or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 67 comments are related to an article called:

Vidal / Eriksen

Page 1 of 3

comment by Hengy (U9129)

posted on 23/9/20

What a awful web site to try and read anything on.

I’d take eriksen back in a heart beat. Still better than all the creative players we currently have.

posted on 23/9/20

Mine was easy perhaps cos I'm on incognito mode.

posted on 23/9/20

Agree, I am also a little bit happy it's not worked out for him. Even though he was great for us and always handled things professionally, it's just quite nice to see the grass isn't always greener.

Was a strange move in the end. Obviously he wanted Barca/Madrid but in the end none of the big guns were interested. The Italian clubs just love a bargain. They'll often sign player's on frees/ low fees knowing if it doesn't work out they should still profit.

posted on 23/9/20

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 23/9/20

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 23/9/20

Comment deleted by Article Creator

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 23/9/20

be gutted if he joins a prem team though

posted on 23/9/20

Comment deleted by Article Creator

posted on 23/9/20

comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Flashy flibble (U10324)
posted 0 seconds ago
Sympathy for Christian Eriksen among Spurs fans will be in short supply right now.

The Denmark international knows full well that he upset many of his former followers by claiming that he would have a better chance of winning titles at Inter than Tottenham.

Still, it is difficult for neutrals not to feel a little sorry for Eriksen, who bagged two goals in a friendly against Pisa on Saturday and then learned 48 hours later that Arturo Vidal had arrived at Pinetina to effectively take his place in Antonio Conte's starting line-up for the Nerazzurri's Serie A opener against Fiorentina this weekend.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eriksen's San Siro stay has been a disaster to date, but it is not as if it has all been his fault.

When the coronavirus outbreak prompted a nationwide lockdown shortly after his arrival in Italy, Eriksen had yet to find a house for his young family.

"I thought of talking to Romelu Lukaku and Ashley Young, but they already had families to look after, and 14 days sleeping on someone’s sofa is too long," Eriksen told Jyllands Posten.

He ended up staying at the club's training structure and, because he was forbidden from going outside for anything other than essential trips, he would run around the parking lot basement in a desperate bid to keep himself fit.

Eriksen's eagerness to return in peak physical condition after the suspension of play was understandable. After making his Serie A debut as a starter in a 2-0 win at Udinese on February 2, he was relegated to the bench for the next three games before lockdown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Eriksen had been Inter's most noteworthy January signing, with his €20 million (£18m/$24m) transfer from Tottenham considered quite the coup for a team that was high on energy but short on creativity.

It was surprising, then, to see him used so sparingly, but even the attacking midfielder acknowledged before the resumption of the Serie A season in June that Italy had yet to see "the true Christian Eriksen".

We may never, because Vidal's transfer from Barcelona - which was eventually confirmed on Tuesday - cannot be viewed as anything but bad news for Eriksen.

It was Vidal, we have subsequently learned, that Nerazzurri coach Antonio Conte had wanted to sign in January - not Eriksen, which goes a long way towards explaining why the latter has seen so little game time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Inter's intense interest in his services played a pivotal role in Eriksen's decision to join the Italian giants, but it is telling that Conte only spoke once with the attacking midfielder before his arrival in Milan.

Evidently, it was the club, rather than the coach, who really wanted to make this deal happen. Indeed, when Conte met owner Steven Zhang for showdown talks over his own future last month, he pushed for a greater say in Inter's transfer strategy.

We are already seeing the effects of that accord, with the Nerazzurri effectively dropping their interest in Sandro Tonali, one of the most exciting prospects in Italian football, to sign the 33-year-old Vidal, a player with whom Conte won three consecutive Scudetti at Juventus.

The boss wants guarantees rather than promises; artisans rather than artists. And Vidal understands that perfectly well. He knows how demanding Conte can be but, crucially, he knows exactly what he wants from him.

Vidal established himself as arguably the best box-to-box midfielder in the world during his time in Turin. Conte is now banking on him performing the same role at San Siro, either alongside Nicolo Barella and Marcelo Brozovic in a midfield two, or just ahead of them.

Eriksen, by contrast, is less sure of where he fits into Conte's preferred 3-5-2 formation. Tellingly, he was aware right from the off that there could be systemic issues.

"I want to play where I can have the ball," Eriksen explained to the Gazzetta dello Sport shortly after his transfer. "It doesn’t matter where, but I need to stay in the middle of the pitch to create something going forward.

"Conte plays with three in the middle and it’s a bit different, but the most important thing is to have the chance to create."

He has barely had the chance to play, though, as Eriksen simply does not possess the requisite aggression – both physical and mental – that Conte simply expects of his players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The attacking midfielder is willing to work hard but he is simply not going to play with the same physicality as someone like Vidal. Conte even alluded to this perceived flaw after Eriksen was afforded just six minutes of game time in a 3-1 win over Torino on July 13.

“When I pick a player, I don’t look from the neck up," the Italian told Sky Sport Italia. "He’s committed and doing well, but I have to make decisions for the good of Inter."

And that is likely to mean the club offloading a valuable asset who has been reduced to the role of impact sub. Eriksen featured 17 times in Serie A last season, but started only eight games, and contributed just two assists and one goal.

He played just 21 minutes across the Europa League semi-final and final clashes with Shakhtar Donetsk and Sevilla, respectively, making a sale look like the most likely outcome to this marriage of inconvenience.

Inter managed to sign Eriksen for a knockdown fee because his Spurs contract was expiring and, even accounting for the economic crisis caused by the coronavirus, they are confident of making a tidy profit on a player who, in theory, is still at the peak of his considerable powers.

Eriksen's attitude may have been rightly questioned by Spurs fans towards the tail end of his time in north London, but it would be difficult to fault his application in Milan. Even Conte himself has praised the playmaker for the way in which he has attempted to integrate himself both into the team, and the group.

At the end of the day, though, while Inter wanted Eriksen, Conte most certainly did not.

posted on 23/9/20

comment by Everywhere you go always take Lamela with you. (U7905)
posted 3 minutes ago
Agree, I am also a little bit happy it's not worked out for him. Even though he was great for us and always handled things professionally, it's just quite nice to see the grass isn't always greener.

Was a strange move in the end. Obviously he wanted Barca/Madrid but in the end none of the big guns were interested. The Italian clubs just love a bargain. They'll often sign player's on frees/ low fees knowing if it doesn't work out they should still profit.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly that.

Don't remember feeling like that for Modric or Bale though so don't know why Eriksen. Other than the last year you could never question his commitment, workrate or class. Not sure why I'm bitter / enjoying his difficult spell.

posted on 23/9/20

I'm the opposite, I feel a bit sorry for him. He was an excellent player for us, and just decided that he wanted a change. Can't massively blame him. Yeah ok he looked poor the last few months.

He did look pretty stupid when none of the big clubs came in and he ended up at Inter, but I'd rather see him doing well than not.

Wouldn't take him back though, it felt like his time at Spurs came to a definite end.

posted on 23/9/20

comment by NotSoMagicJuande (U1913)
posted 9 seconds ago
I'm the opposite, I feel a bit sorry for him. He was an excellent player for us, and just decided that he wanted a change. Can't massively blame him. Yeah ok he looked poor the last few months.

He did look pretty stupid when none of the big clubs came in and he ended up at Inter, but I'd rather see him doing well than not.

Wouldn't take him back though, it felt like his time at Spurs came to a definite end.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree with this, except for the last point. If he were to come back re-motivated having realised that the grass isn't greener, i'd take him. Still think he offers something no one else in our squad can.

But he's probably on silly money now, so it'll be a non-starter.

posted on 23/9/20

I would have Eriksen back at the drop of a hat. He has still been Spurs best midfielder this century.

posted on 23/9/20

Article deleted by comment creator

posted on 23/9/20

I'm glad his struggling, the way he stopped playing for us is nothing short of mutiny.

He can rejoin us if he comes around my house and apologises to me face to face.

posted on 23/9/20

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 18 minutes ago
I would have Eriksen back at the drop of a hat. He has still been Spurs best midfielder this century.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

posted on 23/9/20

comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 19 minutes ago
I would have Eriksen back at the drop of a hat. He has still been Spurs best midfielder this century.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not often we agree Sandy, but I am with you here.

Well, for the first half of the email anyway

posted on 23/9/20

comment by MourOUTho (U22347)
posted 1 second ago
comment by sandy (U20567)
posted 19 minutes ago
I would have Eriksen back at the drop of a hat. He has still been Spurs best midfielder this century.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not often we agree Sandy, but I am with you here.

Well, for the first half of the email anyway
----------------------------------------------------------------------
*post not email

posted on 23/9/20

I’m I’m honestly indifferent to how he’s doing. He was a great player for us and although his firm dropped towards the end, overall he was an excellent signing.

I find that once a player leave Spurs I generally have no interest in how they get on.

posted on 23/9/20

I can't believe how forgiving some of you are.

If like Bale he had given everything for the club and decided he wanted to move onto the bigger and better things that were available then fair play.

However he stunk the place out for 18 months then went to a lesser club (despite many improved contracts being waved under his nose) so I hope his downward spiral continues and I don't want him back under any circumstances.

I would of given anything to play for Spurs so when I see a player disrespect the club thats me done with them regardless of how good they are.

posted on 23/9/20

Would never have Eriksen back or Poch. The only one I wanted back was Bale and we have him

comment by Hengy (U9129)

posted on 23/9/20

18 months

He got 10 goals and 17 assists in the season before last while scoring crucial goals like against Brighton.

posted on 23/9/20

comment by PawlBawron (U1055)
posted 2 minutes ago
I can't believe how forgiving some of you are.

If like Bale he had given everything for the club and decided he wanted to move onto the bigger and better things that were available then fair play.

However he stunk the place out for 18 months then went to a lesser club (despite many improved contracts being waved under his nose) so I hope his downward spiral continues and I don't want him back under any circumstances.

I would of given anything to play for Spurs so when I see a player disrespect the club thats me done with them regardless of how good they are.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I just want what is best for the club. I'll forgive him if he returned firing on all cylinders and helps us win a trophy.

I'd be surprised if he comes back to the prem though as he wanted a lifestyle change as well. More time in the sunshine.

comment by Edbo (U17933)

posted on 23/9/20

comment by Edward Elizabeth Hitler. (U14393)
posted 37 minutes ago
I'm glad his struggling, the way he stopped playing for us is nothing short of mutiny.

He can rejoin us if he comes around my house and apologises to me face to face.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Myth.

comment by Edbo (U17933)

posted on 23/9/20

Saying you're glad it hasn't worked out for him is pathetic.

Page 1 of 3

Sign in if you want to comment