comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
"
He has the authority to let play flow if there is no threat. For example a player clearly offside and the ball is passed to him. He raises his hands and walks back the way. The ball bounces through to the keeper and the linesman does not raise his flag."

All good and well....in this instance said player has not touched the ball or interfered with play, hence an offside has not occurred

Whole argument was about the linesman at Celtic Park not easing his flag when, in Magnums words.....a CLEAR. offside had occurred, and Sima clearly interfered with play

If the linesman sees this and doesn't raise his flag....he isn't doing his job properly

This has been the point I've been making all this time and it keeps getting twisted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone is twisting it.
The linesman didn't do his job properly. Just like Clement, Lundstrum, Dessers, Cantwell and several others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm more pi$$ed off at Dessers than anyone else after last weekends result, we lost the game because of our own performance, the officials didn't lose it for us...so lets just put a stop to yet another one of your flip flops trying to change the subject.

All I've done is rubbish your stupid claim that the Sima offside was so clear and obvious at the time that only people who weren't watching the game couldn't have seen as much....complete load of bollox, which was initially countered by me saying the linesman didn't see it.

Its only took several days and 300 comments on this article for you to finally start backing down on this crap, but even then, you'd rather say the linesman c didn't do his job properly, than just admit that saying it was a blatantly obvious offside at the time is complete and utter bull$hit

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
"
He has the authority to let play flow if there is no threat. For example a player clearly offside and the ball is passed to him. He raises his hands and walks back the way. The ball bounces through to the keeper and the linesman does not raise his flag."

All good and well....in this instance said player has not touched the ball or interfered with play, hence an offside has not occurred

Whole argument was about the linesman at Celtic Park not easing his flag when, in Magnums words.....a CLEAR. offside had occurred, and Sima clearly interfered with play

If the linesman sees this and doesn't raise his flag....he isn't doing his job properly

This has been the point I've been making all this time and it keeps getting twisted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone is twisting it.
The linesman didn't do his job properly. Just like Clement, Lundstrum, Dessers, Cantwell and several others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm more pi$$ed off at Dessers than anyone else after last weekends result, we lost the game because of our own performance, the officials didn't lose it for us...so lets just put a stop to yet another one of your flip flops trying to change the subject.

All I've done is rubbish your stupid claim that the Sima offside was so clear and obvious at the time that only people who weren't watching the game couldn't have seen as much....complete load of bollox, which was initially countered by me saying the linesman didn't see it.

Its only took several days and 300 comments on this article for you to finally start backing down on this crap, but even then, you'd rather say the linesman c didn't do his job properly, than just admit that saying it was a blatantly obvious offside at the time is complete and utter bull$hit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was at the game.
I doubt you were.
I had a very clear view. I saw it was offside immediately. So did everyone around me.
It's not even a tight call.
I'm not backing down on anything.
I'm not sure why you're obsessing on this but I'm not prolonging it any further. You clearly have issues and I'm concerned for your mental health.

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 36 minutes ago
Gianluca Vialli has died.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye..a year ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just been told that. Apologies! 😂😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauders!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Muhammad Ali these days? 🤣🤣🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wan sheep

Here's a thought.

Can we no have a continuity thread like the Predictors?

For folk who want to batter on about a call over a week later?

A kinda Heavy Goods segregated zone at a ferry port.

To allow everyday travellers to proceed.


I'd call it The Dougie Dougie thread if I set it up.

comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 3 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 14 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 37 seconds ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 36 minutes ago
Gianluca Vialli has died.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aye..a year ago
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just been told that. Apologies! 😂😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauders!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How is Muhammad Ali these days? 🤣🤣🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wan sheep
----------------------------------------------------------------------
🤣

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 20 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 22 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 3 hours, 43 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 41 minutes ago
"
He has the authority to let play flow if there is no threat. For example a player clearly offside and the ball is passed to him. He raises his hands and walks back the way. The ball bounces through to the keeper and the linesman does not raise his flag."

All good and well....in this instance said player has not touched the ball or interfered with play, hence an offside has not occurred

Whole argument was about the linesman at Celtic Park not easing his flag when, in Magnums words.....a CLEAR. offside had occurred, and Sima clearly interfered with play

If the linesman sees this and doesn't raise his flag....he isn't doing his job properly

This has been the point I've been making all this time and it keeps getting twisted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think anyone is twisting it.
The linesman didn't do his job properly. Just like Clement, Lundstrum, Dessers, Cantwell and several others.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm more pi$$ed off at Dessers than anyone else after last weekends result, we lost the game because of our own performance, the officials didn't lose it for us...so lets just put a stop to yet another one of your flip flops trying to change the subject.

All I've done is rubbish your stupid claim that the Sima offside was so clear and obvious at the time that only people who weren't watching the game couldn't have seen as much....complete load of bollox, which was initially countered by me saying the linesman didn't see it.

Its only took several days and 300 comments on this article for you to finally start backing down on this crap, but even then, you'd rather say the linesman c didn't do his job properly, than just admit that saying it was a blatantly obvious offside at the time is complete and utter bull$hit
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I was at the game.
I doubt you were.
I had a very clear view. I saw it was offside immediately. So did everyone around me.
It's not even a tight call.
I'm not backing down on anything.
I'm not sure why you're obsessing on this but I'm not prolonging it any further. You clearly have issues and I'm concerned for your mental health.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nae bother mate...nae bother

You're now talking about my mental health because I called bull$hit

Nae bother

comment by The Mighty Quinn (U4099)
posted 21 hours, 45 minutes ago


Here's a thought.

Can we no have a continuity thread like the Predictors?

For folk who want to batter on about a call over a week later?

A kinda Heavy Goods segregated zone at a ferry port.

To allow everyday travellers to proceed.


I'd call it The Dougie Dougie thread if I set it up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See you in a month or two Mr everyday

Hawl!

3 days in a row mate!

3 days.


Anyway stuff like that discourages others from posting.

I know it did, and does me.

Don't get me started on them that copy/paste what every kvnt has

already read 7 times. But with a 9 word sentence the only addition.