It's like this is first transfer for that amount and in last 15 years we had transfers for 50 pounds. LOL. Have you been frozen in some capsule last 30 years?
I will restructure our bid to match or even better City but won’t go above £90 million
————-
Don’t show your hand, if anyone from City is reading this, well………..
£90m is acceptable if West Ham agree.
£91m is a breach of Human Rights and the reason junior doctors are camping out near foodbanks if they don't.
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
Where does it stop? Pay £100 million plus for Rice and another club will be asking for £150 million next season.
This also speaks to the failure of our scouting system. That in the last five years or so they have not been able to bring through a DM ready to play in the first team.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like City’s doping only started last season. Get real!
It stops when transfer fees become too large for ordinary, rule abiding clubs to budget for within the constraints of FFP.
Already clubs are relying on waiting for contracts to wind down and sign players for free.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like City’s doping only started last season. Get real!
——-
Exactly, yes the revenues good now it’s just how that advantage was obtained in the first place which is under investigation.
Man Cheaty has no chance of signing Rice for £80mil
"....but to pay £100 million plus for one player in a climate teachers, nurses and other everyday working people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me."
You might want to avoid the outside world, and the inter/social media, altogether then.
Would then paying £80M in the same climate be ok with you?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 50 minutes ago
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conveniently missing out it was the doping that enabled you to be in that position in the first place 🙄
comment by newWAYNEorder (U23010)
posted 2 minutes ago
"....but to pay £100 million plus for one player in a climate teachers, nurses and other everyday working people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me."
You might want to avoid the outside world, and the inter/social media, altogether then.
Would then paying £80M in the same climate be ok with you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are we not looking on the continent.? This Youssouf Fofana of Monaco that we are being linked to an alternative for £35 million, is Rice £65 million better than him?
The narrative from the bias media is that we keep missing our number one target. So what!? We pushed City last season with our alternative targets, who says we cannot repeat the feat or even go one better with a sensible transfer window.
Caicedo and Rice
by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)26 April 2023
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
I would not mind spunking our entire summer budget on the duo.
They would have made a difference today.
In all the negativity, we did mathematically qualify for the champions league today.
We will challenge again next season.
------
A couple of months ago you were more than happy to spend ~ £250m on 2 players 😂
Does it matter is he's 65 million better, are you more likely to win the title with Rice or Fofana is the question.
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Caicedo and Rice
by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)26 April 2023
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
I would not mind spunking our entire summer budget on the duo.
They would have made a difference today.
In all the negativity, we did mathematically qualify for the champions league today.
We will challenge again next season.
------
A couple of months ago you were more than happy to spend ~ £250m on 2 players 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at over £200 million for both DJ!
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
Does it matter is he's 65 million better, are you more likely to win the title with Rice or Fofana is the question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You will never know. Football is a funny game. A lot of uncertainties.
A cruciate ligament injury here; sudden loss of form there.
The risk we are assuming on Rice going over a £100 million will be too much.
comment by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Caicedo and Rice
by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)26 April 2023
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
I would not mind spunking our entire summer budget on the duo.
They would have made a difference today.
In all the negativity, we did mathematically qualify for the champions league today.
We will challenge again next season.
------
A couple of months ago you were more than happy to spend ~ £250m on 2 players 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at over £200 million for both DJ!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah but either both for 125 or more for one.
Arsenal are still preparing the 3rd bid
£90m
A Monopoly board
A packet of Samosas
As well as a shoot magazine, a whole annual from 1976
comment by 93% (U22980)
posted 10 minutes ago
Arsenal are still preparing the 3rd bid
£90m
A Monopoly board
A packet of Samosas
As well as a shoot magazine, a whole annual from 1976
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus the pound earmarked for John Henry
Arsenal are going to have to be patient if they want to get Rice, they'll need to play the long grain.
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guilty until proven innocent i see. Interesting concept
comment by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
comment by newWAYNEorder (U23010)
posted 2 minutes ago
"....but to pay £100 million plus for one player in a climate teachers, nurses and other everyday working people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me."
You might want to avoid the outside world, and the inter/social media, altogether then.
Would then paying £80M in the same climate be ok with you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are we not looking on the continent.? This Youssouf Fofana of Monaco that we are being linked to an alternative for £35 million, is Rice £65 million better than him?
The narrative from the bias media is that we keep missing our number one target. So what!? We pushed City last season with our alternative targets, who says we cannot repeat the feat or even go one better with a sensible transfer window.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was commenting on the "....people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me." as if paying any money for a sportsperson is ok while that goes on.
West Ham have rejected Manchester City’s £90m offer for Declan Rice
Sign in if you want to comment
Rice pursuit
Page 1 of 3
posted on 27/6/23
It's like this is first transfer for that amount and in last 15 years we had transfers for 50 pounds. LOL. Have you been frozen in some capsule last 30 years?
posted on 27/6/23
posted on 27/6/23
I will restructure our bid to match or even better City but won’t go above £90 million
————-
Don’t show your hand, if anyone from City is reading this, well………..
posted on 27/6/23
£90m is acceptable if West Ham agree.
£91m is a breach of Human Rights and the reason junior doctors are camping out near foodbanks if they don't.
posted on 27/6/23
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
posted on 27/6/23
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
posted on 27/6/23
Where does it stop? Pay £100 million plus for Rice and another club will be asking for £150 million next season.
This also speaks to the failure of our scouting system. That in the last five years or so they have not been able to bring through a DM ready to play in the first team.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like City’s doping only started last season. Get real!
posted on 27/6/23
It stops when transfer fees become too large for ordinary, rule abiding clubs to budget for within the constraints of FFP.
Already clubs are relying on waiting for contracts to wind down and sign players for free.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 17 minutes ago
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Like City’s doping only started last season. Get real!
——-
Exactly, yes the revenues good now it’s just how that advantage was obtained in the first place which is under investigation.
posted on 27/6/23
Man Cheaty has no chance of signing Rice for £80mil
posted on 27/6/23
"....but to pay £100 million plus for one player in a climate teachers, nurses and other everyday working people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me."
You might want to avoid the outside world, and the inter/social media, altogether then.
Would then paying £80M in the same climate be ok with you?
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 50 minutes ago
City made £300m from prize and TV money alone last season, nothing doped about that, it’s a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Conveniently missing out it was the doping that enabled you to be in that position in the first place 🙄
posted on 27/6/23
comment by newWAYNEorder (U23010)
posted 2 minutes ago
"....but to pay £100 million plus for one player in a climate teachers, nurses and other everyday working people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me."
You might want to avoid the outside world, and the inter/social media, altogether then.
Would then paying £80M in the same climate be ok with you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are we not looking on the continent.? This Youssouf Fofana of Monaco that we are being linked to an alternative for £35 million, is Rice £65 million better than him?
The narrative from the bias media is that we keep missing our number one target. So what!? We pushed City last season with our alternative targets, who says we cannot repeat the feat or even go one better with a sensible transfer window.
posted on 27/6/23
Caicedo and Rice
by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)26 April 2023
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
I would not mind spunking our entire summer budget on the duo.
They would have made a difference today.
In all the negativity, we did mathematically qualify for the champions league today.
We will challenge again next season.
------
A couple of months ago you were more than happy to spend ~ £250m on 2 players 😂
posted on 27/6/23
Does it matter is he's 65 million better, are you more likely to win the title with Rice or Fofana is the question.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Caicedo and Rice
by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)26 April 2023
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
I would not mind spunking our entire summer budget on the duo.
They would have made a difference today.
In all the negativity, we did mathematically qualify for the champions league today.
We will challenge again next season.
------
A couple of months ago you were more than happy to spend ~ £250m on 2 players 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at over £200 million for both DJ!
posted on 27/6/23
comment by HB Fashion Sakala is offside again (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
Does it matter is he's 65 million better, are you more likely to win the title with Rice or Fofana is the question.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You will never know. Football is a funny game. A lot of uncertainties.
A cruciate ligament injury here; sudden loss of form there.
The risk we are assuming on Rice going over a £100 million will be too much.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 4 minutes ago
Caicedo and Rice
by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hyp... (U7978)26 April 2023
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
I would not mind spunking our entire summer budget on the duo.
They would have made a difference today.
In all the negativity, we did mathematically qualify for the champions league today.
We will challenge again next season.
------
A couple of months ago you were more than happy to spend ~ £250m on 2 players 😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not at over £200 million for both DJ!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nah but either both for 125 or more for one.
posted on 27/6/23
Arsenal are still preparing the 3rd bid
£90m
A Monopoly board
A packet of Samosas
As well as a shoot magazine, a whole annual from 1976
posted on 27/6/23
comment by 93% (U22980)
posted 10 minutes ago
Arsenal are still preparing the 3rd bid
£90m
A Monopoly board
A packet of Samosas
As well as a shoot magazine, a whole annual from 1976
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Plus the pound earmarked for John Henry
posted on 27/6/23
Arsenal are going to have to be patient if they want to get Rice, they'll need to play the long grain.
posted on 27/6/23
comment by Aggers Right Elbow (U3402)
posted 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
Until City have been able to the address the charges hanging over the club I don’t see why they should be able to spend another 100 million on one player🤷🏼♂️ The financial doping goes on it seems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guilty until proven innocent i see. Interesting concept
posted on 27/6/23
comment by ubad9jagooner .Ramsey : don't get the hype ! (U7978)
posted 1 hour, 8 minutes ago
comment by newWAYNEorder (U23010)
posted 2 minutes ago
"....but to pay £100 million plus for one player in a climate teachers, nurses and other everyday working people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me."
You might want to avoid the outside world, and the inter/social media, altogether then.
Would then paying £80M in the same climate be ok with you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are we not looking on the continent.? This Youssouf Fofana of Monaco that we are being linked to an alternative for £35 million, is Rice £65 million better than him?
The narrative from the bias media is that we keep missing our number one target. So what!? We pushed City last season with our alternative targets, who says we cannot repeat the feat or even go one better with a sensible transfer window.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was commenting on the "....people are scavenging food banks to live does not sit well with me." as if paying any money for a sportsperson is ok while that goes on.
posted on 27/6/23
West Ham have rejected Manchester City’s £90m offer for Declan Rice
Page 1 of 3