comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
"We can also safely say that there is nothing in the comment that implies a comparison between Liverpool and United"
I don't agree with this and I have explained why.
You disagree welshpool.
Do we really need to go over it again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I've comprehensively pointed out that your logic is flawed.
Since you didn't base your opinion in Robbing's club allegiance then how did you get a comparison with Liverpool out of a comment that mentions no clubs. Why weren't you assuming he could have been comparing United to Villa?
If I make a comment saying that the Tories are an embarrassment because of their handling of the pandemic - it is not a valid assumption to assume I am comparing to Labour, or the Greens or any other party. It means mu comment is criticising the tories. I might be doing it to wind-up tory supporters, but that doesn't mean my criticism is unreasonable.
Any attempt to infer that I am saying Labour would do it better is a faulty argument based on an incorrectly inferred assumption.
You go on about how I read things literally, but if the alternative is completely misreading something because you are making wrong assumptions then I would say it is much smarter to take a comment at face value.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
"We can also safely say that there is nothing in the comment that implies a comparison between Liverpool and United"
I don't agree with this and I have explained why.
You disagree welshpool.
Do we really need to go over it again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I've comprehensively pointed out that your logic is flawed.
Since you didn't base your opinion in Robbing's club allegiance then how did you get a comparison with Liverpool out of a comment that mentions no clubs. Why weren't you assuming he could have been comparing United to Villa?
If I make a comment saying that the Tories are an embarrassment because of their handling of the pandemic - it is not a valid assumption to assume I am comparing to Labour, or the Greens or any other party. It means mu comment is criticising the tories. I might be doing it to wind-up tory supporters, but that doesn't mean my criticism is unreasonable.
Any attempt to infer that I am saying Labour would do it better is a faulty argument based on an incorrectly inferred assumption.
You go on about how I read things literally, but if the alternative is completely misreading something because you are making wrong assumptions then I would say it is much smarter to take a comment at face value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think you have, but all you’ve done is given an opinion.
There’s no fact there.
And I’m bored of writing the same things to someone who clearly won’t ever understand why an alternative opinion is valid.
Particularly given that you have a blind spot for anything not literal.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When?
This is a lie
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He means don't state facts about him. That's only OK when he does it.
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t.
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When?
This is a lie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s the truth.
But as I say, let’s leave it shall we?
As I always do, I’m willing to give you another chance to be decent.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you blamed the thread, and blamed me explicitly ( and nobody else actually) for starting the thread. That is blaming me no matter how hard you twist it. Especially egregious since I didn't start the comment thread. I replied to you. So you started the comment thread.
You then admitted that you were blaming me (along with other people).
So when you said that you didnt blame me you were lying.
Either you were blaming me as the creator (in your opinion) of the thread, or you were blaming me as part of a group (and blaming a group still means you are blaming the individuals within that group).
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposed.
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you blamed the thread, and blamed me explicitly ( and nobody else actually) for starting the thread. That is blaming me no matter how hard you twist it. Especially egregious since I didn't start the comment thread. I replied to you. So you started the comment thread.
You then admitted that you were blaming me (along with other people).
So when you said that you didnt blame me you were lying.
Either you were blaming me as the creator (in your opinion) of the thread, or you were blaming me as part of a group (and blaming a group still means you are blaming the individuals within that group).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not, actually, and I quickly posted to make that point to ensure you didn’t think that’s what I was saying.
Seems to me you can’t admit you were wrong.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When?
This is a lie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s the truth.
But as I say, let’s leave it shall we?
As I always do, I’m willing to give you another chance to be decent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I’d like to know when please. You’re outright lying here.
Remember it’s downy my the accuser to find proof yeah.
I think you’re the one lacking decency here.
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its mad. I even showed the direct quote. Can you see any mention of other people in this quote?
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
I think you’re the one lacking decency here.
-----
I've only seen Winston going rabid and flinging abuse around the place.
Everyone has managed to stay cool, calm and collected.
Hey Winston, appears to be a common theme going on in terms of argumentative posters...
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its mad. I even showed the direct quote. Can you see any mention of other people in this quote?
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, it happens sometimes, and he can't even admit that and just move on. Imagine that?
Fields, I’m not trawling through posts just to prove it.
If you want to be decent to me from now on, great. If not, that’s your choice.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you blamed the thread, and blamed me explicitly ( and nobody else actually) for starting the thread. That is blaming me no matter how hard you twist it. Especially egregious since I didn't start the comment thread. I replied to you. So you started the comment thread.
You then admitted that you were blaming me (along with other people).
So when you said that you didnt blame me you were lying.
Either you were blaming me as the creator (in your opinion) of the thread, or you were blaming me as part of a group (and blaming a group still means you are blaming the individuals within that group).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not, actually, and I quickly posted to make that point to ensure you didn’t think that’s what I was saying.
Seems to me you can’t admit you were wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where am I wrong? Where is the mentioned of other people in this quote?
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread".
0 mention of other people. You blamed the thread and then stated that it was me who created the thread. Implying the blame was me.
You then literally said you didn't blame me. It is in the literal quote. You explicitly made it about me. You could have just said that the debate has ruined the thread. You deliberately went out of your way to explicitly refer to me (and nobody else). Why did you do this if you didn't mean to? Why did you then explicitly claim you never said this?
What an embarrassment.
Welshpool, there’s quote of me accusing you alone of ruining this thread.
In the same post I said I was partly to blame.
The same post!
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
Fields, I’m not trawling through posts just to prove it.
If you want to be decent to me from now on, great. If not, that’s your choice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not? It’s down to the accuser to provide proof, as you argued for two day the other day
I’ve been decent to you on here today. This is an outright lie. Funny seeing you stoop this low. When you’ve lost the debate and all your supposedly superior intellect can come up with is made up shiite.
Question my intellect again you clown
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
Fields, I’m not trawling through posts just to prove it.
If you want to be decent to me from now on, great. If not, that’s your choice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not? It’s down to the accuser to provide proof, as you argued for two day the other day
I’ve been decent to you on here today. This is an outright lie. Funny seeing you stoop this low. When you’ve lost the debate and all your supposedly superior intellect can come up with is made up shiite.
Question my intellect again you clown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, I’m fine with not providing proof. Go ahead and deny it. Whatever you like.
Sign in if you want to comment
Pool Gang V Winston
Page 13 of 41
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
"We can also safely say that there is nothing in the comment that implies a comparison between Liverpool and United"
I don't agree with this and I have explained why.
You disagree welshpool.
Do we really need to go over it again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I've comprehensively pointed out that your logic is flawed.
Since you didn't base your opinion in Robbing's club allegiance then how did you get a comparison with Liverpool out of a comment that mentions no clubs. Why weren't you assuming he could have been comparing United to Villa?
If I make a comment saying that the Tories are an embarrassment because of their handling of the pandemic - it is not a valid assumption to assume I am comparing to Labour, or the Greens or any other party. It means mu comment is criticising the tories. I might be doing it to wind-up tory supporters, but that doesn't mean my criticism is unreasonable.
Any attempt to infer that I am saying Labour would do it better is a faulty argument based on an incorrectly inferred assumption.
You go on about how I read things literally, but if the alternative is completely misreading something because you are making wrong assumptions then I would say it is much smarter to take a comment at face value.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
posted on 23/5/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
"We can also safely say that there is nothing in the comment that implies a comparison between Liverpool and United"
I don't agree with this and I have explained why.
You disagree welshpool.
Do we really need to go over it again?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And I've comprehensively pointed out that your logic is flawed.
Since you didn't base your opinion in Robbing's club allegiance then how did you get a comparison with Liverpool out of a comment that mentions no clubs. Why weren't you assuming he could have been comparing United to Villa?
If I make a comment saying that the Tories are an embarrassment because of their handling of the pandemic - it is not a valid assumption to assume I am comparing to Labour, or the Greens or any other party. It means mu comment is criticising the tories. I might be doing it to wind-up tory supporters, but that doesn't mean my criticism is unreasonable.
Any attempt to infer that I am saying Labour would do it better is a faulty argument based on an incorrectly inferred assumption.
You go on about how I read things literally, but if the alternative is completely misreading something because you are making wrong assumptions then I would say it is much smarter to take a comment at face value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think you have, but all you’ve done is given an opinion.
There’s no fact there.
And I’m bored of writing the same things to someone who clearly won’t ever understand why an alternative opinion is valid.
Particularly given that you have a blind spot for anything not literal.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When?
This is a lie
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He means don't state facts about him. That's only OK when he does it.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When?
This is a lie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s the truth.
But as I say, let’s leave it shall we?
As I always do, I’m willing to give you another chance to be decent.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you blamed the thread, and blamed me explicitly ( and nobody else actually) for starting the thread. That is blaming me no matter how hard you twist it. Especially egregious since I didn't start the comment thread. I replied to you. So you started the comment thread.
You then admitted that you were blaming me (along with other people).
So when you said that you didnt blame me you were lying.
Either you were blaming me as the creator (in your opinion) of the thread, or you were blaming me as part of a group (and blaming a group still means you are blaming the individuals within that group).
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I didn’t.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposed.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you blamed the thread, and blamed me explicitly ( and nobody else actually) for starting the thread. That is blaming me no matter how hard you twist it. Especially egregious since I didn't start the comment thread. I replied to you. So you started the comment thread.
You then admitted that you were blaming me (along with other people).
So when you said that you didnt blame me you were lying.
Either you were blaming me as the creator (in your opinion) of the thread, or you were blaming me as part of a group (and blaming a group still means you are blaming the individuals within that group).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not, actually, and I quickly posted to make that point to ensure you didn’t think that’s what I was saying.
Seems to me you can’t admit you were wrong.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 51 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 34 seconds ago
Winston
If you want to co to use this discussion I suggest you stop the troll comments about intellect. They are insulting. abusive and will not be tolerated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Will not be tolerated.
As I said, you stop the personal attacks on me and we can move on. Happily.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where have I attacked you personally on this article?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Many, many personal comments.
If you want to stop that and stick to the topic that’s great. I will too.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When?
This is a lie
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s the truth.
But as I say, let’s leave it shall we?
As I always do, I’m willing to give you another chance to be decent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I’d like to know when please. You’re outright lying here.
Remember it’s downy my the accuser to find proof yeah.
I think you’re the one lacking decency here.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its mad. I even showed the direct quote. Can you see any mention of other people in this quote?
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
posted on 23/5/20
I think you’re the one lacking decency here.
-----
I've only seen Winston going rabid and flinging abuse around the place.
Everyone has managed to stay cool, calm and collected.
posted on 23/5/20
Hey Winston, appears to be a common theme going on in terms of argumentative posters...
posted on 23/5/20
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Thor (U22388)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except you did say it. Can't you even admit this?
Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Its mad. I even showed the direct quote. Can you see any mention of other people in this quote?
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, it happens sometimes, and he can't even admit that and just move on. Imagine that?
posted on 23/5/20
Fields, I’m not trawling through posts just to prove it.
If you want to be decent to me from now on, great. If not, that’s your choice.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
Welshpool, that's not a lie, it's a misunderstanding about what eachother meant.
Calling it a lie is pathetic.
If I said 'you ruined the thread' then in my view, I'd be saying that you alone are responsible.
So when I denied saying it, that's what I was denying - rightly or wrongly.
That isn't lying and ffs, I was actually being decent about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you, or did you not write that I had ruined this thread - in a post that literally makes no mention of other people? Even if you meant that I was one of many, that still means you said I ruined the thread.
Did you then say that you didn't say such a thing?
Since the answer to both of these is yes then one of then the second one cannot be true. Either you accidentally wrote it (or somehow forgot what you wrote a couple minutes earlier) and made a mistake - or you deliberately wrote it and it is a lie.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I didn't.
I did not at any point write that you had ruined the thread without the mention of other people.
You made a mistake. I said the debate ruined the thread. I said you started the debate.
That absolutely does not equate to saying that you ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you blamed the thread, and blamed me explicitly ( and nobody else actually) for starting the thread. That is blaming me no matter how hard you twist it. Especially egregious since I didn't start the comment thread. I replied to you. So you started the comment thread.
You then admitted that you were blaming me (along with other people).
So when you said that you didnt blame me you were lying.
Either you were blaming me as the creator (in your opinion) of the thread, or you were blaming me as part of a group (and blaming a group still means you are blaming the individuals within that group).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s not, actually, and I quickly posted to make that point to ensure you didn’t think that’s what I was saying.
Seems to me you can’t admit you were wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where am I wrong? Where is the mentioned of other people in this quote?
"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread".
0 mention of other people. You blamed the thread and then stated that it was me who created the thread. Implying the blame was me.
You then literally said you didn't blame me. It is in the literal quote. You explicitly made it about me. You could have just said that the debate has ruined the thread. You deliberately went out of your way to explicitly refer to me (and nobody else). Why did you do this if you didn't mean to? Why did you then explicitly claim you never said this?
What an embarrassment.
posted on 23/5/20
Welshpool, there’s quote of me accusing you alone of ruining this thread.
posted on 23/5/20
In the same post I said I was partly to blame.
The same post!
posted on 23/5/20
Op for the title change.
posted on 23/5/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
Fields, I’m not trawling through posts just to prove it.
If you want to be decent to me from now on, great. If not, that’s your choice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not? It’s down to the accuser to provide proof, as you argued for two day the other day
I’ve been decent to you on here today. This is an outright lie. Funny seeing you stoop this low. When you’ve lost the debate and all your supposedly superior intellect can come up with is made up shiite.
Question my intellect again you clown
posted on 23/5/20
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 seconds ago
Fields, I’m not trawling through posts just to prove it.
If you want to be decent to me from now on, great. If not, that’s your choice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not? It’s down to the accuser to provide proof, as you argued for two day the other day
I’ve been decent to you on here today. This is an outright lie. Funny seeing you stoop this low. When you’ve lost the debate and all your supposedly superior intellect can come up with is made up shiite.
Question my intellect again you clown
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, I’m fine with not providing proof. Go ahead and deny it. Whatever you like.
Page 13 of 41
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18