Cause he was right and hes a nice guy.

comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 22 seconds ago
Cause he was wrong but has comical teeth
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with this

Klopp has had a lot of bad calls from this particular ref
Over the years and just couldn't take it anymore.
Not bullying in the slightest.
Would like to see var and the refs be on the same page and be held accountable.
Too many games being ruined by ineptness.

U know when you’ve facked someone over badly and feel bad for it? So you’re nicer to them after? Thats probably why.

Think they call it guilt or sumin

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 5 minutes ago
Klopp has had a lot of bad calls from this particular ref
Over the years and just couldn't take it anymore.
Not bullying in the slightest.
Would like to see var and the refs be on the same page and be held accountable.
Too many games being ruined by ineptness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You might just be the least closeted Liverpool fan in existence

It's an incredible precedent to set really - managers can now confront officials on the pitch after the game and accuse them of having an agenda and of not being qualified enough without fear of punishment

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
It's an incredible precedent to set really - managers can now confront officials on the pitch after the game and accuse them of having an agenda and of not being qualified enough without fear of punishment
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Good point

comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
Cause he was right and hes a nice guy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

STOP Never skim an erdinger, he was great the that advert

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know (U18109)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
It's an incredible precedent to set really - managers can now confront officials on the pitch after the game and accuse them of having an agenda and of not being qualified enough without fear of punishment
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Good point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not really though is it, hes well within his right and refs demand respect when everyone knows respect is earnt. If they took responsibility they'd earn some respect.

Instead we see a blatant red card that could have broken a leg, and the refs telling klopp its not red his foots not planted on the floor. And then tells him you're not allowed to stop in the box so it cant be a pen

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 29 minutes ago
It's an incredible precedent to set really - managers can now confront officials on the pitch after the game and accuse them of having an agenda and of not being qualified enough without fear of punishment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, what an incredible precedent. Amazing, stunning, astonishing.

Out of curiosity, which qualifications did he say he was lacking? And what did he say his agenda was?

he said if he thinks thats no a penalty hes never played the game or something along those lines.

Which Clattenburg himself admitted here https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59736316

"I think we, as referees, are sometimes guilty of knowing the laws of the game but we don't understand the game.

this has been an issue for a while, especially the handball rule last year.

I think the point is it doesn’t matter how wronged klopp and Liverpool were (they were, kane should have gone s as me the game would have been very different) you still need to act professionally to the ref (in public anyway)

Now when a manager gets wronged (they will ) they can have a go at the ref after the whistle and there will be no punishments as well Klopp didn’t get any

He shouldn’t have said what he said publicly for the cameras to see

For that he should have got a punishment of sorts

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Chris Kavanaugh in the VAR should be getting absolute pelters

He must be related to David Coote who didn’t send off Pickford for injuring VVD.

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 7 seconds ago
I think the point is it doesn’t matter how wronged klopp and Liverpool were (they were, kane should have gone s as me the game would have been very different) you still need to act professionally to the ref (in public anyway)

Now when a manager gets wronged (they will ) they can have a go at the ref after the whistle and there will be no punishments as well Klopp didn’t get any

He shouldn’t have said what he said publicly for the cameras to see

For that he should have got a punishment of sorts
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because no managers have ever approached the ref "in public" before Sunday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no klopp invented it.

comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 25 seconds ago
Chris Kavanaugh in the VAR should be getting absolute pelters

He must be related to David Coote who didn’t send off Pickford for injuring VVD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
hes made his colleague look a right mug and his colleague got most the stick real time too.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 27 seconds ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 7 seconds ago
I think the point is it doesn’t matter how wronged klopp and Liverpool were (they were, kane should have gone s as me the game would have been very different) you still need to act professionally to the ref (in public anyway)

Now when a manager gets wronged (they will ) they can have a go at the ref after the whistle and there will be no punishments as well Klopp didn’t get any

He shouldn’t have said what he said publicly for the cameras to see

For that he should have got a punishment of sorts
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because no managers have ever approached the ref "in public" before Sunday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no klopp invented it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

I assumed that is what he meant when he started throwing "precedent" around.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i mean god forbid our players start surround the ref in numbers for every decision like some other prem teams, we'll have invented that next.

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know (U18109)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 5 minutes ago
Klopp has had a lot of bad calls from this particular ref
Over the years and just couldn't take it anymore.
Not bullying in the slightest.
Would like to see var and the refs be on the same page and be held accountable.
Too many games being ruined by ineptness.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You might just be the least closeted Liverpool fan in existence
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Give it a rest. Leeds have suffered bad calls this year as much or more than most. If you choose to close your eyes and not see the sad state of var and reffing in the league because spurs benefited one game then you are the mug most think you are.

comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 48 seconds ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 7 seconds ago
I think the point is it doesn’t matter how wronged klopp and Liverpool were (they were, kane should have gone s as me the game would have been very different) you still need to act professionally to the ref (in public anyway)

Now when a manager gets wronged (they will ) they can have a go at the ref after the whistle and there will be no punishments as well Klopp didn’t get any

He shouldn’t have said what he said publicly for the cameras to see

For that he should have got a punishment of sorts
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because no managers have ever approached the ref "in public" before Sunday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
no klopp invented it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was the manor of the approach and what he said (something about having a problem with him ? It’s confrontational )

Passive aggressive however you want to summarise it but he wasn’t wishing him merry Christmas was he

I thought klopp was right to question him just not in front of the cameras is all

The ref had a shocker

Absolutely Klopp is a bully, he is also a hypocrite, bad loser, and generally a disgusting human being.

He sets an appalling example, and stamps his feet like a spoilt child when the referees make his team play to the same set of rules as everybody else.

That said, after all the mass outpourings of collective media grief after Varpool dropped 2 points, I expect the refs to make amends in one of Pools next games. A dodgy pen or sending off is absolutely going to benefit the Saltypudlians in one of their next few games.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

i mean bitter billy and simon jordan must be true

comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 29 minutes ago
It's an incredible precedent to set really - managers can now confront officials on the pitch after the game and accuse them of having an agenda and of not being qualified enough without fear of punishment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, what an incredible precedent. Amazing, stunning, astonishing.

Out of curiosity, which qualifications did he say he was lacking? And what did he say his agenda was?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
He said that Tierney has a problem with him repeatedly and said that he wasn't objective - think it's pretty obvious that he's saying that Tierney has an agenda against him.

He also brought up multiple times that Tierney has never played football. Not as brazen as klopps comments about Tierney having an agenda against him but I'd say it's fair to infer from this that klopp is saying that Tierney's lack of playing experience means that he isn't equipped to make informed decisions.

comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Wessie Road (U10652)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Christopher (U20930)
posted 29 minutes ago
It's an incredible precedent to set really - managers can now confront officials on the pitch after the game and accuse them of having an agenda and of not being qualified enough without fear of punishment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, what an incredible precedent. Amazing, stunning, astonishing.

Out of curiosity, which qualifications did he say he was lacking? And what did he say his agenda was?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
He said that Tierney has a problem with him repeatedly and said that he wasn't objective - think it's pretty obvious that he's saying that Tierney has an agenda against him.

He also brought up multiple times that Tierney has never played football. Not as brazen as klopps comments about Tierney having an agenda against him but I'd say it's fair to infer from this that klopp is saying that Tierney's lack of playing experience means that he isn't equipped to make informed decisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
again something plenty of footballers and pundits have been saying for years, refs like clattenburg admitting recently.

yet cause its Klopp