Streuth. Sounds like a proper gambling addict.

232 bets in 4 years is nothing.

On football that we know about

Cant be having any1 threatening Harry Kane

Just over 1 a week.

If he’s found guilty what happens to him?

Depends on what he bet on. Probably just a fine.

https://youtu.be/X09oxyIeGuY

E8. 4.4 A Participant shall not use any information relating to football which the Participant has obtained by virtue of his or her position within the game and which is not publicly available at that time for or in relation to betting. E8.

I'll be very surprised if this isn't a significant ban

comment by Bãleš left boot (U22081)
posted 4 seconds ago
E8. 4.4 A Participant shall not use any information relating to football which the Participant has obtained by virtue of his or her position within the game and which is not publicly available at that time for or in relation to betting. E8.

I'll be very surprised if this isn't a significant ban
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where does it say he used inside knowledge? When it came out they said he did not bet on his own club.

I'm just providing the definition of the rule the FA said he's broken.

That is E8 4.4 though

Ah good point. Quick Google did me a bad one there.

We'll see what happens I guess. But 232 times?

Hopefully his goals against City are struck off.

Sturridge got a 6 month ban but that was for telling his family which club he was going to next

He's betting he'll be banned

One of the breaches relates to him betting on not making the England WC squad.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Ham Tyler (U15867)
posted 2 minutes ago
One of the breaches relates to him betting on not making the England WC squad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I like that. Gets in he is over the moon. If he doesn't then he's still not devestated. That's why I like to back the scousers.

Were these bets specifically on PL games or can you not make any football related bets? Even so seems harsh, if he has no effect on results or inside knowledge what’s the harm?

Lengthy ban I'd have thought.

comment by Ace (U22861)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by LegendOsgood (U7946)
posted 14 minutes ago
Cant be having any1 threatening Harry Kane
----------------------------------------------------------------------

195 PL goals in 297 appearances, 51 England goals in 75 appearances, three Golden Boots and a WC golden boot, second quickest to 100 PL goals, most goals in a calendar year.

Toney is just two and half years younger than Kane and has 22 PL goals to his name.

He’s hardly a threat is he.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He is never going to displace Kane and rightly so. But on this season's form he is matching him.

It's pretty hard to get on betting sites in the Gulf States anyway, he's probaly glad he didn't get called up.

One of the reasons he wasn't selected. This investigation has been going on a while. No way he could have been picked with this hanging over him.

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 36 minutes ago
232 bets in 4 years is nothing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They’re the ones he’s been caught for