NET spend is bobbins. Total squad cost is a far better measure and even then it does not take into account wages and agent fees.

Net spend is partly useful when considering investment over a limited period of time.

It helps remove the flaw of comparing transfer spend at clubs who have invested very different amounts in their playing squad.

comment by Jalisco Red - The Axis of Ant[h]ony (U4195)
posted 6 hours, 47 minutes ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Clockwork Red: Jadon and the Argonauts (U4892)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Jay. (U16498)
posted 6 minutes ago
Elon Musk is readying a bid!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
After seeing what he's doing to Twitter, I think that'd be a fantastic move for Liverpool and they should definitely try and get that to happen. Wonder if he'd make the players pay $8 a month to be verified
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Can't see the fans being happy when the Liver bird on the badge is replaced by the Twitter bird either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe they should do it just so they can replace the team bus with a SpaceX shuttle
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is already looking at potential ways of turning Klopp's excuses into fuel
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Apparently if Klopp and Firmino are in the same room and smile at the same time, a sort of nuclear fusion happens between their teeth and free endless energy can be harnessed. Musk wants this energy for Tesla batteries

comment by #LiquidGenius (U20571)
posted 7 hours, 36 minutes ago
Makes sense to dispose of the asset at this time.

Liverpool as a business are floundering and without the immediate possibility of a Super League, it’s not worth holding on to them any longer.

They bought Liverpool dirt cheap as well, so they’ll make a small profit I would imagine.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Except for the record revenues, ffs

Surely you will protest any sale to super rich individuals given Jurgens feelings towards these types of owmers

Apparently FSG want 1.8 billion for Lfc.

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 12 minutes ago
Apparently FSG want 1.8 billion for Lfc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
£4bn apparently.

1.8 mate not 4

£4bn is what I've seen. 1.8 doesn't make much sense considering they rejected £3bn last year.

That was rejected due to Super League

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 37 minutes ago
Apparently FSG want 1.8 billion for Lfc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That would be undervaluing them by about 2.5 billion at least, that’s clearly not right.

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 13 minutes ago
That was rejected due to Super League
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Makes sense that they want more than what they rejected to sell.

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 37 minutes ago
Apparently FSG want 1.8 billion for Lfc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That would be undervaluing them by about 2.5 billion at least, that’s clearly not right.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Culer is stupid beyond belief.

Curler having a bad day on this thread

The valuations people are reporting at 4 billion are including U.K. inflation.

Fsg are based in the USA and aren’t applying U.K. inflation to their valuation, which is 1.8 billion.

Simple.

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 23 minutes ago
The valuations people are reporting at 4 billion are including U.K. inflation.

Fsg are based in the USA and aren’t applying U.K. inflation to their valuation, which is 1.8 billion.

Simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 41 minutes ago
The valuations people are reporting at 4 billion are including U.K. inflation.

Fsg are based in the USA and aren’t applying U.K. inflation to their valuation, which is 1.8 billion.

Simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well that’s that persona gone then!

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 44 minutes ago
The valuations people are reporting at 4 billion are including U.K. inflation.

Fsg are based in the USA and aren’t applying U.K. inflation to their valuation, which is 1.8 billion.

Simple.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Interesting. Have you got any US assets you want to sell?

4.5 billion sale predicted after buying for £300Mil...

Id sell as well.

£4.5 billion

The valuation is £1.8 billion ffs

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 6 minutes ago
£4.5 billion

The valuation is £1.8 billion ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah.

Actually it seems as though it's $5bn, or £4.4bn.

comment by Culèr: The Evolving Brand ✅ (U9489)
posted 25 minutes ago
£4.5 billion

The valuation is £1.8 billion ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I wonder who to believe Forbes or you!?

tough one...

Not a chance they sell for a cent less than Chelsea sold for.

Roman was forced to sell, FSG aren’t seemingly under pressure.

Liverpool are a much bigger and more valuable club, ugh I hate saying that sentence.

The media are now reporting Southampton are also trying to sell themselves to US investors.