You just know Hamilton or Falkirk will get their act in gear by then and spoil it for everyone
Good news particularly as Killie are the least likely of the plastics to get relegated
To be fair Falkirk (or at least the council have) installed a second full size astro pitch right next to the stadium.
I guess theres a chance they could do most of their training on that and put a grass pitch down in the stadium.
Thats the set up they used to have at Brockville. I remember playing on that astro - it was nasty.
Do you know what would really help our league?
The broadcaster saying here's a better deal but in return I want astro banned.
I want away fans to be given minimum 10% of tickets and Andy.
And finally I want the heads of Michael Stewart and Ian Crocker on pikes.
The second Astro Falkirk had was way better. It is what Celtic had put down at both training centres. Still better than Killie’s and livi’s
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so is my list more or less accurate ?
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so is my list more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate.
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so is my list more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd put St Mirren in the higher group. They definitely out do St Johnstone and Dunfermline - I actually think Raith have a bigger following than Dunfermline?
Dunfermline have a bigger potential tbf
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 54 minutes ago
Dunno who Andy is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
C'mon.. just tell us..
Anyways should probably be
1. Celtic
2. Rangers
3. Everyone else
Dunfermline, Raith, Partick, Falkirk all about the same level. St Johnstone probably in with them. Maybe demote Dundee Utd to Dundee/Motherwell/Killie level.
I'd still like a 20 team top flight. Team like Thistle, Dunfermline, Falkirk, Hamilton et al would be great for a bit of variety.
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
"State of the art training facilities will hopefully help them to recruit a better standard of player and therefore the league quality increases."
Didnt work for Aberdeen Still shiete
We really need to get Livingston to fook, utterly depressing every little thing about them. Pitch utterly horrendous, budget for a top flight team utterly pathetic, and worst of all an utter embarrassment of a support numbers wise absolutely pathetic, it’s an embarrassment when the cameras are there ffs, not 100% sure but we’re they not Medowbank Thistle back in they day? That team probably had more supporters
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine letting a TV deal dictate the structure of your league.
Personally I'd like fewer OF games each season. They're supposed to be big, high pressure occasions that can swing the league in one direction or another. We lost the first OF game of the season and it's not as much of a disaster as it should have been because we get the chance at another three OF games to not just pull it back but completely reverse things. And yes I'm aware that by the next OF game the league will be all but wrapped up anyway.
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine letting a TV deal dictate the structure of your league.
Personally I'd like fewer OF games each season. They're supposed to be big, high pressure occasions that can swing the league in one direction or another. We lost the first OF game of the season and it's not as much of a disaster as it should have been because we get the chance at another three OF games to not just pull it back but completely reverse things. And yes I'm aware that by the next OF game the league will be all but wrapped up anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Way too soon to be calling the league. Surely the potential twists and turns are the whole reason there should be more not less? Of course it is invariably double or quits in our two team league but I can see why rangers fans would prefer less.
comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 12 hours, 31 minutes ago
We really need to get Livingston to fook, utterly depressing every little thing about them. Pitch utterly horrendous, budget for a top flight team utterly pathetic, and worst of all an utter embarrassment of a support numbers wise absolutely pathetic, it’s an embarrassment when the cameras are there ffs, not 100% sure but we’re they not Medowbank Thistle back in they day? That team probably had more supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least they fill their ground for the TV games.
If they had grass I'd be fine with them. It's the dafty clubs cutting away tickets for a half empty ground.
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 15 hours, 36 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Considering the amount of money they pay us we should ignore them.
Its not like premier league money that we are reliant on.
We are the worst paid league in terms of tv money in europe and so what they think is irrelevant.
A bigger league would help spread the finances around and make for more interesting games.
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 12 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine letting a TV deal dictate the structure of your league.
Personally I'd like fewer OF games each season. They're supposed to be big, high pressure occasions that can swing the league in one direction or another. We lost the first OF game of the season and it's not as much of a disaster as it should have been because we get the chance at another three OF games to not just pull it back but completely reverse things. And yes I'm aware that by the next OF game the league will be all but wrapped up anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Way too soon to be calling the league. Surely the potential twists and turns are the whole reason there should be more not less? Of course it is invariably double or quits in our two team league but I can see why rangers fans would prefer less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the other side of the coin of course. The whole season should be twists and turns, not just OF games, but the rest of the league just isn't up to the standard needed to be competitive with us, and that's not their fault given the finances. I'd love to see my team be regularly competitive in Europe, but being realistic and honest I'd rather have the prize money distributed more (though obviously not completely) evenly across the rest of the league so that the gap is smaller, even if that means a bit less quality in my own team.
Sign in if you want to comment
Kilmarnock to ditch 4G
Page 1 of 3
posted on 13/11/23
You just know Hamilton or Falkirk will get their act in gear by then and spoil it for everyone
posted on 13/11/23
Good news particularly as Killie are the least likely of the plastics to get relegated
posted on 13/11/23
To be fair Falkirk (or at least the council have) installed a second full size astro pitch right next to the stadium.
I guess theres a chance they could do most of their training on that and put a grass pitch down in the stadium.
Thats the set up they used to have at Brockville. I remember playing on that astro - it was nasty.
posted on 13/11/23
Do you know what would really help our league?
The broadcaster saying here's a better deal but in return I want astro banned.
I want away fans to be given minimum 10% of tickets and Andy.
And finally I want the heads of Michael Stewart and Ian Crocker on pikes.
posted on 13/11/23
Dunno who Andy is
posted on 13/11/23
The second Astro Falkirk had was way better. It is what Celtic had put down at both training centres. Still better than Killie’s and livi’s
posted on 13/11/23
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
posted on 13/11/23
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
posted on 13/11/23
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so is my list more or less accurate ?
posted on 13/11/23
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so is my list more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate.
posted on 13/11/23
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Peks (U6618)
posted 2 minutes ago
Are Killie a well supported club?
my understanding of Scottish football is that the hierarchy is like this:
1. Celtic, Rangers
2. Aberdeen, Hibs, Hearts
3. Dundee Utd
4. Motherwell, Killie, Dundee
5. Dunfermline , St Mirren, St Johnstone
is this more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How did the Pars get in there?
Also Hibs are in with Dundee United.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so is my list more or less accurate ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Inaccurate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd put St Mirren in the higher group. They definitely out do St Johnstone and Dunfermline - I actually think Raith have a bigger following than Dunfermline?
posted on 13/11/23
Dunfermline have a bigger potential tbf
posted on 13/11/23
comment by HB Maybe Beale wasn't the mastermind (U21935)
posted 54 minutes ago
Dunno who Andy is
----------------------------------------------------------------------
C'mon.. just tell us..
posted on 13/11/23
Anyways should probably be
1. Celtic
2. Rangers
3. Everyone else
posted on 13/11/23
Dunfermline, Raith, Partick, Falkirk all about the same level. St Johnstone probably in with them. Maybe demote Dundee Utd to Dundee/Motherwell/Killie level.
posted on 13/11/23
I'd still like a 20 team top flight. Team like Thistle, Dunfermline, Falkirk, Hamilton et al would be great for a bit of variety.
posted on 13/11/23
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
posted on 13/11/23
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
posted on 13/11/23
"State of the art training facilities will hopefully help them to recruit a better standard of player and therefore the league quality increases."
Didnt work for Aberdeen Still shiete
posted on 13/11/23
We really need to get Livingston to fook, utterly depressing every little thing about them. Pitch utterly horrendous, budget for a top flight team utterly pathetic, and worst of all an utter embarrassment of a support numbers wise absolutely pathetic, it’s an embarrassment when the cameras are there ffs, not 100% sure but we’re they not Medowbank Thistle back in they day? That team probably had more supporters
posted on 13/11/23
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine letting a TV deal dictate the structure of your league.
Personally I'd like fewer OF games each season. They're supposed to be big, high pressure occasions that can swing the league in one direction or another. We lost the first OF game of the season and it's not as much of a disaster as it should have been because we get the chance at another three OF games to not just pull it back but completely reverse things. And yes I'm aware that by the next OF game the league will be all but wrapped up anyway.
posted on 13/11/23
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine letting a TV deal dictate the structure of your league.
Personally I'd like fewer OF games each season. They're supposed to be big, high pressure occasions that can swing the league in one direction or another. We lost the first OF game of the season and it's not as much of a disaster as it should have been because we get the chance at another three OF games to not just pull it back but completely reverse things. And yes I'm aware that by the next OF game the league will be all but wrapped up anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Way too soon to be calling the league. Surely the potential twists and turns are the whole reason there should be more not less? Of course it is invariably double or quits in our two team league but I can see why rangers fans would prefer less.
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Lexballielegend (U22945)
posted 12 hours, 31 minutes ago
We really need to get Livingston to fook, utterly depressing every little thing about them. Pitch utterly horrendous, budget for a top flight team utterly pathetic, and worst of all an utter embarrassment of a support numbers wise absolutely pathetic, it’s an embarrassment when the cameras are there ffs, not 100% sure but we’re they not Medowbank Thistle back in they day? That team probably had more supporters
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At least they fill their ground for the TV games.
If they had grass I'd be fine with them. It's the dafty clubs cutting away tickets for a half empty ground.
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 15 hours, 36 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Considering the amount of money they pay us we should ignore them.
Its not like premier league money that we are reliant on.
We are the worst paid league in terms of tv money in europe and so what they think is irrelevant.
A bigger league would help spread the finances around and make for more interesting games.
posted on 14/11/23
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 12 hours, 23 minutes ago
comment by WorkPermitPending (U1067)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by Call Sign (U3627)
posted 3 hours, 48 minutes ago
comment by Paddy (U5235)
posted 6 minutes ago
Imagine the state of the TV deal for 2 Celtic/Rangers game per season
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine the state of it with 4 games per season...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Imagine letting a TV deal dictate the structure of your league.
Personally I'd like fewer OF games each season. They're supposed to be big, high pressure occasions that can swing the league in one direction or another. We lost the first OF game of the season and it's not as much of a disaster as it should have been because we get the chance at another three OF games to not just pull it back but completely reverse things. And yes I'm aware that by the next OF game the league will be all but wrapped up anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Way too soon to be calling the league. Surely the potential twists and turns are the whole reason there should be more not less? Of course it is invariably double or quits in our two team league but I can see why rangers fans would prefer less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's the other side of the coin of course. The whole season should be twists and turns, not just OF games, but the rest of the league just isn't up to the standard needed to be competitive with us, and that's not their fault given the finances. I'd love to see my team be regularly competitive in Europe, but being realistic and honest I'd rather have the prize money distributed more (though obviously not completely) evenly across the rest of the league so that the gap is smaller, even if that means a bit less quality in my own team.
Page 1 of 3