FIVE-SEASON VAR NET SCORE

Brighton +6
Aston Villa +4
Liverpool +4
Everton +3
Man City +3
Man United +3
Newcastle +3
Chelsea +2
Crystal Palace +2
Tottenham -3
West Ham -5
Arsenal -7
Wolves -17

+ Relates to decisions for - decisions against

comment by Graham Fyfe (U1734)
posted 8 minutes ago
are we saying that my hilarious English defending wum ended up being true?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep.

comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 5 minutes ago
FIVE-SEASON VAR NET SCORE

Brighton +6
Aston Villa +4
Liverpool +4
Everton +3
Man City +3
Man United +3
Newcastle +3
Chelsea +2
Crystal Palace +2
Tottenham -3
West Ham -5
Arsenal -7
Wolves -17

+ Relates to decisions for - decisions against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So VAR benefits 9 teams positively over the past 5 years and only negatively affects 4 teams? Yet we are listening to one butthurt team who want it banned? That's like banning shoes cos some priiick with no legs complains that they don't benefit them.

Is Graham Fyfe the new post op Barry?!

Does Graham Fyfe get top four this season?

Nice

Doesn't pun live in the the aarrse end of Graham Fife?

comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
FIVE-SEASON VAR NET SCORE

Brighton +6
Aston Villa +4
Liverpool +4
Everton +3
Man City +3
Man United +3
Newcastle +3
Chelsea +2
Crystal Palace +2
Tottenham -3
West Ham -5
Arsenal -7
Wolves -17

+ Relates to decisions for - decisions against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
corwrecked decisions ore uncorwreckeddecisions?

comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 6 hours, 19 minutes ago
FIVE-SEASON VAR NET SCORE

Brighton +6
Aston Villa +4
Liverpool +4
Everton +3
Man City +3
Man United +3
Newcastle +3
Chelsea +2
Crystal Palace +2
Tottenham -3
West Ham -5
Arsenal -7
Wolves -17

+ Relates to decisions for - decisions against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are these your own figures?

comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 7 hours, 3 minutes ago
FIVE-SEASON VAR NET SCORE

Brighton +6
Aston Villa +4
Liverpool +4
Everton +3
Man City +3
Man United +3
Newcastle +3
Chelsea +2
Crystal Palace +2
Tottenham -3
West Ham -5
Arsenal -7
Wolves -17

+ Relates to decisions for - decisions against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you calculate this yourself?

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 7 hours, 3 minutes ago
FIVE-SEASON VAR NET SCORE

Brighton +6
Aston Villa +4
Liverpool +4
Everton +3
Man City +3
Man United +3
Newcastle +3
Chelsea +2
Crystal Palace +2
Tottenham -3
West Ham -5
Arsenal -7
Wolves -17

+ Relates to decisions for - decisions against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you calculate this yourself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, was online. Don't see any reason to doubt it. Zero doubt we have been worst hit by it.

Wolves have been by far the worst affected through VAR, with more decisions against them than any other club since it was introduced in 2019-20. Wolves have a net score on VAR overturns of minus-17 decisions, with the next worst-affected club being Arsenal on minus-7.

https://www.espn.co.uk/football/story/_/id/40152426/premier-league-clubs-vote-scrapping-var-wolves-next-season

I don’t think that means the decisions were wrong, just that they were negative to the club in question

comment by Bats Uncensored (U18355)
posted 9 minutes ago
I don’t think that means the decisions were wrong, just that they were negative to the club in question
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Add to that the decisions VAR made which were later acknowledged to be wrong so that we receive apologies.

Way I read this is that for some dark motive, refs have gone out of their way to benefit Wolves.

Fortunately we know have a system capable of averting such obvious cases of corruption, and the corrupt parties want to put a stop to it.

It's far and away the most obvious explanation.

Investigate Wolves ASAP.

It's still bullsheet as it accounts only for what was reviewed and ignores incidents where VAR wasn't involved, but should have been. The article even claims Wolves have had only three mistakes this season, no? That's utterly ridiculous as they've had many more.

Also, Wives are stoopid for petitioning of removal of VAR. We all know that won't happen.

What they should have done is suggest some changes and improvements which are needed, like disbanding the incompetent PGMOL and separating ref and VAR refs into different groups or some stuff like that.

*Wolves not wives

- Impact on goal celebrations and the spontaneous passion that makes football special

- Frustration and confusion inside stadiums due to lengthy VAR checks and poor communication

- A more hostile atmosphere with protests, booing of the Premier League anthem and chants against VAR

- Overreach of VAR's original purpose to correct clear and obvious mistakes, now overanalysing subjective decisions and compromising the game's fluidity and integrity

- Diminished accountability of on-field officials, due to the safety net of VAR, leading to an erosion of authority on the pitch
-----------------------------------------------
No one who goes to games will argue with that.

The majority of us on here and across the world don't go to games. The FA should listen to the majority of us fans and not the small minority that go to games. Why would you vote for something that only benefits a selfish minority at the expense of the greater good? Unless you're pranks voting in an election?

The only thing VAR is good at is when it comes to offsides. With the new automated offside system in place from next season, there no point in persisting VAR. It is very subjective when it comes to decide what is a foul.

comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 3 hours, 11 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf-----JA606 NFL fantasy champ 2023 (U11551)
posted 7 hours, 3 minutes ago
FIVE-SEASON VAR NET SCORE

Brighton +6
Aston Villa +4
Liverpool +4
Everton +3
Man City +3
Man United +3
Newcastle +3
Chelsea +2
Crystal Palace +2
Tottenham -3
West Ham -5
Arsenal -7
Wolves -17

+ Relates to decisions for - decisions against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you calculate this yourself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nope, was online. Don't see any reason to doubt it. Zero doubt we have been worst hit by it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal non VAR champions

This why Norwich shouldn’t be allowed back in the Prem

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c04348v8r9eo

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
Also, Wives are stoopid for petitioning of removal of VAR. We all know that won't happen.

What they should have done is suggest some changes and improvements which are needed, like disbanding the incompetent PGMOL and separating ref and VAR refs into different groups or some stuff like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reported

comment by it'sonlyagame (U6426)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 13 minutes ago
Also, Wives are stoopid for petitioning of removal of VAR. We all know that won't happen.

What they should have done is suggest some changes and improvements which are needed, like disbanding the incompetent PGMOL and separating ref and VAR refs into different groups or some stuff like that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Reported
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ipswich