comment by Kung Fu Cantona đđź đľđ¸ (U18082)
posted 6 minutes ago
A few people in England boycotting the Qataris won't make a blind bit of difference considering the larger bulk of United fans around the world are relishing the takeover.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it’s the brutal, autocratic dictator al-Thani leading the bid, I expect there’ll be more than a few United fans outside England who’ll also take issue.
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
United kind of paid the price for being the first English financial football juggernaut with the Glazers and now this. We reaped the rewards then suffered (comparatively) from it. As people have stated yes it was kind of inevitable from that point.
I don't really want the Qataris to take over but, to be honest, it won't stop me supporting United.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no other motives you say?
That's why you play at the Etihad stadium, train at the Etihad Campus and have visit Abu Dhabi on rolling billboards at every single game you absolute cretin. đđđ
You see.....you've allowed yourself to be bought by the BS propaganda. You have to do it to convince yourself this is all perfectly normal and City are just acting like any other big club .
There's no difference at all. You were bought for one purpose. Just bleeding accept it.
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please' of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 2 minutes ago
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who doesn’t? But do you like the autocratic rulers who care nothing for human life in their pursuit to show they have bigger diiiicks than their rivals?
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no other motives you say?
That's why you play at the Etihad stadium, train at the Etihad Campus and have visit Abu Dhabi on rolling billboards at every single game you absolute cretin. đđđ
You see.....you've allowed yourself to be bought by the BS propaganda. You have to do it to convince yourself this is all perfectly normal and City are just acting like any other big club .
There's no difference at all. You were bought for one purpose. Just bleeding accept it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were bought for one sole purpose, you’re right, just not the one you think because you’re a moron. What’s the one big difference between PSG and us and that might give you a clue?
Don’t deflect though, I’ve already stated I’d rather not have the owners that we do. If you’re full of integrity, why haven’t you boycotted United already if you don’t like the idea of being a marketing tool for a sovereign state?
Musk would be horrendously hilarious.
Musk would make Greenwood captain to stick it to the libs.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 9 seconds ago
Musk would make Greenwood captain to stick it to the libs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Giggs to the end of the season too
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no other motives you say?
That's why you play at the Etihad stadium, train at the Etihad Campus and have visit Abu Dhabi on rolling billboards at every single game you absolute cretin. đđđ
You see.....you've allowed yourself to be bought by the BS propaganda. You have to do it to convince yourself this is all perfectly normal and City are just acting like any other big club .
There's no difference at all. You were bought for one purpose. Just bleeding accept it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were bought for one sole purpose, you’re right, just not the one you think because you’re a moron. What’s the one big difference between PSG and us and that might give you a clue?
Don’t deflect though, I’ve already stated I’d rather not have the owners that we do. If you’re full of integrity, why haven’t you boycotted United already if you don’t like the idea of being a marketing tool for a sovereign state?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
Don't you find it hilarious that Abu Dhabi based companies just so happen to be the best sponsorship deals you can get? đ The truth is they probably aren't. But your owner doesn't care. If he could get an extra £50m a year from a western company sponsoring you he still wouldn't change Etihad.
I love it how you just can't accept what's so obvious. You can't accept it because you don't want to accept it. đ
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He also had to go to the banks to buy Twatbook as he didn’t have the cash. So we wouldn’t be better off than we are now.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He also had to go to the banks to buy Twatbook as he didn’t have the cash. So we wouldn’t be better off than we are now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The banks/Saudis
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He also had to go to the banks to buy Twatbook as he didn’t have the cash. So we wouldn’t be better off than we are now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The banks/Saudis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America, Oracle Corporation founder and some Saudi Prince.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by United_kaz (U9943)
posted 1 minute ago
Yh probably announced officially March time, clear the debt, rebuild the stadium and I'll be happy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll be happy we clear the debt and rebuild the stadium. But I'll be very unhappy who's paying for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Me too.
Inevitable though at the prices being quoted. The PL are partly to blame for allowing these state owned vanity projects to begin with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That almost sounds like a penny dropping
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah don't think you're getting off the hook there melts. Just because the PL allowed your takeover doesn't mean you can be cheating toe rags. Two wrongs don't make a right.
At least you will all know that if United fall into very rich ME hands then your club will be partly responsible for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you were so close to finally getting it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no getting it. You were and still are willing to accept your owner despite all the negative human rights stuff in Abu Dhabi because you wanted to see a few trophies before you popped your clogs.
I don't want that for my club. I think this club is bigger and better than that. Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.
Not that I get a say in any of it but that's how I feel and so do many other reds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re really not the brightest sometimes SE!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have I said that is untrue?
You really are the most delusional City fan I know. You just can't bring yourself to admit it either.
I don't want to be a sports washing club like your poxy Tinpot club did. That's the difference Melts. It's called integrity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a read back of your own comments that I was replying to and think about why I might have said the penny is finally dropping, you were so close and now you’ve descended again into being a complete muppet.
And just to be very clear for the umpteenth time, I have never wanted any of the ownership structure and governance that football clubs have in place nowadays and haven’t done for over thirty years, including ours.
I’d also have a think about existing partnerships too that you’ve got if you don’t want to be a mrketing tool used by a state. Or have you already been boycotting the club, given your “integrity”…?
---------------------------------------------------------------
We don't desperately need to sell our souls to compete. We already spend similar amounts to City as it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't desperately need to sell our souls to compete. We already spend similar amounts to City as it is.
Who do you mean by ‘we’. ?
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope you realise who the poster is you're agreeing with here. The guy who isn't right on anything ever. đ
Not sure you're in good company there melts.
Like I said....if you could just come to terms what you are this would all be avoided. But you can't. You're sponsored by Etihad because it's a failing airline running at huge losses but one that is close to the hearts of your owner. Nothing more.
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please' of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 21 minutes ago
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would warrant that nobody on here has an issue with Arabs or Qataris.
What people have an issue with is autocratic dictators who suppress, brutalise and otherwise silence dissenters, enact overtly discriminatory laws, control the press, and enable the exploitation of workers to the extent of enslavement.
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s being kind. He’s a facking moron.
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please'of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 21 minutes ago
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would warrant that nobody on here has an issue with Arabs or Qataris.
What people have an issue with is autocratic dictators who suppress, brutalise and otherwise silence dissenters, enact overtly discriminatory laws, control the press, and enable the exploitation of workers to the extent of enslavement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't care for that.
I like Arab's and Qataris.
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s being kind. He’s a facking moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's fecking rich sweetheart.
How about going to a fecking game? Oh you don't do you?
You're just as bad the Newcastle and City fans. Shameless.
Sign in if you want to comment
Qatari Bid Imminent
Page 5 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Kung Fu Cantona đđź đľđ¸ (U18082)
posted 6 minutes ago
A few people in England boycotting the Qataris won't make a blind bit of difference considering the larger bulk of United fans around the world are relishing the takeover.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it’s the brutal, autocratic dictator al-Thani leading the bid, I expect there’ll be more than a few United fans outside England who’ll also take issue.
posted on 16/2/23
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
posted on 16/2/23
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
posted on 16/2/23
United kind of paid the price for being the first English financial football juggernaut with the Glazers and now this. We reaped the rewards then suffered (comparatively) from it. As people have stated yes it was kind of inevitable from that point.
I don't really want the Qataris to take over but, to be honest, it won't stop me supporting United.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no other motives you say?
That's why you play at the Etihad stadium, train at the Etihad Campus and have visit Abu Dhabi on rolling billboards at every single game you absolute cretin. đđđ
You see.....you've allowed yourself to be bought by the BS propaganda. You have to do it to convince yourself this is all perfectly normal and City are just acting like any other big club .
There's no difference at all. You were bought for one purpose. Just bleeding accept it.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please' of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 2 minutes ago
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who doesn’t? But do you like the autocratic rulers who care nothing for human life in their pursuit to show they have bigger diiiicks than their rivals?
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no other motives you say?
That's why you play at the Etihad stadium, train at the Etihad Campus and have visit Abu Dhabi on rolling billboards at every single game you absolute cretin. đđđ
You see.....you've allowed yourself to be bought by the BS propaganda. You have to do it to convince yourself this is all perfectly normal and City are just acting like any other big club .
There's no difference at all. You were bought for one purpose. Just bleeding accept it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were bought for one sole purpose, you’re right, just not the one you think because you’re a moron. What’s the one big difference between PSG and us and that might give you a clue?
Don’t deflect though, I’ve already stated I’d rather not have the owners that we do. If you’re full of integrity, why haven’t you boycotted United already if you don’t like the idea of being a marketing tool for a sovereign state?
posted on 16/2/23
Musk would be horrendously hilarious.
posted on 16/2/23
Musk would make Greenwood captain to stick it to the libs.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 9 seconds ago
Musk would make Greenwood captain to stick it to the libs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Giggs to the end of the season too
posted on 16/2/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
“Why haven't I boycotted from something that hasn't happened yet and still might not? Yeah that makes a lot of sense. đđđ“
“Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.”
You honestly don’t think that’s happened yet?
On PSG and us, there’s completely different motivations for the ownership so lumping them together I disagree with. Just speaking about us though, I entirely agree it isn’t a good thing overall for football to attract investors like them (or even Abramovich or the Glazers for you). I wonder what happened that attracted owners like them to football in the first place and why I, again, advocate a return to pre-nineties rules around ownership and distribution of wealth and who I might find more than partly to blame for that going away….
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no other motives you say?
That's why you play at the Etihad stadium, train at the Etihad Campus and have visit Abu Dhabi on rolling billboards at every single game you absolute cretin. đđđ
You see.....you've allowed yourself to be bought by the BS propaganda. You have to do it to convince yourself this is all perfectly normal and City are just acting like any other big club .
There's no difference at all. You were bought for one purpose. Just bleeding accept it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We were bought for one sole purpose, you’re right, just not the one you think because you’re a moron. What’s the one big difference between PSG and us and that might give you a clue?
Don’t deflect though, I’ve already stated I’d rather not have the owners that we do. If you’re full of integrity, why haven’t you boycotted United already if you don’t like the idea of being a marketing tool for a sovereign state?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
Don't you find it hilarious that Abu Dhabi based companies just so happen to be the best sponsorship deals you can get? đ The truth is they probably aren't. But your owner doesn't care. If he could get an extra £50m a year from a western company sponsoring you he still wouldn't change Etihad.
I love it how you just can't accept what's so obvious. You can't accept it because you don't want to accept it. đ
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He also had to go to the banks to buy Twatbook as he didn’t have the cash. So we wouldn’t be better off than we are now.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He also had to go to the banks to buy Twatbook as he didn’t have the cash. So we wouldn’t be better off than we are now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The banks/Saudis
posted on 16/2/23
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Robb - Marry me Alissa White-Gluz (U22716)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Post Nearly Man (U1270)
posted 16 minutes ago
Clear the debt, reduce season card prices, back ETH and don't interfere with his transfer picks and maybe sort out mobile signal at OT. That'll do me.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk is your man for mobile signal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Also an utterbellend, I don't think the trade off for better signal is worth it
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeh, let's stick with the despots.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Musk isn’t any better. He will definitely interfere with the running of the club.
In less than two months he has run twatbook into the ground.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus he’s in cahoots with the Saudis and the Russians to get Trump back in the White House and undermine the US.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He also had to go to the banks to buy Twatbook as he didn’t have the cash. So we wouldn’t be better off than we are now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The banks/Saudis
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America, Oracle Corporation founder and some Saudi Prince.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 54 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 38 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by United_kaz (U9943)
posted 1 minute ago
Yh probably announced officially March time, clear the debt, rebuild the stadium and I'll be happy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll be happy we clear the debt and rebuild the stadium. But I'll be very unhappy who's paying for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Me too.
Inevitable though at the prices being quoted. The PL are partly to blame for allowing these state owned vanity projects to begin with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That almost sounds like a penny dropping
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah don't think you're getting off the hook there melts. Just because the PL allowed your takeover doesn't mean you can be cheating toe rags. Two wrongs don't make a right.
At least you will all know that if United fall into very rich ME hands then your club will be partly responsible for it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And you were so close to finally getting it!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There's no getting it. You were and still are willing to accept your owner despite all the negative human rights stuff in Abu Dhabi because you wanted to see a few trophies before you popped your clogs.
I don't want that for my club. I think this club is bigger and better than that. Being used as a marketing tool to mask homophobia, modern day slavery and sexism amongst many other things isn' in line with the ethos of this great football club.
Not that I get a say in any of it but that's how I feel and so do many other reds.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You’re really not the brightest sometimes SE!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What have I said that is untrue?
You really are the most delusional City fan I know. You just can't bring yourself to admit it either.
I don't want to be a sports washing club like your poxy Tinpot club did. That's the difference Melts. It's called integrity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Have a read back of your own comments that I was replying to and think about why I might have said the penny is finally dropping, you were so close and now you’ve descended again into being a complete muppet.
And just to be very clear for the umpteenth time, I have never wanted any of the ownership structure and governance that football clubs have in place nowadays and haven’t done for over thirty years, including ours.
I’d also have a think about existing partnerships too that you’ve got if you don’t want to be a mrketing tool used by a state. Or have you already been boycotting the club, given your “integrity”…?
---------------------------------------------------------------
We don't desperately need to sell our souls to compete. We already spend similar amounts to City as it is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't desperately need to sell our souls to compete. We already spend similar amounts to City as it is.
Who do you mean by ‘we’. ?
posted on 16/2/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope you realise who the poster is you're agreeing with here. The guy who isn't right on anything ever. đ
Not sure you're in good company there melts.
Like I said....if you could just come to terms what you are this would all be avoided. But you can't. You're sponsored by Etihad because it's a failing airline running at huge losses but one that is close to the hearts of your owner. Nothing more.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please' of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 21 minutes ago
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would warrant that nobody on here has an issue with Arabs or Qataris.
What people have an issue with is autocratic dictators who suppress, brutalise and otherwise silence dissenters, enact overtly discriminatory laws, control the press, and enable the exploitation of workers to the extent of enslavement.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s being kind. He’s a facking moron.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by isembowel the libeals, an ink the bloo of thei chilen (U17054)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas please'of the year Runner Up 2021 (U18599)
posted 21 minutes ago
I like Arabs and Qataris.
OK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would warrant that nobody on here has an issue with Arabs or Qataris.
What people have an issue with is autocratic dictators who suppress, brutalise and otherwise silence dissenters, enact overtly discriminatory laws, control the press, and enable the exploitation of workers to the extent of enslavement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't care for that.
I like Arab's and Qataris.
posted on 16/2/23
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 54 seconds ago
You were bought to sports wash Abu Dhabi and attract tourism as they know the world is becoming less dependent on oil and sooner than later all cars will be electric meaning their chief export will be far less valuable.
———
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’ll reiterate what I said earlier, he isn’t the brightest!
And SE, yes, they are looking for a different sponsor to Etihad, that’s been widely publicised, and I absolutely guarantee you that will change in the next season or two.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s being kind. He’s a facking moron.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's fecking rich sweetheart.
How about going to a fecking game? Oh you don't do you?
You're just as bad the Newcastle and City fans. Shameless.
Page 5 of 7
6 | 7