All of their coverage has been embarrassing in recent years.

I also seriously hope that they do not pay the ransom to get back in.

I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.

if thats the case we should ban tom english for being a specky gimp.

comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.

comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can imaging it would really bite for some fans to see their licence fee money being handed to Rangers for this.

comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we scrapped that? Even still if we haven't as an official broadcast partner of spfl I'd assume they be exempt

nah, why would anyone be angry about charitable donations.

you'll still moan at them, you're like the homeless guy who says they haven't eaten for days and then complains if someone gives them a big mac meal instead of a pound.

comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can imaging it would really bite for some fans to see their licence fee money being handed to Rangers for this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
why do we suddenly start caring about the press' privileges. Everyday we slaughter them for being idiots with a pen. a group that will be as sleekit as possible for their own benefit with zero consideration of their actions, damn right we should charge them, give them nothing take from them everything.

fook em, I only really tune into our own media interviews and presentations

just raging cause they haven't sold morelos for you yet.

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can imaging it would really bite for some fans to see their licence fee money being handed to Rangers for this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
why do we suddenly start caring about the press' privileges. Everyday we slaughter them for being idiots with a pen. a group that will be as sleekit as possible for their own benefit with zero consideration of their actions, damn right we should charge them, give them nothing take from them everything.

fook em, I only really tune into our own media interviews and presentations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not everyone is able to get to games or have means to pay sky to watch it. Radio will probably become a bit more popular source than its been for years especially if online streams are difficult to come by

comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can imaging it would really bite for some fans to see their licence fee money being handed to Rangers for this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well my taxes paid your old clubs debt

comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 28 seconds ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can imaging it would really bite for some fans to see their licence fee money being handed to Rangers for this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
why do we suddenly start caring about the press' privileges. Everyday we slaughter them for being idiots with a pen. a group that will be as sleekit as possible for their own benefit with zero consideration of their actions, damn right we should charge them, give them nothing take from them everything.

fook em, I only really tune into our own media interviews and presentations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not everyone is able to get to games or have means to pay sky to watch it. Radio will probably become a bit more popular source than its been for years especially if online streams are difficult to come by
----------------------------------------------------------------------
id say 90% of viewing audiences know how to stream games anyway. My auld man cant send an email but knows how to stream a game, her auld man bought a tablet pretty much exclusively to watch streamed games on it.

Rangers win again.

social media has changed everything but some people still like the papers.

I can't stand the red tops tbh.

comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 21 seconds ago
social media has changed everything but some people still like the papers.

I can't stand the red tops tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bet you love bbc though.

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can imaging it would really bite for some fans to see their licence fee money being handed to Rangers for this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
why do we suddenly start caring about the press' privileges. Everyday we slaughter them for being idiots with a pen. a group that will be as sleekit as possible for their own benefit with zero consideration of their actions, damn right we should charge them, give them nothing take from them everything.

fook em, I only really tune into our own media interviews and presentations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of my mates say similar in terms of news about Celtic but it always make me think your missing out on critical views in order to get a better idea of whats the reality.

A bit like the social media news readers that only ever get fed news that agrees with their views and sometimes leads to less critical thinking and more biased opinion's.

Not that you are guilty of this.

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by JFK - The Rebel Treble (U8919)
posted 21 seconds ago
social media has changed everything but some people still like the papers.

I can't stand the red tops tbh.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bet you love bbc though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

mate you run about the mens showers at the gym playing hungry hippos.

comment by Hoop Dream$ (U14822)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Humble Hamish (U21959)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can imaging it would really bite for some fans to see their licence fee money being handed to Rangers for this.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
why do we suddenly start caring about the press' privileges. Everyday we slaughter them for being idiots with a pen. a group that will be as sleekit as possible for their own benefit with zero consideration of their actions, damn right we should charge them, give them nothing take from them everything.

fook em, I only really tune into our own media interviews and presentations
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Some of my mates say similar in terms of news about Celtic but it always make me think your missing out on critical views in order to get a better idea of whats the reality.

A bit like the social media news readers that only ever get fed news that agrees with their views and sometimes leads to less critical thinking and more biased opinion's.

Not that you are guilty of this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dunno, i thin most of us have watched the game long enough , lets be honest pretty much all of us on here live and breath football every single day.

I never really feel "educated" from reading pundits articles, we can pretty much all make up our own opinions and lets be honest we prob have more knowledge about our clubs than any BBC journo does.

This place is better than any rag or mainstream site.

comment by Miller - Bounce Game Champion (U9310)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Gersmid (U22273)
posted 2 minutes ago
I don't think any ransom was required, they were never banned. I think it's likely the reporter who had his access revoked will move on to other areas to avoid a need to go back and hopefully a fresh start elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume they will need to pay the £25k a season for access same as everyone else. Its a ransom and would not be a proper use of licence payer funds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think we scrapped that? Even still if we haven't as an official broadcast partner of spfl I'd assume they be exempt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good if they have scrapped it. Didn't know.

I'm not sure Rangers care much about the official partners of the spfl mind 🤣

It's not so much about pundit articles though and more independent reporting.

Put it this way I was very grateful for the media when Craig Whyte and co were around.

comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 40 minutes ago
I also seriously hope that they do not pay the ransom to get back in.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope it comes out your pocket

comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted 6 minutes ago

This place is better than any rag or mainstream site.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Awww

you should thank every last one of them for saying you were deed only to pretend it happened.

comment by Lauders - 55 time predictor champion (U9757)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by Magnum (Stopping the 2) (U22391)
posted 40 minutes ago
I also seriously hope that they do not pay the ransom to get back in.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope it comes out your pocket
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've seen what comes out his pocket