It was never clear why TT left as far as I know...
If you're right - we got exactly what we deserved
Hey Bov
Come join my prediction league - next match up
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/459319
Apparently in one of the first games after the takeover Chelsea were losing at half time and Boehly wanted to bring some execs into the changing room to meet the players, etc, and Tuchel, quite rightly, refused him entry.
Boehly decided to get rid soon after.
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 10 minutes ago
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't flatter yourself, Boehly does these things on his own. See Cucurella.
Boehly is just a bigger spending and higher risk version of Daniel Levy or any other normal owners in the football pyramid who, quite rightly, wants to see a return on their investment and doesn't have billions of money to just waste if things went wrong like Roman did.
You Chelsea fans are just not used to having normal owners after being spoilt by the lottery win
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 15 minutes ago
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs trying to claim credit for a situation that saw Liverpool having their desperate turned down flat
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 24 minutes ago
Apparently in one of the first games after the takeover Chelsea were losing at half time and Boehly wanted to bring some execs into the changing room to meet the players, etc, and Tuchel, quite rightly, refused him entry.
Boehly decided to get rid soon after.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuchel won't stand up for this kind of shenanigans...What Keane use to call the prawn sandwich bunch
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestin... (U1108)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You could have had both, but failed, and that's a win for you
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestin... (U1108)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You could have had both, but failed, and that's a win for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Major bullet dodged for someone who had a season in the PL. We knew he was going to Chelsea so just made them pay more for him.
We mentally ruined Caicedo. Chelsea didn't even need him.since when do you need 2 holding midfielders who offer you less than sh|t going forward.
and get this you Chelsea buy another 1 as well
Caicedo was always a big gamble for someone with so little experience - kind of a more high profile Ndombele.
Guy wanted to join us, then wanted to join Chelsea after we signed Rice.
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pascal Gross still plays for Brighton. He’s the guy that made Bissouma, MacAllister and Caceido look good.
"Sean Dyche is everything that I want Mauricio Pochettino to be" - Rory Jennings
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you doing down there
comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 10 minutes ago
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't flatter yourself, Boehly does these things on his own. See Cucurella.
---------------------------------------------------
This. Liverpool's bid was irrelevant, we'd have wound up paying whatever Brighton wanted cos Boehly's weak.
Cute spin though trying to make it seem like the player didn't just choose us, and considering how terrible we are that's quite funny
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you clearly can't read. Chelsea had to pay more than they would have because of Liverpool. That's all. Do you disagree with that?
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you clearly can't read. Chelsea had to pay more than they would have because of Liverpool. That's all. Do you disagree with that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really, Brighton had turned down all previous offers for Chelsea so they would have had to increase anyhow. To what level I can't say, but all previous deals with Brighton and Bhoely have ended up as huge wins for Brighton.
Sign in if you want to comment
This is on Boehly
Page 1 of 3
posted on 11/12/23
It was never clear why TT left as far as I know...
If you're right - we got exactly what we deserved
posted on 11/12/23
Hey Bov
Come join my prediction league - next match up
https://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/459319
posted on 11/12/23
Apparently in one of the first games after the takeover Chelsea were losing at half time and Boehly wanted to bring some execs into the changing room to meet the players, etc, and Tuchel, quite rightly, refused him entry.
Boehly decided to get rid soon after.
posted on 11/12/23
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
posted on 11/12/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 10 minutes ago
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't flatter yourself, Boehly does these things on his own. See Cucurella.
posted on 11/12/23
Boehly is just a bigger spending and higher risk version of Daniel Levy or any other normal owners in the football pyramid who, quite rightly, wants to see a return on their investment and doesn't have billions of money to just waste if things went wrong like Roman did.
You Chelsea fans are just not used to having normal owners after being spoilt by the lottery win
posted on 11/12/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 15 minutes ago
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ffs trying to claim credit for a situation that saw Liverpool having their desperate turned down flat
posted on 11/12/23
* desperate bid
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Robbing Hoody - I taught Szoboszlai how to cushion half volleys (U6374)
posted 24 minutes ago
Apparently in one of the first games after the takeover Chelsea were losing at half time and Boehly wanted to bring some execs into the changing room to meet the players, etc, and Tuchel, quite rightly, refused him entry.
Boehly decided to get rid soon after.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuchel won't stand up for this kind of shenanigans...What Keane use to call the prawn sandwich bunch
posted on 11/12/23
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
posted on 11/12/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestin... (U1108)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You could have had both, but failed, and that's a win for you
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestin... (U1108)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You could have had both, but failed, and that's a win for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Major bullet dodged for someone who had a season in the PL. We knew he was going to Chelsea so just made them pay more for him.
posted on 11/12/23
We mentally ruined Caicedo. Chelsea didn't even need him.since when do you need 2 holding midfielders who offer you less than sh|t going forward.
and get this you Chelsea buy another 1 as well
posted on 11/12/23
Caicedo was always a big gamble for someone with so little experience - kind of a more high profile Ndombele.
Guy wanted to join us, then wanted to join Chelsea after we signed Rice.
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
posted on 11/12/23
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
comment by Neo (U9135)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The way the player has performed, it definitely feels like it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We got the guy who made him look good
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pascal Gross still plays for Brighton. He’s the guy that made Bissouma, MacAllister and Caceido look good.
posted on 11/12/23
"Sean Dyche is everything that I want Mauricio Pochettino to be" - Rory Jennings
posted on 11/12/23
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted 46 seconds ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How you doing down there
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Bov (U6696)
posted 2 hours, 5 minutes ago
comment by (K̇ash) - Liverpool 7-0 Man U - Free Palestine 🇵🇸 (U1108)
posted 10 minutes ago
We played a blinder on you by making you pay so much for Caicedo
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't flatter yourself, Boehly does these things on his own. See Cucurella.
---------------------------------------------------
This. Liverpool's bid was irrelevant, we'd have wound up paying whatever Brighton wanted cos Boehly's weak.
Cute spin though trying to make it seem like the player didn't just choose us, and considering how terrible we are that's quite funny
posted on 11/12/23
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you clearly can't read. Chelsea had to pay more than they would have because of Liverpool. That's all. Do you disagree with that?
posted on 11/12/23
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted 25 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are in your favour, you argue the facts. When facts are not in your favour you argue the process." (U1282)
posted 39 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - "When the facts are ... (U1282)
posted 9 minutes ago
Of course we did. Chelsea had bid 95m and we made them pay another 20 or so million.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
and they got the player....but somehow that's a win for LFC
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That wasn't the point, was it? Learn to read. Kash said we made Chelsea pay more money, and we did. That's a fact.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Liverpool only bid for the player to make the bid higher? Sounds as daft as your lot
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No, you clearly can't read. Chelsea had to pay more than they would have because of Liverpool. That's all. Do you disagree with that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not really, Brighton had turned down all previous offers for Chelsea so they would have had to increase anyhow. To what level I can't say, but all previous deals with Brighton and Bhoely have ended up as huge wins for Brighton.
Page 1 of 3