or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 158 comments are related to an article called:

Prince Harry vs the Royal Family

Page 3 of 7

posted on 8/1/23

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 9 seconds ago
Apologies that was a bit rude but my point still stands
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And here you are, posting more than anyone. It's hilarious that you complain about people being interested, while posting on the same thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Huh? My first post on this article was about 10 mins ago. This will be my 4th post.

I couldn't care less what they do. As long as they don't get taken out by the government they can do whatever they want, I don't focus my attention on them as I have a life of my own that takes precedence. I can understand if you're retired, or a bum, all you can really do is read the news all day or watch TV but even still why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm retired, don't watch TV, or listen to the radio except in the car. I do read the newspapers, and as there has been a Royal Family all my life I have an opinion about them.
Apparently you are not interested in them, yet strangely have an opinion about those who do post about them, odd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm on a football forum not a Harry and Meghan forum ffs

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 51 seconds ago
why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.
———
Doesn’t this apply to you and Man United?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good point

posted on 8/1/23

comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't focus my attention on them as I have a life of my own that takes precedence. I can understand if you're retired, or a bum, all you can really do is read the news all day or watch TV but even still why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Id stop here and give up now if I was you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, what will you do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
eh? Wow you're hard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you, are you vidicchins little brother or just the bouncer when he's away?

posted on 8/1/23

Has Harry referenced anything at all about Prince Andrew? With so much bad behaviour from his family that he's happy to talk about, surely the behaviour of Prince Andrew would be worth at least a disapproving mention?

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 51 seconds ago
why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.
———
Doesn’t this apply to you and Man United?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I get the sentiment, though. It is hilarious how wound up people get about all of this.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
I bet Andrew’s book would sell well, imagine all the paedo/nonce/sex party stuff being serialised in the papers
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Exactly.

On a separate note I did see this hilarious shiiitpost from Matt Le Tossier the other day where he saw this advert for the channel 4 mockumentary called Prince Andrew : the musical and he really thought it was the satanic paedo ring laughing at us all and being blatant proof they exist.

What a caaaant.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 9 seconds ago
Apologies that was a bit rude but my point still stands
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And here you are, posting more than anyone. It's hilarious that you complain about people being interested, while posting on the same thread.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Huh? My first post on this article was about 10 mins ago. This will be my 4th post.

I couldn't care less what they do. As long as they don't get taken out by the government they can do whatever they want, I don't focus my attention on them as I have a life of my own that takes precedence. I can understand if you're retired, or a bum, all you can really do is read the news all day or watch TV but even still why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm retired, don't watch TV, or listen to the radio except in the car. I do read the newspapers, and as there has been a Royal Family all my life I have an opinion about them.
Apparently you are not interested in them, yet strangely have an opinion about those who do post about them, odd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm on a football forum not a Harry and Meghan forum ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then make an article about football ffs.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 25 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 21 seconds ago
comment by Ali - (U1192)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
I don't focus my attention on them as I have a life of my own that takes precedence. I can understand if you're retired, or a bum, all you can really do is read the news all day or watch TV but even still why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Id stop here and give up now if I was you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why, what will you do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
eh? Wow you're hard.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So are you, are you vidicchins little brother or just the bouncer when he's away?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
i told you that you should have left it there in my last post.

This reply explains exactly why I am right.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Robb Me The Horizon (U22716)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
I bet Andrew’s book would sell well, imagine all the paedo/nonce/sex party stuff being serialised in the papers
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Exactly.

On a separate note I did see this hilarious shiiitpost from Matt Le Tossier the other day where he saw this advert for the channel 4 mockumentary called Prince Andrew : the musical and he really thought it was the satanic paedo ring laughing at us all and being blatant proof they exist.

What a caaaant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He’s the poster boy for why heading should be banned in football.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Robb Me The Horizon (U22716)
posted 32 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 1 minute ago
I bet Andrew’s book would sell well, imagine all the paedo/nonce/sex party stuff being serialised in the papers
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Exactly.

On a separate note I did see this hilarious shiiitpost from Matt Le Tossier the other day where he saw this advert for the channel 4 mockumentary called Prince Andrew : the musical and he really thought it was the satanic paedo ring laughing at us all and being blatant proof they exist.

What a caaaant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't even think Le Tiss is a caaaant. He's just an ill informed moron, in way over his head.

I saw him on Twitter a few days ago about how people should make it a New Years resolution to engage in critical thinking. I'm guessing googling in search of something to validate his need for confirmation bias is not critical thinking. Nor is constantly looking for anything contrary to what 99% of those in the know tell us

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 1 minute ago
the passing of probably the only decent Royal in the Queen

didn't know charles had died
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustained by those suitcases full of used Arab notes?

And the same Queen that used Royal Assent privileges to get financial transparency laws changed to conceal her wealth? That vetoed road safety and land policies to 'protect' her homes? That vetted bills on trusts and inheritances? That got exemption from animal cruelty inspectors monitoring her estates? That person?

posted on 8/1/23

I can understand if you're retired, or a bum, all you can really do is read the news all day or watch TV but even still why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.

++

My last word to you on this is that I dont believe you when you say that you cant understand people who deliberately watch or read things on the TV
or in newspapers and books and feel compelled to comment on them if the subject annoys them.

posted on 8/1/23

Reading through all the comments here, it seems only Robb is roped in to whatever his media source tells him

comment by Batty (U4664)

posted on 8/1/23

Pair of narcissists. Desperate for money and the
spotlight, milked from the big, bad Royal family they
claim to despise. Manipulating whatever media
outlet is daft enough to give them oxygen.

While also claiming to want a normal peaceful life
away from the big, bad Royal family and spotlight.

Dumb and dumber. Tired of both of them. Be glad
when they're a distant, obnoxious memory.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Ham Tyler (U15867)
posted 7 minutes ago
Has Harry referenced anything at all about Prince Andrew? With so much bad behaviour from his family that he's happy to talk about, surely the behaviour of Prince Andrew would be worth at least a disapproving mention?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure why but Jason and uncle Bryn's fishing trip comes to mind?

posted on 8/1/23

comment by RB&W - Whiteside has done it again (U21434)
posted 1 minute ago
I can understand if you're retired, or a bum, all you can really do is read the news all day or watch TV but even still why do people deliberately watch and read things that annoy them? I just can't understand it.

++

My last word to you on this is that I dont believe you when you say that you cant understand people who deliberately watch or read things on the TV
or in newspapers and books and feel compelled to comment on them if the subject annoys them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah I'm with you there. The whole reason for watching something is that it will evoke a reaction, be it negative or positive. It's the things that don't capture my interest at all, for good or for bad, that I won't bother watching or opening an article on.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Christ We Won (TENƎꓕ) (U17162)
posted 3 minutes ago
Reading through all the comments here, it seems only Robb is roped in to whatever his media source tells him
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What media source would that be?

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Ham Tyler (U15867)
posted 12 minutes ago
Has Harry referenced anything at all about Prince Andrew? With so much bad behaviour from his family that he's happy to talk about, surely the behaviour of Prince Andrew would be worth at least a disapproving mention?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is probably the thing the Royals are most worried about, and why they’ve gone to lengths to discredit him.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 1 minute ago
the passing of probably the only decent Royal in the Queen

didn't know charles had died
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sustained by those suitcases full of used Arab notes?

And the same Queen that used Royal Assent privileges to get financial transparency laws changed to conceal her wealth? That vetoed road safety and land policies to 'protect' her homes? That vetted bills on trusts and inheritances? That got exemption from animal cruelty inspectors monitoring her estates? That person?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you mean our esteemed Queen, the woman whose funeral generated a twenty mile queue, then yes, that woman.
Who incidentally had respect from all over the world for the job she did almost to her dying day.
Is that the woman you meant?

posted on 8/1/23

Poor Harry,
Born with a silver spoon in his mouth & diamond encrusted chips on both shoulders

posted on 8/1/23

I probably should've made it clear, I was being specific towards H and M.
I get some things are unavoidable, you turn the news on and the anchorman tells you something that fecks you off but H and M, it's like people deliberately seek out to know everything about them just so they can be even more angry at them

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Ham Tyler (U15867)
posted 12 minutes ago
Has Harry referenced anything at all about Prince Andrew? With so much bad behaviour from his family that he's happy to talk about, surely the behaviour of Prince Andrew would be worth at least a disapproving mention?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is probably the thing the Royals are most worried about, and why they’ve gone to lengths to discredit him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Got a mention today. As he is no longer HRH I don't suppose they care much.

posted on 8/1/23

comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Ham Tyler (U15867)
posted 12 minutes ago
Has Harry referenced anything at all about Prince Andrew? With so much bad behaviour from his family that he's happy to talk about, surely the behaviour of Prince Andrew would be worth at least a disapproving mention?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is probably the thing the Royals are most worried about, and why they’ve gone to lengths to discredit him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it's not even for any love of that monster either. It's just due to the reputational damage to the Royals and the knock on effect of that.

I'm sure they're absolutely disgusted by and ashamed of the dirty great paedo but not enough to allow a scandal to develop that could hurt their own social position

posted on 8/1/23

comment by merrysupersteve (relaxed about the situation) (U1132)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Lisandro The King Martinez (U10026)
posted 57 seconds ago
comment by Ham Tyler (U15867)
posted 12 minutes ago
Has Harry referenced anything at all about Prince Andrew? With so much bad behaviour from his family that he's happy to talk about, surely the behaviour of Prince Andrew would be worth at least a disapproving mention?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is probably the thing the Royals are most worried about, and why they’ve gone to lengths to discredit him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And it's not even for any love of that monster either. It's just due to the reputational damage to the Royals and the knock on effect of that.

I'm sure they're absolutely disgusted by and ashamed of the dirty great paedo but not enough to allow a scandal to develop that could hurt their own social position
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah exactly. Protecting the reputation of the monarchy has always been one of their most important jobs. This isn’t a new thing, it’s a tale as old as time.

posted on 8/1/23

It does show the way the people of the UK have been conditioned over the centuries to act towards their overlords that they would queue 20 miles to pay tribute to a queen and yet allow the Tories to strip away their fundamental rights to protest and now strike. It’s almost like a big chunk of the populace want to stay in their place and not change the status quo 🤔

Page 3 of 7

Sign in if you want to comment