or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1009 comments are related to an article called:

Pool Gang V Winston

Page 24 of 41

posted on 23/5/20

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
No Welshpool.

What I wrote is what I meant.

You assumed I meant something else. You were wrong.

I’ve repeatedly told you this.

Keep posting the same stuff. I’ll continue to repeat the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok so you when you said "I didn't say you ruined the thread" literally a handful of comments after saying that I ruined the thread - you meant it?

So you were lying then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Except at no point did I say ‘you have ruined the thread’.

You know that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the direct quote

"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread".

Youa have literally said that my action created something that ruined the thread.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for proving me right.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
No Welshpool.

What I wrote is what I meant.

You assumed I meant something else. You were wrong.

I’ve repeatedly told you this.

Keep posting the same stuff. I’ll continue to repeat the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok so you when you said "I didn't say you ruined the thread" literally a handful of comments after saying that I ruined the thread - you meant it?

So you were lying then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Except at no point did I say ‘you have ruined the thread’.

You know that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the direct quote

"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread".

Youa have literally said that my action created something that ruined the thread.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for proving me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you admit you.said I ruined the thread.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
No Welshpool.

What I wrote is what I meant.

You assumed I meant something else. You were wrong.

I’ve repeatedly told you this.

Keep posting the same stuff. I’ll continue to repeat the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok so you when you said "I didn't say you ruined the thread" literally a handful of comments after saying that I ruined the thread - you meant it?

So you were lying then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Except at no point did I say ‘you have ruined the thread’.

You know that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the direct quote

"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread".

Youa have literally said that my action created something that ruined the thread.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for proving me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you admit you.said I ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No. Because I didn’t.

And nowhere in that quote is me saying that.

posted on 23/5/20

I’ll add that in the SAME post, I said you should admit you’re partly at fault.

Funny how you keep leaving that bit out.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
No Welshpool.

What I wrote is what I meant.

You assumed I meant something else. You were wrong.

I’ve repeatedly told you this.

Keep posting the same stuff. I’ll continue to repeat the truth.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ok so you when you said "I didn't say you ruined the thread" literally a handful of comments after saying that I ruined the thread - you meant it?

So you were lying then.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Except at no point did I say ‘you have ruined the thread’.

You know that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is the direct quote

"you picked out a rather unimportant point and turned it into a ridiculous ongoing debate that has completely ruined the thread".

Youa have literally said that my action created something that ruined the thread.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for proving me right.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you admit you.said I ruined the thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No. Because I didn’t.

And nowhere in that quote is me saying that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes there is. You confirmed this later when you said "I'm saying that a group of people have contributed to ruining this thread. You're one of them".

So once again you explicitly referred to me as ruining this thread. You do realise that when you are accusing a group of doing something then you are including everyone in that group? Especially when you single them out.

posted on 23/5/20

“ I wasn’t abusive to you at all today.

The comment about intellect was genuine.”

Funny how many people’s intellect you question when you get to a certain point in a debate. It’s a pattern.

I don’t care if you thought they were genuine. Anyone else reading will be able to see you losing the argument and resorting to questioning (with no good reason I’ll add) my intellect.

It’s not the first time. I’m not the first person. Neither will be the last time.

posted on 23/5/20

No there isn’t Welshpool.

Because saying ‘you ruined the thread’ is different to saying you’ve contributed to ruining the thread.

And I never said you ruined the thread. Not once.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 17 seconds ago
“ I wasn’t abusive to you at all today.

The comment about intellect was genuine.”

Funny how many people’s intellect you question when you get to a certain point in a debate. It’s a pattern.

I don’t care if you thought they were genuine. Anyone else reading will be able to see you losing the argument and resorting to questioning (with no good reason I’ll add) my intellect.

It’s not the first time. I’m not the first person. Neither will be the last time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really? Can’t recall doing it a single time this year.

I think you’ve imagined it.

You can think what you want. I genuinely don’t think you’re very bright.

posted on 23/5/20

Welsh

He’s basically saying twice you ruined the thread, directly and indirectly, yet denying ever saying it at the same time. Despite a quote in black and white woth him saying it.

Impressive

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
I’ll add that in the SAME post, I said you should admit you’re partly at fault.

Funny how you keep leaving that bit out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Literally doesn't matter. Whether you say one person did something, or 3 people did something and that one person is one of those three, you are still accusing them of doing it.

"Your honor, I didn't say welshpool did it"

"You said he was one of the people who did it"

"Yeah but that means I didnt say he did it"

It is nonsensical.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 40 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 minutes ago
I’ll add that in the SAME post, I said you should admit you’re partly at fault.

Funny how you keep leaving that bit out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Literally doesn't matter. Whether you say one person did something, or 3 people did something and that one person is one of those three, you are still accusing them of doing it.

"Your honor, I didn't say welshpool did it"

"You said he was one of the people who did it"

"Yeah but that means I didnt say he did it"

It is nonsensical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It does matter.

It makes it clear that my point was consistent throughout and any interpretation of the sentence you quoted as ‘you ruined this thread’ is incorrect.

posted on 23/5/20

Winston, envoke the centuries old debating rule

When debating against 3 or more people and doing replies to every question posed is impossible then walk away without feeling you lost.

By sticking around you’re showing weakness

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Welsh

He’s basically saying twice you ruined the thread, directly and indirectly, yet denying ever saying it at the same time. Despite a quote in black and white woth him saying it.

Impressive
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There’s that intellect again.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
No there isn’t Welshpool.

Because saying ‘you ruined the thread’ is different to saying you’ve contributed to ruining the thread.

And I never said you ruined the thread. Not once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it isn't. Because if you played a part in something happening then it happened because of you.

"Eric Cantona never win the league, because he only played a part in the league win so we cannot ever say he won the league"

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 17 seconds ago
“ I wasn’t abusive to you at all today.

The comment about intellect was genuine.”

Funny how many people’s intellect you question when you get to a certain point in a debate. It’s a pattern.

I don’t care if you thought they were genuine. Anyone else reading will be able to see you losing the argument and resorting to questioning (with no good reason I’ll add) my intellect.

It’s not the first time. I’m not the first person. Neither will be the last time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really? Can’t recall doing it a single time this year.

I think you’ve imagined it.

You can think what you want. I genuinely don’t think you’re very bright.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re narrowing it down to this year. You have a site wide reputation for it.

Well I genuinely believe you have your own problems. But we all know what happens when they’re brought up.You start crying again.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Robb - Fack off ‘rona (U22311)
posted 17 seconds ago
Winston, envoke the centuries old debating rule

When debating against 3 or more people and doing replies to every question posed is impossible then walk away without feeling you lost.

By sticking around you’re showing weakness
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t agree.

I’ll leave when I want. I’ll return if I choose.

It’s nice and easy for me.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 17 seconds ago
“ I wasn’t abusive to you at all today.

The comment about intellect was genuine.”

Funny how many people’s intellect you question when you get to a certain point in a debate. It’s a pattern.

I don’t care if you thought they were genuine. Anyone else reading will be able to see you losing the argument and resorting to questioning (with no good reason I’ll add) my intellect.

It’s not the first time. I’m not the first person. Neither will be the last time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really? Can’t recall doing it a single time this year.

I think you’ve imagined it.

You can think what you want. I genuinely don’t think you’re very bright.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re narrowing it down to this year. You have a site wide reputation for it.

Well I genuinely believe you have your own problems. But we all know what happens when they’re brought up.You start crying again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I assumed if it was so common then I’d have said it in the past five months.

Clearly you just made it up.

You’re getting desperate.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Welsh

He’s basically saying twice you ruined the thread, directly and indirectly, yet denying ever saying it at the same time. Despite a quote in black and white woth him saying it.

Impressive
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There’s that intellect again.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that’s not very nice, or called for.

That’s that famous none abusive Winston again

posted on 23/5/20

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
No there isn’t Welshpool.

Because saying ‘you ruined the thread’ is different to saying you’ve contributed to ruining the thread.

And I never said you ruined the thread. Not once.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it isn't. Because if you played a part in something happening then it happened because of you.

"Eric Cantona never win the league, because he only played a part in the league win so we cannot ever say he won the league"
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Saying ‘you ruined this thread’ is not the same as saying ‘you are partly responsible, along with me and others, of ruining this thread’.

They’re not the same thing no matter how desperate you claim otherwise.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Welsh

He’s basically saying twice you ruined the thread, directly and indirectly, yet denying ever saying it at the same time. Despite a quote in black and white woth him saying it.

Impressive
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There’s that intellect again.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that’s not very nice, or called for.

That’s that famous none abusive Winston again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not remotely abusive.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 17 seconds ago
“ I wasn’t abusive to you at all today.

The comment about intellect was genuine.”

Funny how many people’s intellect you question when you get to a certain point in a debate. It’s a pattern.

I don’t care if you thought they were genuine. Anyone else reading will be able to see you losing the argument and resorting to questioning (with no good reason I’ll add) my intellect.

It’s not the first time. I’m not the first person. Neither will be the last time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really? Can’t recall doing it a single time this year.

I think you’ve imagined it.

You can think what you want. I genuinely don’t think you’re very bright.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re narrowing it down to this year. You have a site wide reputation for it.

Well I genuinely believe you have your own problems. But we all know what happens when they’re brought up.You start crying again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I assumed if it was so common then I’d have said it in the past five months.

Clearly you just made it up.

You’re getting desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is mentioning your apparent problems getting desperate but you bringing up intellect not?

There’s that hypocrisy again.

“But that’s different”

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Welsh

He’s basically saying twice you ruined the thread, directly and indirectly, yet denying ever saying it at the same time. Despite a quote in black and white woth him saying it.

Impressive
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There’s that intellect again.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that’s not very nice, or called for.

That’s that famous none abusive Winston again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not remotely abusive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I found it abusive

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 17 seconds ago
“ I wasn’t abusive to you at all today.

The comment about intellect was genuine.”

Funny how many people’s intellect you question when you get to a certain point in a debate. It’s a pattern.

I don’t care if you thought they were genuine. Anyone else reading will be able to see you losing the argument and resorting to questioning (with no good reason I’ll add) my intellect.

It’s not the first time. I’m not the first person. Neither will be the last time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really? Can’t recall doing it a single time this year.

I think you’ve imagined it.

You can think what you want. I genuinely don’t think you’re very bright.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re narrowing it down to this year. You have a site wide reputation for it.

Well I genuinely believe you have your own problems. But we all know what happens when they’re brought up.You start crying again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I assumed if it was so common then I’d have said it in the past five months.

Clearly you just made it up.

You’re getting desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is mentioning your apparent problems getting desperate but you bringing up intellect not?

There’s that hypocrisy again.

“But that’s different”
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I don’t have any ‘apparent problems’.

And if you don’t understand the difference then you really are stupid.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
Welsh

He’s basically saying twice you ruined the thread, directly and indirectly, yet denying ever saying it at the same time. Despite a quote in black and white woth him saying it.

Impressive
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There’s that intellect again.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well that’s not very nice, or called for.

That’s that famous none abusive Winston again
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not remotely abusive.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I found it abusive
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then you need a dictionary.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Robbing Hoody - tell me I can't and I'll show you I can (U6374)
posted 1 minute ago
Nah it's just that Welsh is absolutely serving you. I couldn't care less about Liverpool affiliation.

Quick, tell me what I think!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Course it is Robbing.

Nothing to do with your opinion of me at all.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope. Not everything has some hiding meaning. Youre simply having an absolute mare as always having talked so much shiiiiiiiit that people are pulling your bollox apart. It's not even hard for them.

All because you had to go and tell people what another person meant despite them telling you what they acrually meant .

Absolutely fvcking bonkers.

Page 24 of 41

Sign in if you want to comment