Agreed

Nobody's paying 75m for havertz though.

There's no way Chelsea will get what their expecting for most of the players they're selling.

comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 3 minutes ago
Nobody's paying 75m for havertz though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal need a bigger squad... And Chelsea don't sell players cheaply

Guardian are reporting Chelsea are demanding £70 mil

comment by The Revenant (U21957)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 3 minutes ago
Nobody's paying 75m for havertz though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal need a bigger squad... And Chelsea don't sell players cheaply
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They didn't, but due to decisions made by their new ownership, they may be left with little choice.

comment by Arsenal's 3G Network (U21076)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Revenant (U21957)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 3 minutes ago
Nobody's paying 75m for havertz though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal need a bigger squad... And Chelsea don't sell players cheaply
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They didn't, but due to decisions made by their new ownership, they may be left with little choice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They got rid off Felix, Kante to trim the wage bill

comment by The Revenant (U21957)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 3 minutes ago
Nobody's paying 75m for havertz though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal need a bigger squad... And Chelsea don't sell players cheaply
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That doesn't mean we'll pay £70m.

comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by The Revenant (U21957)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by King TUt (U3732)
posted 3 minutes ago
Nobody's paying 75m for havertz though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Arsenal need a bigger squad... And Chelsea don't sell players cheaply
----------------------------------------------------------------------

That doesn't mean we'll pay £70m.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh you'd have to be a complete idiot club to spend that on him

Why are Arsenal considered Havertz ?
Where is the bid for Rice?

Declan rice is quality …..can’t believe some don’t rate him

Reminds me of carrick in that it will take a move to one of the big teams for him to finally get the plaudits

I really don’t understand this link from an Arsenal point of view…

If they want to spend 40 million maybe Arteta can get something out of the player but get Rice and Caicedo done first.

They already have a Jesus I don’t get why why would want another striker whose best attributes aren’t scoring goals.

Probably an unpopular opinion but I think he is worth that. Not necessarily based on his Chelsea performance's but I don't think the Chelsea team/system and constant changing 11 compliments his skills.

I think he has talent and could def offer something to a good team in the right position. Of he goes to a team and plays CM or AM I genuinely think in a complimentary system he would excel.

When people say Kai Havertz is a proven PL player I agree, he's proved in the PL that he can't hit a barn door...👀

comment by FootyMcfootfoot (U21853)
posted 16 minutes ago
Probably an unpopular opinion but I think he is worth that. Not necessarily based on his Chelsea performance's but I don't think the Chelsea team/system and constant changing 11 compliments his skills.

I think he has talent and could def offer something to a good team in the right position. Of he goes to a team and plays CM or AM I genuinely think in a complimentary system he would excel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Completely agree…he is a very technical player being judged as a striker as Chelsea chucked him there

He would be good playing off a striker as the link rather than being relied on as a goal scorer

He isn’t worth the money they want though but just better than how he has looked

Op you added an extra 0 in your Rice price. Must have been a typo. You’re welcome

comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 31 minutes ago
They already have a Jesus I don’t get why why would want another striker whose best attributes aren’t scoring goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We also have Trossard

Would be funny if Arsenal paid £70m for Havertz, he’s crap.

comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
Op you added an extra 0 in your Rice price. Must have been a typo. You’re welcome
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not talking about basmati rice 🍚. It's Declan Rice

comment by The Revenant (U21957)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Baz tard (U19119)
posted 3 minutes ago
Op you added an extra 0 in your Rice price. Must have been a typo. You’re welcome
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I am not talking about basmati rice 🍚. It's Declan Rice
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Good point. You added an extra 2 and 0 then.

comment by 93% (U22980)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by FFS Mike. (U1170)
posted 31 minutes ago
They already have a Jesus I don’t get why why would want another striker whose best attributes aren’t scoring goals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We also have Trossard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps, Arsenal are testing waters...

I doubt Arsenal will pay anything near that. Utd have bid £40m for Mount. It should be something around that imo

Why are teams interested in Havertz?

He's been awful.