comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 30 minutes ago
Kane is a quality player but haaland is another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane would do better in a 2 upfront..not physical or fast enough to lead the line effectively anymore. Needs players around him. He needs Kulu and Son. Haaland doesn't seem to need anyone
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 33 minutes ago
OP
Kane has like 200 Prem goals. Haaland has barely 20. I don't think he needs to take lectures of the likes of you on how to score goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you persist in this 'only PL goals count ' nonsense Sandy? The simple facts are that Haaland is scoring twice as many goals as Kane, albeit in a better team admittedly. However he has done it in every league he has played in, and there is every indication that he could get 50 goals or more total in every competition this season, depending on whether Pep plays him in the cups, which, even you will have to admit is insanely impressive. Nobody is saying that Kane is bad, it is just that Haaland is on another level to every striker on the planet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still hasn't scored as many goals as Kane. When he does then you can say he is a better striker. He has to do it at the top level for several years.
A year or two in a two team Gernan League, and a few games in the Prem for a financially doped club prove nothing yet.
He needs to get multiple Golden boots like Kane at club and International level to prove he is better. At the moment Ksne is still the best in the Prem.
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Struggling to think of another striker that’s looked this devastating at a similar age, R9 maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Greaves was better. He was closing in on 200 top flight goals at a similar age.
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 30 minutes ago
Kane is a quality player but haaland is another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane would do better in a 2 upfront..not physical or fast enough to lead the line effectively anymore. Needs players around him. He needs Kulu and Son. Haaland doesn't seem to need anyone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What!!! He hardly touched the ball first half today. Without his teammates laying them on a plate, he wouldn't be scoring so many.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 58 minutes ago
Haaland is just way more physical and bullies defenders. Lane uses his size well to win free kicks, and loves scoring, but haaland just plays like a dif beast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is way more complicated. Costa & Drogba to me were physical in that they wanted the CB to be in close for the tussle, the chance to turn or use them as a leverage in the jump or to win the free kick. Haaland is a different beast. Bullies by pace and movement. Rarely see a tussle, battle or endemic fouling. He has a magical ability (for a big man) and clearly has worked very hard at sorting his feet out for a ball coming in often taking fewer steps in slow motion to make sure he is making controlled contact when it arrives. In addition to his other attributes I think he is outstanding at that hence his great stats.
This comparison is kind of boring already. Haaland is just a phenomenal goalscorer, unlike anything we've seen in this league.
He doesn't have the all round game that Kane has, but he doesn't need it.
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 18 minutes ago
This comparison is kind of boring already. Haaland is just a phenomenal goalscorer, unlike anything we've seen in this league.
He doesn't have the all round game that Kane has, but he doesn't need it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
A shoe in Pep signing all about movement, energy, never say die and desire to improve attitude. Everything else (gulp) is a bonus !
You can see he's more than a penalty box player that pass for Foden's second goal was special. If he stayed here for more than a few years he would break all the records but from what his dad was reported to have said that might not be the case.
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 30 minutes ago
Kane is a quality player but haaland is another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane would do better in a 2 upfront..not physical or fast enough to lead the line effectively anymore. Needs players around him. He needs Kulu and Son. Haaland doesn't seem to need anyone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy’s right. Haaland doesn’t need anyone? He’s got KDB putting chances on a silver platter for him, all he has to do is stick a leg or a head out and it’s a goal, hence his absurdly low touch counts. Sterling used to get gifted the same chances and spunk 70% of them. Don’t make out like Haaland is doing it all on his own because if there’s one thing he’s not doing, it’s making his own chances.
He’s an excellent poacher playing in a team that dominates possession and creates lots of chance, it’s as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know sweet FA about football. Put kane in the city team and he wouldn't score half the goals that haaland does. He would just dive, moan and try to intimidate the ref. He's an embarrasment
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 33 minutes ago
OP
Kane has like 200 Prem goals. Haaland has barely 20. I don't think he needs to take lectures of the likes of you on how to score goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you persist in this 'only PL goals count ' nonsense Sandy? The simple facts are that Haaland is scoring twice as many goals as Kane, albeit in a better team admittedly. However he has done it in every league he has played in, and there is every indication that he could get 50 goals or more total in every competition this season, depending on whether Pep plays him in the cups, which, even you will have to admit is insanely impressive. Nobody is saying that Kane is bad, it is just that Haaland is on another level to every striker on the planet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still hasn't scored as many goals as Kane. When he does then you can say he is a better striker. He has to do it at the top level for several years.
A year or two in a two team Gernan League, and a few games in the Prem for a financially doped club prove nothing yet.
He needs to get multiple Golden boots like Kane at club and International level to prove he is better. At the moment Ksne is still the best in the Prem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane is nowhere near the best in the PL this season, there is a player who has twice as many goals, although he doesn't play for a financially dopey club.
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
Winning the golden boot and top assist maker award in the same season while playin for a Jose facking Mourinho team is a lot tricker than putting away tap in’s for Peps City at home to Forest and Palace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 5 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 33 minutes ago
OP
Kane has like 200 Prem goals. Haaland has barely 20. I don't think he needs to take lectures of the likes of you on how to score goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you persist in this 'only PL goals count ' nonsense Sandy? The simple facts are that Haaland is scoring twice as many goals as Kane, albeit in a better team admittedly. However he has done it in every league he has played in, and there is every indication that he could get 50 goals or more total in every competition this season, depending on whether Pep plays him in the cups, which, even you will have to admit is insanely impressive. Nobody is saying that Kane is bad, it is just that Haaland is on another level to every striker on the planet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still hasn't scored as many goals as Kane. When he does then you can say he is a better striker. He has to do it at the top level for several years.
A year or two in a two team Gernan League, and a few games in the Prem for a financially doped club prove nothing yet.
He needs to get multiple Golden boots like Kane at club and International level to prove he is better. At the moment Ksne is still the best in the Prem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He finished 11th in the Ballon d'Or whereas Kane finished 23rd. No way Kane is still the best in the PL
The highest Kane finished was 10th, expect Haaland to smash that cos he's in a different league.
Haaland has proved absolutely nothing yet, that he is a one season Prem wonder. My granny could scire goals in that financially doped team against some of the worse defenders in my lifetime.
I struggle to think of a decent defender in the Prem. The standard is at all time low.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 24 minutes ago
Haaland has proved absolutely nothing yet, that he is a one season Prem wonder. My granny could scire goals in that financially doped team against some of the worse defenders in my lifetime.
I struggle to think of a decent defender in the Prem. The standard is at all time low.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haaland finished 11th in the Ballon d'Or, so he proved his worth to the independent judges. The opinion of biased fans like you is irrelevant.
He also won the German Cup. Very likely he will win something with City this year.
Kane has won nothing with his club, nothing.
Kane is playing a defensive Conte. You cannot compare him to Haaland in a Pep team.
You can't blame Kane for dropping deep you have to blame Conte.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
Haaland has proved absolutely nothing yet, that he is a one season Prem wonder. My granny could scire goals in that financially doped team against some of the worse defenders in my lifetime.
I struggle to think of a decent defender in the Prem. The standard is at all time low.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This shows that Kane isn't anything special if he is up against the worse defenders the league has ever seen.
Haaland is just posting figures that a World class forward should achieve against poor defenders.
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
comment by Bennyville (U8058)
posted 10 minutes ago
I miss 4231
Still haven’t been the same since Eriksen’s departure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was crap for his last year. We haven’t been the same since Dembele left.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant before he downed tools. Selling Dembele in Jan was also a silly mistake.
Dembele was pretty gone by then, but I can't help think how he would have helped as a one-off game vs Liverpool in the final
Sign in if you want to comment
That's how you play cf Harry.. Remember?
Page 2 of 2
posted on 2/10/22
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 30 minutes ago
Kane is a quality player but haaland is another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane would do better in a 2 upfront..not physical or fast enough to lead the line effectively anymore. Needs players around him. He needs Kulu and Son. Haaland doesn't seem to need anyone
posted on 2/10/22
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 33 minutes ago
OP
Kane has like 200 Prem goals. Haaland has barely 20. I don't think he needs to take lectures of the likes of you on how to score goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you persist in this 'only PL goals count ' nonsense Sandy? The simple facts are that Haaland is scoring twice as many goals as Kane, albeit in a better team admittedly. However he has done it in every league he has played in, and there is every indication that he could get 50 goals or more total in every competition this season, depending on whether Pep plays him in the cups, which, even you will have to admit is insanely impressive. Nobody is saying that Kane is bad, it is just that Haaland is on another level to every striker on the planet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still hasn't scored as many goals as Kane. When he does then you can say he is a better striker. He has to do it at the top level for several years.
A year or two in a two team Gernan League, and a few games in the Prem for a financially doped club prove nothing yet.
He needs to get multiple Golden boots like Kane at club and International level to prove he is better. At the moment Ksne is still the best in the Prem.
posted on 2/10/22
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 1 hour, 4 minutes ago
Struggling to think of another striker that’s looked this devastating at a similar age, R9 maybe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Greaves was better. He was closing in on 200 top flight goals at a similar age.
posted on 2/10/22
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 30 minutes ago
Kane is a quality player but haaland is another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane would do better in a 2 upfront..not physical or fast enough to lead the line effectively anymore. Needs players around him. He needs Kulu and Son. Haaland doesn't seem to need anyone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What!!! He hardly touched the ball first half today. Without his teammates laying them on a plate, he wouldn't be scoring so many.
posted on 2/10/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/10/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/10/22
comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 3 hours, 58 minutes ago
Haaland is just way more physical and bullies defenders. Lane uses his size well to win free kicks, and loves scoring, but haaland just plays like a dif beast.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It is way more complicated. Costa & Drogba to me were physical in that they wanted the CB to be in close for the tussle, the chance to turn or use them as a leverage in the jump or to win the free kick. Haaland is a different beast. Bullies by pace and movement. Rarely see a tussle, battle or endemic fouling. He has a magical ability (for a big man) and clearly has worked very hard at sorting his feet out for a ball coming in often taking fewer steps in slow motion to make sure he is making controlled contact when it arrives. In addition to his other attributes I think he is outstanding at that hence his great stats.
posted on 2/10/22
This comparison is kind of boring already. Haaland is just a phenomenal goalscorer, unlike anything we've seen in this league.
He doesn't have the all round game that Kane has, but he doesn't need it.
posted on 2/10/22
comment by PhilspursFGR (U3278)
posted 18 minutes ago
This comparison is kind of boring already. Haaland is just a phenomenal goalscorer, unlike anything we've seen in this league.
He doesn't have the all round game that Kane has, but he doesn't need it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This.
A shoe in Pep signing all about movement, energy, never say die and desire to improve attitude. Everything else (gulp) is a bonus !
posted on 2/10/22
You can see he's more than a penalty box player that pass for Foden's second goal was special. If he stayed here for more than a few years he would break all the records but from what his dad was reported to have said that might not be the case.
posted on 2/10/22
What did his dad say ?
posted on 2/10/22
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Ioavirgo (U10470)
posted 52 minutes ago
comment by Ole dirty Baztard - penited and penandes (U19119)
posted 30 minutes ago
Kane is a quality player but haaland is another level.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane would do better in a 2 upfront..not physical or fast enough to lead the line effectively anymore. Needs players around him. He needs Kulu and Son. Haaland doesn't seem to need anyone
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy’s right. Haaland doesn’t need anyone? He’s got KDB putting chances on a silver platter for him, all he has to do is stick a leg or a head out and it’s a goal, hence his absurdly low touch counts. Sterling used to get gifted the same chances and spunk 70% of them. Don’t make out like Haaland is doing it all on his own because if there’s one thing he’s not doing, it’s making his own chances.
He’s an excellent poacher playing in a team that dominates possession and creates lots of chance, it’s as simple as that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know sweet FA about football. Put kane in the city team and he wouldn't score half the goals that haaland does. He would just dive, moan and try to intimidate the ref. He's an embarrasment
posted on 2/10/22
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 2/10/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 33 minutes ago
OP
Kane has like 200 Prem goals. Haaland has barely 20. I don't think he needs to take lectures of the likes of you on how to score goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you persist in this 'only PL goals count ' nonsense Sandy? The simple facts are that Haaland is scoring twice as many goals as Kane, albeit in a better team admittedly. However he has done it in every league he has played in, and there is every indication that he could get 50 goals or more total in every competition this season, depending on whether Pep plays him in the cups, which, even you will have to admit is insanely impressive. Nobody is saying that Kane is bad, it is just that Haaland is on another level to every striker on the planet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still hasn't scored as many goals as Kane. When he does then you can say he is a better striker. He has to do it at the top level for several years.
A year or two in a two team Gernan League, and a few games in the Prem for a financially doped club prove nothing yet.
He needs to get multiple Golden boots like Kane at club and International level to prove he is better. At the moment Ksne is still the best in the Prem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane is nowhere near the best in the PL this season, there is a player who has twice as many goals, although he doesn't play for a financially dopey club.
posted on 3/10/22
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 4 hours, 47 minutes ago
Winning the golden boot and top assist maker award in the same season while playin for a Jose facking Mourinho team is a lot tricker than putting away tap in’s for Peps City at home to Forest and Palace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 3/10/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 5 hours, 45 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 1 hour, 6 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 33 minutes ago
OP
Kane has like 200 Prem goals. Haaland has barely 20. I don't think he needs to take lectures of the likes of you on how to score goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do you persist in this 'only PL goals count ' nonsense Sandy? The simple facts are that Haaland is scoring twice as many goals as Kane, albeit in a better team admittedly. However he has done it in every league he has played in, and there is every indication that he could get 50 goals or more total in every competition this season, depending on whether Pep plays him in the cups, which, even you will have to admit is insanely impressive. Nobody is saying that Kane is bad, it is just that Haaland is on another level to every striker on the planet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He still hasn't scored as many goals as Kane. When he does then you can say he is a better striker. He has to do it at the top level for several years.
A year or two in a two team Gernan League, and a few games in the Prem for a financially doped club prove nothing yet.
He needs to get multiple Golden boots like Kane at club and International level to prove he is better. At the moment Ksne is still the best in the Prem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He finished 11th in the Ballon d'Or whereas Kane finished 23rd. No way Kane is still the best in the PL
The highest Kane finished was 10th, expect Haaland to smash that cos he's in a different league.
posted on 3/10/22
Haaland has proved absolutely nothing yet, that he is a one season Prem wonder. My granny could scire goals in that financially doped team against some of the worse defenders in my lifetime.
I struggle to think of a decent defender in the Prem. The standard is at all time low.
posted on 3/10/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 24 minutes ago
Haaland has proved absolutely nothing yet, that he is a one season Prem wonder. My granny could scire goals in that financially doped team against some of the worse defenders in my lifetime.
I struggle to think of a decent defender in the Prem. The standard is at all time low.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Haaland finished 11th in the Ballon d'Or, so he proved his worth to the independent judges. The opinion of biased fans like you is irrelevant.
He also won the German Cup. Very likely he will win something with City this year.
Kane has won nothing with his club, nothing.
posted on 3/10/22
Kane is playing a defensive Conte. You cannot compare him to Haaland in a Pep team.
You can't blame Kane for dropping deep you have to blame Conte.
posted on 3/10/22
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
Haaland has proved absolutely nothing yet, that he is a one season Prem wonder. My granny could scire goals in that financially doped team against some of the worse defenders in my lifetime.
I struggle to think of a decent defender in the Prem. The standard is at all time low.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This shows that Kane isn't anything special if he is up against the worse defenders the league has ever seen.
Haaland is just posting figures that a World class forward should achieve against poor defenders.
posted on 3/10/22
comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 1 day, 2 hours ago
comment by Bennyville (U8058)
posted 10 minutes ago
I miss 4231
Still haven’t been the same since Eriksen’s departure.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He was crap for his last year. We haven’t been the same since Dembele left.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I meant before he downed tools. Selling Dembele in Jan was also a silly mistake.
posted on 3/10/22
Dembele was pretty gone by then, but I can't help think how he would have helped as a one-off game vs Liverpool in the final
Page 2 of 2