JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 35 seconds ago
Who do you work for Tammy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GSK. What about you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Takeda here but have also worked for BMS, Cardinal and Gilead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that in Dublin? I know a few people who contracted over there for Takeda recently in validation. Must have been a big project on a new facility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is but I reckon that was the ex Shire plant in Dunboyne Meath you are referring to.
Takeda took over Shire in January this year. They have since sold that facility on.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 35 seconds ago
Who do you work for Tammy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GSK. What about you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Takeda here but have also worked for BMS, Cardinal and Gilead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that in Dublin? I know a few people who contracted over there for Takeda recently in validation. Must have been a big project on a new facility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, scratch my offer to you Tammy. Irish, get me a job in Ireland
Spent some time at GSK in Waterford (Dungarvan), wouldn't mind spending a few years there tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would not inflict Waterford on any man mate
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
They can't make it compulsory. Whatever your views on whether they should or not, they just can't.
There are other methods though. I'd point to the example of Poolmyfinger, who didn't trust the vaccine until he was told black people might be higher priority, at which point he was outraged that he and his family would be denied a life-saving vaccine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Best vaccine in the world if offered to me, overated dangerous rubbish if not. I have never seen a vaccine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit harsh, if someone, for whatever reason, doesn't want to take the vaccine, your saying that they are only making their decision based on false info and should be therefore shutdown, that sounds dictator-ish to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I'm saying that people who speak mistruths about this or any other vaccine should not be permitted to speak in the media.
I've heard radio shows where people have called to say something that is wrong.
The scientist on the show has told them they're wrong, but you're then hoping that the people listening have picked that up and understood.
It's so dangerous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 38 seconds ago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit harsh, if someone, for whatever reason, doesn't want to take the vaccine, your saying that they are only making their decision based on false info and should be therefore shutdown, that sounds dictator-ish to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I'm saying that people who speak mistruths about this or any other vaccine should not be permitted to speak in the media.
I've heard radio shows where people have called to say something that is wrong.
The scientist on the show has told them they're wrong, but you're then hoping that the people listening have picked that up and understood.
It's so dangerous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not asking you to take what a scientist says as gospel.
I'm asking the media to not publish or give a platform to view that are proven to be incorrect.
comment by Ole-dirty-baztard - You want ole in, ole out, in, out, in, out, shake it all about. Do the ole Koke (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
They can't make it compulsory. Whatever your views on whether they should or not, they just can't.
There are other methods though. I'd point to the example of Poolmyfinger, who didn't trust the vaccine until he was told black people might be higher priority, at which point he was outraged that he and his family would be denied a life-saving vaccine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not asking you to take what a scientist says as gospel.
I'm asking the media to not publish or give a platform to view that are proven to be incorrect.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok fair enough, but trying to get the media to not publish BS is a near impossible job, that's their bread and butter.
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
LET'S GO MENTAL
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine it is much better than 95% safe otherwise it would never get to the trial stage never mind past it.
What an absolute stupid thing to think
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
LET'S GO MENTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm all for this
comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 7 minutes ago
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not asking you to take what a scientist says as gospel.
I'm asking the media to not publish or give a platform to view that are proven to be incorrect.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok fair enough, but trying to get the media to not publish BS is a near impossible job, that's their bread and butter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That, my friend, is a good point
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - A Beekers Dozen (U2958)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (monitoring the situation) (U1132)
Sorry to hear about your loss. I'll definitely be taking the vaccine if and when I'm eligible to do so
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks mate.
It just feels like a lot of people don't care less because it affects the older generation. But they have every right to be protected.
If it were kids dying of this (god foribid), there would be far, far less anti mask/anti vax types.
The people who are unsure about the vaccine due to it's rushed nature have rightful concerns.... But these conspiracy, or worse still, political nay sayers are boiling my blood right now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be surprised at the amount of young parents who are anti-vax when it comes to having their children get the MMR vacination, some countries have seen a big increase in measles since that numpty said it gives you autism.
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
LET'S GO MENTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leaked memo from Cummings?
Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
————
Sensible policies for a safer Britain
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine it is much better than 95% safe otherwise it would never get to the trial stage never mind past it.
What an absolute stupid thing to think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's much better than 95% safe to you then?
A vaccine developed in less than 12 months, considering no vaccine has been developed in anything less than 5 years, would be deemed to be more than 95% safe to you?
He may be on his way out but thank god Donald Trump invented this vaccine
comment by Ole-dirty-baztard - You want ole in, ole out, in, out, in, out, shake it all about. Do the ole Koke (U19119)
posted 30 seconds ago
He may be on his way out but thank Donald Trump Donald Trump invented this vaccine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed it for you
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
Wasn't this essentially the governments initial stratergy?
LET'S GO MENTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine it is much better than 95% safe otherwise it would never get to the trial stage never mind past it.
What an absolute stupid thing to think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's much better than 95% safe to you then?
A vaccine developed in less than 12 months, considering no vaccine has been developed in anything less than 5 years, would be deemed to be more than 95% safe to you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine that a vast amount of resources and man hours have been thrown into development of these vaccines.Far more than development of other vaccines that take longer in time but use far fewer resources and man hours.
Just the other day on TikTok (I know right?) I saw a doctor fighting the good fight against misinformation on social media explaining that the reason vaccines normally take so long to be created can be down to two things
1) Waiting ages for funding
2) Waiting ages to find volunteers to be tested
This time round unlimited funding has been very quickly found as has volunteers. He said most of the time during waiting for vaccines, that is exactly what happens - waiting around. Nothing really happening.
This time around all those hurdles have been quickly removed. Hopefully more videos like that are circulated to counteract the absolute BS that already exists.
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
I’m getting a strange whiff of, “Haha, let’s laugh at people dying if they don’t have the vaccine, serves them right”
When in reality it’s not an anti vax thing at all, it’s just that there’s no knowing if there will be any long term affects as it is such a new drug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And of course the contrary applies. If the vaccines give problems the antis will say "see I told you so3
Sign in if you want to comment
Vaccine Hesitancy
Page 5 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 20/11/20
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 35 seconds ago
Who do you work for Tammy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GSK. What about you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Takeda here but have also worked for BMS, Cardinal and Gilead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that in Dublin? I know a few people who contracted over there for Takeda recently in validation. Must have been a big project on a new facility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is but I reckon that was the ex Shire plant in Dunboyne Meath you are referring to.
Takeda took over Shire in January this year. They have since sold that facility on.
posted on 20/11/20
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Tamwolf (U17286)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 35 seconds ago
Who do you work for Tammy?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
GSK. What about you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Takeda here but have also worked for BMS, Cardinal and Gilead.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that in Dublin? I know a few people who contracted over there for Takeda recently in validation. Must have been a big project on a new facility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, scratch my offer to you Tammy. Irish, get me a job in Ireland
Spent some time at GSK in Waterford (Dungarvan), wouldn't mind spending a few years there tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would not inflict Waterford on any man mate
posted on 20/11/20
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
They can't make it compulsory. Whatever your views on whether they should or not, they just can't.
There are other methods though. I'd point to the example of Poolmyfinger, who didn't trust the vaccine until he was told black people might be higher priority, at which point he was outraged that he and his family would be denied a life-saving vaccine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 20/11/20
Best vaccine in the world if offered to me, overated dangerous rubbish if not. I have never seen a vaccine.
posted on 20/11/20
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit harsh, if someone, for whatever reason, doesn't want to take the vaccine, your saying that they are only making their decision based on false info and should be therefore shutdown, that sounds dictator-ish to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I'm saying that people who speak mistruths about this or any other vaccine should not be permitted to speak in the media.
I've heard radio shows where people have called to say something that is wrong.
The scientist on the show has told them they're wrong, but you're then hoping that the people listening have picked that up and understood.
It's so dangerous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
posted on 20/11/20
comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 38 seconds ago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
A bit harsh, if someone, for whatever reason, doesn't want to take the vaccine, your saying that they are only making their decision based on false info and should be therefore shutdown, that sounds dictator-ish to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, I'm saying that people who speak mistruths about this or any other vaccine should not be permitted to speak in the media.
I've heard radio shows where people have called to say something that is wrong.
The scientist on the show has told them they're wrong, but you're then hoping that the people listening have picked that up and understood.
It's so dangerous.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not asking you to take what a scientist says as gospel.
I'm asking the media to not publish or give a platform to view that are proven to be incorrect.
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Ole-dirty-baztard - You want ole in, ole out, in, out, in, out, shake it all about. Do the ole Koke (U19119)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
They can't make it compulsory. Whatever your views on whether they should or not, they just can't.
There are other methods though. I'd point to the example of Poolmyfinger, who didn't trust the vaccine until he was told black people might be higher priority, at which point he was outraged that he and his family would be denied a life-saving vaccine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
posted on 20/11/20
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not asking you to take what a scientist says as gospel.
I'm asking the media to not publish or give a platform to view that are proven to be incorrect.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok fair enough, but trying to get the media to not publish BS is a near impossible job, that's their bread and butter.
posted on 20/11/20
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
LET'S GO MENTAL
posted on 20/11/20
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine it is much better than 95% safe otherwise it would never get to the trial stage never mind past it.
What an absolute stupid thing to think
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 3 minutes ago
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
LET'S GO MENTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm all for this
posted on 20/11/20
comment by AFCISMYTEAM (U14931)
posted 7 minutes ago
Another issue is that not everyone takes what these scientist say as gospel, because 1) they're only human, and make mistakes 2) we have been following 'the science' since this thing started, and we're (and most of the world) are not doing too well, hence the faith in these scientist has been diminished.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not asking you to take what a scientist says as gospel.
I'm asking the media to not publish or give a platform to view that are proven to be incorrect.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok fair enough, but trying to get the media to not publish BS is a near impossible job, that's their bread and butter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That, my friend, is a good point
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - A Beekers Dozen (U2958)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (monitoring the situation) (U1132)
Sorry to hear about your loss. I'll definitely be taking the vaccine if and when I'm eligible to do so
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks mate.
It just feels like a lot of people don't care less because it affects the older generation. But they have every right to be protected.
If it were kids dying of this (god foribid), there would be far, far less anti mask/anti vax types.
The people who are unsure about the vaccine due to it's rushed nature have rightful concerns.... But these conspiracy, or worse still, political nay sayers are boiling my blood right now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be surprised at the amount of young parents who are anti-vax when it comes to having their children get the MMR vacination, some countries have seen a big increase in measles since that numpty said it gives you autism.
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 6 minutes ago
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
LET'S GO MENTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leaked memo from Cummings?
posted on 20/11/20
Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
————
Sensible policies for a safer Britain
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine it is much better than 95% safe otherwise it would never get to the trial stage never mind past it.
What an absolute stupid thing to think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's much better than 95% safe to you then?
A vaccine developed in less than 12 months, considering no vaccine has been developed in anything less than 5 years, would be deemed to be more than 95% safe to you?
posted on 20/11/20
He may be on his way out but thank god Donald Trump invented this vaccine
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Ole-dirty-baztard - You want ole in, ole out, in, out, in, out, shake it all about. Do the ole Koke (U19119)
posted 30 seconds ago
He may be on his way out but thank Donald Trump Donald Trump invented this vaccine
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed it for you
posted on 20/11/20
Thanks Barry
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Garry Brady (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
How fun would it be if instead of a traditional vaccine, they made an anti coronavirus that was also a virus. So basically a vaccine that spreads in the same way as cornavirus.
Rules to help spread the vaccine:
1. You must remain within 1m of at least 6 people from at least 3 different households at all times.
2. You must spit at at least 5 people per day.
3. Bus and train services will be reduced to ensure overcrowding.
4. You must travel at least 100 miles per day, for non-essential purposes
5. Wearing a mask will be banned in public places
6. Pubs and nightclubs will open 24/7 and drink out to help out will also run 24/7.
Wasn't this essentially the governments initial stratergy?
LET'S GO MENTAL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 20/11/20
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Colemanballs (U22246)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 minutes ago
JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
Wow.
You want me to tell you why this vaccine would only be 95% safe?
We're done here. Thanks for effortlessly proving my points as well as showing that you absolutely will not admit when you balls up. Great work.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I do. Give me some evidence as to how this vaccine is 95% safe.
One thing I've realised about you is that you talk a good game, but that's all it really is. Seen as you're certain this vaccine is 95% safe, show me how it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine it is much better than 95% safe otherwise it would never get to the trial stage never mind past it.
What an absolute stupid thing to think
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What's much better than 95% safe to you then?
A vaccine developed in less than 12 months, considering no vaccine has been developed in anything less than 5 years, would be deemed to be more than 95% safe to you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would imagine that a vast amount of resources and man hours have been thrown into development of these vaccines.Far more than development of other vaccines that take longer in time but use far fewer resources and man hours.
posted on 20/11/20
Just the other day on TikTok (I know right?) I saw a doctor fighting the good fight against misinformation on social media explaining that the reason vaccines normally take so long to be created can be down to two things
1) Waiting ages for funding
2) Waiting ages to find volunteers to be tested
This time round unlimited funding has been very quickly found as has volunteers. He said most of the time during waiting for vaccines, that is exactly what happens - waiting around. Nothing really happening.
This time around all those hurdles have been quickly removed. Hopefully more videos like that are circulated to counteract the absolute BS that already exists.
posted on 20/11/20
comment by Geoff Tipps (U1449)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
I’m getting a strange whiff of, “Haha, let’s laugh at people dying if they don’t have the vaccine, serves them right”
When in reality it’s not an anti vax thing at all, it’s just that there’s no knowing if there will be any long term affects as it is such a new drug
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And of course the contrary applies. If the vaccines give problems the antis will say "see I told you so3
Page 5 of 8
6 | 7 | 8