comment by Loco Liverpool (U18018)
posted 4 minutes ago
Pretty much every team has someone standing on the goalkeeper on corners
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i use too do it
stud on his feets n helled his jersey
standard stuff

comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted 4 minutes ago
Just have a shiiiit keeper who never comes off his line and these things don’t get debated, this the genius of ETH
----------------------------------------------------------------------

How are the Southampton and Wolves manager still in jobs. 1 point from 8 games is shambolic

City play Southampton next week (obvious fix) Put monney on Haaland getting at least 3 goals.

Delete everything you remember pre John Stones heading it, the offside can only occur from the Stones header, not from the corner. Silva backing into the keeper doesn't exist in the context of the offside decision. It's not relevant. Only if they think that it was enough for a foul.

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
He nudged the keeper when the corner was taken though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s fine though. That’s way before Stones heads it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The keeper wasn't set by the time Stones heads it as he's getting Silva off him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought he was. That doesn’t matter though. Silvas not in an offside position until Stones heads it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you think he was? He's still stepping backwards at the time Stones heads it. Your second point may have merit, I'd need to see it again. Obviously according to the law he's not offside until his teammate plays the ball.

Silva was interfering with the keeper as the corner was being taken.

Ref has happy to stop the play and book a Wolves player earlier for interfering with a City player when City had a FK on the edge of the area.

He should show a bit of consistency. Or if he didn't see Bernardo fouling the GK, then the var should have flagged it up and not been so selective with what got shown to the ref.

comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 7 seconds ago
City play Southampton next week (obvious fix) Put monney on Haaland getting at least 3 goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
y do Man Cs* allweighs gett too play the sheet teems?

they play Wulfz tooday why? Liverpool halve too play the Chelseas ffs

comment by Barf Vader (U15867)
posted less than a minute ago
Silva was interfering with the keeper as the corner was being taken.

Ref has happy to stop the play and book a Wolves player earlier for interfering with a City player when City had a FK on the edge of the area.

He should show a bit of consistency. Or if he didn't see Bernardo fouling the GK, then the var should have flagged it up and not been so selective with what got shown to the ref.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're allowed to interfere with a keeper to an extent if you are not offside. He wasn't offside when he nudged the keeper. When was interfering with a keeper a foul?

comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
He nudged the keeper when the corner was taken though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s fine though. That’s way before Stones heads it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The keeper wasn't set by the time Stones heads it as he's getting Silva off him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought he was. That doesn’t matter though. Silvas not in an offside position until Stones heads it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you think he was? He's still stepping backwards at the time Stones heads it. Your second point may have merit, I'd need to see it again. Obviously according to the law he's not offside until his teammate plays the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He did the same movement I’d have expected him to regardless of what silva had done.

Like I said, it’s a moot point anyway as Silva wasn’t offside at that point and there is absolutely no way there was enough for a foul there.

I don’t think it’s a foul or offside, funny thing is tho if Sa doesn’t push Silva out of the way it would’ve been given as offside

Anyway everybody’s bicycle is safe for 90 mins the dippers are playing at home

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
He nudged the keeper when the corner was taken though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s fine though. That’s way before Stones heads it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The keeper wasn't set by the time Stones heads it as he's getting Silva off him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought he was. That doesn’t matter though. Silvas not in an offside position until Stones heads it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you think he was? He's still stepping backwards at the time Stones heads it. Your second point may have merit, I'd need to see it again. Obviously according to the law he's not offside until his teammate plays the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He did the same movement I’d have expected him to regardless of what silva had done.

Like I said, it’s a moot point anyway as Silva wasn’t offside at that point and there is absolutely no way there was enough for a foul there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would have expected him to move forward and then have to take steps to get back on his line, if Silva wasn't there? What's Silva there for then?

comment by #4zA (U22472)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 7 seconds ago
City play Southampton next week (obvious fix) Put monney on Haaland getting at least 3 goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
y do Man Cs* allweighs gett too play the sheet teems?

they play Wulfz tooday why? Liverpool halve too play the Chelseas ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's so unfair.

comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
He nudged the keeper when the corner was taken though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s fine though. That’s way before Stones heads it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The keeper wasn't set by the time Stones heads it as he's getting Silva off him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought he was. That doesn’t matter though. Silvas not in an offside position until Stones heads it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you think he was? He's still stepping backwards at the time Stones heads it. Your second point may have merit, I'd need to see it again. Obviously according to the law he's not offside until his teammate plays the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He did the same movement I’d have expected him to regardless of what silva had done.

Like I said, it’s a moot point anyway as Silva wasn’t offside at that point and there is absolutely no way there was enough for a foul there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would have expected him to move forward and then have to take steps to get back on his line, if Silva wasn't there? What's Silva there for then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He didn’t have to move forward, that was entirely his own choice. It’s not the point to focus on anyway.

Liverpool play a top 6 team, a new experience for this season.

comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
He nudged the keeper when the corner was taken though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s fine though. That’s way before Stones heads it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The keeper wasn't set by the time Stones heads it as he's getting Silva off him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought he was. That doesn’t matter though. Silvas not in an offside position until Stones heads it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you think he was? He's still stepping backwards at the time Stones heads it. Your second point may have merit, I'd need to see it again. Obviously according to the law he's not offside until his teammate plays the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He did the same movement I’d have expected him to regardless of what silva had done.

Like I said, it’s a moot point anyway as Silva wasn’t offside at that point and there is absolutely no way there was enough for a foul there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would have expected him to move forward and then have to take steps to get back on his line, if Silva wasn't there? What's Silva there for then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete everything you know pre Stones header. When (not before) Stones heads the ball, is Silva interfering with the keeper? Blocking his view maybe? Remember NOT before.

comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted 3 minutes ago
Anyway everybody’s bicycle is safe for 90 mins the dippers are playing at home
----------------------------------------------------------------------

gk had clear site n freedumb of moovement as ball was headered

Sarr is about a foot taller than Bernardo, I doubt he was blocking his view.

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
He nudged the keeper when the corner was taken though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s fine though. That’s way before Stones heads it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The keeper wasn't set by the time Stones heads it as he's getting Silva off him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought he was. That doesn’t matter though. Silvas not in an offside position until Stones heads it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you think he was? He's still stepping backwards at the time Stones heads it. Your second point may have merit, I'd need to see it again. Obviously according to the law he's not offside until his teammate plays the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He did the same movement I’d have expected him to regardless of what silva had done.

Like I said, it’s a moot point anyway as Silva wasn’t offside at that point and there is absolutely no way there was enough for a foul there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would have expected him to move forward and then have to take steps to get back on his line, if Silva wasn't there? What's Silva there for then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He didn’t have to move forward, that was entirely his own choice. It’s not the point to focus on anyway.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Debatable, if he doesn't get Silva off him he's even less set for making the save. Obviously in hindsight that would have been better but he didn't know that. Silva's whole role in the move is to put the keeper off and stop him getting set. The shot was straight at him but his reaction was affected by that due to not being set. Perhaps a moot point as you say however.

comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 3 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 44 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by TheresOnlyOne7-0Reds (U1721)
posted 19 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Jake Moon (U11781)
posted 4 minutes ago
He nudged the keeper when the corner was taken though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s fine though. That’s way before Stones heads it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
The keeper wasn't set by the time Stones heads it as he's getting Silva off him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought he was. That doesn’t matter though. Silvas not in an offside position until Stones heads it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did you think he was? He's still stepping backwards at the time Stones heads it. Your second point may have merit, I'd need to see it again. Obviously according to the law he's not offside until his teammate plays the ball.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He did the same movement I’d have expected him to regardless of what silva had done.

Like I said, it’s a moot point anyway as Silva wasn’t offside at that point and there is absolutely no way there was enough for a foul there.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would have expected him to move forward and then have to take steps to get back on his line, if Silva wasn't there? What's Silva there for then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He didn’t have to move forward, that was entirely his own choice. It’s not the point to focus on anyway.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Debatable, if he doesn't get Silva off him he's even less set for making the save. Obviously in hindsight that would have been better but he didn't know that. Silva's whole role in the move is to put the keeper off and stop him getting set. The shot was straight at him but his reaction was affected by that due to not being set. Perhaps a moot point as you say however.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s not perhaps a moot point, it just is a moot point unless you’re arguing it should have been a foul.

If Boris and Hafi join forces a new world order will emerge

I need a better analogy to explain. Like when people think a coin is more likely to come up heads if it was tails the time before.

What Silva was doing before Stones headed it is the coin coming up tails. The coin is flipped again as Stones heads it.

The coin coming up tails pre Stones header has no impact on the next flip...

comment by Franko Cantona (U22187)
posted 1 minute ago
If Boris and Hafi join forces a new world order will emerge
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't insult Hafi, he's your best poster.