or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 1009 comments are related to an article called:

Pool Gang V Winston

Page 20 of 41

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
“ Yeh, it’s my interpretation of your actions.

Given that you deny it every time it’s fairly clear we can’t rely on honesty from you.”

Well you are notoriously good at it

Again with everytime. Again with nothing to back it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing to back it up? Your posts are oozing anger.

posted on 23/5/20

Yes Welshpool, and those comments remain entirely accurate.

You keep removing them from the whole post to remove the context, because you’re struggling.

I accepted your opinion a long time ago. But that’s all it is, an opinion.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
Besides Winston

Who’s to say I should or shouldn’t be replying to your posts. Again you seem to be shocked you attract attention when you say thinks that are a mixture of contentious, downright stupid, false and hypocritical.

The feigned shock at this just makes you look even more silly
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where did I say I was shocked?

But if you’re fed up, maybe you shouldn’t do it and then you won’t be fed up.

Hardly difficult logic to follow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem shocked that people have fun correcting your constant stupid comments, as if people are treating you unfairly.

What do you expect?

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
“ Yeh, it’s my interpretation of your actions.

Given that you deny it every time it’s fairly clear we can’t rely on honesty from you.”

Well you are notoriously good at it

Again with everytime. Again with nothing to back it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing to back it up? Your posts are oozing anger.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Robbing’s were oozing too?

Mystic Winston’s off again.

‘It’s not what you said it’s the way you said it’

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
“ Yeh, it’s my interpretation of your actions.

Given that you deny it every time it’s fairly clear we can’t rely on honesty from you.”

Well you are notoriously good at it

Again with everytime. Again with nothing to back it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing to back it up? Your posts are oozing anger.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Robbing’s were oozing too?

Mystic Winston’s off again.

‘It’s not what you said it’s the way you said it’
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where did I suggest Robbing was angry?

Answer: I didn’t.

Only you.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 17 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
Besides Winston

Who’s to say I should or shouldn’t be replying to your posts. Again you seem to be shocked you attract attention when you say thinks that are a mixture of contentious, downright stupid, false and hypocritical.

The feigned shock at this just makes you look even more silly
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where did I say I was shocked?

But if you’re fed up, maybe you shouldn’t do it and then you won’t be fed up.

Hardly difficult logic to follow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You seem shocked that people have fun correcting your constant stupid comments, as if people are treating you unfairly.

What do you expect?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I haven’t made any stupid arguments.

I merely suggested that it’s strange for someone apparently fed up by me to keep coming back to me for more ‘debate’.

But here you are.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 45 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 5 minutes ago
“ Yeh, it’s my interpretation of your actions.

Given that you deny it every time it’s fairly clear we can’t rely on honesty from you.”

Well you are notoriously good at it

Again with everytime. Again with nothing to back it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing to back it up? Your posts are oozing anger.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like Robbing’s were oozing too?

Mystic Winston’s off again.

‘It’s not what you said it’s the way you said it’
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where did I suggest Robbing was angry?

Answer: I didn’t.

Only you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I did t day you said he was angry, I asked if Robbing’s posts were oozing too seeing as they were packed with hidden meaning.

Fed up of your attitude dopey. For someone who bangs on about what people don’t say how are you not getting that?

And Robbing, and plenty of others

posted on 23/5/20

They weren’t oozing or packed with hidden meaning.

Just another example of you still not understanding the actual point I was making.

And again, if you’re fed up of my attitude, why choose to engage with me again and again?

Seems you can’t help yourself. Obsessed.

posted on 23/5/20

“I haven’t made any stupid arguments”

The stupidest argument out forward not this article so far

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“I haven’t made any stupid arguments”

The stupidest argument out forward not this article so far
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Coming from you, this is quite amusing.

posted on 23/5/20

“ They weren’t oozing or packed with hidden meaning”

Yet you inferred something incorrect from a comment of his, even after he clarified it with you

This was your whole argument you head case

posted on 23/5/20

I quite like Winston, not sure there many on here that fight their corner better.

Don't get the grief he gets,

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ They weren’t oozing or packed with hidden meaning”

Yet you inferred something incorrect from a comment of his, even after he clarified it with you

This was your whole argument you head case
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you need to recap what I actually said.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Why have cotton when you can have silk. (U22200)
posted 2 minutes ago
I quite like Winston, not sure there many on here that fight their corner better.

Don't get the grief he gets,
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers mate. I have plenty of faults but I’d take them over some of the ones these guys have.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ They weren’t oozing or packed with hidden meaning”

Yet you inferred something incorrect from a comment of his, even after he clarified it with you

This was your whole argument you head case
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you need to recap what I actually said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“I’m not trawling through past posts”

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ They weren’t oozing or packed with hidden meaning”

Yet you inferred something incorrect from a comment of his, even after he clarified it with you

This was your whole argument you head case
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you need to recap what I actually said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“I’m not trawling through past posts”
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That’s fine. You still don’t actually understand what I said though.

posted on 23/5/20

When your words come back to haunt you

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
Besides Winston

Who’s to say I should or shouldn’t be replying to your posts. Again you seem to be shocked you attract attention when you say thinks that are a mixture of contentious, downright stupid, false and hypocritical.

The feigned shock at this just makes you look even more silly
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You forgot angry and hormonal.

Wait...that’s you

I haven’t read most of this, but give the poor guy a break, there’s the chuckle brothers here and mr-sense-of humour-bypass vs poor Winston.

Bit unsporting this chaps.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
When your words come back to haunt you
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Bless.

Except they haven’t, have they.

Im saying that you still don’t understand my point and suggested you try reading it again.

If you choose to remain ignorant, that’s absolutely fine.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ They weren’t oozing or packed with hidden meaning”

Yet you inferred something incorrect from a comment of his, even after he clarified it with you

This was your whole argument you head case
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you need to recap what I actually said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“I’m not trawling through past posts”
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That’s fine. You still don’t actually understand what I said though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s your incorrect interpretation.

We’re used to you getting it wrong though, as evidenced on this thread

Tell us the one about you making the site a better place again

posted on 23/5/20

“ If you choose to remain ignorant, that’s absolutely fine“

Everyone is ignorant but the one that can see

comment by Thor (U22388)

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
Oh look, the yapping dog is back.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 seconds ago
“ If you choose to remain ignorant, that’s absolutely fine“

Everyone is ignorant but the one that can see


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, it’s just you.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
“ They weren’t oozing or packed with hidden meaning”

Yet you inferred something incorrect from a comment of his, even after he clarified it with you

This was your whole argument you head case
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you need to recap what I actually said.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“I’m not trawling through past posts”
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That’s fine. You still don’t actually understand what I said though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s your incorrect interpretation.

We’re used to you getting it wrong though, as evidenced on this thread

Tell us the one about you making the site a better place again

----------------------------------------------------------------------

No, it’s a fact.

What you’ve described is not what I said.

posted on 23/5/20

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 9 seconds ago
“ If you choose to remain ignorant, that’s absolutely fine“

Everyone is ignorant but the one that can see


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, it’s just you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robbing, Welsh, Thor, those who voted for you, no doubt Admins (sure they’re dead happy with your quest to make the site better)

Never you though, weird

Page 20 of 41

Sign in if you want to comment