comment by kramthered (U10304)
posted 29 minutes ago
Klopp will be charged, lying about a conversation with the ref is about as snide as you can get.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp should have been red carded for what he did to the 4th official and and also a separate charge for his remarks about the Ref!!!!
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 32 minutes ago
Hilarious seeing all these Spurs fans claim that Skipps leg breaker wasn’t a red while Jota’s high foot was. Absolutely fecking delusional.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Skipp won the ball. Jota put his studs straight into Skipps face. Your the fecking delusional clown.
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by kramthered (U10304)
posted 29 minutes ago
Klopp will be charged, lying about a conversation with the ref is about as snide as you can get.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp should have been red carded for what he did to the 4th official and and also a separate charge for his remarks about the Ref!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He will be charged. He's probably already booked a flight to Turkey to enable him to lie through his teeth
oh the naivety I had when I posted this asking people to be 'impartial'. Silly boy...
I've now watched the highlights on MOTD though, and for what it's worth, I think the pundits on there called it right:
Skipp on Diaz should've been a free kick and a yellow. Only saved by the fact he nicked the ball first. But if he'd had seen red it would be hard to argue too much against.
Jota on Skipp, very dangerous, didn't get the ball, should've been a definite red.
I don't think they discussed the Richarlison penalty shout. In real time I thought it was nailed on. On replay....I think it still probably should have been given but it was maybe a little soft.
As for Klopps behaviour, it's one of those where if you're an opposition or neutral fan you find it pretty awful, but if its 'one of your own' you love it.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 11 minutes ago
Bringing up a manager who hasn’t managed in the PL for 10 years as a defence for Klopp’s actions yesterday is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a defence because at no point have I defended Klopp. Perhaps you should look up the meaning of the word defence. I merely highlighted some hypocrisy and double standards
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 11 minutes ago
Bringing up a manager who hasn’t managed in the PL for 10 years as a defence for Klopp’s actions yesterday is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a defence because at no point have I defended Klopp. Perhaps you should look up the meaning of the word defence. I merely highlighted some hypocrisy and double standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You did use it as a defence. You used it as deflection, which is a form of defence.
You’ve no proof of hypocrisy here.
You’re assuming that people criticising Klopp didn’t also criticise Ferguson, but you have no proof for that and are probably basing it on your own character.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 11 minutes ago
Bringing up a manager who hasn’t managed in the PL for 10 years as a defence for Klopp’s actions yesterday is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a defence because at no point have I defended Klopp. Perhaps you should look up the meaning of the word defence. I merely highlighted some hypocrisy and double standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You did use it as a defence. You used it as deflection, which is a form of defence.
You’ve no proof of hypocrisy here.
You’re assuming that people criticising Klopp didn’t also criticise Ferguson, but you have no proof for that and are probably basing it on your own character.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't assume anything about people, I stated a general fact about the generality of the Man United fan base.
Pointing out hypocrisy is definitely not necessarily a deflection. It can be sometimes and not other times. That's not debateable, so your reasoning is flawed ab initio and it's you making assumptions about my intentions.
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 58 seconds ago
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because he’s not the one who came out and told the media that the referee has a personal vendetta against Liverpool, or words to that effect.
But yes, the abhorrent behaviour of players and managers towards officials is a problem across every single club.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 58 seconds ago
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because he’s not the one who came out and told the media that the referee has a personal vendetta against Liverpool, or words to that effect.
But yes, the abhorrent behaviour of players and managers towards officials is a problem across every single club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he feels that way and they dont explain or listen he should keep quiet and allow it?
Tierney has been an awful ref for us on the end of a lot of controversy against us. The worst reffing performance ive ever seen was him reffing the 2-2 vs tottenham the other season where he sent robbo off let kan stay on and ignored blatant jota pen etc.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
Officiating in this league is run like a mafia, theyre untouchable. Ofc its not right the way some managers and players react like they do but its understandable too from frustration. Frustration because they run it how they do with such arrogances etc too and allowed to get away with it scot-free.
They are really poor and need to start opening up avenues to take more responsibility and be culpable. Maybe then they'd get a bit of respect they demand. Its earnt not given thats what we're taught no?
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 58 seconds ago
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because he’s not the one who came out and told the media that the referee has a personal vendetta against Liverpool, or words to that effect.
But yes, the abhorrent behaviour of players and managers towards officials is a problem across every single club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he feels that way and they dont explain or listen he should keep quiet and allow it?
Tierney has been an awful ref for us on the end of a lot of controversy against us. The worst reffing performance ive ever seen was him reffing the 2-2 vs tottenham the other season where he sent robbo off let kan stay on and ignored blatant jota pen etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, he should behave like an adult on the touch line and approach the authorities in private if he feels there’s an issue.
Ranting on the sidelines and then moaning to the media makes him look like someone who can’t control their emotions, rather than someone with a legitimate complaint.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it a requirement that I mention Klopp? So if I'd mentioned Klopp it wouldn't be a reluctance to stay on topic? Stop with these ridiculous logic vacuums.
he has approached them, they brush it off and do nothing as he said and continue to treat klopp with how he feels hes been treated.
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it a requirement that I mention Klopp? So if I'd mentioned Klopp it wouldn't be a reluctance to stay on topic? Stop with these ridiculous logic vacuums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, we’re done.
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
he has approached them, they brush it off and do nothing as he saidand continue to treat klopp with how he feels hes been treated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, if you’re happy with that behaviour then that’s your lookout.
I hope you don’t have kids.
"We have our history with Tierney, I really don't know what he has against us," Klopp told Sky Sports. "He has said there [are] no problems but that cannot be true.
"How he looks at me, I don't understand it. In England nobody has to clarify these situations, it's really tricky and hard to understand.
"What he said to me when he gave me the yellow card is not OK."
____________
Is what he said winston, so i assume hes been down the private route already.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it a requirement that I mention Klopp? So if I'd mentioned Klopp it wouldn't be a reluctance to stay on topic? Stop with these ridiculous logic vacuums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, we’re done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 4 minutes ago
"We have our history with Tierney, I really don't know what he has against us," Klopp told Sky Sports. "He has said there [are] no problems but that cannot be true.
"How he looks at me, I don't understand it. In England nobody has to clarify these situations, it's really tricky and hard to understand.
"What he said to me when he gave me the yellow card is not OK."
____________
Is what he said winston, so i assume hes been down the private route already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then perhaps he should keep it that way.
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
he has approached them, they brush it off and do nothing as he saidand continue to treat klopp with how he feels hes been treated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, if you’re happy with that behaviour then that’s your lookout.
I hope you don’t have kids.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Father of the year spent 'quality time' posting on 606 all day again
You're so unaware of how transparent you are it's unreal
‘Spent all day posting on 606’
I’ve done loads with my son today, and all weekend in fact.
Some of us can post online a fair bit during the day without it taking over our lives. It’s weird that you think I couldn’t have been doing anything else.
Clearly you’re sat in a basement somewhere with a computer screen and your right hand as your best friends, so you think that’s how everyone lives their lives.
As a side note, I love how you’ve become so obsessed that you login just to follow me around. I’m in total control of you, and you know it.
Of course you did, you were posting here while driving somewhere, playing football, giving him focus. We all know you're on another level when it comes to multitasking.
You've chosen to prioritise arguing here, this is a fact.
Sign in if you want to comment
Questions about decisions
Page 5 of 6
6
posted on 1/5/23
comment by kramthered (U10304)
posted 29 minutes ago
Klopp will be charged, lying about a conversation with the ref is about as snide as you can get.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp should have been red carded for what he did to the 4th official and and also a separate charge for his remarks about the Ref!!!!
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 32 minutes ago
Hilarious seeing all these Spurs fans claim that Skipps leg breaker wasn’t a red while Jota’s high foot was. Absolutely fecking delusional.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Skipp won the ball. Jota put his studs straight into Skipps face. Your the fecking delusional clown.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by RED666👺 The Influencer (U6562)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by kramthered (U10304)
posted 29 minutes ago
Klopp will be charged, lying about a conversation with the ref is about as snide as you can get.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Klopp should have been red carded for what he did to the 4th official and and also a separate charge for his remarks about the Ref!!!!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He will be charged. He's probably already booked a flight to Turkey to enable him to lie through his teeth
posted on 1/5/23
oh the naivety I had when I posted this asking people to be 'impartial'. Silly boy...
I've now watched the highlights on MOTD though, and for what it's worth, I think the pundits on there called it right:
Skipp on Diaz should've been a free kick and a yellow. Only saved by the fact he nicked the ball first. But if he'd had seen red it would be hard to argue too much against.
Jota on Skipp, very dangerous, didn't get the ball, should've been a definite red.
I don't think they discussed the Richarlison penalty shout. In real time I thought it was nailed on. On replay....I think it still probably should have been given but it was maybe a little soft.
As for Klopps behaviour, it's one of those where if you're an opposition or neutral fan you find it pretty awful, but if its 'one of your own' you love it.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 11 minutes ago
Bringing up a manager who hasn’t managed in the PL for 10 years as a defence for Klopp’s actions yesterday is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a defence because at no point have I defended Klopp. Perhaps you should look up the meaning of the word defence. I merely highlighted some hypocrisy and double standards
posted on 1/5/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 11 minutes ago
Bringing up a manager who hasn’t managed in the PL for 10 years as a defence for Klopp’s actions yesterday is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a defence because at no point have I defended Klopp. Perhaps you should look up the meaning of the word defence. I merely highlighted some hypocrisy and double standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You did use it as a defence. You used it as deflection, which is a form of defence.
You’ve no proof of hypocrisy here.
You’re assuming that people criticising Klopp didn’t also criticise Ferguson, but you have no proof for that and are probably basing it on your own character.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 3 hours, 11 minutes ago
Bringing up a manager who hasn’t managed in the PL for 10 years as a defence for Klopp’s actions yesterday is bizarre.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's not a defence because at no point have I defended Klopp. Perhaps you should look up the meaning of the word defence. I merely highlighted some hypocrisy and double standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You did use it as a defence. You used it as deflection, which is a form of defence.
You’ve no proof of hypocrisy here.
You’re assuming that people criticising Klopp didn’t also criticise Ferguson, but you have no proof for that and are probably basing it on your own character.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't assume anything about people, I stated a general fact about the generality of the Man United fan base.
Pointing out hypocrisy is definitely not necessarily a deflection. It can be sometimes and not other times. That's not debateable, so your reasoning is flawed ab initio and it's you making assumptions about my intentions.
posted on 1/5/23
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
posted on 1/5/23
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 58 seconds ago
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because he’s not the one who came out and told the media that the referee has a personal vendetta against Liverpool, or words to that effect.
But yes, the abhorrent behaviour of players and managers towards officials is a problem across every single club.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 58 seconds ago
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because he’s not the one who came out and told the media that the referee has a personal vendetta against Liverpool, or words to that effect.
But yes, the abhorrent behaviour of players and managers towards officials is a problem across every single club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he feels that way and they dont explain or listen he should keep quiet and allow it?
Tierney has been an awful ref for us on the end of a lot of controversy against us. The worst reffing performance ive ever seen was him reffing the 2-2 vs tottenham the other season where he sent robbo off let kan stay on and ignored blatant jota pen etc.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
posted on 1/5/23
Officiating in this league is run like a mafia, theyre untouchable. Ofc its not right the way some managers and players react like they do but its understandable too from frustration. Frustration because they run it how they do with such arrogances etc too and allowed to get away with it scot-free.
They are really poor and need to start opening up avenues to take more responsibility and be culpable. Maybe then they'd get a bit of respect they demand. Its earnt not given thats what we're taught no?
posted on 1/5/23
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 6 seconds ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 58 seconds ago
Mason was far worse than Klopp everytime the camera went to the touchline it was him screaming at officials. Nothing said about that though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Probably because he’s not the one who came out and told the media that the referee has a personal vendetta against Liverpool, or words to that effect.
But yes, the abhorrent behaviour of players and managers towards officials is a problem across every single club.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If he feels that way and they dont explain or listen he should keep quiet and allow it?
Tierney has been an awful ref for us on the end of a lot of controversy against us. The worst reffing performance ive ever seen was him reffing the 2-2 vs tottenham the other season where he sent robbo off let kan stay on and ignored blatant jota pen etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, he should behave like an adult on the touch line and approach the authorities in private if he feels there’s an issue.
Ranting on the sidelines and then moaning to the media makes him look like someone who can’t control their emotions, rather than someone with a legitimate complaint.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it a requirement that I mention Klopp? So if I'd mentioned Klopp it wouldn't be a reluctance to stay on topic? Stop with these ridiculous logic vacuums.
posted on 1/5/23
he has approached them, they brush it off and do nothing as he said and continue to treat klopp with how he feels hes been treated.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it a requirement that I mention Klopp? So if I'd mentioned Klopp it wouldn't be a reluctance to stay on topic? Stop with these ridiculous logic vacuums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, we’re done.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
he has approached them, they brush it off and do nothing as he saidand continue to treat klopp with how he feels hes been treated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, if you’re happy with that behaviour then that’s your lookout.
I hope you don’t have kids.
posted on 1/5/23
"We have our history with Tierney, I really don't know what he has against us," Klopp told Sky Sports. "He has said there [are] no problems but that cannot be true.
"How he looks at me, I don't understand it. In England nobody has to clarify these situations, it's really tricky and hard to understand.
"What he said to me when he gave me the yellow card is not OK."
____________
Is what he said winston, so i assume hes been down the private route already.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 59 seconds ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 41 seconds ago
comment by K7-0ptimus Primal (U1282)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 4 minutes ago
It’s not a fact then, it’s an assumption.
There’s no hypocrisy here. There’s just a reluctance to stick to the actual discussion, presumably because there’s no credible defence of the way Klopp behaved.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What are you talking about? Don't waste my time. Now you're accusing me of reluctance to stick to the topic. More assumptions and bogus accusations. You seem to think with certainty that you know the unknowable and know people intentions. You don't and you are wrong.
How can I be reluctant to stick to the topic when my comment was a reply to two other comments on the thread? This is nonsense Winston. Not in the mood for a silly debate bro.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Because you didn’t even mention Klopp, you just tried to deflect onto Ferguson and accused people of hypocrisy without evidence.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it a requirement that I mention Klopp? So if I'd mentioned Klopp it wouldn't be a reluctance to stay on topic? Stop with these ridiculous logic vacuums.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, we’re done.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
posted on 1/5/23
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 4 minutes ago
"We have our history with Tierney, I really don't know what he has against us," Klopp told Sky Sports. "He has said there [are] no problems but that cannot be true.
"How he looks at me, I don't understand it. In England nobody has to clarify these situations, it's really tricky and hard to understand.
"What he said to me when he gave me the yellow card is not OK."
____________
Is what he said winston, so i assume hes been down the private route already.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Then perhaps he should keep it that way.
posted on 1/5/23
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 8 hours, 15 minutes ago
comment by InBefore (U20589)
posted 1 minute ago
he has approached them, they brush it off and do nothing as he saidand continue to treat klopp with how he feels hes been treated.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Okay, if you’re happy with that behaviour then that’s your lookout.
I hope you don’t have kids.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Father of the year spent 'quality time' posting on 606 all day again
You're so unaware of how transparent you are it's unreal
posted on 1/5/23
‘Spent all day posting on 606’
I’ve done loads with my son today, and all weekend in fact.
Some of us can post online a fair bit during the day without it taking over our lives. It’s weird that you think I couldn’t have been doing anything else.
Clearly you’re sat in a basement somewhere with a computer screen and your right hand as your best friends, so you think that’s how everyone lives their lives.
As a side note, I love how you’ve become so obsessed that you login just to follow me around. I’m in total control of you, and you know it.
posted on 1/5/23
Of course you did, you were posting here while driving somewhere, playing football, giving him focus. We all know you're on another level when it comes to multitasking.
You've chosen to prioritise arguing here, this is a fact.
Page 5 of 6
6