comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - It's Rashers! (U2958)
posted 9 seconds ago
Here's my adjusted "wants" to fit in with Rdds thread

1) I want owners with morales that match mine.
2) I want a 10 million seat stadium with seats made of solid gold that are gifted to each fan as we exit.
3) I want, ney, demand that they employ Ana de Armas to personally spend each match weekend with me
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are ok with them saddling us with debt ?

Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've done it again... Deleted my post then replied to it

comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - It's Rashers! (U2958)
posted 11 seconds ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 1 minute ago

I'm just laughing at the fact that your morals didn't even make your top 3 priorities 🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Admittedly, being as stupid as you does look quite fun. I might jam a crayola up my nose and get the RDD experience.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rattled

comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - It's Rashers! (U2958)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 53 seconds ago
comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - It's Rashers! (U2958)
posted 9 seconds ago
Here's my adjusted "wants" to fit in with Rdds thread

1) I want owners with morales that match mine.
2) I want a 10 million seat stadium with seats made of solid gold that are gifted to each fan as we exit.
3) I want, ney, demand that they employ Ana de Armas to personally spend each match weekend with me
----------------------------------------------------------------------

So you are ok with them saddling us with debt ?

Wow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You've done it again... Deleted my post then replied to it
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have I ?

comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
I assume RDD would be OK with a consortium of paedophiles running the club? He didn't mention it in his list of priorities so it obviously doesn't matter to him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have this group bid?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim Jong Un hasn't, but you said I should have it as a priority if it mattered to me. Your words, not mine.

Have your morals around paedophilia gone out the window now RDD?

3) I want, ney, demand that they employ Ana de Armas to personally spend each match weekend with me

----------

You'll get Chris Armas and you'll be happy with it.

And indisjt ask what you want.

I asked what were the 3 most important things you require from them.

comment by Clockwork Red: With or Wout You (U4892)
posted 20 seconds ago
3) I want, ney, demand that they employ Ana de Armas to personally spend each match weekend with me

----------

You'll get Chris Armas and you'll be happy with it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Armas really would come every day

comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
I assume RDD would be OK with a consortium of paedophiles running the club? He didn't mention it in his list of priorities so it obviously doesn't matter to him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have this group bid?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim Jong Un hasn't, but you said I should have it as a priority if it mattered to me. Your words, not mine.

Have your morals around paedophilia gone out the window now RDD?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I cant influence what you think the owners should bring Champ.

Rest assured though, if a group of paedos bid for United and I were asked what my priorities for new owners were, I'd say no paedos.

Supplying lots of money for the manager to recruit as and when he sees fit.

Maintain and improve/modernise infrastructure. ie Carrington/OldTrafford

Don't get involved in the running of the football operations. Leave it to the football people.

I assume, as RDD didn't list "must not employ Chris Armas to personally spend each match weekend with me"... That he is already taken.

That's how this tardigrade level logic works, right?

comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 55 minutes ago
I was expecting the human rights thingntkngeature in some peoples answers, and was interested to find out where within their priorities it came.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There had been fewer than ten responses when you "found out" these priorities - and half of those weren't serious.

comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar

comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 23 seconds ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 22 seconds ago
comment by -bloodred- (U1222)
posted 1 minute ago
I assume RDD would be OK with a consortium of paedophiles running the club? He didn't mention it in his list of priorities so it obviously doesn't matter to him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Have this group bid?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kim Jong Un hasn't, but you said I should have it as a priority if it mattered to me. Your words, not mine.

Have your morals around paedophilia gone out the window now RDD?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I cant influence what you think the owners should bring Champ.

Rest assured though, if a group of paedos bid for United and I were asked what my priorities for new owners were, I'd say no paedos.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good for you.

Most people, if asked the question in the OP, would probably give an answer based on what they want for the football club. If you then asked, "but what if the caveat is that the owners are part of a pretty ghastly regime using as a means to sportswash?", they might say "yeah, that would be a no-go for me". Which is perfectly fine.

That, by the way, is how a normal functioning adult would approach this conversation. But obviously you are you, and you behave in the disingenuous way you have in this thread instead trying to have an adult discussion. I shall leave you to it.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one who can afford the club is ethically sound

comment by Wonder Man (U11164)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one who can afford the club is ethically sound
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be daft.

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 15 seconds ago
comment by Wonder Man (U11164)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one who can afford the club is ethically sound
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be daft.
-------------------------
You don't get anywhere near a billion without compromising your ethics somewhere

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Wonder Man (U11164)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one who can afford the club is ethically sound
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want an owner that can pay outright and not incur any debt, either themselves or on the club, that isn’t that daft a statement to be fair.

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Wonder Man (U11164)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one who can afford the club is ethically sound
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want an owner that can pay outright and not incur any debt, either themselves or on the club, that isn’t that daft a statement to be fair.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about Norway? It clearly doesn't have to be a person.

1. The debt cleared
2. Significant improvements to the fan experience (stadium redevelopment, fan engagement etc.)
3. Astute executive hires (read: people who know how to run a huge football club successfully)

comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Wonder Man (U11164)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one who can afford the club is ethically sound
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want an owner that can pay outright and not incur any debt, either themselves or on the club, that isn’t that daft a statement to be fair.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about Norway? It clearly doesn't have to be a person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well it can’t actually be a country either!

The usual chumps are here derailing another article with their constant drivel. This place is a shower of shiiiiiit now

Culer installed as ceo
Rdd as woman’s team manager (until culer shuts it down)
A statue of Greenwood out front.
A crackdown on Bobby charlton’s stationary and toilet roll reselling business

comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 13 minutes ago
The usual chumps are here derailing another article with their constant drivel. This place is a shower of shiiiiiit now
----------------------------------------------------------------------Notice that we all treated this article as serious and answered with football related “wants”.

RDD then played his little trump card and derailed his own thread, which was his plan all along. As you know.

I guess you will align yourself with anyone though, as long as they are pro-Qatari takeover

comment by Ji Sung Park's Cousin - It's Rashers! (U2958)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by scholayScholes (U13961)
posted 13 minutes ago
The usual chumps are here derailing another article with their constant drivel. This place is a shower of shiiiiiit now
----------------------------------------------------------------------Notice that we all treated this article as serious and answered with football related “wants”.

RDD then played his little trump card and derailed his own thread, which was his plan all along. As you know.

I guess you will align yourself with anyone though, as long as they are pro-Qatari takeover
----------------------------------------------------------------------
cool stories

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 55 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Wonder Man (U11164)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 13 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 32 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I ❤️ FRDD (U22942)
posted 38 seconds ago
Looks like Jo has spoiled the thread so i will say this

Clearly, who owns the club isn't too important as long as they run the club well.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope. Clearly who owns the club is very important.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Beyond what I said?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. They must be ethically sound. Not like Qatar
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No one who can afford the club is ethically sound
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't be daft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If you want an owner that can pay outright and not incur any debt, either themselves or on the club, that isn’t that daft a statement to be fair.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
How about Norway? It clearly doesn't have to be a person.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well it can’t actually be a country either!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just name someone as Qatar do.