comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 minutes ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The voices in Scholay's head
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Most had said that Martial probably isn't the ultimate answer, but that he is a better option than Ronaldo"
Are you just born stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Were you born stupid
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 10 minutes ago
As it stands, ETH is proceeding without him, however it is utter madness to compare the FDJ situation to Ronaldo situation when one matter is over!!!! The other we don't know as the season is ongoing.
Clutching of the highest order here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's comparing FDJ staying at Barcelona to Martial being preferred to Ronaldo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The person that brought up me being wrong on defending Ronaldo after only couple of games into season compared to a case that is finish. You can read up to find it or carry on being stupid thinking you can catch me out
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 10 minutes ago
As it stands, ETH is proceeding without him, however it is utter madness to compare the FDJ situation to Ronaldo situation when one matter is over!!!! The other we don't know as the season is ongoing.
Clutching of the highest order here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's comparing FDJ staying at Barcelona to Martial being preferred to Ronaldo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The person that brought up me being wrong on defending Ronaldo after only couple of games into season compared to a case that is finish. You can read up to find it or carry on being stupid thinking you can catch me out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does that count as comparing the FDJ situation to the Ronaldo one?
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Facking hell.
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
vv
You can have a lollipop if you really must for *guessing* early doors, but we also have to take it back for your stern defence of Ronaldo which is looking pretty rotten 8 games into the season.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Context here being I was told Martial is going to spearhead our forward. But let's miss this bit out
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
vv
You can have a lollipop if you really must for *guessing* early doors, but we also have to take it back for your stern defence of Ronaldo which is looking pretty rotten 8 games into the season.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Context here being I was told Martial is going to spearhead our forward. But let's miss this bit out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The argument at hand with Martial was that I believed Ronaldo is better and should start ahead of him.
Someone stating we do need to get another striker, what has that got to do with the above.
Show me where I have failed to grasp the idea today that wanting Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo means said individuals have not voiced that there is a need for another striker to be bought? You are having a dire mare here
This thread must never die
I believed and still to this day believe Ronaldo is the better option.
What exactly has this got to do with bringing in another striker.
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 1 minute ago
This thread must never die
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed it is very funny watching the imbeciles all now saying they knew we had little to no chance of getting FDJ.
And now it is the Ronaldo and Martial debate, looooooool.
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 1 minute ago
This thread must never die
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed it is very funny watching the imbeciles all now saying they knew we had little to no chance of getting FDJ.
And now it is the Ronaldo and Martial debate, looooooool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would anyone say we had little or no chance of getting De Jong if they didn't have any evidence? It would just be conjecture.
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 12 minutes ago
This thread must never die
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s amazing.
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drink enough of it and it won't matter
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drink enough of it and it won't matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If mrs Irish complains when I’m pissssssed I shall refer her to this comment
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drink enough of it and it won't matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If mrs Irish complains when I’m pissssssed I shall refer her to this comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by BerbaKing11 (U6256)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Marcus The Triumvir Antony (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
You can have a lollipop if you really must for *guessing* early doors, but we also have to take it back for your stern defence of Ronaldo which is looking pretty rotten 8 games into the season.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Context here being I was told Martial is going to spearhead our forward. But let's miss this bit out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WAIT...
*Now* context matters? Only now? At this point?
So do all of the factors surrounding the FDJ saga suddenly matter, too? Or is that not how this works?
You can't write "I told you so!" articles whilst stripping away all the context to what people were actually discussing regarding FDJ, and then cry "but context!" when people told you Ronaldo was past it...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you are not this stupid. The FDJ saga is finish. Over! He has come out to say he was not interested.
We have I believe potentially more than 40 games to play this season and you are telling me I was wrong about Ronaldo already??
Please confirm this and let's revisit end of season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you miss this bit from my post? You cutting bits out again? Surely not...:
"Of course, Ronaldo might turn it around - I'm happy to say I've no idea, unlike some."
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by Marcus The Triumvir Antony (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
That explains why you struggle with these things then. Though you probably shouldn’t act so arrogant when you are clearly incapable of understanding the language to the requisite level to debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you tell me do you know the definition of spearhead?
What did I say that led to you claiming it is ' blah blah' with your required level and command of the English language.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the only person that has used the term "spearhead".
So can you quote people who said that Martial would or should "spearhead" our attack, rather than saying he's a better option than Ronaldo but we ideally needed attacking reinforcements?
Sign in if you want to comment
I TOLD YOU SO
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 30 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 2 minutes ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The voices in Scholay's head
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Most had said that Martial probably isn't the ultimate answer, but that he is a better option than Ronaldo"
Are you just born stupid
----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Were you born stupid
posted on 22/9/22
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 10 minutes ago
As it stands, ETH is proceeding without him, however it is utter madness to compare the FDJ situation to Ronaldo situation when one matter is over!!!! The other we don't know as the season is ongoing.
Clutching of the highest order here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's comparing FDJ staying at Barcelona to Martial being preferred to Ronaldo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The person that brought up me being wrong on defending Ronaldo after only couple of games into season compared to a case that is finish. You can read up to find it or carry on being stupid thinking you can catch me out
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
posted on 22/9/22
This thread is grate
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 10 minutes ago
As it stands, ETH is proceeding without him, however it is utter madness to compare the FDJ situation to Ronaldo situation when one matter is over!!!! The other we don't know as the season is ongoing.
Clutching of the highest order here
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's comparing FDJ staying at Barcelona to Martial being preferred to Ronaldo?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The person that brought up me being wrong on defending Ronaldo after only couple of games into season compared to a case that is finish. You can read up to find it or carry on being stupid thinking you can catch me out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Does that count as comparing the FDJ situation to the Ronaldo one?
posted on 22/9/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
posted on 22/9/22
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
posted on 22/9/22
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Facking hell.
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
vv
You can have a lollipop if you really must for *guessing* early doors, but we also have to take it back for your stern defence of Ronaldo which is looking pretty rotten 8 games into the season.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Context here being I was told Martial is going to spearhead our forward. But let's miss this bit out
posted on 22/9/22
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
posted on 22/9/22
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
By stating those that supported Martial were arguing he should spearhead our attack.
---------------
Who are 'those' though? I am genuinely interested to know.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you are telling me you are not aware of individuals supporting the case for Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo?? It is written even here on this thread
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh I'm aware, as I am one of them (or at least I would be if Martial was ever fit).
Most if not everyone who wanted rid of Ronaldo though also thought Martial was not fit for purpose.
You seem to have real difficulty grasping this.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Show me where I have had difficulty grasping this within this convo today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
vv
You can have a lollipop if you really must for *guessing* early doors, but we also have to take it back for your stern defence of Ronaldo which is looking pretty rotten 8 games into the season.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Context here being I was told Martial is going to spearhead our forward. But let's miss this bit out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The argument at hand with Martial was that I believed Ronaldo is better and should start ahead of him.
Someone stating we do need to get another striker, what has that got to do with the above.
Show me where I have failed to grasp the idea today that wanting Martial to start ahead of Ronaldo means said individuals have not voiced that there is a need for another striker to be bought? You are having a dire mare here
posted on 22/9/22
This thread must never die
posted on 22/9/22
I believed and still to this day believe Ronaldo is the better option.
What exactly has this got to do with bringing in another striker.
posted on 22/9/22
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 1 minute ago
This thread must never die
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed it is very funny watching the imbeciles all now saying they knew we had little to no chance of getting FDJ.
And now it is the Ronaldo and Martial debate, looooooool.
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 1 minute ago
This thread must never die
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Indeed it is very funny watching the imbeciles all now saying they knew we had little to no chance of getting FDJ.
And now it is the Ronaldo and Martial debate, looooooool.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would anyone say we had little or no chance of getting De Jong if they didn't have any evidence? It would just be conjecture.
posted on 22/9/22
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
posted on 22/9/22
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
posted on 22/9/22
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
posted on 22/9/22
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 12 minutes ago
This thread must never die
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s amazing.
posted on 22/9/22
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drink enough of it and it won't matter
posted on 22/9/22
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drink enough of it and it won't matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If mrs Irish complains when I’m pissssssed I shall refer her to this comment
posted on 22/9/22
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 33 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 9 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 7 seconds ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by Irishred (U2539)
posted 17 seconds ago
This thread is grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the content we come here for
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How are you doing Irish? You going to beat the Jocks on Saturday?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m good mate and you?
Of course we will and I’ll be watching in a bar in New York
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Brilliant. They've got cars big as bars there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Guinness will be 💩 though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Drink enough of it and it won't matter
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If mrs Irish complains when I’m pissssssed I shall refer her to this comment
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by BerbaKing11 (U6256)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Marcus The Triumvir Antony (U10026)
posted 1 minute ago
You can have a lollipop if you really must for *guessing* early doors, but we also have to take it back for your stern defence of Ronaldo which is looking pretty rotten 8 games into the season.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Context here being I was told Martial is going to spearhead our forward. But let's miss this bit out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
WAIT...
*Now* context matters? Only now? At this point?
So do all of the factors surrounding the FDJ saga suddenly matter, too? Or is that not how this works?
You can't write "I told you so!" articles whilst stripping away all the context to what people were actually discussing regarding FDJ, and then cry "but context!" when people told you Ronaldo was past it...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surely you are not this stupid. The FDJ saga is finish. Over! He has come out to say he was not interested.
We have I believe potentially more than 40 games to play this season and you are telling me I was wrong about Ronaldo already??
Please confirm this and let's revisit end of season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you miss this bit from my post? You cutting bits out again? Surely not...:
"Of course, Ronaldo might turn it around - I'm happy to say I've no idea, unlike some."
posted on 22/9/22
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 45 minutes ago
comment by Marcus The Triumvir Antony (U10026)
posted 5 minutes ago
That explains why you struggle with these things then. Though you probably shouldn’t act so arrogant when you are clearly incapable of understanding the language to the requisite level to debate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you tell me do you know the definition of spearhead?
What did I say that led to you claiming it is ' blah blah' with your required level and command of the English language.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're the only person that has used the term "spearhead".
So can you quote people who said that Martial would or should "spearhead" our attack, rather than saying he's a better option than Ronaldo but we ideally needed attacking reinforcements?
Page 6 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9