Higher than Chelsea premier league attendances pre Roman
You couldn’t even sell your allocation for a FINAL so wind yer neck in.
Amazingly they charge £22.50 for a tickets so that's a good turnout.
OP was typing so furiously that he forgot complete words in his article.
How many do they usually get? The tickets were £5 adults £1 kids, when they're usually £20.
comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 5 minutes ago
How many do they usually get? The tickets were £5 adults £1 kids, when they're usually £20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahhh that would make sense. Normally 4k to 5k.
Might as well do it more often and fill the ground then, plus all the extra sales of beer and pies.
comment by King of the Gil (U7905)
posted 7 hours, 44 minutes ago
Higher than Chelsea premier league attendances pre Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were still winning FA Cups, & European cups etc then...whilst you were wondering how to replace Gazza, whilst still being five years away from winning the Mick...(which we let you win)
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
Both percentage statistics and total capacity is pointless
That's a bit rich considering how much Spurs have been rubbing it in with their new stadium - and how it is 2,062 seats more than the Emirates
No offence, I know you're a very level headed football fan who probably didn't do those shenanigans
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL
P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL
P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm...that's not to be sniffed at.
With Chelsea - I am must not sure the £1bn plus it will cost to upgrade Stamford Bridge is worth the 18,000 extra seats, especially when we probably wouldn't tolerate the decade or so of necessary penny pinching afterwards which will reduce our ability to compete for titles consistently
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL
P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm...that's not to be sniffed at.
With Chelsea - I am must not sure the £1bn plus it will cost to upgrade Stamford Bridge is worth the 18,000 extra seats, especially when we probably wouldn't tolerate the decade or so of necessary penny pinching afterwards which will reduce our ability to compete for titles consistently
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When I were a lad, 18k at the Bridge in Div 2 was champion.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
That's a bit rich considering how much Spurs have been rubbing it in with their new stadium - and how it is 2,062 seats more than the Emirates
No offence, I know you're a very level headed football fan who probably didn't do those shenanigans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more seats when the real owners the NFL use it
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not chose a team that gets lower attendances than Chelsea then?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 day, 12 hours ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not chose a team that gets lower attendances than Chelsea then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the responses answer that.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
More fans than City get in a CL Match?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 15/11/21
Higher than Chelsea premier league attendances pre Roman
posted on 15/11/21
!
posted on 15/11/21
You couldn’t even sell your allocation for a FINAL so wind yer neck in.
posted on 15/11/21
Amazingly they charge £22.50 for a tickets so that's a good turnout.
posted on 15/11/21
OP was typing so furiously that he forgot complete words in his article.
posted on 15/11/21
Sharticle of the Day
posted on 15/11/21
How many do they usually get? The tickets were £5 adults £1 kids, when they're usually £20.
posted on 15/11/21
comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 5 minutes ago
How many do they usually get? The tickets were £5 adults £1 kids, when they're usually £20.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ahhh that would make sense. Normally 4k to 5k.
posted on 15/11/21
Might as well do it more often and fill the ground then, plus all the extra sales of beer and pies.
posted on 15/11/21
comment by King of the Gil (U7905)
posted 7 hours, 44 minutes ago
Higher than Chelsea premier league attendances pre Roman
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were still winning FA Cups, & European cups etc then...whilst you were wondering how to replace Gazza, whilst still being five years away from winning the Mick...(which we let you win)
posted on 15/11/21
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
posted on 15/11/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
posted on 15/11/21
Both percentage statistics and total capacity is pointless
posted on 15/11/21
Total attendance *
posted on 15/11/21
That's a bit rich considering how much Spurs have been rubbing it in with their new stadium - and how it is 2,062 seats more than the Emirates
No offence, I know you're a very level headed football fan who probably didn't do those shenanigans
posted on 15/11/21
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
posted on 15/11/21
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL
P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
posted on 15/11/21
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL
P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm...that's not to be sniffed at.
With Chelsea - I am must not sure the £1bn plus it will cost to upgrade Stamford Bridge is worth the 18,000 extra seats, especially when we probably wouldn't tolerate the decade or so of necessary penny pinching afterwards which will reduce our ability to compete for titles consistently
posted on 15/11/21
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 1 minute ago
Yeah we hold the PL record for attendance but I think most level headed spurs fans could admit we aren’t the best supported team in the PL
P.S at our ticket prices those extra 2,062 seats is an extra £200k for the club
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmm...that's not to be sniffed at.
With Chelsea - I am must not sure the £1bn plus it will cost to upgrade Stamford Bridge is worth the 18,000 extra seats, especially when we probably wouldn't tolerate the decade or so of necessary penny pinching afterwards which will reduce our ability to compete for titles consistently
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When I were a lad, 18k at the Bridge in Div 2 was champion.
posted on 15/11/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
posted on 15/11/21
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
That's a bit rich considering how much Spurs have been rubbing it in with their new stadium - and how it is 2,062 seats more than the Emirates
No offence, I know you're a very level headed football fan who probably didn't do those shenanigans
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's more seats when the real owners the NFL use it
posted on 15/11/21
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
posted on 18/11/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
posted on 18/11/21
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not chose a team that gets lower attendances than Chelsea then?
posted on 20/11/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 day, 12 hours ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 days, 13 hours ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 26 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 3 minutes ago
comment by NPE - Finding Timo (U22712)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
After the embarrassment of not selling all your tickets for the Champions League Final, it seems the rot is setting in:-
Chelsea v Malmo - Attendance - 39,813
City v Club Brugge - Attendance - 50,288
----------------------------------------------------------------------
50,288 = 91.3% turnout at the Etihad
39,913 = 95.2% turnout at Stamford Bridge
Maybe check up some basic facts before you dunk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The capacity for league games at the Etihad is 52,300,substantially less for European games because of UEFA rulings.
Where do you get 91.3% from?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How funny that you point to uefa rulings totally ignoring that that’s the reason why chelsea only had 39,913 for the Malmö game. That’s our capacity for those games . You bloody plonker. And chelsea sold all their tickets for the cl final. That myth was debunked
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't need to say anything about your capacity being decreased by UEFA, I was just pointing out that we had 14,000 more fans at our last CL game than you did.
It's the OP who seems to think we get 12,000 for our European games, I'm simply correcting the thickcunt.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, was he being serious? Looked like a total wind up to me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why not chose a team that gets lower attendances than Chelsea then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the responses answer that.
Page 1 of 1