comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
When Napoli ware draw in same CL groop as Man Cs* in 2011 we droved too Okd Trafford by mistake as nobody had ever hurd of Man Cs*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a stolen bus?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
They stole a bus a few munth laterer after we wun Cuppa Italia
We didn't withold information from CAS and copoperated with them all the way as they were a neutral panel rather than a group of rival CFO's.
====
You know I'm talking about not cooperating with UEFA not CAS. I'm sure you know that. What you trying to do here? Confusing me won't help as I'm not on the independent commission hearing City's case.
You've been playing dumb, obfuscating and twisting facts all day. All City fans are like that these days. I don't know why as this is just a football forum. It doesn't matter to City's case what people here think and whether they buy into your lies and half truths. What the fack are you doing bro?
Of course City cooperated with CAS as the knew they had already artificially created the grounds for a successful appeal by not cooperating with UEFA. Why do Man City universe think people are stoopid?
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
'Income the same as Bournemouth'
These were the attendances during the takeover season.
https://www.worldfootball.net/attendance/eng-premier-league-2009-2010/1/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City fans.
Takeover was in 2008. You're cleverly providing a different page to try to cheat.
Ad what do attendances have to do with this? You've got nothing but had to say something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think our income was the same as Bournmouth's despite them not even being in the PL?
You really are desperate.
Anyway, what time are you setting off for Anfield?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
'Income the same as Bournemouth'
These were the attendances during the takeover season.
https://www.worldfootball.net/attendance/eng-premier-league-2009-2010/1/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City fans.
Takeover was in 2008. You're cleverly providing a different page to try to cheat.
Ad what do attendances have to do with this? You've got nothing but had to say something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think our income was the same as Bournmouth's despite them not even being in the PL?
You really are desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever heard of a figure of speech?
What's your point, that City had the revenues to afford their expenditure? Or is it to just fack around and pretend to miss the point?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 7 minutes ago
Anyway, what time are you setting off for Anfield?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should be soon as I'm almost done with your mum.
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you are. Keep going, people are enjoying the show you clown.
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you are. Keep going, people are enjoying the show you clown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris is a little avant-garde butt v funny
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you are. Keep going, people are enjoying the show you clown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris is a little avant-garde butt v funny
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Naah, just funny
We didn't withold information from CAS and copoperated with them all the way as they were a neutral panel rather than a group of rival CFO's.
====
You know I'm talking about not cooperating with UEFA not CAS. I'm sure you know that. What you trying to do here? Confusing me won't help as I'm not on the independent commission hearing City's case.
====================================
My comment still stands.
Would you tell me or the rest of the board where you live and how much you earn? No.
Would you supply the same information to a bank or HMRC? Yes.
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 26 minutes ago
In the final analysis football is going to completely implode...we all know it, it's a matter of when - not if
I've loved our ride in the last 20 years though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course now that your ride is over football is gonna implode soon anyway. How convenient
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't make the fackin rules son
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 21 minutes ago
115 charges in mental.
Can they honestly be innocent of all the charges?
Seems unlikely to me, but we shall see....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who cares what they say? Do YOU think City aren't cheats? Do you need their kangaroo court to confirm to you that City are cheats? Are you waiting with bated breath to find out if City doped the fack out of football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you provide an example of how City cheated?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I can. Thank you for this question. It's a very good question btw.
Just look at when City were charged, found guilty and punished for cheating. Is that example enough for ya?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who punished City for cheating and when?
In 2014, City were fined for exceeding the spending limit allowed for FFP. If this is what you were referring to, then this makes ALL clubs in Europe (including United) who have been fined for breaking FFP cheats.
If not, then please can you elaborate further so others can read how City cheated.
Did they bribe match officials or fixed matches?
How exactly did City cheat?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're wasting my time making me explain the obvious just because you're defending the indefensible. Clubs don't exceed FFP limits for the same reasons. United got hit by COVID and have still been punished, Everton were reckless and have been punished, yet you think City are being witch hunted you deluded muppet.
What's City's excuse for exceeding FFP limit? Of course they have their excuses but everyone knows it was nothing but doping. So all clubs that break FFP for cheating purposes are cheaters and should be punished accordingly. United and Everton didn't have 115 charges though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The charges are accounting related and if proven, could lead to us failing FFP
City has not failed FFP to date after we agreed to a settlement in 2014.
With regards to the with hunting, would you accept the verdict if City are exonerated?
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee, their lawyers must be pretty crap as they didn't notice that.
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee, their lawyers must be pretty crap as they didn't notice that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The PL's?
I couldn't agree more.
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 hours, 27 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee, their lawyers must be pretty crap as they didn't notice that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The PL's?
I couldn't agree more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aren't a lot of the charges actually the same charges repeated year after year for the years investigated? I often wondered how they reached quite so many.
Sign in if you want to comment
115 trial date agreed
Page 4 of 4
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
When Napoli ware draw in same CL groop as Man Cs* in 2011 we droved too Okd Trafford by mistake as nobody had ever hurd of Man Cs*
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On a stolen bus?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No
They stole a bus a few munth laterer after we wun Cuppa Italia
posted on 30/11/23
We didn't withold information from CAS and copoperated with them all the way as they were a neutral panel rather than a group of rival CFO's.
====
You know I'm talking about not cooperating with UEFA not CAS. I'm sure you know that. What you trying to do here? Confusing me won't help as I'm not on the independent commission hearing City's case.
You've been playing dumb, obfuscating and twisting facts all day. All City fans are like that these days. I don't know why as this is just a football forum. It doesn't matter to City's case what people here think and whether they buy into your lies and half truths. What the fack are you doing bro?
Of course City cooperated with CAS as the knew they had already artificially created the grounds for a successful appeal by not cooperating with UEFA. Why do Man City universe think people are stoopid?
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
'Income the same as Bournemouth'
These were the attendances during the takeover season.
https://www.worldfootball.net/attendance/eng-premier-league-2009-2010/1/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City fans.
Takeover was in 2008. You're cleverly providing a different page to try to cheat.
Ad what do attendances have to do with this? You've got nothing but had to say something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think our income was the same as Bournmouth's despite them not even being in the PL?
You really are desperate.
posted on 30/11/23
Anyway, what time are you setting off for Anfield?
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 4 minutes ago
'Income the same as Bournemouth'
These were the attendances during the takeover season.
https://www.worldfootball.net/attendance/eng-premier-league-2009-2010/1/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City fans.
Takeover was in 2008. You're cleverly providing a different page to try to cheat.
Ad what do attendances have to do with this? You've got nothing but had to say something.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you think our income was the same as Bournmouth's despite them not even being in the PL?
You really are desperate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever heard of a figure of speech?
What's your point, that City had the revenues to afford their expenditure? Or is it to just fack around and pretend to miss the point?
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 7 minutes ago
Anyway, what time are you setting off for Anfield?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Should be soon as I'm almost done with your mum.
posted on 30/11/23
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you are. Keep going, people are enjoying the show you clown.
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you are. Keep going, people are enjoying the show you clown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris is a little avant-garde butt v funny
posted on 30/11/23
comment by #4zA Napul3🤌 (U22472)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 3 minutes ago
Wow, am I at the Edinburgh Fringe?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course you are. Keep going, people are enjoying the show you clown.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boris is a little avant-garde butt v funny
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Naah, just funny
posted on 30/11/23
Bourenmouth.
posted on 30/11/23
We didn't withold information from CAS and copoperated with them all the way as they were a neutral panel rather than a group of rival CFO's.
====
You know I'm talking about not cooperating with UEFA not CAS. I'm sure you know that. What you trying to do here? Confusing me won't help as I'm not on the independent commission hearing City's case.
====================================
My comment still stands.
Would you tell me or the rest of the board where you live and how much you earn? No.
Would you supply the same information to a bank or HMRC? Yes.
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 26 minutes ago
In the final analysis football is going to completely implode...we all know it, it's a matter of when - not if
I've loved our ride in the last 20 years though
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course now that your ride is over football is gonna implode soon anyway. How convenient
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I didn't make the fackin rules son
posted on 30/11/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 4 hours, 6 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 1 hour, 51 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by mancini (U7179)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Elvis (U7425)
posted 21 minutes ago
115 charges in mental.
Can they honestly be innocent of all the charges?
Seems unlikely to me, but we shall see....
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who cares what they say? Do YOU think City aren't cheats? Do you need their kangaroo court to confirm to you that City are cheats? Are you waiting with bated breath to find out if City doped the fack out of football?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you provide an example of how City cheated?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes I can. Thank you for this question. It's a very good question btw.
Just look at when City were charged, found guilty and punished for cheating. Is that example enough for ya?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who punished City for cheating and when?
In 2014, City were fined for exceeding the spending limit allowed for FFP. If this is what you were referring to, then this makes ALL clubs in Europe (including United) who have been fined for breaking FFP cheats.
If not, then please can you elaborate further so others can read how City cheated.
Did they bribe match officials or fixed matches?
How exactly did City cheat?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're wasting my time making me explain the obvious just because you're defending the indefensible. Clubs don't exceed FFP limits for the same reasons. United got hit by COVID and have still been punished, Everton were reckless and have been punished, yet you think City are being witch hunted you deluded muppet.
What's City's excuse for exceeding FFP limit? Of course they have their excuses but everyone knows it was nothing but doping. So all clubs that break FFP for cheating purposes are cheaters and should be punished accordingly. United and Everton didn't have 115 charges though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The charges are accounting related and if proven, could lead to us failing FFP
City has not failed FFP to date after we agreed to a settlement in 2014.
With regards to the with hunting, would you accept the verdict if City are exonerated?
posted on 30/11/23
I wud
posted on 30/11/23
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
posted on 30/11/23
Yes rhey where
posted on 1/12/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee, their lawyers must be pretty crap as they didn't notice that.
posted on 1/12/23
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee, their lawyers must be pretty crap as they didn't notice that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The PL's?
I couldn't agree more.
posted on 1/12/23
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 9 hours, 27 minutes ago
comment by Mamba - Come at the King, you best not miss (U1282)
posted 6 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 hour, 30 minutes ago
Some of the 'offences' weren't even against the rules when they were 'committed'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee, their lawyers must be pretty crap as they didn't notice that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The PL's?
I couldn't agree more.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aren't a lot of the charges actually the same charges repeated year after year for the years investigated? I often wondered how they reached quite so many.
posted on 1/12/23
Think so
Page 4 of 4