comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 8 minutes ago
Nice stadium though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yep
When you loook at it in plain stats like that it really is staggering and hits home how shat we've really been for 20 or so years
comment by JimmyGreaves (U21183)
posted 7 minutes ago
When you loook at it in plain stats like that it really is staggering and hits home how shat we've really been for 20 or so years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ok, we got plenty of profits mate it’s a joke
Enic have turned spurs into losers.
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
What about Leicester 2 Sandy or do they not count as they are doped too I suppose
Then we can add clubs that have won more and just as much trophies than Spurs since ENIC took over. Leicester, Wigan, Portsmouth. Literally shameful.
Audi cup winners they’ll never sing that !
Not one of those clubs have a Cheese Room though.
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted 4 minutes ago
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the point. Spurs were a successful football club with a decent trophy history. Record Fa cup winners before ENIC took over. 23 years of their leadership and we have 1 league cup to show for it. Utter shambles for a club of our size and history.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 45 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bore off mate
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's got a point though, Don. Neither of those two would've been considered top 6 when ENIC took over. Definitely least not in terms of trophy count nor in terms of support. Both Villa and Everton would've been ahead of them, and probably Newcastle too.
Since then, we've seen Villa inhabit the second division and Everton have struggled way more than Spurs. It's also worth noting that both of those clubs at different points have made big investments to try to push for a place at the top table, and it's gone pretty pear-shaped.
Just a bit of perspective. Not saying it's all rosy, but it could be worse mate.
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Mess... (U11551)
posted 16 minutes ago
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tottenham has always been a "member" of Top 6 clubs in England, winning things or not.
That's common knowledge.
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 38 minutes ago
Then we can add clubs that have won more and just as much trophies than Spurs since ENIC took over. Leicester, Wigan, Portsmouth. Literally shameful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget Swansea 😁
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرا�... (U22246)
posted 49 minutes ago
What about Leicester 2 Sandy or do they not count as they are doped too I suppose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leicester have won two trophies, making three in their entire history. Just one more than Spurs this century.
So again what is your point?
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Mess... (U11551)
posted 16 minutes ago
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tottenham has always been a "member" of Top 6 clubs in England, winning things or not.
That's common knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so who are those clubs then? Everton have to be one
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 45 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bore off mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You bore off as well.
comment by it'sonlyagame - today I feel like Gianni ... (U6426)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's got a point though, Don. Neither of those two would've been considered top 6 when ENIC took over. Definitely least not in terms of trophy count nor in terms of support. Both Villa and Everton would've been ahead of them, and probably Newcastle too.
Since then, we've seen Villa inhabit the second division and Everton have struggled way more than Spurs. It's also worth noting that both of those clubs at different points have made big investments to try to push for a place at the top table, and it's gone pretty pear-shaped.
Just a bit of perspective. Not saying it's all rosy, but it could be worse mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone knows that City and Chelsea have purchased their trophies with their sugar daddies. Big probability that one, if not both, would have been up and down from the championship to the Prem for most of the 21st century if not for their lottery wins.
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by it'sonlyagame - today I feel like Gianni ... (U6426)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's got a point though, Don. Neither of those two would've been considered top 6 when ENIC took over. Definitely least not in terms of trophy count nor in terms of support. Both Villa and Everton would've been ahead of them, and probably Newcastle too.
Since then, we've seen Villa inhabit the second division and Everton have struggled way more than Spurs. It's also worth noting that both of those clubs at different points have made big investments to try to push for a place at the top table, and it's gone pretty pear-shaped.
Just a bit of perspective. Not saying it's all rosy, but it could be worse mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone knows that City and Chelsea have purchased their trophies with their sugar daddies. Big probability that one, if not both, would have been up and down from the championship to the Prem for most of the 21st century if not for their lottery wins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right come on Carl Gauss. Give us the maths behind these probabilities. Utterly clueless.
ENIC do not have an elite mentality nor a winners mentality, it has filtered down throughout the whole club and even into large sections of the fanbase.
The club desperately needs a major reset from the top down, that means new owners who will come in and break this cycle of mediocrity.
Some of our fans are part of the problem, they have been abused by ENIC for so long now, they have started to think like ENIC, and are completely oblivious that things could and should operate at a higher level.
Too many fans are accepting of mediocrity and take a ridiculous satisfaction in a healthy balance sheet, to them that is success, because that is the spiel that Levy feeds them.
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 58 seconds ago
ENIC do not have an elite mentality nor a winners mentality, it has filtered down throughout the whole club and even into large sections of the fanbase.
The club desperately needs a major reset from the top down, that means new owners who will come in and break this cycle of mediocrity.
Some of our fans are part of the problem, they have been abused by ENIC for so long now, they have started to think like ENIC, and are completely oblivious that things could and should operate at a higher level.
Too many fans are accepting of mediocrity and take a ridiculous satisfaction in a healthy balance sheet, to them that is success, because that is the spiel that Levy feeds them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, that is the reality of financially doped english football in the 21st century.
It simply is not that easy to win trophies, unless you are bankrolled by State or a Russian Oligarch.
Sign in if you want to comment
Read and weep
Page 1 of 3
posted on 18/1/23
Nice stadium though?
posted on 18/1/23
comment by (K̇ash) - FSG OUT (Get a move on!) - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 8 minutes ago
Nice stadium though?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
yep
posted on 18/1/23
When you loook at it in plain stats like that it really is staggering and hits home how shat we've really been for 20 or so years
posted on 18/1/23
comment by JimmyGreaves (U21183)
posted 7 minutes ago
When you loook at it in plain stats like that it really is staggering and hits home how shat we've really been for 20 or so years
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It’s ok, we got plenty of profits mate it’s a joke
posted on 18/1/23
F ENIC
posted on 18/1/23
Enic have turned spurs into losers.
posted on 18/1/23
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
posted on 18/1/23
What about Leicester 2 Sandy or do they not count as they are doped too I suppose
posted on 18/1/23
Then we can add clubs that have won more and just as much trophies than Spurs since ENIC took over. Leicester, Wigan, Portsmouth. Literally shameful.
posted on 18/1/23
Audi cup winners they’ll never sing that !
posted on 18/1/23
Not one of those clubs have a Cheese Room though.
posted on 18/1/23
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Messi the goat. (U11551)
posted 4 minutes ago
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not the point. Spurs were a successful football club with a decent trophy history. Record Fa cup winners before ENIC took over. 23 years of their leadership and we have 1 league cup to show for it. Utter shambles for a club of our size and history.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 45 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bore off mate
posted on 18/1/23
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's got a point though, Don. Neither of those two would've been considered top 6 when ENIC took over. Definitely least not in terms of trophy count nor in terms of support. Both Villa and Everton would've been ahead of them, and probably Newcastle too.
Since then, we've seen Villa inhabit the second division and Everton have struggled way more than Spurs. It's also worth noting that both of those clubs at different points have made big investments to try to push for a place at the top table, and it's gone pretty pear-shaped.
Just a bit of perspective. Not saying it's all rosy, but it could be worse mate.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Mess... (U11551)
posted 16 minutes ago
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tottenham has always been a "member" of Top 6 clubs in England, winning things or not.
That's common knowledge.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 38 minutes ago
Then we can add clubs that have won more and just as much trophies than Spurs since ENIC took over. Leicester, Wigan, Portsmouth. Literally shameful.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't forget Swansea 😁
posted on 18/1/23
comment by Colemanballs-جيش الدفاع الإسرا�... (U22246)
posted 49 minutes ago
What about Leicester 2 Sandy or do they not count as they are doped too I suppose
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Leicester have won two trophies, making three in their entire history. Just one more than Spurs this century.
So again what is your point?
posted on 18/1/23
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf---A Scottish world champion and Mess... (U11551)
posted 16 minutes ago
With all due respect you weren't one of the big six for a majority of the 00s. You only finished top six a couple of times that decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tottenham has always been a "member" of Top 6 clubs in England, winning things or not.
That's common knowledge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so who are those clubs then? Everton have to be one
posted on 18/1/23
comment by Hezzman (U21558)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 45 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bore off mate
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You bore off as well.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by it'sonlyagame - today I feel like Gianni ... (U6426)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's got a point though, Don. Neither of those two would've been considered top 6 when ENIC took over. Definitely least not in terms of trophy count nor in terms of support. Both Villa and Everton would've been ahead of them, and probably Newcastle too.
Since then, we've seen Villa inhabit the second division and Everton have struggled way more than Spurs. It's also worth noting that both of those clubs at different points have made big investments to try to push for a place at the top table, and it's gone pretty pear-shaped.
Just a bit of perspective. Not saying it's all rosy, but it could be worse mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone knows that City and Chelsea have purchased their trophies with their sugar daddies. Big probability that one, if not both, would have been up and down from the championship to the Prem for most of the 21st century if not for their lottery wins.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by it'sonlyagame - today I feel like Gianni ... (U6426)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 8 minutes ago
Don, both City and Chelsea are financially doped, so they don't count. The other three are considered the three biggest clubs in the country.
So what exactly is your point. Spurs are clearly the best of the rest in the country.
I notice you haven't put up Newcastle's 21st century haul, or any other club for that matter.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traditional Top 6 clubs Sandy. Keep up mate. Chelsea and City do count, or is that because it makes Spurs look even more incompetent. Even if you take them both out, it’s still embarrassing. Liverpool, United and Arsenal trophies totally dwarfs ours after ENIC. The point is that Levy and ENIC have turned this club into ultimate losers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy's got a point though, Don. Neither of those two would've been considered top 6 when ENIC took over. Definitely least not in terms of trophy count nor in terms of support. Both Villa and Everton would've been ahead of them, and probably Newcastle too.
Since then, we've seen Villa inhabit the second division and Everton have struggled way more than Spurs. It's also worth noting that both of those clubs at different points have made big investments to try to push for a place at the top table, and it's gone pretty pear-shaped.
Just a bit of perspective. Not saying it's all rosy, but it could be worse mate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone knows that City and Chelsea have purchased their trophies with their sugar daddies. Big probability that one, if not both, would have been up and down from the championship to the Prem for most of the 21st century if not for their lottery wins.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Right come on Carl Gauss. Give us the maths behind these probabilities. Utterly clueless.
posted on 18/1/23
ENIC do not have an elite mentality nor a winners mentality, it has filtered down throughout the whole club and even into large sections of the fanbase.
The club desperately needs a major reset from the top down, that means new owners who will come in and break this cycle of mediocrity.
Some of our fans are part of the problem, they have been abused by ENIC for so long now, they have started to think like ENIC, and are completely oblivious that things could and should operate at a higher level.
Too many fans are accepting of mediocrity and take a ridiculous satisfaction in a healthy balance sheet, to them that is success, because that is the spiel that Levy feeds them.
posted on 18/1/23
comment by ●Billy The Spur● 20*21*22* ENIC OUT! (U3924)
posted 58 seconds ago
ENIC do not have an elite mentality nor a winners mentality, it has filtered down throughout the whole club and even into large sections of the fanbase.
The club desperately needs a major reset from the top down, that means new owners who will come in and break this cycle of mediocrity.
Some of our fans are part of the problem, they have been abused by ENIC for so long now, they have started to think like ENIC, and are completely oblivious that things could and should operate at a higher level.
Too many fans are accepting of mediocrity and take a ridiculous satisfaction in a healthy balance sheet, to them that is success, because that is the spiel that Levy feeds them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah, that is the reality of financially doped english football in the 21st century.
It simply is not that easy to win trophies, unless you are bankrolled by State or a Russian Oligarch.
Page 1 of 3