"I also thought he looked ill - really gaunt and skinny"
He's always looked like that.
He's the Latino Luke Chadwick.
I thought he was going to get hooked at half time. He was terrible!
He's rarely done it when starting in games. Looks a far better player off the bench at his stage of his career.
Also we are concentrating too much on him, the Wolves FB was fantastic. Had him in his pocket
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
He's rarely done it when starting in games. Looks a far better player off the bench at his stage of his career.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah this.
Thought Sancho had a good impact when he came on too, looked sharp and he also retains possession much better than Garnacho.
Probably better off starting Sancho and having Garnacho as an impact player still until Garnacho becomes more consistent.
Maybe Luke Shaw is stealing Garnacho's food?
Yeah he shouldn't be starting games, suspect as soon as hojlund is fit he will come in and rashford go to the left (he was equally awful). Bright future ahead for him but just not ready to he starting games
comment by Keanos Magic Hat (U10101)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
He's rarely done it when starting in games. Looks a far better player off the bench at his stage of his career.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah this.
Thought Sancho had a good impact when he came on too, looked sharp and he also retains possession much better than Garnacho.
Probably better off starting Sancho and having Garnacho as an impact player still until Garnacho becomes more consistent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that would mean having the invisible Sancho play. He’s been woeful most of the time, though I wouldn’t be adverse to give him a few games to see if he’s actually turned the corner or it was just a one off where he looked ok.
Yeah, absolutely awful. He's still very young and will have games like that, but still not sure how ready he is to start.
I would add that I thought the change in system really didn't help him
Garnacho is a kid and cost us nothing. Antony far more worrying.
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Garnacho is a kid and cost us nothing. Antony far more worrying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel you are a little biased against Antony. He wasn't good last night but probably the least worst of the front 4. Certainly better than Rashford & Garnacho.
Not sure anyone really played well... Team needs to settle.
We have plenty of attacking options now, so hopefully some of them will thrive on the competition.
Thank god our main goalscorer of the season, Varane, stepped up to the plate.
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Garnacho is a kid and cost us nothing. Antony far more worrying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel you are a little biased against Antony. He wasn't good last night but probably the least worst of the front 4. Certainly better than Rashford & Garnacho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And that is exactly his point. They both cost us nothing! Antony 90m what on earth were we thinking
What do we do if Hojlund is better as an impact player from the bench?
He was poor, but no one was that good bar Onana (incident aside ) and maybe Varane.
Yep, he was awful last night, I was gutted Rashford, Bruno, Mount were also dreadful.
Antony the best of the lot, first half at least.
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
What do we do if Hojlund is better as an impact player from the bench?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Start Weghorst
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 9 minutes ago
What do we do if Hojlund is better as an impact player from the bench?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Start Sancho, I guess. We'll have some mint second-half performances though.
I would like Sancho to start the next game instead of Garnacho, in a false 9 position.
It would add an extra body into midfield and let Bruno and Mount play slightly deeper to help Casemiro. Then you can have Rashford and Antony as wide forwards. Not too dissimilar to Real Madrid’s current set up.
Thing is, Spurs will have Garnacho the space to attack, Wolves never.
The issue with Sancho up top, is the ball doesn't stick. You an guarantee any ball when playing out of defence comes straight back at you, as it did last night. We need some sort of outlet.
Might not be a bad idea. Problem is both Garnacho and Sancho seem to be best when coming on against tired legs. Both look pretty useless starting.
We've signed 3 players but our squad feels thinner, and more unbalanced, than ever.
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 2 minutes ago
We've signed 3 players but our squad feels thinner, and more unbalanced, than ever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only two have played, and then on one game, a the goalie was good
Sign in if you want to comment
Garnacho
Page 1 of 3
posted on 15/8/23
"I also thought he looked ill - really gaunt and skinny"
He's always looked like that.
posted on 15/8/23
He's the Latino Luke Chadwick.
posted on 15/8/23
I thought he was going to get hooked at half time. He was terrible!
posted on 15/8/23
He's rarely done it when starting in games. Looks a far better player off the bench at his stage of his career.
posted on 15/8/23
Also we are concentrating too much on him, the Wolves FB was fantastic. Had him in his pocket
posted on 15/8/23
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
He's rarely done it when starting in games. Looks a far better player off the bench at his stage of his career.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah this.
Thought Sancho had a good impact when he came on too, looked sharp and he also retains possession much better than Garnacho.
Probably better off starting Sancho and having Garnacho as an impact player still until Garnacho becomes more consistent.
posted on 15/8/23
Maybe Luke Shaw is stealing Garnacho's food?
posted on 15/8/23
Yeah he shouldn't be starting games, suspect as soon as hojlund is fit he will come in and rashford go to the left (he was equally awful). Bright future ahead for him but just not ready to he starting games
posted on 15/8/23
comment by Keanos Magic Hat (U10101)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 minute ago
He's rarely done it when starting in games. Looks a far better player off the bench at his stage of his career.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah this.
Thought Sancho had a good impact when he came on too, looked sharp and he also retains possession much better than Garnacho.
Probably better off starting Sancho and having Garnacho as an impact player still until Garnacho becomes more consistent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that would mean having the invisible Sancho play. He’s been woeful most of the time, though I wouldn’t be adverse to give him a few games to see if he’s actually turned the corner or it was just a one off where he looked ok.
posted on 15/8/23
Yeah, absolutely awful. He's still very young and will have games like that, but still not sure how ready he is to start.
I would add that I thought the change in system really didn't help him
posted on 15/8/23
Garnacho is a kid and cost us nothing. Antony far more worrying.
posted on 15/8/23
Looks like a drag act.
posted on 15/8/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Garnacho is a kid and cost us nothing. Antony far more worrying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel you are a little biased against Antony. He wasn't good last night but probably the least worst of the front 4. Certainly better than Rashford & Garnacho.
posted on 15/8/23
Not sure anyone really played well... Team needs to settle.
We have plenty of attacking options now, so hopefully some of them will thrive on the competition.
Thank god our main goalscorer of the season, Varane, stepped up to the plate.
posted on 15/8/23
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 2 minutes ago
Garnacho is a kid and cost us nothing. Antony far more worrying.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I feel you are a little biased against Antony. He wasn't good last night but probably the least worst of the front 4. Certainly better than Rashford & Garnacho.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And that is exactly his point. They both cost us nothing! Antony 90m what on earth were we thinking
posted on 15/8/23
What do we do if Hojlund is better as an impact player from the bench?
posted on 15/8/23
He was poor, but no one was that good bar Onana (incident aside ) and maybe Varane.
posted on 15/8/23
Yep, he was awful last night, I was gutted Rashford, Bruno, Mount were also dreadful.
Antony the best of the lot, first half at least.
posted on 15/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 4 minutes ago
What do we do if Hojlund is better as an impact player from the bench?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Start Weghorst
posted on 15/8/23
comment by Ohnono (U22987)
posted 9 minutes ago
What do we do if Hojlund is better as an impact player from the bench?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Start Sancho, I guess. We'll have some mint second-half performances though.
posted on 15/8/23
I would like Sancho to start the next game instead of Garnacho, in a false 9 position.
It would add an extra body into midfield and let Bruno and Mount play slightly deeper to help Casemiro. Then you can have Rashford and Antony as wide forwards. Not too dissimilar to Real Madrid’s current set up.
posted on 15/8/23
Thing is, Spurs will have Garnacho the space to attack, Wolves never.
The issue with Sancho up top, is the ball doesn't stick. You an guarantee any ball when playing out of defence comes straight back at you, as it did last night. We need some sort of outlet.
posted on 15/8/23
Might not be a bad idea. Problem is both Garnacho and Sancho seem to be best when coming on against tired legs. Both look pretty useless starting.
posted on 15/8/23
We've signed 3 players but our squad feels thinner, and more unbalanced, than ever.
posted on 15/8/23
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 2 minutes ago
We've signed 3 players but our squad feels thinner, and more unbalanced, than ever.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Only two have played, and then on one game, a the goalie was good
Page 1 of 3