or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 712 comments are related to an article called:

Hearts v Celtic - LIVE!

Page 24 of 29

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 5/3/24

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 20 minutes ago
The longer the spotlight is on the refs the better.

It's no the manager, it's the refs, look over here.

Get through in the cup, give him some relief. Then when your not looking bang. Livi 1-0 Celtic away in the league.

Boooft maybe it was the manager.

Too late, title decider at Ibrox next week, can't sack him yet he's got a great record against Rangers.

Boot in the balls from Big Phil.

Then all the dafty KTF timmies will be like, it's fooking Rodgers, I always hated the rat bastirt.

Do what you want by that then, you would need to win every game from there and still might not be able to stop us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Whilst it matters, nothing changes if he loses in the cup - the board will give him the season especially if the gap remains as is.

As for your following nonsense you know fine well for both sets of fans it is all or nothing - replace KTF with WATP but the gnashing will be same on your side if we win at Ibrox.

posted on 5/3/24

Clement is under no threat of getting sacked though, fans won't be turning on him if we don't win the league.

He's taken us to the top of the league after Celtic had won the title in September.

We will be gutted but the improvement is clear as day with Beale's pretty schite squad. We're going forward, Celtic going backwards with the men in charge.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 5/3/24

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 1 minute ago
Clement is under no threat of getting sacked though, fans won't be turning on him if we don't win the league.

He's taken us to the top of the league after Celtic had won the title in September.

We will be gutted but the improvement is clear as day with Beale's pretty schite squad. We're going forward, Celtic going backwards with the men in charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great, he has pole position and of course he will get to start next year even if Celtic win the double - whoop de doop. Just as Rodgers will be given the rest of the season and possibly the start of next even if he wins fack all. Our board have previous for sitting it out. But don't kid yourself, if you don't win the league and a gap opens up by Sept next season he will probably be gone too. It is just the way I said - all or nothing.

As for winning the title in Sept - the only tims on here I saw go down that line were those doing so from a reasoned, fundamental resources on top of gap perspective - I didn't see any triumphalism. Plenty bears chucking the towel right enough. But then Clement was not appointed until mid-Oct and since then we've had a transfer window and a swing in the league - stuff that happens, you know!

posted on 5/3/24

Not even the Celtic board would have the brass neck to let Rodgers take another season if he ended up pot less this season.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 5/3/24

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 5 minutes ago
Not even the Celtic board would have the brass neck to let Rodgers take another season if he ended up pot less this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think? FWIW I think we are seeing a repeat Lawwell / Rodgers power struggle. Lawwell will still be bristling from being ousted once before but ultimately, he holds more power taking joy out of revenge on BR whilst feeding DD the same 'we tried' scheite he feeds the fans.

Lawwell is permanent being DD's placeman. BR is transient. ONly one winner and plenty losers. Why the latter agreed to return is a complete mystery unless he himself believes he's a busted flush in the managerial marketplace.

posted on 5/3/24

Would be fun if that transpired, I can only imagine the levels of sourness from the Celtic support going into next season in that scenario.

FWIW I think for now any Celtic manager that gets beaten to the title by Rangers given the imagined and
genuine differences in financial power will be given the boot.

I say imagined as the gulf is supposedly so great but not sure the reality of money going into the clubs and not held in a rainy day pot will be altogether that different.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago

Lawwell is permanent being DD's placeman. BR is transient.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought that was just a rumour.

posted on 5/3/24

Peter lawwell is the biggest problem at our club, closely followed by the manager.

If steven mcgowan is to be believed, the criteria mark lawwell was to work to was stinking of pl input.

He has no right being back at the club

posted on 5/3/24

comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Clement is under no threat of getting sacked though, fans won't be turning on him if we don't win the league.

He's taken us to the top of the league after Celtic had won the title in September.

We will be gutted but the improvement is clear as day with Beale's pretty schite squad. We're going forward, Celtic going backwards with the men in charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing your best here but the improvement wasn't clear at Parkhead and it wasn't clear at ibrox on Saturday.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Clement is under no threat of getting sacked though, fans won't be turning on him if we don't win the league.

He's taken us to the top of the league after Celtic had won the title in September.

We will be gutted but the improvement is clear as day with Beale's pretty schite squad. We're going forward, Celtic going backwards with the men in charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing your best here but the improvement wasn't clear at Parkhead and it wasn't clear at ibrox on Saturday.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Celtic were left hanging on at the end against ten men. Thats a very clear improvement. Never mind the blindingly obvious improvement in our play and results in comparison to start of season. Including European turnaround.

Clement has improved Rangers. Rodgers has weakened Celtic.

Cant imagine the meltdown if it was Celtic who lost and hadn’t got a penalty for a Rangers player punching the ball out of play in the box.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Clement is under no threat of getting sacked though, fans won't be turning on him if we don't win the league.

He's taken us to the top of the league after Celtic had won the title in September.

We will be gutted but the improvement is clear as day with Beale's pretty schite squad. We're going forward, Celtic going backwards with the men in charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing your best here but the improvement wasn't clear at Parkhead and it wasn't clear at ibrox on Saturday.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Celtic were left hanging on at the end against ten men. Thats a very clear improvement. Never mind the blindingly obvious improvement in our play and results in comparison to start of season. Including European turnaround.

Clement has improved Rangers. Rodgers has weakened Celtic.

Cant imagine the meltdown if it was Celtic who lost and hadn’t got a penalty for a Rangers player punching the ball out of play in the box.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
…that wouldn’t have been awarded in any case due to an offside decision that would have kicked in.

And a meltdown along the lines of numerous statements, leaks to fan media and a call for a referee to never ref one of their games again?

That kind of meltdown?!

Good shout though.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Clement is under no threat of getting sacked though, fans won't be turning on him if we don't win the league.

He's taken us to the top of the league after Celtic had won the title in September.

We will be gutted but the improvement is clear as day with Beale's pretty schite squad. We're going forward, Celtic going backwards with the men in charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing your best here but the improvement wasn't clear at Parkhead and it wasn't clear at ibrox on Saturday.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Celtic were left hanging on at the end against ten men. Thats a very clear improvement. Never mind the blindingly obvious improvement in our play and results in comparison to start of season. Including European turnaround.

Clement has improved Rangers. Rodgers has weakened Celtic.

Cant imagine the meltdown if it was Celtic who lost and hadn’t got a penalty for a Rangers player punching the ball out of play in the box.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
European turnaround. Gvb had you in a European final. 🤣🤣🤣

posted on 5/3/24

Aye the Michael Beale ordeal never happened did it, was just a nightmare🤣🤣🤣

But aye Rodgers is an improvement on your last manager Lennon to be fair, long may he continue

posted on 5/3/24

Yang’s appeal dismissed.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 24 minutes ago
comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 38 minutes ago
comment by Magnum (3 in a row easy) (U22391)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by HB Fash (U21935)
posted 2 hours, 12 minutes ago
Clement is under no threat of getting sacked though, fans won't be turning on him if we don't win the league.

He's taken us to the top of the league after Celtic had won the title in September.

We will be gutted but the improvement is clear as day with Beale's pretty schite squad. We're going forward, Celtic going backwards with the men in charge.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You're doing your best here but the improvement wasn't clear at Parkhead and it wasn't clear at ibrox on Saturday.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Celtic were left hanging on at the end against ten men. Thats a very clear improvement. Never mind the blindingly obvious improvement in our play and results in comparison to start of season. Including European turnaround.

Clement has improved Rangers. Rodgers has weakened Celtic.

Cant imagine the meltdown if it was Celtic who lost and hadn’t got a penalty for a Rangers player punching the ball out of play in the box.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
European turnaround. Gvb had you in a European final. 🤣🤣🤣
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They probably mostly remember the E. Coli.

posted on 5/3/24

Did Beale not beat Betis and also drew with PSV?!

posted on 5/3/24

Did Beale not beat Betis
—-
Pleasingly alliterative.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted less than a minute ago
Did Beale not beat Betis
—-
Pleasingly alliterative.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Surprisingly not intended.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 25 minutes ago
Did Beale not beat Betis and also drew with PSV?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So weird the 2nd leg of that game was never played. No evidence of it anywhere.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 5/3/24

comment by bmcl1987 - the M stands for meltdown 🤓 (U14177)
posted 2 hours, 36 minutes ago
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 1 hour, 17 minutes ago

Lawwell is permanent being DD's placeman. BR is transient.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I thought that was just a rumour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 5/3/24

comment by RenegadeOF (U9457)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
Aye the Michael Beale ordeal never happened did it, was just a nightmare🤣🤣🤣

But aye Rodgers is an improvement on your last manager Lennon to be fair, long may he continue
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Must be comforting to your therapist that you have managed to eradicate 2 years of Ange from your consciousness!

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 5/3/24

* compforting

posted on 5/3/24

comment by Silver (U6112)
posted about an hour ago
* compforting
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just as well.

posted on 5/3/24

comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 10 hours, 28 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted less than a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 1 hour, 34 minutes ago
comment by whodunnit (U22710)
posted about a minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 6 minutes ago
Audio has no “fact” revealing properties.

What it does is explain why a decision is made. Bottom line is that pretty much all of these contentious decisions are the referees interpretation, “ably” assisted by the VAR panel.

The criticism depending upon which set of glasses are being worn will imo just bring more howling about corruptness or downright cheating because inevitably some on all sides just won’t agree.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
of course it has. you can say for a fact that the ref said this the VAR rom said that, who requested what, and their reasoning for awarding something.

rather than just guessing what discussions where had and how they came to whatever decision and their process behind it.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don’t think that’s what’s meant there. Reads more that it will reveal the opinion of how a decision was made. That doesn’t mean the reason is factual.

Could be wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No; you are Correct.

Sadly, we just have yet another version of why anything mentioned is just wrong.

I believe I was pretty clear on what was meant.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
i think its very clear that your opinion is based on 100% guesswork and zero evidence.

It would be better to take as much guesswork out of the situation as possible. in addition to this I think they fans are also entitled to know what decisions are taking place whilst either paying for a ticket for said game or paying subscription. I think we are entitled to know what decisions are being made by who since we are paying for the product.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
See if you look up, you’ll see the point being made flying right over the top of you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I genuinely have to give up with this man. It’s head banging against wall stuff in its purest form.

Just has to have an argument even if it means conjuring up something completely irrelevant or is born out of simply not reading or understanding the point being made.

Exasperating stuff

posted on 5/3/24

This feels like an optimum time to resume posting eh? Hope we're all grand

Page 24 of 29

Sign in if you want to comment