No, Bales. You’ve jumped in, misrepresenting what has actually happened. Your posts are embarrassing, and you’ve resorted to a blanket statement of “City are guilty” of the charges that UEFA brought against them.


Despite the fact that the opposite was what has actually happened.

Your posts are a joke.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by mancWoohoo - Maximus Mardius Cob-onius (U10676)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 minutes ago
City are up there with the Guildford 4 and the Birmingham 6.

Please admit you're all wrong and apologise.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don’t forget the Weatherfield One.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OJ Simpson more like.

There's none as blind as those who refuse to see.

Quite.

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
Let's see:

The UEFA Executive is made up of the CEO's of our major rivals.

The CAS panel was made up of 3 independent judges approved by both sides.

What club in their right mind would reveal commerically sensitive information to people who could illegaly benefit from it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect that City may well sue the G14 out of existence, and the clubs within it can go to the wall with them if there is any justice. Restraint of Trade cartel designed to keep rich clubs rich and prevent competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City’s plan for winning the CL finally revealed

And are you typing with a straight face when you’re going on about preventing competition and rich clubs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The whole point of the G14 was to prevent any new clubs getting even a sniff of what the members were carving up between them. Do you even think before you post? Setting up the G14 was a grubby attempt to keep the rich from sharing the spoils, even you can see that.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by *GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
Let's see:

The UEFA Executive is made up of the CEO's of our major rivals.

The CAS panel was made up of 3 independent judges approved by both sides.

What club in their right mind would reveal commerically sensitive information to people who could illegaly benefit from it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect that City may well sue the G14 out of existence, and the clubs within it can go to the wall with them if there is any justice. Restraint of Trade cartel designed to keep rich clubs rich and prevent competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City’s plan for winning the CL finally revealed

And are you typing with a straight face when you’re going on about preventing competition and rich clubs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The whole point of the G14 was to prevent any new clubs getting even a sniff of what the members were carving up between them. Do you even think before you post? Setting up the G14 was a grubby attempt to keep the rich from sharing the spoils, even you can see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

But it no longer exists. So who are you suing ffs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Those that were members, not difficult is it?

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 40 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 hours, 38 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 11 minutes ago
Let's see:

The UEFA Executive is made up of the CEO's of our major rivals.

The CAS panel was made up of 3 independent judges approved by both sides.

What club in their right mind would reveal commerically sensitive information to people who could illegaly benefit from it?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I suspect that City may well sue the G14 out of existence, and the clubs within it can go to the wall with them if there is any justice. Restraint of Trade cartel designed to keep rich clubs rich and prevent competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City’s plan for winning the CL finally revealed

And are you typing with a straight face when you’re going on about preventing competition and rich clubs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The whole point of the G14 was to prevent any new clubs getting even a sniff of what the members were carving up between them. Do you even think before you post? Setting up the G14 was a grubby attempt to keep the rich from sharing the spoils, even you can see that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everything you’re posting here pretty much sums City up, just as a single entity. Grubby indeed.

But you said you’ll sue them out of existence, they don’t exist so good luck with that.

comment by Imran The King Khan (U10026)
posted 2 minutes ago
But you said you’ll sue them out of existence, they don’t exist so good luck with that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
like that film where billy connolly was a fisherman?

We won’t be suing anyone. Wouldn’t be surprised to see a few stories start to leak about a couple of other clubs now though.

City were very quick to allow Liverpool to move on from the spying incident, that type of thing will not be allowed to happen with such little fuss again.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/12121540/jose-mourinho-ffp-dead-man-citys-champions-league-ban/amp/

Well said Jose

Let the grubby little cheats have it.

“A disgraceful decision”

And everybody knows it.

City fans, leaving aside the rights and wrongs of the rule for a moment, let me ask you this; do you believe Amazon pay their taxes?

It’s not a trick question btw, just trying to find the middle ground here.

It is a tricky question, they pay the tax they're legally required to pay.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 8 minutes ago
It is a tricky question, they pay the tax they're legally required to pay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It maybe a tricky question but it’s not a trick question

So you’re genuinely happy about Amazon’s tax record? No problem there, in your view?

Yes, they pay the tax they're legally required to pay.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8523111/MARTIN-SAMUEL-Hateful-eight-step-war-against-Manchester-City-FFP-saga.html

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 26 seconds ago
Yes, they pay the tax they're legally required to pay.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thought you were left leaning politically, but perhaps I remember that wrong.

Thanks for answering anyway, will be interested to hear what other City fans think.

I am left leaning, I answered the question as you presented it.

If you’re left leaning then it’s unlikely you’re genuinely happy about Amazon’s tax record.

If you want to pretend you are for the purposes of this discussion then that’s your prerogative but a little disappointing in all honesty.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 26 minutes ago
If you’re left leaning then it’s unlikely you’re genuinely happy about Amazon’s tax record.

If you want to pretend you are for the purposes of this discussion then that’s your prerogative but a little disappointing in all honesty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Im far from happy, I just answered your question