comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 28 seconds ago
Yeah but it's different for Trump to cut off the reporter than for her to cut off him (in my opinion at least).
I think it's fair enough for her to challenge him if it's done respectfully. I just thought it was disrespectful to interrupt him while he's answering the question you asked and shows that attitude that a lot have that it's more fun to attack Trump and try and have a swing at him rather than actually just do your job and ask him questions.
I've seen the same with politicians in this country when they're questioned, they're being constantly interrupted as they try to answer. It comes across like the people asking the questions are more interested in making the politicians look bad (rightly or wrongly) than actually hearing out what they have to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect one of the reasons why she tried to interrupt him was because Trump does not allow dialogue. He will always try to shut discourse down, so he can get out the narrative he wants.
A question is asked and he in turn avoids actually answering it. Whilst this is hardly uncommon of late, she was pressing him to answer her question, and not the question Trump wanted to answer instead.
This is a decent read on the conference from the BBC’s North America editor, Jon Sopel who attended the presser:
“Contempt seemed to ooze out of every pore. Central to the president's argument is that at the end of January he stopped a lot of flights coming from China and that had saved countless thousands of American lives."
"Paula Reid from CBS pushed back forcefully, arguing that, bold move though that was, it wasn't followed through with any meaningful action in February, when testing was minimal and precious time was lost."
"The president was enraged. You could see the fury coursing through him as he was extremely rude to her (he didn't answer the detail of her arguments, though). He called her a "fake" and "disgraceful".
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52276004
It's not as if he doesn't have form here.
When NBC asked him for his message to people who are frightened due too CV19 he said "you're a terrible reporter" “you ought to be ashamed of yourself.”
https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/trump-daily-coronavirus-briefing-attack-reporter-69717997
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 7 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think all she wanted was for him to answer the question she posed to him.
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 2 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not just Paula Reid. Every reporter/broadcaster who has ever criticised him gets comparable treatment.
It was clear Trump was unwilling to answer her question, (and never did) so not sure what else she could have done to press him to answer?
Do you think she should have let him rant for a few minutes uninterrupted, avoiding the question, and after which he would then move on to the next journalist?
At least she tried to hold him to account as forcefully as possible.
Why couldn't she let him answer and ask whatever follow up when he was done talking? Isn't that the respectful way of doing it?
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why couldn't she let him answer and ask whatever follow up when he was done talking? Isn't that the respectful way of doing it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Trump will not allow follow up questions if he does not like the initial question.
Do you not think she owes him a little more respect as the country's president to not cut him off while he's answering her?
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 2 minutes ago
Do you not think she owes him a little more respect as the country's president to not cut him off while he's answering her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He wasn't answering her though. He was lying and she called him out for doing so.
Don't see that as being in anyway disrespectful. Especially given his own juvenile conduct.
Fair enough. I just think I would have been more respectful in her position and waited until he was finished and then raised my issues in a more respectful way rather than interrupting the president while he's talking.
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 1 minute ago
Fair enough. I just think I would have been more respectful in her position and waited until he was finished and then raised my issues in a more respectful way rather than interrupting the president while he's talking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you honestly believe Trump would have afforded her a follow up question after calling her a "fake" and "disgraceful"?
All for having the audacity to ask what measures his administration had put in place during the month of February to combat/prepare for a deadly disease that has now killed over 12,000 Americans?
It wasn't exactly an unfair/unwarranted question.
If you look at MSNs homepage everyday theres about 10 articles on the latest media or democrat attacking whatever Trump has said
Its always orchestrated attacks and its boring petty and juvenile
in February Pelosi was saying come to San Francisco and enjoy yourselves that how much the fakkin Democrats knew in February
comment by somethingelse (U3109)
posted 12 minutes ago
If you look at MSNs homepage everyday theres about 10 articles on the latest media or democrat attacking whatever Trump has said
Its always orchestrated attacks and its boring petty and juvenile
in February Pelosi was saying come to San Francisco and enjoy yourselves that how much the fakkin Democrats knew in February
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think thats more of an indictment of US media.
Hard to find a completely impartial broadcaster. Which Trump relies on.
Anyone critical of his administration is "fake news" thus rendering all future output unreliable. Whether it is or not irrelevant, as the narrative already set.
IMO good governance should come from the top. And a pandemic such as covid19 should transcend political divides, and place saving lives front and centre.
Trump's main priority is winning the US election, and sadly it seems people's lives and safety are considered collateral damage.
By way of example, in the month of February he held five campaign rallies. This was despite US intelligence briefing the Whitehouse the month before regarding the potential catastrophe that was on the horizon. Which they had been tracking since November 19.
Do you honestly believe Trump would have afforded her a follow up question after calling her a "fake" and "disgraceful"?
-------------------------
Perhaps not but then only one of them would have come across badly rather than both of them.
Not that it really matters though I guess.
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 3 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A reporter has absolutely the right to interrupt - if a politician is pivoting away from the question made, then it is absolutely okay for the reporter to interrupt them.
Trump often ignores questions only to pivot to points he would like to make, or irrelevant statements. The media needs to play it's part in holding him to account; too often he is left to speak any bullcrap of the top of his head or straight out lie.
Fair enough. I'm not that personally invested in defending Trump, I just sympathise with him a little when it does seem to me like people wanna attack him sometimes a little too much. That was my perception of the interaction with him and the reporter.
I get that there's a lot of emotion around the situation and the results of his actions as well too, so that's also a factor.
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 5 minutes ago
Fair enough. I'm not that personally invested in defending Trump, I just sympathise with him a little when it does seem to me like people wanna attack him sometimes a little too much. That was my perception of the interaction with him and the reporter.
I get that there's a lot of emotion around the situation and the results of his actions as well too, so that's also a factor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to this dispute, Trump and team had put on some bizarre propaganda piece - it seems to me much of the reporters were rather frustrated by this.
Jeez Wahl, you are such a misogynist.
Your comments on here read EXACTLY the same as your comments about the lovely Eva
Why do you hate women who question authority?
Do you think they should keep their mouths shut and stay in the kitchen?
It was Trump who was out of order, not the journalist.
comment by somethingelse (U3109)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
If you look at MSNs homepage everyday theres about 10 articles on the latest media or democrat attacking whatever Trump has said
Its always orchestrated attacks and its boring petty and juvenile
in February Pelosi was saying come to San Francisco and enjoy yourselves that how much the fakkin Democrats knew in February
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And on other websites they are licking Trumps ass left, right and centre. It should be equally boring and repetitive...
This is just something people perceive depending on their inclinations. Its a reason used to back up an opinion but it doesn't stand up to close scrutiny and doesn't actually make sense.
There will always be some website throwing mud or kissing ass. You can't use that as a reason for anything.
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 3 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A reporter has absolutely the right to interrupt - if a politician is pivoting away from the question made, then it is absolutely okay for the reporter to interrupt them.
Trump often ignores questions only to pivot to points he would like to make, or irrelevant statements. The media needs to play it's part in holding him to account; too often he is left to speak any bullcrap of the top of his head or straight out lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that's the thing with Trump. "Ask your question and then shut the fack up. I'll just say what I want even if it doesn't answer your question and you shouldn't interrupt me. No wonder your ratings have fallen off a cliff, what kind of journalism is this?"
Then MAGA boys show up like "but, but, but its the media's fault and they deserve it".
Its not the presidents job to correct and reprimand journalists FFS. He's clearly deflecting and bluffing his way through it all like an episode of the Apprentice.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Poolmyfinger (U12438)
posted 9 hours ago
"Prior to this dispute, Trump and team had put on some bizarre propaganda piece - it seems to me much of the reporters were rather frustrated by this"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
As they should. He's getting blasted by the media for "not doing enough" but yet they're giving other elected officials a pass for helping to spread the virus (i.e. Nancy Pelosi).
So, I applaud Trump for using their (media's) words against them. Even the President is protected by the First Amendment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was pure propaganda - made up of carefully edited (predominately) Fox News excerpts. It was a campaign video. Nothing more.
It was presented to the media, not to inform (as was the purpose of the briefing) the public but to point score. To get 'one over' his critics.
His presser yesterday was no better. Completely out of his depth. For anyone interested, watch this and draw your own conclusions:
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1250186439637295105?s=09
Trump is performing okay, as New York Governor Cuomo said, Trump has delivered for New York,with hospital ships and medical supplies, of course its cynical to be looking at the politics when anybody could die from this ,but that's something the fake news media keep bringing to the table, and Trump would be wise to ignore it and focus on delivering
Sign in if you want to comment
Fat Orange.
Page 2 of 3
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 28 seconds ago
Yeah but it's different for Trump to cut off the reporter than for her to cut off him (in my opinion at least).
I think it's fair enough for her to challenge him if it's done respectfully. I just thought it was disrespectful to interrupt him while he's answering the question you asked and shows that attitude that a lot have that it's more fun to attack Trump and try and have a swing at him rather than actually just do your job and ask him questions.
I've seen the same with politicians in this country when they're questioned, they're being constantly interrupted as they try to answer. It comes across like the people asking the questions are more interested in making the politicians look bad (rightly or wrongly) than actually hearing out what they have to say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect one of the reasons why she tried to interrupt him was because Trump does not allow dialogue. He will always try to shut discourse down, so he can get out the narrative he wants.
A question is asked and he in turn avoids actually answering it. Whilst this is hardly uncommon of late, she was pressing him to answer her question, and not the question Trump wanted to answer instead.
This is a decent read on the conference from the BBC’s North America editor, Jon Sopel who attended the presser:
“Contempt seemed to ooze out of every pore. Central to the president's argument is that at the end of January he stopped a lot of flights coming from China and that had saved countless thousands of American lives."
"Paula Reid from CBS pushed back forcefully, arguing that, bold move though that was, it wasn't followed through with any meaningful action in February, when testing was minimal and precious time was lost."
"The president was enraged. You could see the fury coursing through him as he was extremely rude to her (he didn't answer the detail of her arguments, though). He called her a "fake" and "disgraceful".
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52276004
It's not as if he doesn't have form here.
When NBC asked him for his message to people who are frightened due too CV19 he said "you're a terrible reporter" “you ought to be ashamed of yourself.”
https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/trump-daily-coronavirus-briefing-attack-reporter-69717997
posted on 14/4/20
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 7 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think all she wanted was for him to answer the question she posed to him.
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 2 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not just Paula Reid. Every reporter/broadcaster who has ever criticised him gets comparable treatment.
It was clear Trump was unwilling to answer her question, (and never did) so not sure what else she could have done to press him to answer?
Do you think she should have let him rant for a few minutes uninterrupted, avoiding the question, and after which he would then move on to the next journalist?
At least she tried to hold him to account as forcefully as possible.
posted on 14/4/20
Why couldn't she let him answer and ask whatever follow up when he was done talking? Isn't that the respectful way of doing it?
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 2 minutes ago
Why couldn't she let him answer and ask whatever follow up when he was done talking? Isn't that the respectful way of doing it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because Trump will not allow follow up questions if he does not like the initial question.
posted on 14/4/20
Do you not think she owes him a little more respect as the country's president to not cut him off while he's answering her?
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 2 minutes ago
Do you not think she owes him a little more respect as the country's president to not cut him off while he's answering her?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He wasn't answering her though. He was lying and she called him out for doing so.
Don't see that as being in anyway disrespectful. Especially given his own juvenile conduct.
posted on 14/4/20
Fair enough. I just think I would have been more respectful in her position and waited until he was finished and then raised my issues in a more respectful way rather than interrupting the president while he's talking.
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 1 minute ago
Fair enough. I just think I would have been more respectful in her position and waited until he was finished and then raised my issues in a more respectful way rather than interrupting the president while he's talking.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you honestly believe Trump would have afforded her a follow up question after calling her a "fake" and "disgraceful"?
All for having the audacity to ask what measures his administration had put in place during the month of February to combat/prepare for a deadly disease that has now killed over 12,000 Americans?
It wasn't exactly an unfair/unwarranted question.
posted on 14/4/20
If you look at MSNs homepage everyday theres about 10 articles on the latest media or democrat attacking whatever Trump has said
Its always orchestrated attacks and its boring petty and juvenile
in February Pelosi was saying come to San Francisco and enjoy yourselves that how much the fakkin Democrats knew in February
posted on 14/4/20
comment by somethingelse (U3109)
posted 12 minutes ago
If you look at MSNs homepage everyday theres about 10 articles on the latest media or democrat attacking whatever Trump has said
Its always orchestrated attacks and its boring petty and juvenile
in February Pelosi was saying come to San Francisco and enjoy yourselves that how much the fakkin Democrats knew in February
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think thats more of an indictment of US media.
Hard to find a completely impartial broadcaster. Which Trump relies on.
Anyone critical of his administration is "fake news" thus rendering all future output unreliable. Whether it is or not irrelevant, as the narrative already set.
IMO good governance should come from the top. And a pandemic such as covid19 should transcend political divides, and place saving lives front and centre.
Trump's main priority is winning the US election, and sadly it seems people's lives and safety are considered collateral damage.
By way of example, in the month of February he held five campaign rallies. This was despite US intelligence briefing the Whitehouse the month before regarding the potential catastrophe that was on the horizon. Which they had been tracking since November 19.
posted on 14/4/20
Do you honestly believe Trump would have afforded her a follow up question after calling her a "fake" and "disgraceful"?
-------------------------
Perhaps not but then only one of them would have come across badly rather than both of them.
Not that it really matters though I guess.
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 3 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A reporter has absolutely the right to interrupt - if a politician is pivoting away from the question made, then it is absolutely okay for the reporter to interrupt them.
Trump often ignores questions only to pivot to points he would like to make, or irrelevant statements. The media needs to play it's part in holding him to account; too often he is left to speak any bullcrap of the top of his head or straight out lie.
posted on 14/4/20
Fair enough. I'm not that personally invested in defending Trump, I just sympathise with him a little when it does seem to me like people wanna attack him sometimes a little too much. That was my perception of the interaction with him and the reporter.
I get that there's a lot of emotion around the situation and the results of his actions as well too, so that's also a factor.
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 5 minutes ago
Fair enough. I'm not that personally invested in defending Trump, I just sympathise with him a little when it does seem to me like people wanna attack him sometimes a little too much. That was my perception of the interaction with him and the reporter.
I get that there's a lot of emotion around the situation and the results of his actions as well too, so that's also a factor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Prior to this dispute, Trump and team had put on some bizarre propaganda piece - it seems to me much of the reporters were rather frustrated by this.
posted on 14/4/20
Jeez Wahl, you are such a misogynist.
Your comments on here read EXACTLY the same as your comments about the lovely Eva
Why do you hate women who question authority?
Do you think they should keep their mouths shut and stay in the kitchen?
It was Trump who was out of order, not the journalist.
posted on 14/4/20
comment by somethingelse (U3109)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
If you look at MSNs homepage everyday theres about 10 articles on the latest media or democrat attacking whatever Trump has said
Its always orchestrated attacks and its boring petty and juvenile
in February Pelosi was saying come to San Francisco and enjoy yourselves that how much the fakkin Democrats knew in February
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And on other websites they are licking Trumps ass left, right and centre. It should be equally boring and repetitive...
This is just something people perceive depending on their inclinations. Its a reason used to back up an opinion but it doesn't stand up to close scrutiny and doesn't actually make sense.
There will always be some website throwing mud or kissing ass. You can't use that as a reason for anything.
posted on 14/4/20
comment by Black Hawk (U16342)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Wahl Icht - (U22332)
posted 3 hours, 2 minutes ago
I'm not going to argue that he wasn't rude. But doesn't he kind of have the right to be if he wants to? He doesn't "need" to be polite to her if he doesn't want to. That's not his job. Whereas a reporter as part of their job is to be respectful and professional. Cutting off the person you're asking questions to, especially when they're the President of all people, just seems rude to me.
I don't think she was wrong to ask questions and challenge him. I just think it seemed to me like she was more interested in 'going toe to toe' with him rather than just doing her job and asking questions. And I've seen that before. I just think Trump is owed more respect than he sometimes gets.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A reporter has absolutely the right to interrupt - if a politician is pivoting away from the question made, then it is absolutely okay for the reporter to interrupt them.
Trump often ignores questions only to pivot to points he would like to make, or irrelevant statements. The media needs to play it's part in holding him to account; too often he is left to speak any bullcrap of the top of his head or straight out lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that's the thing with Trump. "Ask your question and then shut the fack up. I'll just say what I want even if it doesn't answer your question and you shouldn't interrupt me. No wonder your ratings have fallen off a cliff, what kind of journalism is this?"
posted on 14/4/20
Then MAGA boys show up like "but, but, but its the media's fault and they deserve it".
Its not the presidents job to correct and reprimand journalists FFS. He's clearly deflecting and bluffing his way through it all like an episode of the Apprentice.
posted on 14/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/4/20
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/4/20
comment by Poolmyfinger (U12438)
posted 9 hours ago
"Prior to this dispute, Trump and team had put on some bizarre propaganda piece - it seems to me much of the reporters were rather frustrated by this"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
As they should. He's getting blasted by the media for "not doing enough" but yet they're giving other elected officials a pass for helping to spread the virus (i.e. Nancy Pelosi).
So, I applaud Trump for using their (media's) words against them. Even the President is protected by the First Amendment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was pure propaganda - made up of carefully edited (predominately) Fox News excerpts. It was a campaign video. Nothing more.
It was presented to the media, not to inform (as was the purpose of the briefing) the public but to point score. To get 'one over' his critics.
His presser yesterday was no better. Completely out of his depth. For anyone interested, watch this and draw your own conclusions:
https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1250186439637295105?s=09
posted on 15/4/20
Trump is performing okay, as New York Governor Cuomo said, Trump has delivered for New York,with hospital ships and medical supplies, of course its cynical to be looking at the politics when anybody could die from this ,but that's something the fake news media keep bringing to the table, and Trump would be wise to ignore it and focus on delivering
Page 2 of 3