Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
"Now I think the whole forum is united in thinking that the dismissal was very unfair"
"Was Tuchel dismissed unfairly?"
Effort put into this article is worse than the Chelsea & Liverpool teams at the moment
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the year before you were in UCL
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer you to my original reply.
In simple terms I think you are wrong.
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer you to my original reply.
In simple terms I think you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on what?? Tuchel is still above Klopp in the league and has a better UCL record than him this season..
comment by Michael Edwards FC {Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Now I think the whole forum is united in thinking that the dismissal was very unfair"
"Was Tuchel dismissed unfairly?"
Effort put into this article is worse than the Chelsea & Liverpool teams at the moment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea are above LFC in the league and have a better UCL record so that response doesn't quite work pal
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the year before you were in UCL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So were Chelsea
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer you to my original reply.
In simple terms I think you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on what?? Tuchel is still above Klopp in the league and has a better UCL record than him this season..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on what I said in my original response.
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the year before you were in UCL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So were Chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What in 20/21 you mean or 19/20?
They were in it in 19/20 due to winning EL
Klopp has history of doing well at a club before the walls come crashing down.
He also has relegation on his CV.
Comment deleted by Article Creator
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 9 minutes ago
Klopp has history of doing well at a club before the walls come crashing down.
He also has relegation on his CV.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it's like Jose's 3rd season syndrome. I am very confident they won't get top 4 this season.... their team is finished.
Salah probably wishes he’d not signed that new contract
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 52 seconds ago
Salah probably wishes he’d not signed that new contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder if the likes of TAA, VVD, Fabinho etc are sulking because he's on a reported 500k a week and they aren't. Sinking ship vibe about LFC now.
It's the way Chelsea operates. They're very impatient. They would have fired ten hag after two games this year.
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 4 minutes ago
Salah probably wishes he’d not signed that new contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More likely Liverpool wishes he hadn't.
Here's a thought to ponder:
If Klopp could back to July now and keep Mane, let him go for free in summer 2023, but not sign Nunez
Would he do it??
Deleting a comment because it showed you were wrong
Dearie me this site has gone down the pan
Mane wanted to go, Nunez will come good.
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 1 minute ago
Mane wanted to go, Nunez will come good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nunez is absolutely woeful
Mane was your best player
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 1 minute ago
Mane wanted to go, Nunez will come good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nunez is absolutely woeful
Mane was your best player
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not my player, but he was good for Liverpool.
Sign in if you want to comment
Klopp Vs Tuchel: Unfair Dismissal?
Page 1 of 2
posted on 8/9/22
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
posted on 8/9/22
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
posted on 8/9/22
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
posted on 8/9/22
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
posted on 8/9/22
"Now I think the whole forum is united in thinking that the dismissal was very unfair"
"Was Tuchel dismissed unfairly?"
Effort put into this article is worse than the Chelsea & Liverpool teams at the moment
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
posted on 8/9/22
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the year before you were in UCL
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer you to my original reply.
In simple terms I think you are wrong.
posted on 8/9/22
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer you to my original reply.
In simple terms I think you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on what?? Tuchel is still above Klopp in the league and has a better UCL record than him this season..
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Michael Edwards FC {Proud owner of the 5 000 000th comment} (U2720)
posted 6 minutes ago
"Now I think the whole forum is united in thinking that the dismissal was very unfair"
"Was Tuchel dismissed unfairly?"
Effort put into this article is worse than the Chelsea & Liverpool teams at the moment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chelsea are above LFC in the league and have a better UCL record so that response doesn't quite work pal
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the year before you were in UCL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So were Chelsea
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 4 minutes ago
You appear to suggest that Tuchel was dismissed on a perfermance basis alone. It has been reported that this is not the case and that there are a number of reasons as to why he was therefore no and any comparison to Klopp is unnecessary and unhelpful if you want to understand the reasoning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It just seems to me that Tuchel was unfairly axed. Should Liverpool sack Klopp too for being worse than him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer you to my original reply.
In simple terms I think you are wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on what?? Tuchel is still above Klopp in the league and has a better UCL record than him this season..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on what I said in my original response.
posted on 8/9/22
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by The Welsh Xavi (U15412)
posted 4 minutes ago
Tuchel taking over a Chelsea side in 9th were struggling to get top 4, but Klopp taking over a Liverpool side in 10th had a chance to get top 4?
Big brain logic here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No no I mean in 15/16 Liverpool were seen as a team to get in the top 4. For example they were in the UCL the year before so it was a bit of a given they should get top 4 again.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We finished 6th the year before
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But the year before you were in UCL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So were Chelsea
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What in 20/21 you mean or 19/20?
They were in it in 19/20 due to winning EL
posted on 8/9/22
Klopp has history of doing well at a club before the walls come crashing down.
He also has relegation on his CV.
posted on 8/9/22
Comment deleted by Article Creator
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 9 minutes ago
Klopp has history of doing well at a club before the walls come crashing down.
He also has relegation on his CV.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah it's like Jose's 3rd season syndrome. I am very confident they won't get top 4 this season.... their team is finished.
posted on 8/9/22
Salah probably wishes he’d not signed that new contract
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 52 seconds ago
Salah probably wishes he’d not signed that new contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder if the likes of TAA, VVD, Fabinho etc are sulking because he's on a reported 500k a week and they aren't. Sinking ship vibe about LFC now.
posted on 8/9/22
It's the way Chelsea operates. They're very impatient. They would have fired ten hag after two games this year.
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Big Deki Energy (U3338)
posted 4 minutes ago
Salah probably wishes he’d not signed that new contract
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More likely Liverpool wishes he hadn't.
posted on 8/9/22
Here's a thought to ponder:
If Klopp could back to July now and keep Mane, let him go for free in summer 2023, but not sign Nunez
Would he do it??
posted on 8/9/22
Deleting a comment because it showed you were wrong
Dearie me this site has gone down the pan
posted on 8/9/22
Mane wanted to go, Nunez will come good.
posted on 8/9/22
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 1 minute ago
Mane wanted to go, Nunez will come good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nunez is absolutely woeful
Mane was your best player
posted on 8/9/22
comment by Culèr: Mr Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 1 minute ago
Mane wanted to go, Nunez will come good.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nunez is absolutely woeful
Mane was your best player
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not my player, but he was good for Liverpool.
Page 1 of 2