https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/feb/22/google-pauses-ai-generated-images-of-people-after-ethnicity-criticism
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/23/google-gemini-ai-images-wrong-woke/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/22/google-gemini-ai-image-generation-pause/
https://www.ft.com/content/979fe974-2902-4d78-8243-a0cff68e630a
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
Can you imagine of the AI bots were able to engage.
This is the way of thinking now. No wonder the far right is on the rise as it's geared towards the culture war and people are lapping it up, which is unfortunate. Why take just one incident and make certain conclusions from it as of the rest of the world and history don't exist? That's such a Tory thing to do.
It works both ways and all ways. "Coverage of bias in AI has shown numerous examples of a negative impact on people of colour too. A Washington Post investigation last year showed multiple examples of image generators showing bias against people of colour, as well as sexism. It found that the image generator Stable Diffusion XL showed recipients of food stamps as being primarily non-white or darker-skinned despite 63% of the recipients of food stamps in the US being white. A request for an image of a person “at social services” produced similar results."
This white victimhood that dominates this era is pathetic. Diversity and integration needs promotion as history shows us the grim alternative. Diversity doesn't mean anti white, it means diversity that includes whites. Anyone with a problem with that needs to looks at themselves very closely.
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
Apparently a guy asked a few probing questions to Gemini and he found out that it adds certain words to your search, without your knowledge or permission, like “inclusion", “diversity", “disabled", “feminine", etc.
=====
This sounds like typical right wing scare mongering. I would bet money that this turns out to be complete bullsheet made up to make things look worse than they are and get people emotional because the truth won't do that enough.
ChatGPT is also racist
https://youtu.be/thG2rbClcvE?si=oligmnLrrla1kzKi
The people behind them will use AI to further their agenda.
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba, I like reading your replies, but you’ve jumped straight to the bingo card responses here.
Anti-white, far right, etc.
Did you see when the program was asked to show a white family, it said something along the lines of “that is against our policy, to focus on ethnicities”.
However, when asked about “a black family”, “Sure thing…” was the reply.
This program has been shut down now, whilst they fix it.
But just go on Google Images and you get similar “diversity” results.
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 13 minutes ago
ChatGPT is also racist
https://youtu.be/thG2rbClcvE?si=oligmnLrrla1kzKi
The people behind them will use AI to further their agenda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a disgrace also.
comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba, I like reading your replies, but you’ve jumped straight to the bingo card responses here.
Anti-white, far right, etc.
Did you see when the program was asked to show a white family, it said something along the lines of “that is against our policy, to focus on ethnicities”.
However, when asked about “a black family”, “Sure thing…” was the reply.
This program has been shut down now, whilst they fix it.
But just go on Google Images and you get similar “diversity” results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is rarely any middle ground for Mamba…..
Did you see when the program was asked to show a white family, it said something along the lines of “that is against our policy, to focus on ethnicities”.
=====
Are you typing this with a straight face? Where's the evidence? How can you believe something like that without concrete proof? Do you have it?
Mamba, I like reading your replies, but you’ve jumped straight to the bingo card responses here.
Anti-white, far right, etc.
====
What do you mean? Let's not pretend we don't know what the OP is implying. Similar incidences have happened in the past without similar implications being made.
I just gave examples. People on food stamps are majority white but AI will show something else. etc etc.
The West has a problem with every trivial thing being weaponised against immigration, diversity, integration and to foster white victimhood. It's pathetic.
But just go on Google Images and you get similar “diversity” results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Google serves the whole world. Of course you get diversity results
What were you expecting? Single ethnicity results from a company serving the whole world? Of course you get diversity results FFS.
This is what I'm talking about. Even google searches are weaponised now. "Look at us, the Zionists/NWO want to great replacement us and even big tech is in on it"
Facking joke. Even non racist people are buying into it or condoning it as the agenda is inevitable like a tsunami.
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, and it's happened many times before with people of various races bring victims, but apparently, according to the OP, this particular incident has other connotations. ie. Forcing diversity down our throats.
It's pathetic and the question is why it has so much traction.
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, and it's happened many times before with people of various races bring victims, but apparently, according to the OP, this particular incident has other connotations. ie. Forcing diversity down our throats.
It's pathetic and the question is why it has so much traction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has traction because so many people lap it up. We’re in this bizarre period that people are not happy unless they’re outraged. When you actually read what the Google spokesman says then it all seems very reasonable and makes sense. But that’s not what people want to hear.
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Daft question, but couldn’t things like that just be down to ‘rogue’ employees?
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, and it's happened many times before with people of various races bring victims, but apparently, according to the OP, this particular incident has other connotations. ie. Forcing diversity down our throats.
It's pathetic and the question is why it has so much traction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has traction because so many people lap it up. We’re in this bizarre period that people are not happy unless they’re outraged. When you actually read what the Google spokesman says then it all seems very reasonable and makes sense. But that’s not what people want to hear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nail on head. This topic sells papers and gets clicks on the internet I guess.
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Daft question, but couldn’t things like that just be down to ‘rogue’ employees?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's very possible, and could also be down to errors or just an early version of a system that needs work and improvement. Not everything is a conspiracy to force diversity on white people.
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not exactly the same but both are examples of racially based manipulation / influence in a negative manner.
Sign in if you want to comment
Gemini AI.
Page 1 of 2
posted on 24/2/24
https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2024/feb/22/google-pauses-ai-generated-images-of-people-after-ethnicity-criticism
posted on 24/2/24
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/23/google-gemini-ai-images-wrong-woke/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/02/22/google-gemini-ai-image-generation-pause/
https://www.ft.com/content/979fe974-2902-4d78-8243-a0cff68e630a
posted on 24/2/24
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
posted on 24/2/24
Can you imagine of the AI bots were able to engage.
posted on 24/2/24
AIdolf Hitler
posted on 24/2/24
This is the way of thinking now. No wonder the far right is on the rise as it's geared towards the culture war and people are lapping it up, which is unfortunate. Why take just one incident and make certain conclusions from it as of the rest of the world and history don't exist? That's such a Tory thing to do.
It works both ways and all ways. "Coverage of bias in AI has shown numerous examples of a negative impact on people of colour too. A Washington Post investigation last year showed multiple examples of image generators showing bias against people of colour, as well as sexism. It found that the image generator Stable Diffusion XL showed recipients of food stamps as being primarily non-white or darker-skinned despite 63% of the recipients of food stamps in the US being white. A request for an image of a person “at social services” produced similar results."
This white victimhood that dominates this era is pathetic. Diversity and integration needs promotion as history shows us the grim alternative. Diversity doesn't mean anti white, it means diversity that includes whites. Anyone with a problem with that needs to looks at themselves very closely.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
posted on 24/2/24
Apparently a guy asked a few probing questions to Gemini and he found out that it adds certain words to your search, without your knowledge or permission, like “inclusion", “diversity", “disabled", “feminine", etc.
=====
This sounds like typical right wing scare mongering. I would bet money that this turns out to be complete bullsheet made up to make things look worse than they are and get people emotional because the truth won't do that enough.
posted on 24/2/24
AI needs binning.
posted on 24/2/24
ChatGPT is also racist
https://youtu.be/thG2rbClcvE?si=oligmnLrrla1kzKi
The people behind them will use AI to further their agenda.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba, I like reading your replies, but you’ve jumped straight to the bingo card responses here.
Anti-white, far right, etc.
Did you see when the program was asked to show a white family, it said something along the lines of “that is against our policy, to focus on ethnicities”.
However, when asked about “a black family”, “Sure thing…” was the reply.
This program has been shut down now, whilst they fix it.
But just go on Google Images and you get similar “diversity” results.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by N2 (U22280)
posted 13 minutes ago
ChatGPT is also racist
https://youtu.be/thG2rbClcvE?si=oligmnLrrla1kzKi
The people behind them will use AI to further their agenda.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That’s a disgrace also.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by Shinjury list (U1700)
posted 12 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamba, I like reading your replies, but you’ve jumped straight to the bingo card responses here.
Anti-white, far right, etc.
Did you see when the program was asked to show a white family, it said something along the lines of “that is against our policy, to focus on ethnicities”.
However, when asked about “a black family”, “Sure thing…” was the reply.
This program has been shut down now, whilst they fix it.
But just go on Google Images and you get similar “diversity” results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is rarely any middle ground for Mamba…..
posted on 24/2/24
Did you see when the program was asked to show a white family, it said something along the lines of “that is against our policy, to focus on ethnicities”.
=====
Are you typing this with a straight face? Where's the evidence? How can you believe something like that without concrete proof? Do you have it?
posted on 24/2/24
Mamba, I like reading your replies, but you’ve jumped straight to the bingo card responses here.
Anti-white, far right, etc.
====
What do you mean? Let's not pretend we don't know what the OP is implying. Similar incidences have happened in the past without similar implications being made.
I just gave examples. People on food stamps are majority white but AI will show something else. etc etc.
The West has a problem with every trivial thing being weaponised against immigration, diversity, integration and to foster white victimhood. It's pathetic.
posted on 24/2/24
But just go on Google Images and you get similar “diversity” results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Google serves the whole world. Of course you get diversity results
What were you expecting? Single ethnicity results from a company serving the whole world? Of course you get diversity results FFS.
This is what I'm talking about. Even google searches are weaponised now. "Look at us, the Zionists/NWO want to great replacement us and even big tech is in on it"
Facking joke. Even non racist people are buying into it or condoning it as the agenda is inevitable like a tsunami.
posted on 24/2/24
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
posted on 24/2/24
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, and it's happened many times before with people of various races bring victims, but apparently, according to the OP, this particular incident has other connotations. ie. Forcing diversity down our throats.
It's pathetic and the question is why it has so much traction.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
posted on 24/2/24
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, and it's happened many times before with people of various races bring victims, but apparently, according to the OP, this particular incident has other connotations. ie. Forcing diversity down our throats.
It's pathetic and the question is why it has so much traction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has traction because so many people lap it up. We’re in this bizarre period that people are not happy unless they’re outraged. When you actually read what the Google spokesman says then it all seems very reasonable and makes sense. But that’s not what people want to hear.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Daft question, but couldn’t things like that just be down to ‘rogue’ employees?
posted on 24/2/24
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 3 minutes ago
Isn’t it just a simple case of it over correcting itself?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly, and it's happened many times before with people of various races bring victims, but apparently, according to the OP, this particular incident has other connotations. ie. Forcing diversity down our throats.
It's pathetic and the question is why it has so much traction.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It has traction because so many people lap it up. We’re in this bizarre period that people are not happy unless they’re outraged. When you actually read what the Google spokesman says then it all seems very reasonable and makes sense. But that’s not what people want to hear.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nail on head. This topic sells papers and gets clicks on the internet I guess.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by Terminator1 (U1863)
posted 16 seconds ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Daft question, but couldn’t things like that just be down to ‘rogue’ employees?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's very possible, and could also be down to errors or just an early version of a system that needs work and improvement. Not everything is a conspiracy to force diversity on white people.
posted on 24/2/24
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by "Just stay away from white conservative parts of America if you have a gun Mamba. That's all I ask." (U1282)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Admin1 (U1)
posted 12 minutes ago
It's an overcorrection from the time Microsoft's chatbot went full on racist. I'd imagine the shareholders are nervy that an AI could go full on Hitler. It's part of an even larger issue of AI alignment mechanisms. But forcing diversity weightings at expense of accuracy seems like a counter productive policy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We don't know if they forced diversity weightings at all, leave alone at the expense of accuracy.
I didn't see black or brown people trying to claim big tech is against them when AI has facked them up in the past.
I didn't see people trying to claim big tech is forcing whiteness weightings when AI has previously gone racist.
AI has been weird with people of colour for a while, the moment it messes up a historical dude or situation involving a white person, then the culture war bullsheet debate immediately pops up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you forgetting when you typed into Google ‘white man steals car’ Google suggested did you mean ‘black man steals car’?
There was quite rightly an uproar about that.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
And rightfully so as that's not exactly the same as some historically inaccurate images. Or is it the same in your opinion?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not exactly the same but both are examples of racially based manipulation / influence in a negative manner.
Page 1 of 2