Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 11 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Dude is obsessed, even has a reference to us in his username

Basically recognising city are the better team it looks like

comment by Gaffer Pranks- Aka Stiffler (U22336)
posted 14 minutes ago
Dude is obsessed, even has a reference to us in his username
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It was a reference to Chelsea trying to stop the City quad last season by winning Cup semi, winning at Etihad to delay title, and CL final

Chelsea champions league odds: N/a

Always amazes me why would a fan of neither team care?

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Both were better than Chelsea in the 80’s

comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Both were better than Chelsea in the 80’s
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At times that could be true

But the truth is also that from 77-82 Italian and Spanish clubs were at their weakest ever which is why England won so many European Cups. Only German teams and St Etienne were decent.

The best teams Liverpool had to face were Gladbach and St Etienne. The strongest teams they faced in Europe they lost to: Forest 78.9 and when Italian football recovered the great Juve side of 85

And people forget Liverpool were also thrashed by unexeceptional sides: CSKA, Widsew Lodz and Dinamo

Liverpool never beat a great side during this period

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 42 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get it, you thought Chelsea had turned it around versus Madrid and you couldn’t wait to post your ‘Chelsea overcomes unprecedented adversity to stage miracle comeback’ article. But they decked it up, snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

And now you resort to jumping on the City bandwagon, full of envy because you realise that only clubs with genuine pedigrees can finish off these miracle comebacks.

Bless.

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 1 minute ago
Liverpool never beat a great side during this period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So when you were going on about our ‘annual bye’ you meant way back in the 80’s

Desperate times

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Both were better than Chelsea in the 80’s
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At times that could be true

But the truth is also that from 77-82 Italian and Spanish clubs were at their weakest ever which is why England won so many European Cups. Only German teams and St Etienne were decent.

The best teams Liverpool had to face were Gladbach and St Etienne. The strongest teams they faced in Europe they lost to: Forest 78.9 and when Italian football recovered the great Juve side of 85

And people forget Liverpool were also thrashed by unexeceptional sides: CSKA, Widsew Lodz and Dinamo


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet here we are, the greatest English European side in history.

Don’t think this has gone as well as CFC hoped

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 16 minutes ago
Liverpool never beat a great side during this period
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not whilst madrid, barca and bayern have been in rebuild mode. Still you are Downplaying their achievement a bit I think.

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 42 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get it, you thought Chelsea had turned it around versus Madrid and you couldn’t wait to post your ‘Chelsea overcomes unprecedented adversity to stage miracle comeback’ article. But they decked it up, snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

And now you resort to jumping on the City bandwagon, full of envy because you realise that only clubs with genuine pedigrees can finish off these miracle comebacks.

Bless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep this

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
We should have played Chelsea instead.

comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Both were better than Chelsea in the 80’s
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At times that could be true

But the truth is also that from 77-82 Italian and Spanish clubs were at their weakest ever which is why England won so many European Cups. Only German teams and St Etienne were decent.

The best teams Liverpool had to face were Gladbach and St Etienne. The strongest teams they faced in Europe they lost to: Forest 78.9 and when Italian football recovered the great Juve side of 85

And people forget Liverpool were also thrashed by unexeceptional sides: CSKA, Widsew Lodz and Dinamo


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet here we are, the greatest English European side in history.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think people forget that those teams weren’t bad at all back then. It’s only since the PL and CL took turned football into greed that these teams have dropped off. It’s a totally different (ruined) landscape now.

But the truth is also that from 77-82 Italian and Spanish clubs were at their weakest ever which is why England won so many European Cups.
=======
Why is it that Europe is always going through a weak period every time Liverpool are top dogs? Only to then bounce back the moment Liverpool are out of it?

comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Both were better than Chelsea in the 80’s
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At times that could be true

But the truth is also that from 77-82 Italian and Spanish clubs were at their weakest ever which is why England won so many European Cups. Only German teams and St Etienne were decent.

The best teams Liverpool had to face were Gladbach and St Etienne. The strongest teams they faced in Europe they lost to: Forest 78.9 and when Italian football recovered the great Juve side of 85

And people forget Liverpool were also thrashed by unexeceptional sides: CSKA, Widsew Lodz and Dinamo


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet here we are, the greatest English European side in history.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think people forget that those teams weren’t bad at all back then. It’s only since the PL and CL took turned football into greed that these teams have dropped off. It’s a totally different (ruined) landscape now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
30 years from now when the current best teams have fallen from grace people will be saying "oh, you only beat Man City in that final".

comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Both were better than Chelsea in the 80’s
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At times that could be true

But the truth is also that from 77-82 Italian and Spanish clubs were at their weakest ever which is why England won so many European Cups. Only German teams and St Etienne were decent.

The best teams Liverpool had to face were Gladbach and St Etienne. The strongest teams they faced in Europe they lost to: Forest 78.9 and when Italian football recovered the great Juve side of 85

And people forget Liverpool were also thrashed by unexeceptional sides: CSKA, Widsew Lodz and Dinamo


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet here we are, the greatest English European side in history.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think people forget that those teams weren’t bad at all back then. It’s only since the PL and CL took turned football into greed that these teams have dropped off. It’s a totally different (ruined) landscape now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People also forget that these teams which the OP is so quick to denigrate didn't finish 3rd or 4th in their respective leagues, they were all national champions.

comment by Keep It Greasy - Music is the BEST (U1396)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by FieldsofAnfieldRd (U18971)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 14 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Last time we got to the final we had PSG and Napoli in our group and had to beat Bayern and Barca over 2 legs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes bit tougher than playing Panathaniakos or Dinamo Bucharest in the 80s in semi final.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Both were better than Chelsea in the 80’s
----------------------------------------------------------------------

At times that could be true

But the truth is also that from 77-82 Italian and Spanish clubs were at their weakest ever which is why England won so many European Cups. Only German teams and St Etienne were decent.

The best teams Liverpool had to face were Gladbach and St Etienne. The strongest teams they faced in Europe they lost to: Forest 78.9 and when Italian football recovered the great Juve side of 85

And people forget Liverpool were also thrashed by unexeceptional sides: CSKA, Widsew Lodz and Dinamo


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet here we are, the greatest English European side in history.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think people forget that those teams weren’t bad at all back then. It’s only since the PL and CL took turned football into greed that these teams have dropped off. It’s a totally different (ruined) landscape now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People also forget that these teams which the OP is so quick to denigrate didn't finish 3rd or 4th in their respective leagues, they were all national champions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, pre money destroying the game era was ALL champs.

comment by CFC: Quad stoppers (U20729)
posted 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
Think CL is more even given Liverpool's annual bye to the final, although City better side
----------------------------------------------------------------------