we can be assured that we have not heard the last of this. Sky will not certainly not wish to be on bad terms with their regulator.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It may make the difference between what type of punishment is dished out.
I'd be interested to know (as I've no idea) how much 'bite' Ofcom have with Sky...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
One thing’s for sure, it has come back to bite them on the rse.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm afraid I don't 100% share your confidence in that.
FWIW - I didn't really think the second celtic statement was pathetic and can 100% see why they would not be happy about it.
My view on journos is aligned to the Spitting Image puppet versions - for those old enough to remember.
I worded my post like that for two main reasons -
To imitate the style of the celtic poster's response to Rangers' statements in the past on here.
And secondly to 'promote' some debate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you admit you got it all wrong 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I got my 'wrongness' right
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, you mis-spoke 😂
Page 5 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9