If anything Chelsea will be next because they have admitted it, so there's no need to go through CAS whereas City likely will.
and I'm having none of this "it has nothing to do with the current owners" or "they pointed it out so they shouldn't be punished" rubbish. They pointed it out because they knew it would come to light due to the added scrutiny as a result of government involvement. And not being the owners at the time? Tough luck, the club shouldn't get away with benefitting from breaking results.
If the FA do the right thing then we will be awarded the 2017 PL title.
comment by SimonB (U22811)
posted 6 minutes ago
If anything Chelsea will be next because they have admitted it, so there's no need to go through CAS whereas City likely will.
and I'm having none of this "it has nothing to do with the current owners" or "they pointed it out so they shouldn't be punished" rubbish. They pointed it out because they knew it would come to light due to the added scrutiny as a result of government involvement. And not being the owners at the time? Tough luck, the club shouldn't get away with benefitting from breaking results.
If the FA do the right thing then we will be awarded the 2017 PL title.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City can't go through CAS this time. Its not allowed within the PL rules unlike with UEFA and the CL.
They are not going to make 115 charges disappear mate. Nobody is going to buy that they are innocent of all of them. The PL clearly have a case otherwise they'd not risk looking incredibly stupid.
Chelsea and City are going to have their house of cards fall in eventually.
They will be fined and that’s that.
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
A fine, and a temporary cessation of complimentary Premier League chocolates
Everton can't afford to pay the FA while City will give them enough money that it will finally pay off Wembley
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was okay when you, Liverpool and Arsenal scooping up the titles but not okay now, strange how it works.
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was okay when you, Liverpool and Arsenal scooping up the titles but not okay now, strange how it works.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guessing your not very clued up on how spending what you earn works.
Sounds about right when your financially doped by a regime that kills for fun
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was okay when you, Liverpool and Arsenal scooping up the titles but not okay now, strange how it works.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guessing your not very clued up on how spending what you earn works.
Sounds about right when your financially doped by a regime that kills for fun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could we worse, we could have owners who fund Israel.
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think i wurk it out that if Man Cs* r punush commendurate with hoe Juventus whete punish 4 kinda similar crimes, Man Cs* wud begin next season on -135 pts.
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 7 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think i wurk it out that if Man Cs* r punush commendurate with hoe Juventus whete punish 4 kinda similar crimes, Man Cs* wud begin next season on -135 pts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City aren't accused of match fixing or bribing officals you lemon.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 7 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think i wurk it out that if Man Cs* r punush commendurate with hoe Juventus whete punish 4 kinda similar crimes, Man Cs* wud begin next season on -135 pts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City aren't accused of match fixing or bribing officals you lemon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No just shady offshore payments to managers and players and falsified sponsorship deals to make sure you can have the best team in the land......much better that Boris. 😂
Imagine being owned by one of the richest men on the planet who for which money is no issue but still have to resort to cheating to comply with rules you agreed to adhere by.
Rui Pinto.... He's the real Portuguese Magnifico.
You should visit him in prison before the Maltese get to him
Desperate Liverpool and United fans pinning all their hopes on City being found guilty.
I am looking forward to the meltdown on here when we are exonerated from those made up charges.
All charges r made up
They halve 2b by default
Sign in if you want to comment
Everton Stripped? City next perhaps?
Page 2 of 2
posted on 15/11/23
If anything Chelsea will be next because they have admitted it, so there's no need to go through CAS whereas City likely will.
and I'm having none of this "it has nothing to do with the current owners" or "they pointed it out so they shouldn't be punished" rubbish. They pointed it out because they knew it would come to light due to the added scrutiny as a result of government involvement. And not being the owners at the time? Tough luck, the club shouldn't get away with benefitting from breaking results.
If the FA do the right thing then we will be awarded the 2017 PL title.
posted on 15/11/23
comment by SimonB (U22811)
posted 6 minutes ago
If anything Chelsea will be next because they have admitted it, so there's no need to go through CAS whereas City likely will.
and I'm having none of this "it has nothing to do with the current owners" or "they pointed it out so they shouldn't be punished" rubbish. They pointed it out because they knew it would come to light due to the added scrutiny as a result of government involvement. And not being the owners at the time? Tough luck, the club shouldn't get away with benefitting from breaking results.
If the FA do the right thing then we will be awarded the 2017 PL title.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City can't go through CAS this time. Its not allowed within the PL rules unlike with UEFA and the CL.
They are not going to make 115 charges disappear mate. Nobody is going to buy that they are innocent of all of them. The PL clearly have a case otherwise they'd not risk looking incredibly stupid.
Chelsea and City are going to have their house of cards fall in eventually.
posted on 15/11/23
They will be fined and that’s that.
posted on 15/11/23
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
posted on 15/11/23
A fine, and a temporary cessation of complimentary Premier League chocolates
posted on 15/11/23
Everton can't afford to pay the FA while City will give them enough money that it will finally pay off Wembley
posted on 15/11/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
posted on 15/11/23
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
posted on 15/11/23
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was okay when you, Liverpool and Arsenal scooping up the titles but not okay now, strange how it works.
posted on 15/11/23
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was okay when you, Liverpool and Arsenal scooping up the titles but not okay now, strange how it works.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guessing your not very clued up on how spending what you earn works.
Sounds about right when your financially doped by a regime that kills for fun
posted on 15/11/23
comment by Clever - son son son - 'Ten Haaaagendas p... (U18599)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 42 seconds ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 29 seconds ago
comment by Carter (U18826)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Vladimikel Artutin - committing war crimes against football since 2019 (U18355)
posted 4 minutes ago
They will be fined and that’s that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe that will be the outcome personally. Fines against a man worth 40bn+ is going to achieve what? That's not going to put off any further rule breaks. City would gladly take the fines if that was the case and carry on.
I think it will be more severe than fines but it won't be as severe as it should be.
As for Chelsea.....who knows. If they play ball and cooperate then they might get a less severe punishment. Afterall it was Abramovich at the helm not the current owner.
Personally I'd love to see the PL make an example out of both. They have made a mockery of the league for nearly 20 years really between them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
At worse an owner had to find ways to push his own money through, because you kuunts the top 3 didn't like a bit of competition.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Competition? There's no competition against unlimited wealth mate.
City and PSG had 3 league titles BETWEEN them in their entire history prior to the takeovers. It's well over 20 now not so very long after. Is that competitive?
The truth is it should never have got this far. Abu Dhabi shouldn't have been welcomed in to start with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was okay when you, Liverpool and Arsenal scooping up the titles but not okay now, strange how it works.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Guessing your not very clued up on how spending what you earn works.
Sounds about right when your financially doped by a regime that kills for fun
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could we worse, we could have owners who fund Israel.
posted on 15/11/23
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
posted on 15/11/23
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think i wurk it out that if Man Cs* r punush commendurate with hoe Juventus whete punish 4 kinda similar crimes, Man Cs* wud begin next season on -135 pts.
posted on 16/11/23
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 7 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think i wurk it out that if Man Cs* r punush commendurate with hoe Juventus whete punish 4 kinda similar crimes, Man Cs* wud begin next season on -135 pts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City aren't accused of match fixing or bribing officals you lemon.
posted on 16/11/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 2 hours, 17 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 7 hours, 35 minutes ago
comment by Peter O'Hanraha-hanrahan (U1217)
posted 10 seconds ago
comment by RB&W - One man down, One nil up (U21434)
posted 3 hours, 50 minutes ago
If they wont relegate these teams for whatever reasons make them start the new season on -43 points. Its up to them then if they make the magic 43 points which is usually enough at the end of the season. Maybe City might even save themselves.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it would be fitting to start them on -115 points. The number of charges, plus would guarantee relegation on negative points even if they won every game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think i wurk it out that if Man Cs* r punush commendurate with hoe Juventus whete punish 4 kinda similar crimes, Man Cs* wud begin next season on -135 pts.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City aren't accused of match fixing or bribing officals you lemon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No just shady offshore payments to managers and players and falsified sponsorship deals to make sure you can have the best team in the land......much better that Boris. 😂
Imagine being owned by one of the richest men on the planet who for which money is no issue but still have to resort to cheating to comply with rules you agreed to adhere by.
Rui Pinto.... He's the real Portuguese Magnifico.
posted on 16/11/23
You should visit him in prison before the Maltese get to him
posted on 16/11/23
Desperate Liverpool and United fans pinning all their hopes on City being found guilty.
I am looking forward to the meltdown on here when we are exonerated from those made up charges.
posted on 16/11/23
All charges r made up
They halve 2b by default
Page 2 of 2