comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 4 seconds ago
Good run, lucky finish
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Was so sloppy

comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 24 minutes ago
Livi aren't even attacking. They never do v Rangers

Easy 4 or 5 goals today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical Martindale. Play 2 up top and don't attack.

They need to get rid of that chancer. If livi go down and we get rid of him and that pitch it will be a great result.

Nice finish by McCausland. But it's ruled out.

No idea why that's ruled out

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 24 minutes ago
Livi aren't even attacking. They never do v Rangers

Easy 4 or 5 goals today
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Typical Martindale. Play 2 up top and don't attack.

They need to get rid of that chancer. If livi go down and we get rid of him and that pitch it will be a great result.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spot on.

baffling decision

comment by super phoenix rangers - comments on this forum are not mine but a fictionalised version loosely based on someone similar to me (U14864)
posted 7 seconds ago
No idea why that's ruled out
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feenyin ref mate

It’s a push ffs.

Try it in a European competition

How the fvck can they rule that out? if it's for Sima "fouling" the defender then you have to pull it back and give a penalty for the shirt pull on Sima.

That's mental

comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted less than a minute ago
How the fvck can they rule that out?if it's for Sima "fouling" the defender then you have to pull it back and give a penalty for the shirt pull on Sima.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because it’s a push is why

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted less than a minute ago
How the fvck can they rule that out?if it's for Sima "fouling" the defender then you have to pull it back and give a penalty for the shirt pull on Sima.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because it’s a push is why
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But sima had his shirt pulled first is his point

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted less than a minute ago
How the fvck can they rule that out?if it's for Sima "fouling" the defender then you have to pull it back and give a penalty for the shirt pull on Sima.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because it’s a push is why
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The gentlest of nudges, and the shirt pull on Sima came first.

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted less than a minute ago
How the fvck can they rule that out?if it's for Sima "fouling" the defender then you have to pull it back and give a penalty for the shirt pull on Sima.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because it’s a push is why
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you'll find Sima's shirt was being pulled at the start of this, so if you are pulling it back it has to be a penalty

I’m not the ref ffs <lauhh> Nor am I a VAR chappie

Everyone asked what the foul was for and I answered

comment by Samus (Isle of) Arran (U22669)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted less than a minute ago
How the fvck can they rule that out?if it's for Sima "fouling" the defender then you have to pull it back and give a penalty for the shirt pull on Sima.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because it’s a push is why
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Think you'll find Sima's shirt was being pulled at the start of this, so if you are pulling it back it has to be a penalty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are pulling it back, the only thing that should be guaranteed is a happy end

Is the ref wearing a camo jacket and black balaclava?

comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 31 seconds ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted less than a minute ago
How the fvck can they rule that out?if it's for Sima "fouling" the defender then you have to pull it back and give a penalty for the shirt pull on Sima.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because it’s a push is why
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The gentlest of nudges, and the shirt pull on Sima came first.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Made no sense to rule that out

Dessers been pash despite the goal

Penalty

VAR was pash earlier. Looks a pen this, VAR great again

Penalty to Rangers.

Gotta go same way surely

Yes Tav!

Gotta say var at least doing its job there. Don't think anyone saw it

But as clear a handball as you will see I guess