https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1634956907268960256/pu/vid/1920x1080/HsPcQasAhpIvef7w.mp4?tag=14

By contrast...Enzo radar for racking through-passes is absolutely stupendous.
Eye of 🪡

Comment deleted by Article Creator

King of the sharticle

comment by Chelseamf™®© (U1677)
posted 17 hours, 50 minutes ago
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1634956907268960256/pu/vid/1920x1080/HsPcQasAhpIvef7w.mp4?tag=14

By contrast...Enzo radar for racking through-passes is absolutely stupendous.
Eye of 🪡
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes his passing is remarkable

Was it that good in World Cup?

Yep, did exhibit that variety of extensive passing distribution at the WC. (Voted player of the tournament)
Passes over the top of opposition last line of defence was a feature of Argentina's play. Alvarez benefitted from this, massively.

comment by Chelseamf™®© (U1677)
posted 3 hours, 29 minutes ago
Yep, did exhibit that variety of extensive passing distribution at the WC. (Voted player of the tournament)
Passes over the top of opposition last line of defence was a feature of Argentina's play. Alvarez benefitted from this, massively.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Good to know. I didn't see that many games

From what I have seen of him in Prem he looks more talented than Rice

I like Felix, but we have bought so many forward thinking players that another would just be pointless. He was taken off to give us more aggressiveness in midfield - which Gallagher did. But in games when you have a lot of possession, a player like Felix is a great weapon.

Enzo & Rice are different profiles of midfielders that may end up playing together and complementing each other.
Rice is more or less a box to box ball-winning midfielder.
Enzo is a tempo-setting complete playmaker.

They can co-exist in the same lineup.
Do I think re-signing Rice is or should be a priority signing for the club? Not really, but the idea of them in the team works in theory.

comment by Chelseamf™®© (U1677)
posted 1 minute ago
Enzo & Rice are different profiles of midfielders that may end up playing together and complementing each other.
Rice is more or less a box to box ball-winning midfielder.
Enzo is a tempo-setting complete playmaker.

They can co-exist in the same lineup.
Do I think re-signing Rice is or should be a priority signing for the club? Not really, but the idea of them in the team works in theory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I still haven't made my mind up about Rice. He's not an 70m plus player. Not sure he'll develop into that special player that a lot of people seem to think he is. If we can get Kante anywhere near full fitness and release Enzo from the shackles of only defensive duties, he will show what he can do.

comment by Chelseamf™®© (U1677)
posted 22 hours, 15 minutes ago
Enzo & Rice are different profiles of midfielders that may end up playing together and complementing each other.
Rice is more or less a box to box ball-winning midfielder.
Enzo is a tempo-setting complete playmaker.

They can co-exist in the same lineup.
Do I think re-signing Rice is or should be a priority signing for the club? Not really, but the idea of them in the team works in theory.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes agree. Enzo can do the lot.

Enzo-Zak pivot when Kante is injured

I'm not sure what the plan is with Zak, but there hasn't been any rumblings that the club intend to trigger the buy option.
I can only deduce based on that...he's going to be sent back to Juventus.

Andrey Santos work-permit is a certainty now for next season, with him being called-up for Brazil. He'll be in the squad come the new season.