comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 57 minutes ago

So much for the SNP article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t believe it’s gone already!!

Thing is-you just know it’s the same guy every time!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now my life isn't aw that superb but how fcking sad are younof that's your reason for getting oot yer bed in the morning?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Missed it. Was it the usual?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro55?

Enlighten me anyone who has knowledge of this stuff, only from a layman’s pov but constantly diluting shares to raise capital cannot be a substanable business model. Is it to oust King? Is it to simply pay wages and overheads etc.. all seems crazy it was only a few weeks or go this was done

Rangers have now issued 450,000,000 shares is that normal for a business or football club?

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 57 minutes ago

So much for the SNP article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t believe it’s gone already!!

Thing is-you just know it’s the same guy every time!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now my life isn't aw that superb but how fcking sad are younof that's your reason for getting oot yer bed in the morning?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Missed it. Was it the usual?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro55?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gotta think so? If not a similar sorta of vanker

comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 56 minutes ago
Enlighten me anyone who has knowledge of this stuff, only from a layman’s pov but constantly diluting shares to raise capital cannot be a substanable business model. Is it to oust King? Is it to simply pay wages and overheads etc.. all seems crazy it was only a few weeks or go this was done
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash boost, timmy.

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (2 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 57 minutes ago

So much for the SNP article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t believe it’s gone already!!

Thing is-you just know it’s the same guy every time!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now my life isn't aw that superb but how fcking sad are younof that's your reason for getting oot yer bed in the morning?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Missed it. Was it the usual?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro55?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s yer man.

Reappeared as Lanarkshire Lad I think it was, and had a go at the SNP (not without merit).

Was clear who it was though.

comment by Insufferable-Piffle, just in case, I'm sorry! (U4388)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 57 minutes ago

So much for the SNP article.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can’t believe it’s gone already!!

Thing is-you just know it’s the same guy every time!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now my life isn't aw that superb but how fcking sad are younof that's your reason for getting oot yer bed in the morning?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought you were talking about me at first!

Then realised it might as well have been about me…

God loves a trier. Even though rugby is for pooves.

comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 9 minutes ago
God loves a trier. Even though rugby is for pooves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fart lighting thing is just to ensure they get their cracks out.

comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 56 minutes ago
Enlighten me anyone who has knowledge of this stuff, only from a layman’s pov but constantly diluting shares to raise capital cannot be a substanable business model. Is it to oust King? Is it to simply pay wages and overheads etc.. all seems crazy it was only a few weeks or go this was done
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash boost, timmy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Saw a decent reply to that:

Daily Record 1912 - "Titanic to benefit from water boost opportunity."

Sooo,

Rodgers v Postecoglou

Has it gone to extra time and penalties?

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 9 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by Chris[topher] (U20930)
posted 10 minutes ago
disappointed that we haven't been linked to Ange more, think he's grate
----------------------------------------------------------------------

One of a kind eh?

You that is
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Ahhhhhhh is it him?

comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 12 hours, 15 minutes ago
Rangers have now issued 450,000,000 shares is that normal for a business or football club?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the majority shareholding votes for it then it’s up to them if their shareholding gets diluted. Only way to prevent that happening is to buy more shares and keep your overall percentage.

It’s the small individual shareholder who gets shafted but as those are mainly fans they don’t really care about the value. It’s more a gesture of support so the cost is immaterial.

There does come a point however where the volume of shares means the value drops to virtually nothing and then what is the purpose of buying even more unless it’s to essentially find the business itself.

I mean, where else can they borrow money from?

No, no, no - you don't understand - more shares at the same price means the club is worth more, right? £112m versus ra terroroists £105m - yasssss! GSTK

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 17 minutes ago
No, no, no - you don't understand - more shares at the same price means the club is worth more, right? £112m versus ra terroroists £105m - yasssss! GSTK
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Or this could indeed be correct

comment by I'm not as think as you drunk I am.......Schizophrenia was my idea!.....No it wasn't!.....You are never alone with a Schizo :D (U2115)
posted 11 hours, 43 minutes ago
Sooo,

Rodgers v Postecoglou

Has it gone to extra time and penalties?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope it doesn't. We don't get nearly as much practice,

What part of the team do we need to strengthen for CL?

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 17 minutes ago
No, no, no - you don't understand - more shares at the same price means the club is worth more, right? £112m versus ra terroroists £105m - yasssss! GSTK
----------------------------------------------------------------------



Or this could indeed be correct
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣🤣🤣

comment by FourThrees (U9258)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
What part of the team do we need to strengthen for CL?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd say LB, LCB, RW, #9, #10 - not necessarily in that order. Depends heavily on who leaves, who is available in our market and who wants to play in Scotland but these are our weakest links imho - they all do OK and some much improved but:

Taylor - looks like he's blowing out his erse after 5 mins and not strong or dynamic enough.

Starfelt - still mesmerised by balls over the top, can be rash and not dominant enough in the air.

#7 - Abada prob away, Forrest prob done, Hak & Maeda seem preferred on the left?

#9 - as well as Kyogo has done in Scotland he was a main reason we didn't get any more CL points - just need better quality somehow.

#10 - could really do with a focal point that everything goes through. MOR might one day be that but isn't there yet. Calmac, Maeda, Hak, Turnbull, Mooy, Hatate, Iwata can all, in theory, play in there but none as good as MOR who is not good enough yet or we lose too much of them playing out of their more natural position.

I said weeks ago who can go. I feel sorry for Turnbull, Welsh, Forrest, Ralston, Hazard, McCarthy then the guys that are loaned out - Johnston, Otoo, Monty, Kenny, Shaw, Urhoghide - all these guys being kept on a yo-yo string and smoke blown up their @rse cos we need home trained and home developed names for UEFA. Doubtful they'd be here otherwise?

Will be interesting if Ange gives Johnston a shot when he comes back?

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by FourThrees (U9258)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
What part of the team do we need to strengthen for CL?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd say LB, LCB, RW, #9, #10 - not necessarily in that order. Depends heavily on who leaves, who is available in our market and who wants to play in Scotland but these are our weakest links imho - they all do OK and some much improved but:

Taylor - looks like he's blowing out his erse after 5 mins and not strong or dynamic enough.

Starfelt - still mesmerised by balls over the top, can be rash and not dominant enough in the air.

#7 - Abada prob away, Forrest prob done, Hak & Maeda seem preferred on the left?

#9 - as well as Kyogo has done in Scotland he was a main reason we didn't get any more CL points - just need better quality somehow.

#10 - could really do with a focal point that everything goes through. MOR might one day be that but isn't there yet. Calmac, Maeda, Hak, Turnbull, Mooy, Hatate, Iwata can all, in theory, play in there but none as good as MOR who is not good enough yet or we lose too much of them playing out of their more natural position.

I said weeks ago who can go. I feel sorry for Turnbull, Welsh, Forrest, Ralston, Hazard, McCarthy then the guys that are loaned out - Johnston, Otoo, Monty, Kenny, Shaw, Urhoghide - all these guys being kept on a yo-yo string and smoke blown up their @rse cos we need home trained and home developed names for UEFA. Doubtful they'd be here otherwise?

Will be interesting if Ange gives Johnston a shot when he comes back?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Your last sentence.

Why? Just……why?

Cos I knew it would ruin your day!

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by FourThrees (U9258)
posted 1 hour, 2 minutes ago
What part of the team do we need to strengthen for CL?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd say LB, LCB, RW, #9, #10 - not necessarily in that order. Depends heavily on who leaves, who is available in our market and who wants to play in Scotland but these are our weakest links imho - they all do OK and some much improved but:

Taylor - looks like he's blowing out his erse after 5 mins and not strong or dynamic enough.

Starfelt - still mesmerised by balls over the top, can be rash and not dominant enough in the air.

#7 - Abada prob away, Forrest prob done, Hak & Maeda seem preferred on the left?

#9 - as well as Kyogo has done in Scotland he was a main reason we didn't get any more CL points - just need better quality somehow.

#10 - could really do with a focal point that everything goes through. MOR might one day be that but isn't there yet. Calmac, Maeda, Hak, Turnbull, Mooy, Hatate, Iwata can all, in theory, play in there but none as good as MOR who is not good enough yet or we lose too much of them playing out of their more natural position.

I said weeks ago who can go. I feel sorry for Turnbull, Welsh, Forrest, Ralston, Hazard, McCarthy then the guys that are loaned out - Johnston, Otoo, Monty, Kenny, Shaw, Urhoghide - all these guys being kept on a yo-yo string and smoke blown up their @rse cos we need home trained and home developed names for UEFA. Doubtful they'd be here otherwise?

Will be interesting if Ange gives Johnston a shot when he comes back?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yup pretty much agree with all of that, plus add the Ajetis, Barkas and Soro of ones to go.

Was Mooy a one year contract? We may be looking to replace him and O'Riley this summer, see reports of clubs being interested in O'Riley this morning.

Apparently Kent is going to Burnley?

comment by GTB, moon howling nonsense (U14017)
posted 11 seconds ago
Was Mooy a one year contract? We may be looking to replace him and O'Riley this summer, see reports of clubs being interested in O'Riley this morning.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mooy has another year.

MOR still has 3 years